0.00/0.04	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.06	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.18/0.43	% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
0.18/0.43	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.18/0.43	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.18/0.43	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.18/0.43	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.18/0.43	% CPULimit : 1440
0.18/0.43	% WCLimit  : 180
0.18/0.43	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 08:54:22 UTC 2026
0.18/0.43	% CPUTime  : 
0.18/0.43	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.26/0.51	Running first-order theorem proving
0.26/0.51	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.50/0.85	% Version: 3.5.1
0.50/0.85	% Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
0.50/0.85	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.50/0.85	% Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 900s (5) cores
0.50/0.85	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.50/0.85	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.50/0.85	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.50/0.85	% new_bool_1 with pid 1157271 completed with status 0
0.50/0.85	% Result found by new_bool_1
0.50/0.85	% Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
0.50/0.85	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.50/0.85	% Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 900s (5) cores
0.50/0.85	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.50/0.85	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.50/0.85	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.50/0.85	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.50/0.85	% Search class: FHUNF-FFSM11-SFFFFFNN
0.50/0.85	% partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
0.50/0.85	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.50/0.85	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.50/0.85	% SubtermCWHack with pid 1157273 completed with status 0
0.50/0.85	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.50/0.85	% Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
0.50/0.85	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.50/0.85	% Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 900s (5) cores
0.50/0.85	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.50/0.85	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.50/0.85	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.50/0.85	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.50/0.85	% Search class: FHUNF-FFSM11-SFFFFFNN
0.50/0.85	% partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
0.50/0.85	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.50/0.85	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.50/0.85	% Preprocessing time       : 0.008 s
0.50/0.85	
0.50/0.85	% Proof found!
0.50/0.85	% SZS status Theorem
0.50/0.85	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.50/0.85	fof(query148, conjecture, ?[X2]:((borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X2)<=mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', query148)).
0.50/0.85	fof(ax2_7997, axiom, ![X21, X22]:((mtvisible(X22)<=(mtvisible(X21)&genlmt(X21,X22)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax', ax2_7997)).
0.50/0.85	fof(ax2_648, axiom, (mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)=>borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax', ax2_648)).
0.50/0.85	fof(ax2_724, axiom, genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax', ax2_724)).
0.50/0.85	fof(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X2]:((borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X2)<=mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query148])).
0.50/0.85	fof(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X2]:((mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)=>borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X2)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.50/0.85	fof(c_0_6, plain, ![X21, X22]:(((mtvisible(X21)&genlmt(X21,X22))=>mtvisible(X22))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax2_7997])).
0.50/0.85	fof(c_0_7, plain, (~mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)|borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_648])])).
0.50/0.85	fof(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X23]:((mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)&~borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X23))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])).
0.50/0.85	fof(c_0_9, plain, ![X24, X25]:((~mtvisible(X24)|~genlmt(X24,X25)|mtvisible(X25))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])).
0.50/0.85	cnf(c_0_10, plain, (borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,c_georegion_l4_x45_y10)|~mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.50/0.85	cnf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (~borderson(c_georegion_l4_x45_y9,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.50/0.85	cnf(c_0_12, plain, (mtvisible(X2)|~mtvisible(X1)|~genlmt(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.50/0.85	cnf(c_0_13, plain, (genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_724])).
0.50/0.85	cnf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, (mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.50/0.85	cnf(c_0_15, plain, (~mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])).
0.50/0.85	cnf(c_0_16, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13]), c_0_14])]), c_0_15]), ['proof']).
0.50/0.85	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.50/0.85	% Parsed axioms                        : 8006
0.50/0.85	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7963
0.50/0.85	% Initial clauses                      : 44
0.50/0.85	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.50/0.85	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 44
0.50/0.85	% Processed clauses                    : 42
0.50/0.85	% ...of these trivial                  : 6
0.50/0.85	% ...subsumed                          : 2
0.50/0.85	% ...remaining for further processing  : 34
0.50/0.85	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.50/0.85	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.50/0.85	% Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.50/0.85	% Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.50/0.85	% Generated clauses                    : 18
0.50/0.85	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
0.50/0.85	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.50/0.85	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.50/0.85	% Paramodulations                      : 18
0.50/0.85	% Factorizations                       : 0
0.50/0.85	% NegExts                              : 0
0.50/0.85	% Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.50/0.85	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.50/0.85	% Total rewrite steps                  : 9
0.50/0.85	% ...of those cached                   : 1
0.50/0.85	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.50/0.85	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.50/0.85	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.50/0.85	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.50/0.85	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.50/0.85	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.50/0.85	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.50/0.85	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.50/0.85	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.50/0.85	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.50/0.85	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.50/0.85	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.50/0.85	% Current number of processed clauses  : 34
0.50/0.85	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 17
0.50/0.85	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.50/0.85	%    Negative unit clauses             : 3
0.50/0.85	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 14
0.50/0.85	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
0.50/0.85	% ...number of literals in the above   : 6
0.50/0.85	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.50/0.85	% Current number of archived clauses   : 0
0.50/0.85	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 9
0.50/0.85	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
0.50/0.85	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
0.50/0.85	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
0.50/0.85	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.50/0.85	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.50/0.85	% BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.50/0.85	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.50/0.85	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.50/0.85	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 52500
0.50/0.85	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 31376
0.50/0.85	
0.50/0.85	% -------------------------------------------------
0.50/0.85	% User time                : 0.058 s
0.50/0.85	% System time              : 0.023 s
0.50/0.85	% Total time               : 0.081 s
0.50/0.85	% Maximum resident set size: 20120 pages
0.50/0.85	
0.50/0.85	% -------------------------------------------------
0.50/0.85	% User time                : 0.271 s
0.50/0.85	% System time              : 0.047 s
0.50/0.85	% Total time               : 0.318 s
0.50/0.85	% Maximum resident set size: 11008 pages
0.50/0.85	% E exiting
0.50/0.85	EOF