0.00/0.03	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.04	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.10/0.40	% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
0.10/0.40	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.40	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.40	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.10/0.40	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.10/0.40	% CPULimit : 1440
0.10/0.40	% WCLimit  : 180
0.10/0.40	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:29:51 UTC 2026
0.10/0.40	% CPUTime  : 
0.10/0.40	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.10/0.47	Running first-order theorem proving
0.10/0.47	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.20/0.51	% Version: 3.5.1
0.20/0.51	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.20/0.51	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.20/0.51	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.20/0.51	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.20/0.51	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.20/0.51	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.20/0.51	% new_bool_3 with pid 705510 completed with status 0
0.20/0.51	% Result found by new_bool_3
0.20/0.51	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.20/0.51	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.20/0.51	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.20/0.51	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.20/0.51	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.20/0.51	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.20/0.51	% Search class: FGHNF-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN
0.20/0.51	% partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
0.20/0.51	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.20/0.51	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.20/0.51	% SubtermCWHack with pid 705513 completed with status 0
0.20/0.51	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.20/0.51	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.20/0.51	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.20/0.51	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.20/0.51	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.20/0.51	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.20/0.51	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.20/0.51	% Search class: FGHNF-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN
0.20/0.51	% partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
0.20/0.51	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.20/0.51	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.20/0.51	% Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.20/0.51	
0.20/0.51	% Proof found!
0.20/0.51	% SZS status Theorem
0.20/0.51	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.20/0.51	fof(tac, axiom, ![X1, X2]:((status(X1,X2,tac)<=>(![X4]:(model(X4,X2))&?[X3]:(model(X3,X1))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax', tac)).
0.20/0.51	fof(isa, axiom, ![X9, X10]:((![X1, X2]:((status(X1,X2,X9)=>status(X1,X2,X10)))<=>isa(X9,X10))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax', isa)).
0.20/0.51	fof(isa_tac_thm, conjecture, isa(tac,thm), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', isa_tac_thm)).
0.20/0.51	fof(thm, axiom, ![X1, X2]:((status(X1,X2,thm)<=>![X3]:((model(X3,X1)=>model(X3,X2))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax', thm)).
0.20/0.51	fof(c_0_4, plain, ![X25, X26, X27, X29, X30, X32]:((((model(X27,X26)|~status(X25,X26,tac))&(model(esk4_2(X25,X26),X25)|~status(X25,X26,tac)))&(~model(esk5_2(X29,X30),X30)|~model(X32,X29)|status(X29,X30,tac)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[tac])])])])])])])).
0.20/0.51	fof(c_0_5, plain, ![X11, X12, X15, X16, X17, X18]:((((status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X11)|isa(X11,X12))&(~status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X12)|isa(X11,X12)))&(~isa(X15,X16)|(~status(X17,X18,X15)|status(X17,X18,X16))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[isa])])])])])])])).
0.20/0.51	fof(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~(isa(tac,thm)), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[isa_tac_thm])).
0.20/0.51	fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X19, X20, X21, X22, X23]:(((~status(X19,X20,thm)|(~model(X21,X19)|model(X21,X20)))&((model(esk3_2(X22,X23),X22)|status(X22,X23,thm))&(~model(esk3_2(X22,X23),X23)|status(X22,X23,thm))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm])])])])])])])).
0.20/0.51	cnf(c_0_8, plain, (model(X1,X2)|~status(X3,X2,tac)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.20/0.51	cnf(c_0_9, plain, (status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)|isa(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.20/0.51	fof(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ~isa(tac,thm), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.20/0.51	cnf(c_0_11, plain, (status(X1,X2,thm)|~model(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.20/0.51	cnf(c_0_12, plain, (isa(tac,X1)|model(X2,esk2_2(tac,X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])).
0.20/0.51	fof(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ~isa(tac,thm), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.20/0.51	cnf(c_0_14, plain, (isa(X1,X2)|~status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.20/0.51	cnf(c_0_15, plain, (isa(tac,X1)|status(X2,esk2_2(tac,X1),thm)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])).
0.20/0.51	cnf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, (~isa(tac,thm)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.20/0.51	cnf(c_0_17, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15]), c_0_16]), ['proof']).
0.20/0.51	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.20/0.51	% Parsed axioms                        : 33
0.20/0.51	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 23
0.20/0.51	% Initial clauses                      : 25
0.20/0.51	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.20/0.51	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 25
0.20/0.51	% Processed clauses                    : 62
0.20/0.51	% ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.20/0.51	% ...subsumed                          : 3
0.20/0.51	% ...remaining for further processing  : 58
0.20/0.51	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.20/0.51	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.20/0.51	% Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.20/0.51	% Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.20/0.51	% Generated clauses                    : 82
0.20/0.51	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 47
0.20/0.51	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.20/0.51	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.20/0.51	% Paramodulations                      : 82
0.20/0.51	% Factorizations                       : 0
0.20/0.51	% NegExts                              : 0
0.20/0.51	% Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.20/0.51	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.20/0.51	% Total rewrite steps                  : 32
0.20/0.51	% ...of those cached                   : 19
0.20/0.51	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.20/0.51	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.20/0.51	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.20/0.51	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.20/0.51	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.20/0.51	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.20/0.51	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.20/0.51	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.20/0.51	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.20/0.51	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.20/0.51	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.20/0.51	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.20/0.51	% Current number of processed clauses  : 58
0.20/0.51	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 21
0.20/0.51	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.20/0.51	%    Negative unit clauses             : 8
0.20/0.51	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 29
0.20/0.51	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10
0.20/0.51	% ...number of literals in the above   : 27
0.20/0.51	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.20/0.51	% Current number of archived clauses   : 0
0.20/0.51	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 53
0.20/0.51	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 41
0.20/0.51	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
0.20/0.51	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
0.20/0.51	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.20/0.51	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 11
0.20/0.51	% BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.20/0.51	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.20/0.51	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.20/0.51	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 2457
0.20/0.51	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 527
0.20/0.51	
0.20/0.51	% -------------------------------------------------
0.20/0.51	% User time                : 0.011 s
0.20/0.51	% System time              : 0.000 s
0.20/0.51	% Total time               : 0.011 s
0.20/0.51	% Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
0.20/0.51	
0.20/0.51	% -------------------------------------------------
0.20/0.51	% User time                : 0.016 s
0.20/0.51	% System time              : 0.005 s
0.20/0.51	% Total time               : 0.020 s
0.20/0.51	% Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
0.20/0.51	% E exiting
0.20/0.51	EOF