0.00/0.04 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.17/0.42 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu 0.17/0.42 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.17/0.42 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.17/0.42 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.17/0.42 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.17/0.42 % CPULimit : 1440 0.17/0.42 % WCLimit : 180 0.17/0.42 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:43:42 UTC 2026 0.17/0.43 % CPUTime : 0.17/0.43 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.25/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving 0.25/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.25/0.54 % Version: 3.5.1 0.25/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN. 0.25/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.25/0.54 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores 0.25/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.25/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores 0.25/0.54 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.25/0.54 % sh5l with pid 962060 completed with status 0 0.25/0.54 % Result found by sh5l 0.25/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN. 0.25/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.25/0.54 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores 0.25/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.25/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores 0.25/0.54 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.25/0.54 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000) 0.25/0.54 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000 0.25/0.54 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN 0.25/0.54 % partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN 0.25/0.54 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.25/0.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores 0.25/0.54 % SubtermCWHack with pid 962061 completed with status 0 0.25/0.54 % Result found by SubtermCWHack 0.25/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN. 0.25/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.25/0.54 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores 0.25/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.25/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores 0.25/0.54 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.25/0.54 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000) 0.25/0.54 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000 0.25/0.54 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN 0.25/0.54 % partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN 0.25/0.54 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.25/0.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores 0.25/0.54 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s 0.25/0.54 0.25/0.54 % Proof found! 0.25/0.54 % SZS status Theorem 0.25/0.54 % SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.25/0.54 fof(wca, axiom, ![X1, X2]:((status(X1,X2,wca)<=>((?[X5]:(~(model(X5,X2)))&?[X4]:(model(X4,X2)))&~(?[X3]:(model(X3,X1)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax', wca)). 0.25/0.54 fof(isa, axiom, ![X9, X10]:((![X1, X2]:((status(X1,X2,X9)=>status(X1,X2,X10)))<=>isa(X9,X10))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax', isa)). 0.25/0.54 fof(isa_wca_thm, conjecture, isa(wca,thm), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', isa_wca_thm)). 0.25/0.54 fof(thm, axiom, ![X1, X2]:((status(X1,X2,thm)<=>![X3]:((model(X3,X1)=>model(X3,X2))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax', thm)). 0.25/0.54 fof(c_0_4, plain, ![X1, X2]:((status(X1,X2,wca)<=>((?[X5]:(~model(X5,X2))&?[X4]:(model(X4,X2)))&~(?[X3]:(model(X3,X1)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[wca])). 0.25/0.54 fof(c_0_5, plain, ![X25, X26, X29, X30, X31, X32, X33]:(((((~model(esk4_2(X25,X26),X26)|~status(X25,X26,wca))&(model(esk5_2(X25,X26),X26)|~status(X25,X26,wca)))&(~model(X29,X25)|~status(X25,X26,wca)))&(model(X32,X31)|~model(X33,X31)|model(esk6_2(X30,X31),X30)|status(X30,X31,wca)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])])])])). 0.25/0.54 fof(c_0_6, plain, ![X11, X12, X15, X16, X17, X18]:((((status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X11)|isa(X11,X12))&(~status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X12)|isa(X11,X12)))&(~isa(X15,X16)|(~status(X17,X18,X15)|status(X17,X18,X16))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[isa])])])])])])])). 0.25/0.54 fof(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ~(isa(wca,thm)), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[isa_wca_thm])). 0.25/0.54 cnf(c_0_8, plain, (~model(X1,X2)|~status(X2,X3,wca)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.25/0.54 cnf(c_0_9, plain, (status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)|isa(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.25/0.54 fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X19, X20, X21, X22, X23]:(((~status(X19,X20,thm)|(~model(X21,X19)|model(X21,X20)))&((model(esk3_2(X22,X23),X22)|status(X22,X23,thm))&(~model(esk3_2(X22,X23),X23)|status(X22,X23,thm))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm])])])])])])])). 0.25/0.54 fof(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ~isa(wca,thm), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.25/0.54 cnf(c_0_12, plain, (isa(wca,X1)|~model(X2,esk1_2(wca,X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])). 0.25/0.54 cnf(c_0_13, plain, (model(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1)|status(X1,X2,thm)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])). 0.25/0.54 fof(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ~isa(wca,thm), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 0.25/0.54 cnf(c_0_15, plain, (isa(X1,X2)|~status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.25/0.54 cnf(c_0_16, plain, (isa(wca,X1)|status(esk1_2(wca,X1),X2,thm)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])). 0.25/0.54 cnf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (~isa(wca,thm)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])). 0.25/0.54 cnf(c_0_18, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16]), c_0_17]), ['proof']). 0.25/0.54 % SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.25/0.54 % Parsed axioms : 33 0.25/0.54 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 23 0.25/0.54 % Initial clauses : 26 0.25/0.54 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.25/0.54 % Initial clauses in saturation : 26 0.25/0.54 % Processed clauses : 43 0.25/0.54 % ...of these trivial : 0 0.25/0.54 % ...subsumed : 2 0.25/0.54 % ...remaining for further processing : 41 0.25/0.54 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.25/0.54 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.25/0.54 % Backward-subsumed : 0 0.25/0.54 % Backward-rewritten : 0 0.25/0.54 % Generated clauses : 26 0.25/0.54 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 22 0.25/0.54 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.25/0.54 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.25/0.54 % Paramodulations : 26 0.25/0.54 % Factorizations : 0 0.25/0.54 % NegExts : 0 0.25/0.54 % Equation resolutions : 0 0.25/0.54 % Disequality decompositions : 0 0.25/0.54 % Total rewrite steps : 1 0.25/0.54 % ...of those cached : 0 0.25/0.54 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.25/0.54 % Propositional check models : 0 0.25/0.54 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.25/0.54 % Propositional clauses : 0 0.25/0.54 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.25/0.54 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.25/0.54 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.25/0.54 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.25/0.54 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.25/0.54 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.25/0.54 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.25/0.54 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.25/0.54 % Current number of processed clauses : 41 0.25/0.54 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 12 0.25/0.54 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.25/0.54 % Negative unit clauses : 9 0.25/0.54 % Non-unit-clauses : 20 0.25/0.54 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5 0.25/0.54 % ...number of literals in the above : 16 0.25/0.54 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.25/0.54 % Current number of archived clauses : 0 0.25/0.54 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 24 0.25/0.54 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19 0.25/0.54 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1 0.25/0.54 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17 0.25/0.54 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.25/0.54 % BW rewrite match attempts : 5 0.25/0.54 % BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.25/0.54 % Condensation attempts : 0 0.25/0.54 % Condensation successes : 0 0.25/0.54 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2060 0.25/0.54 % Search garbage collected termcells : 548 0.25/0.54 0.25/0.54 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.25/0.54 % User time : 0.007 s 0.25/0.54 % System time : 0.002 s 0.25/0.54 % Total time : 0.010 s 0.25/0.54 % Maximum resident set size: 3936 pages 0.25/0.54 0.25/0.54 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.25/0.54 % User time : 0.011 s 0.25/0.54 % System time : 0.008 s 0.25/0.54 % Total time : 0.019 s 0.25/0.54 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages 0.25/0.54 % E exiting 0.25/0.54 EOF