0.00/0.02	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.04	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.09/0.36	% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
0.09/0.36	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.09/0.36	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.09/0.36	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.09/0.36	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.09/0.36	% CPULimit : 1440
0.09/0.36	% WCLimit  : 180
0.09/0.36	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:23:16 UTC 2026
0.09/0.36	% CPUTime  : 
0.09/0.36	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.09/0.41	Running first-order theorem proving
0.09/0.41	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.09/0.43	% Version: 3.5.1
0.09/0.43	% Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.09/0.43	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.09/0.43	% Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 900s (5) cores
0.09/0.43	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.09/0.43	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.09/0.43	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.09/0.43	% new_bool_3 with pid 2666083 completed with status 0
0.09/0.43	% Result found by new_bool_3
0.09/0.43	% Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.09/0.43	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.09/0.43	% Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 900s (5) cores
0.09/0.43	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.09/0.43	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.09/0.43	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.09/0.43	% Search class: FGHSF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
0.09/0.43	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.09/0.43	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.09/0.43	% SubtermCWHack with pid 2666086 completed with status 0
0.09/0.43	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.09/0.43	% Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.09/0.43	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.09/0.43	% Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 900s (5) cores
0.09/0.43	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.09/0.43	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.09/0.43	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.09/0.43	% Search class: FGHSF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
0.09/0.43	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.09/0.43	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.09/0.43	% Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.09/0.43	
0.09/0.43	% Proof found!
0.09/0.43	% SZS status Theorem
0.09/0.43	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.09/0.43	fof(pel54, conjecture, ~(?[X4]:(![X3]:((![X5]:((?[X1]:((~(?[X2]:((big_f(X2,X1)&big_f(X2,X5))))&big_f(X1,X5)))<=big_f(X3,X5)))<=>big_f(X3,X4))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', pel54)).
0.09/0.43	fof(pel54_1, axiom, ![X1]:(?[X2]:(![X3]:((big_f(X3,X2)<=>X1=X3)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', pel54_1)).
0.09/0.43	fof(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~(~(?[X4]:(![X3]:((![X5]:((?[X1]:((~(?[X2]:((big_f(X2,X1)&big_f(X2,X5))))&big_f(X1,X5)))<=big_f(X3,X5)))<=>big_f(X3,X4)))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[pel54])).
0.09/0.43	fof(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~(~(?[X4]:(![X3]:((![X5]:((big_f(X3,X5)=>?[X1]:((~(?[X2]:((big_f(X2,X1)&big_f(X2,X5))))&big_f(X1,X5)))))<=>big_f(X3,X4)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.09/0.43	fof(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X7, X9, X11, X13]:((((big_f(X7,esk2_1(X7))|big_f(X7,esk1_0))&((big_f(esk3_2(X7,X9),X9)|~big_f(X9,esk2_1(X7))|big_f(X7,esk1_0))&(big_f(esk3_2(X7,X9),esk2_1(X7))|~big_f(X9,esk2_1(X7))|big_f(X7,esk1_0))))&((~big_f(X13,esk4_2(X7,X11))|~big_f(X13,X11)|~big_f(X7,X11)|~big_f(X7,esk1_0))&(big_f(esk4_2(X7,X11),X11)|~big_f(X7,X11)|~big_f(X7,esk1_0))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])])])).
