0.00/0.04	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.07	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.15/0.49	% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
0.15/0.49	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.15/0.49	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.15/0.49	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.15/0.49	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.15/0.49	% CPULimit : 1440
0.15/0.49	% WCLimit  : 180
0.15/0.49	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:07:33 UTC 2026
0.15/0.50	% CPUTime  : 
0.15/0.50	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.19/0.57	Running first-order theorem proving
0.19/0.57	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.25/1.07	% Version: 3.5.1
0.25/1.07	% Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
0.25/1.07	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.25/1.07	% Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 900s (5) cores
0.25/1.07	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.25/1.07	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.25/1.07	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.25/1.07	% sh5l with pid 679393 completed with status 0
0.25/1.07	% Result found by sh5l
0.25/1.07	% Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
0.25/1.07	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.25/1.07	% Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 900s (5) cores
0.25/1.07	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.25/1.07	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.25/1.07	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.25/1.07	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
0.25/1.07	% SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
0.25/1.07	% Search class: FHHNF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
0.25/1.07	% partial match(1): FGHNF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
0.25/1.07	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.25/1.07	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.25/1.07	% SubtermCWHack with pid 679397 completed with status 0
0.25/1.07	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.25/1.07	% Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
0.25/1.07	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.25/1.07	% Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 900s (5) cores
0.25/1.07	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.25/1.07	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.25/1.07	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.25/1.07	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
0.25/1.07	% SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
0.25/1.07	% Search class: FHHNF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
0.25/1.07	% partial match(1): FGHNF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
0.25/1.07	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.25/1.07	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.25/1.07	% Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
0.25/1.07	
0.25/1.07	% Proof found!
0.25/1.07	% SZS status Theorem
0.25/1.07	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.25/1.07	fof(query142, conjecture, ?[X1]:((mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)=>borderson(X1,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', query142)).
0.25/1.07	fof(ax2_7642, axiom, ![X3, X6]:((borderson(X6,X3)<=borderson(X3,X6))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax', ax2_7642)).
0.25/1.07	fof(ax2_2459, axiom, (mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)=>borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax', ax2_2459)).
0.25/1.07	fof(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1]:((mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)=>borderson(X1,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64)))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query142])).
0.25/1.07	fof(c_0_4, plain, ![X3, X6]:((borderson(X3,X6)=>borderson(X6,X3))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax2_7642])).
0.25/1.07	fof(c_0_5, plain, (~mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)|borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_2459])])).
0.25/1.07	fof(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X23]:((mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)&~borderson(X23,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])).
0.25/1.07	fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X29, X30]:((~borderson(X29,X30)|borderson(X30,X29))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])).
0.25/1.07	cnf(c_0_8, plain, (borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65)|~mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.25/1.07	cnf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.25/1.07	cnf(c_0_10, plain, (borderson(X2,X1)|~borderson(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.25/1.07	cnf(c_0_11, plain, (borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])])).
0.25/1.07	cnf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (~borderson(X1,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.25/1.07	cnf(c_0_13, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11]), c_0_12]), ['proof']).
0.25/1.07	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.25/1.07	% Parsed axioms                        : 8006
0.25/1.08	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7772
0.25/1.08	% Initial clauses                      : 235
0.25/1.08	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.25/1.08	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 235
0.25/1.08	% Processed clauses                    : 374
0.25/1.08	% ...of these trivial                  : 33
0.25/1.08	% ...subsumed                          : 25
0.25/1.08	% ...remaining for further processing  : 316
0.25/1.08	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.25/1.08	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.25/1.08	% Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.25/1.08	% Backward-rewritten                   : 11
0.25/1.08	% Generated clauses                    : 407
0.25/1.08	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 351
0.25/1.08	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.25/1.08	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.25/1.08	% Paramodulations                      : 407
0.25/1.08	% Factorizations                       : 0
0.25/1.08	% NegExts                              : 0
0.25/1.08	% Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.25/1.08	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.25/1.08	% Total rewrite steps                  : 111
0.25/1.08	% ...of those cached                   : 61
0.25/1.08	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.25/1.08	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.25/1.08	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.25/1.08	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.25/1.08	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.25/1.08	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.25/1.08	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.25/1.08	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.25/1.08	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.25/1.08	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.25/1.08	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.25/1.08	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.25/1.08	% Current number of processed clauses  : 305
0.25/1.08	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 167
0.25/1.08	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.25/1.08	%    Negative unit clauses             : 3
0.25/1.08	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 135
0.25/1.08	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 208
0.25/1.08	% ...number of literals in the above   : 415
0.25/1.08	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.25/1.08	% Current number of archived clauses   : 11
0.25/1.08	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4717
0.25/1.08	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4395
0.25/1.08	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 25
0.25/1.08	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1592
0.25/1.08	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.25/1.08	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
0.25/1.08	% BW rewrite match successes           : 1
0.25/1.08	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.25/1.08	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.25/1.08	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 61610
0.25/1.08	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 31528
0.25/1.08	
0.25/1.08	% -------------------------------------------------
0.25/1.08	% User time                : 0.087 s
0.25/1.08	% System time              : 0.051 s
0.25/1.08	% Total time               : 0.139 s
0.25/1.08	% Maximum resident set size: 20632 pages
0.25/1.08	
0.25/1.08	% -------------------------------------------------
0.25/1.08	% User time                : 0.348 s
0.25/1.08	% System time              : 0.077 s
0.25/1.08	% Total time               : 0.425 s
0.25/1.08	% Maximum resident set size: 11008 pages
0.25/1.08	% E exiting
0.25/1.08	EOF