0.00/0.03	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.04	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.11/0.37	% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
0.11/0.37	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.37	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.37	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.11/0.37	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.11/0.37	% CPULimit : 1440
0.11/0.37	% WCLimit  : 180
0.11/0.37	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:00:32 UTC 2026
0.11/0.38	% CPUTime  : 
0.11/0.38	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.11/0.42	Running first-order theorem proving
0.11/0.42	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.11/0.45	% Version: 3.5.1
0.11/0.45	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.11/0.45	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.11/0.45	% Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores
0.11/0.45	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.11/0.45	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.11/0.45	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.11/0.45	% new_bool_3 with pid 2602046 completed with status 0
0.11/0.45	% Result found by new_bool_3
0.11/0.45	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.11/0.45	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.11/0.45	% Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores
0.11/0.45	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.11/0.45	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.11/0.45	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.11/0.45	% Search class: FGUSS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
0.11/0.45	% partial match(1): FGUSS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
0.11/0.45	% Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.11/0.45	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.11/0.45	% SubtermCWHack with pid 2602050 completed with status 0
0.11/0.45	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.11/0.45	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.11/0.45	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.11/0.45	% Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores
0.11/0.45	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.11/0.45	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.11/0.45	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.11/0.45	% Search class: FGUSS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
0.11/0.45	% partial match(1): FGUSS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
0.11/0.45	% Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.11/0.45	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.11/0.45	% Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.11/0.45	
0.11/0.45	% Proof found!
0.11/0.45	% SZS status Theorem
0.11/0.45	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.11/0.45	fof(goal_016, conjecture, ?[X3, X4]:(~((ord(X3)=>(ord(merge(X3,X4))<=~(ord(X4)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', goal_016)).
0.11/0.45	fof(axiom_009, axiom, ![X7]:(X7=merge(nil,X7)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_009)).
0.11/0.45	fof(axiom_007, axiom, ![X5]:(~(leqNat(s(X5),z))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_007)).
0.11/0.45	fof(axiom_015, axiom, ![X7, X6, X3]:((ord(cons(X7,cons(X6,X3)))<=>(leqNat(X7,X6)&ord(cons(X6,X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_015)).
0.11/0.45	fof(axiom_013, axiom, ord(nil), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_013)).
0.11/0.45	fof(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X3, X4]:(~((ord(X3)=>(ord(merge(X3,X4))<=~(ord(X4))))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goal_016])).
0.11/0.45	fof(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X3, X4]:(~((ord(X3)=>(~ord(X4)=>ord(merge(X3,X4))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.11/0.45	fof(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X9, X10]:((~ord(X9)|(ord(X10)|ord(merge(X9,X10))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])).
0.11/0.45	fof(c_0_8, plain, ![X25]:(X25=merge(nil,X25)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_009])).
0.11/0.45	fof(c_0_9, plain, ![X5]:(~leqNat(s(X5),z)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_007])).
0.11/0.45	fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X12, X13, X14]:((((leqNat(X12,X13)|~ord(cons(X12,cons(X13,X14))))&(ord(cons(X13,X14))|~ord(cons(X12,cons(X13,X14)))))&(~leqNat(X12,X13)|~ord(cons(X13,X14))|ord(cons(X12,cons(X13,X14)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_015])])])])).
0.11/0.45	cnf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (ord(X2)|ord(merge(X1,X2))|~ord(X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.11/0.45	cnf(c_0_12, plain, (X1=merge(nil,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.11/0.45	cnf(c_0_13, plain, (ord(nil)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_013])).
0.11/0.45	fof(c_0_14, plain, ![X30]:(~leqNat(s(X30),z)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])).
0.11/0.45	cnf(c_0_15, plain, (leqNat(X1,X2)|~ord(cons(X1,cons(X2,X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.11/0.45	cnf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, (ord(X1)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12]), c_0_13])])).
0.11/0.45	cnf(c_0_17, plain, (~leqNat(s(X1),z)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
0.11/0.45	cnf(c_0_18, plain, (leqNat(X1,X2)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])])).
0.11/0.45	cnf(c_0_19, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18])]), ['proof']).
0.11/0.45	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.11/0.45	% Parsed axioms                        : 16
0.11/0.45	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 4
0.11/0.45	% Initial clauses                      : 15
0.11/0.45	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.11/0.45	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 15
0.11/0.45	% Processed clauses                    : 12
0.11/0.45	% ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.11/0.45	% ...subsumed                          : 0
0.11/0.45	% ...remaining for further processing  : 12
0.11/0.45	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.11/0.45	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.11/0.45	% Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.11/0.45	% Backward-rewritten                   : 6
0.11/0.45	% Generated clauses                    : 2
0.11/0.45	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
0.11/0.45	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.11/0.45	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.11/0.45	% Paramodulations                      : 2
0.11/0.45	% Factorizations                       : 0
0.11/0.45	% NegExts                              : 0
0.11/0.45	% Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.11/0.45	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.11/0.45	% Total rewrite steps                  : 8
0.11/0.45	% ...of those cached                   : 0
0.11/0.45	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.11/0.45	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.11/0.45	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.11/0.45	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.11/0.45	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.11/0.45	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.11/0.45	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.11/0.45	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.11/0.45	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.11/0.45	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.11/0.45	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.11/0.45	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.11/0.45	% Current number of processed clauses  : 6
0.11/0.45	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
0.11/0.45	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.11/0.45	%    Negative unit clauses             : 2
0.11/0.45	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
0.11/0.45	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
0.11/0.45	% ...number of literals in the above   : 9
0.11/0.45	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.11/0.45	% Current number of archived clauses   : 6
0.11/0.45	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
0.11/0.45	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.11/0.45	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.11/0.45	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.11/0.45	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.11/0.45	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 8
0.11/0.45	% BW rewrite match successes           : 8
0.11/0.45	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.11/0.45	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.11/0.45	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 896
0.11/0.45	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 127
0.11/0.45	
0.11/0.45	% -------------------------------------------------
0.11/0.45	% User time                : 0.004 s
0.11/0.45	% System time              : 0.003 s
0.11/0.45	% Total time               : 0.007 s
0.11/0.45	% Maximum resident set size: 3592 pages
0.11/0.45	
0.11/0.45	% -------------------------------------------------
0.11/0.45	% User time                : 0.005 s
0.11/0.45	% System time              : 0.008 s
0.11/0.45	% Total time               : 0.013 s
0.11/0.45	% Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
0.11/0.45	% E exiting
0.11/0.45	EOF