0.00/0.02 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.08/0.35 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu 0.08/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.08/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.08/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.08/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.08/0.35 % CPULimit : 1440 0.08/0.35 % WCLimit : 180 0.08/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:22:39 UTC 2026 0.08/0.35 % CPUTime : 0.08/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.12/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving 0.12/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 1.70/1.53 % Version: 3.5.1 1.70/1.53 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN. 1.70/1.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 1.70/1.53 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 900s (5) cores 1.70/1.53 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 1.70/1.53 % Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores 1.70/1.53 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 1.70/1.53 % new_bool_1 with pid 3465849 completed with status 9 1.70/1.53 % new_bool_3 with pid 3465848 completed with status 9 1.70/1.53 % sh5l with pid 3465850 completed with status 9 1.70/1.53 % G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 3465847 completed with status 0 1.70/1.53 % Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y 1.70/1.53 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN. 1.70/1.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 1.70/1.53 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 900s (5) cores 1.70/1.53 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) 1.70/1.53 % No SInE strategy applied 1.70/1.53 % Search class: FHHNM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN 1.70/1.53 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 1.70/1.53 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 91s (1) cores 1.70/1.53 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 541s (1) cores 1.70/1.53 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y with 91s (1) cores 1.70/1.53 % Starting new_bool_3 with 91s (1) cores 1.70/1.53 % Starting new_bool_1 with 86s (1) cores 1.70/1.53 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3465933 completed with status 0 1.70/1.53 % Result found by SubtermCWHack 1.70/1.53 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN. 1.70/1.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 1.70/1.53 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 900s (5) cores 1.70/1.53 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) 1.70/1.53 % No SInE strategy applied 1.70/1.53 % Search class: FHHNM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN 1.70/1.53 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 1.70/1.53 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 91s (1) cores 1.70/1.53 % Preprocessing time : 0.052 s 1.70/1.53 1.70/1.53 % Proof found! 1.70/1.53 % SZS status Theorem 1.70/1.53 % SZS output start CNFRefutation 1.70/1.53 fof(ax2_3129, axiom, ![X4]:((partiallyintangibleindividual(X4)=>individual(X4))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax', ax2_3129)). 1.70/1.53 fof(ax2_3795, axiom, ![X4]:((intangibleindividual(X4)=>partiallyintangibleindividual(X4))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax', ax2_3795)). 1.70/1.53 fof(ax2_3577, axiom, ![X4]:((aspatialinformationstore(X4)=>intangibleindividual(X4))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax', ax2_3577)). 1.70/1.53 fof(ax2_3925, axiom, ![X4]:((aspatialinformationstore(X4)<=microtheory(X4))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax', ax2_3925)). 1.70/1.53 fof(ax2_1265, axiom, ![X4]:((microtheory(X4)<=applicationcontext(X4))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax', ax2_1265)). 1.70/1.53 fof(ax2_529, axiom, ![X1, X2]:((collection(X1)<=genls(X1,X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax', ax2_529)). 1.70/1.53 fof(query145, conjecture, ~(genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', query145)). 1.70/1.53 fof(ax2_2066, axiom, applicationcontext(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax', ax2_2066)). 1.70/1.53 fof(ax2_3226, axiom, ![X4]:(~((individual(X4)&collection(X4)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax', ax2_3226)). 1.70/1.53 fof(c_0_9, plain, ![X1086]:((~partiallyintangibleindividual(X1086)|individual(X1086))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_3129])])])). 1.70/1.53 fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X955]:((~intangibleindividual(X955)|partiallyintangibleindividual(X955))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_3795])])])). 1.70/1.53 cnf(c_0_11, plain, (individual(X1)|~partiallyintangibleindividual(X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 1.70/1.53 cnf(c_0_12, plain, (partiallyintangibleindividual(X1)|~intangibleindividual(X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])). 1.70/1.53 fof(c_0_13, plain, ![X2545]:((~aspatialinformationstore(X2545)|intangibleindividual(X2545))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_3577])])])). 1.70/1.53 fof(c_0_14, plain, ![X4]:((microtheory(X4)=>aspatialinformationstore(X4))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax2_3925])). 1.70/1.53 fof(c_0_15, plain, ![X4]:((applicationcontext(X4)=>microtheory(X4))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax2_1265])). 1.70/1.53 fof(c_0_16, plain, ![X1, X2]:((genls(X1,X2)=>collection(X1))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax2_529])). 1.70/1.53 fof(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ~(~(genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query145])). 