0.00/0.01	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.02	% Command  : run_iprover 180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
0.03/0.29	% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
0.03/0.29	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.03/0.29	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.03/0.29	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.03/0.29	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.03/0.29	% CPULimit : 1440
0.03/0.29	% WCLimit  : 180
0.03/0.29	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 04:41:30 UTC 2026
0.03/0.30	% CPUTime  : 
0.03/0.30	Running run_iprover 180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
0.03/0.31	/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/SPCForProblem: Command not found.
0.03/0.31	Running first-order theorem proving
0.03/0.31	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.03/0.32	
0.03/0.32	% ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
0.03/0.32	
0.03/0.32	% Detected problem language: tptp
0.06/0.33	% Proving...
2.39/1.06	% SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
2.39/1.06	% SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	%---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	% ------  iProver source info
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	% git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
2.39/1.06	% git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
2.39/1.06	% git: non_committed_changes: false
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	% ------ Parsing...
2.39/1.06	% ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	% ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	% ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	% ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
2.39/1.06	% ------ Proving...
2.39/1.06	% ------ Problem Properties 
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	% 
2.39/1.06	% clauses                               126
2.39/1.06	% conjectures                           3
2.39/1.06	% EPR                                   100
2.39/1.06	% Horn                                  99
2.39/1.06	% unary                                 28
2.39/1.06	% binary                                39
2.39/1.06	% lits                                  353
2.39/1.06	% lits eq                               61
2.39/1.06	% fd_pure                               0
2.39/1.06	% fd_pseudo                             0
2.39/1.06	% fd_cond                               0
2.39/1.06	% fd_pseudo_cond                        31
2.39/1.06	% AC symbols                            0
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	% ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	% ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	% ------ 
2.39/1.06	% Current options:
2.39/1.06	% ------ 
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	% 
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	% ------ Proving...
2.39/1.06	% 
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	% SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	% SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	fof(f40,conjecture,(
2.39/1.06	  ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] : (X2 != s(X0,X3) | X3 = X1 | s(X0,X1) != X2)),
2.39/1.06	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz7_8)).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	fof(f41,negated_conjecture,(
2.39/1.06	  ~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] : (X2 != s(X0,X3) | X3 = X1 | s(X0,X1) != X2)),
2.39/1.06	  inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f40])).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	fof(f82,axiom,(
2.39/1.06	  ! [X0,X1] : X1 = s(X0,s(X0,X1))),
2.39/1.06	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',aSatz7_7)).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	fof(f112,plain,(
2.39/1.06	  ? [X0,X1,X2,X3] : (s(X0,X3) = X2 & X1 != X3 & s(X0,X1) = X2)),
2.39/1.06	  inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f41])).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	fof(f113,plain,(
2.39/1.06	  sK2 = s(sK0,sK3) & sK1 != sK3 & sK2 = s(sK0,sK1)),
2.39/1.06	  inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2),skolemize(X3,sK3)],[f112])).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	fof(f162,plain,(
2.39/1.06	  sK2 = s(sK0,sK1)),
2.39/1.06	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f113])).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	fof(f163,plain,(
2.39/1.06	  sK1 != sK3),
2.39/1.06	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f113])).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	fof(f164,plain,(
2.39/1.06	  sK2 = s(sK0,sK3)),
2.39/1.06	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f113])).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	fof(f231,plain,(
2.39/1.06	  ( ! [X0,X1] : (s(X0,s(X0,X1)) = X1) )),
2.39/1.06	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f82])).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	tcf(c_97,negated_conjecture, 
2.39/1.06	    (s(sK0,sK3) = sK2),
2.39/1.06	    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f164])).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	tcf(c_98,negated_conjecture, 
2.39/1.06	    (sK3 != sK1),
2.39/1.06	    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f163])).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	tcf(c_99,negated_conjecture, 
2.39/1.06	    (s(sK0,sK1) = sK2),
2.39/1.06	    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f162])).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	tcf(c_165,plain,![X0:$i,X1:$i]:  
2.39/1.06	    (s(X0,s(X0,X1)) = X1),
2.39/1.06	    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f231])).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	tcf(c_3829,definition, 
2.39/1.06	    (iPr_def_10 = s(sK0,sK1)),
2.39/1.06	    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[])).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	tcf(c_3830,definition, 
2.39/1.06	    (iPr_def_11 = s(sK0,sK3)),
2.39/1.06	    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[])).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	tcf(c_3831,negated_conjecture, 
2.39/1.06	    (iPr_def_10 = sK2),
2.39/1.06	    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_99,c_3829])).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	tcf(c_3832,negated_conjecture, 
2.39/1.06	    (sK3 != sK1),
2.39/1.06	    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_98])).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	tcf(c_3833,negated_conjecture, 
2.39/1.06	    (iPr_def_11 = sK2),
2.39/1.06	    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_97,c_3830])).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	tcf(c_5395,plain, 
2.39/1.06	    (iPr_def_10 = iPr_def_11),
2.39/1.06	    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_3833,c_3831])).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	tcf(c_5397,plain, 
2.39/1.06	    (s(sK0,sK3) = iPr_def_10),
2.39/1.06	    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_3830,c_5395])).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	tcf(c_5399,plain, 
2.39/1.06	    (s(sK0,iPr_def_10) = sK3),
2.39/1.06	    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5397,c_165])).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	tcf(c_5400,plain, 
2.39/1.06	    (s(sK0,iPr_def_10) = sK1),
2.39/1.06	    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3829,c_165])).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	tcf(c_5415,plain, 
2.39/1.06	    (sK3 = sK1),
2.39/1.06	    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_5400,c_5399])).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	tcf(c_5416,plain, 
2.39/1.06	    ($false),
2.39/1.06	    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5415,c_3832])).
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	% SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.06	
2.39/1.12	EOF