0.09/0.43	fof(c_0_5, plain, ![X14, X16, X17]:(((~big_f(X16,esk5_1(X14))|X14=X16)&(X14!=X17|big_f(X17,esk5_1(X14))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[pel54_1])])])])])])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (~big_f(X1,esk4_2(X2,X3))|~big_f(X1,X3)|~big_f(X2,X3)|~big_f(X2,esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (big_f(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)|big_f(X1,esk1_0)|~big_f(X2,esk2_1(X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_8, plain, (X2=X1|~big_f(X1,esk5_1(X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (big_f(esk4_2(X1,X2),X2)|~big_f(X1,X2)|~big_f(X1,esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (big_f(X1,esk1_0)|~big_f(esk3_2(X1,esk4_2(X2,X3)),X3)|~big_f(esk4_2(X2,X3),esk2_1(X1))|~big_f(X2,esk1_0)|~big_f(X2,X3)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (big_f(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk2_1(X1))|big_f(X1,esk1_0)|~big_f(X2,esk2_1(X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (esk4_2(X1,esk5_1(X2))=X2|~big_f(X1,esk5_1(X2))|~big_f(X1,esk1_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_13, plain, (big_f(X2,esk5_1(X1))|X1!=X2), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, (big_f(X1,esk1_0)|~big_f(X2,esk2_1(X1))|~big_f(X2,esk1_0)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11]), c_0_9])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, (~big_f(X1,esk5_1(X2))|~big_f(X3,esk5_1(X2))|~big_f(X1,esk1_0)|~big_f(X3,X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_12])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_16, plain, (big_f(X1,esk5_1(X1))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (big_f(X1,esk1_0)|~big_f(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk1_0)|~big_f(X2,esk2_1(X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_11])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, (~big_f(X1,esk5_1(X2))|~big_f(X2,esk1_0)|~big_f(X1,X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, (big_f(X1,esk1_0)|~big_f(esk1_0,esk2_1(X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_7])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, (big_f(X1,esk2_1(X1))|big_f(X1,esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, (~big_f(X1,esk1_0)|~big_f(X1,X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_16])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, (big_f(esk1_0,esk1_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20])).
0.09/0.43	cnf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22]), c_0_22])]), ['proof']).
0.09/0.43	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.09/0.43	% Parsed axioms                        : 2
0.09/0.43	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.09/0.43	% Initial clauses                      : 7
0.09/0.43	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.09/0.43	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
0.09/0.43	% Processed clauses                    : 45
0.09/0.43	% ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.09/0.43	% ...subsumed                          : 3
0.09/0.43	% ...remaining for further processing  : 42
0.09/0.43	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
0.09/0.43	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.09/0.43	% Backward-subsumed                    : 2
0.09/0.43	% Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.09/0.43	% Generated clauses                    : 60
0.09/0.43	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 56
0.09/0.43	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.09/0.43	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
0.09/0.43	% Paramodulations                      : 59
0.09/0.43	% Factorizations                       : 0
0.09/0.43	% NegExts                              : 0
0.09/0.43	% Equation resolutions                 : 1
0.09/0.43	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.09/0.43	% Total rewrite steps                  : 3
0.09/0.43	% ...of those cached                   : 1
0.09/0.43	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.09/0.43	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.09/0.43	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.09/0.43	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.09/0.43	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.09/0.43	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.09/0.43	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.09/0.43	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.09/0.43	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.09/0.43	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.09/0.43	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.09/0.43	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.09/0.43	% Current number of processed clauses  : 39
0.09/0.43	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
0.09/0.43	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.09/0.43	%    Negative unit clauses             : 0
0.09/0.43	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 37
0.09/0.43	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 18
0.09/0.43	% ...number of literals in the above   : 40
0.09/0.43	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.09/0.43	% Current number of archived clauses   : 2
0.09/0.43	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 285
0.09/0.43	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 167
0.09/0.43	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 6
0.09/0.43	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.09/0.43	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.09/0.43	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.09/0.43	% BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.09/0.43	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.09/0.43	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.09/0.43	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 2082
0.09/0.43	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 180
0.09/0.43	
0.09/0.43	% -------------------------------------------------
0.09/0.43	% User time                : 0.005 s
0.09/0.43	% System time              : 0.002 s
0.09/0.43	% Total time               : 0.007 s
0.09/0.43	% Maximum resident set size: 3576 pages
0.09/0.43	
0.09/0.43	% -------------------------------------------------
0.09/0.43	% User time                : 0.006 s
0.09/0.43	% System time              : 0.007 s
0.09/0.43	% Total time               : 0.013 s
0.09/0.43	% Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
0.09/0.43	% E exiting
0.09/0.43	EOF