1.70/1.53 cnf(c_0_18, plain, (individual(X1)|~intangibleindividual(X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])). 1.70/1.53 cnf(c_0_19, plain, (intangibleindividual(X1)|~aspatialinformationstore(X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])). 1.70/1.53 fof(c_0_20, plain, ![X2153]:((~microtheory(X2153)|aspatialinformationstore(X2153))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])])])). 1.70/1.53 fof(c_0_21, plain, ![X51]:((~applicationcontext(X51)|microtheory(X51))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])])])). 1.70/1.53 fof(c_0_22, plain, ![X978, X979]:((~genls(X978,X979)|collection(X978))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])])). 1.70/1.53 fof(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])). 1.70/1.53 cnf(c_0_24, plain, (individual(X1)|~aspatialinformationstore(X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])). 1.70/1.53 cnf(c_0_25, plain, (aspatialinformationstore(X1)|~microtheory(X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])). 1.70/1.53 cnf(c_0_26, plain, (microtheory(X1)|~applicationcontext(X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])). 1.70/1.53 cnf(c_0_27, plain, (applicationcontext(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_2066])). 1.70/1.53 fof(c_0_28, plain, ![X1300]:((~individual(X1300)|~collection(X1300))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_3226])])])). 1.70/1.53 cnf(c_0_29, plain, (collection(X1)|~genls(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22])). 1.70/1.53 cnf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, (genls(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14,c_tptpcol_15_80088)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])). 1.70/1.53 cnf(c_0_31, plain, (individual(X1)|~microtheory(X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_25])). 1.70/1.53 cnf(c_0_32, plain, (microtheory(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_27])). 1.70/1.53 cnf(c_0_33, plain, (~individual(X1)|~collection(X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28])). 1.70/1.53 cnf(c_0_34, negated_conjecture, (collection(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_30])). 1.70/1.53 cnf(c_0_35, plain, (individual(c_wamt_evalinitial_p14)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31, c_0_32])). 1.70/1.53 cnf(c_0_36, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33, c_0_34]), c_0_35])]), ['proof']). 1.70/1.53 % SZS output end CNFRefutation 1.70/1.53 % Parsed axioms : 8006 1.70/1.53 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 1.70/1.53 % Initial clauses : 8006 1.70/1.53 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 1.70/1.53 % Initial clauses in saturation : 8006 1.70/1.53 % Processed clauses : 10486 1.70/1.53 % ...of these trivial : 2393 1.70/1.53 % ...subsumed : 256 1.70/1.53 % ...remaining for further processing : 7837 1.70/1.53 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 1.70/1.53 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 1.70/1.53 % Backward-subsumed : 1 1.70/1.53 % Backward-rewritten : 16 1.70/1.53 % Generated clauses : 11978 1.70/1.53 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10538 1.70/1.53 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 1.70/1.53 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 1.70/1.53 % Paramodulations : 11978 1.70/1.53 % Factorizations : 0 1.70/1.53 % NegExts : 0 1.70/1.53 % Equation resolutions : 0 1.70/1.53 % Disequality decompositions : 0 1.70/1.53 % Total rewrite steps : 2776 1.70/1.53 % ...of those cached : 2007 1.70/1.53 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 1.70/1.53 % Propositional check models : 0 1.70/1.53 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 1.70/1.53 % Propositional clauses : 0 1.70/1.53 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 1.70/1.53 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 1.70/1.53 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 1.70/1.53 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 1.70/1.53 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 1.70/1.53 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 1.70/1.53 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 1.70/1.53 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 1.70/1.53 % Current number of processed clauses : 7820 1.70/1.53 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 3924 1.70/1.53 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 1.70/1.53 % Negative unit clauses : 214 1.70/1.53 % Non-unit-clauses : 3682 1.70/1.53 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8058 1.70/1.53 % ...number of literals in the above : 10447 1.70/1.53 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 1.70/1.53 % Current number of archived clauses : 17 1.70/1.53 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1642083 1.70/1.53 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1575938 1.70/1.53 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 256 1.70/1.53 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 284390 1.70/1.53 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 1.70/1.53 % BW rewrite match attempts : 42 1.70/1.53 % BW rewrite match successes : 16 1.70/1.53 % Condensation attempts : 0 1.70/1.53 % Condensation successes : 0 1.70/1.53 % Termbank termtop insertions : 427348 1.70/1.53 % Search garbage collected termcells : 41866 1.70/1.53 1.70/1.53 % ------------------------------------------------- 1.70/1.53 % User time : 0.891 s 1.70/1.53 % System time : 0.080 s 1.70/1.53 % Total time : 0.971 s 1.70/1.53 % Maximum resident set size: 24984 pages 1.70/1.53 1.70/1.53 % ------------------------------------------------- 1.70/1.53 % User time : 3.502 s 1.70/1.53 % System time : 0.587 s 1.70/1.53 % Total time : 4.089 s 1.70/1.53 % Maximum resident set size: 11008 pages 1.70/1.53 % E exiting 1.70/1.53 EOF