0.00/0.01	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.02	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.03/0.30	% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
0.03/0.30	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.03/0.30	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.03/0.30	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.03/0.30	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.03/0.30	% CPULimit : 1440
0.03/0.30	% WCLimit  : 180
0.03/0.30	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 10:11:48 UTC 2026
0.03/0.30	% CPUTime  : 
0.03/0.30	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.07/0.33	Running first-order theorem proving
0.07/0.33	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.07/0.35	% Version: 3.5.1
0.07/0.35	% Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
0.07/0.35	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.07/0.35	% Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 540s (3) cores
0.07/0.35	% Starting new_bool_3 with 360s (2) cores
0.07/0.35	% Starting new_bool_1 with 360s (2) cores
0.07/0.35	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.07/0.35	% new_bool_3 with pid 1857915 completed with status 0
0.07/0.35	% Result found by new_bool_3
0.07/0.35	% Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
0.07/0.35	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.07/0.35	% Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 540s (3) cores
0.07/0.35	% Starting new_bool_3 with 360s (2) cores
0.07/0.35	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.07/0.35	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.07/0.35	% Search class: FGUNF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
0.07/0.35	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 360 seconds (360 total)
0.07/0.35	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 37s (1) cores
0.07/0.35	% Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 217s (1) cores
0.07/0.35	% SubtermCWHack with pid 1857918 completed with status 0
0.07/0.35	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.07/0.35	% Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
0.07/0.35	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.07/0.35	% Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 540s (3) cores
0.07/0.35	% Starting new_bool_3 with 360s (2) cores
0.07/0.35	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.07/0.35	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.07/0.35	% Search class: FGUNF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
0.07/0.35	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 360 seconds (360 total)
0.07/0.35	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 37s (1) cores
0.07/0.35	% Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.07/0.35	
0.07/0.35	% Proof found!
0.07/0.35	% SZS status Theorem
0.07/0.35	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.07/0.35	fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_prop_bottomdataproperty_term, conjecture, iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_owl_bottomDataProperty,uri_ex_p), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conclusion_rdfbased_sem_prop_bottomdataproperty_term)).
0.07/0.35	fof(owl_prop_bottomdataproperty_ext, axiom, ![X7, X8]:(~(iext(uri_owl_bottomDataProperty,X7,X8))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax', owl_prop_bottomdataproperty_ext)).
0.07/0.35	fof(owl_rdfsext_subpropertyof, axiom, ![X12, X14]:((iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X12,X14)<=>((ip(X12)&![X7, X8]:((iext(X14,X7,X8)<=iext(X12,X7,X8))))&ip(X14)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax', owl_rdfsext_subpropertyof)).
0.07/0.35	fof(owl_parts_iodp_cond_set, axiom, ![X7]:((iodp(X7)=>ip(X7))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax', owl_parts_iodp_cond_set)).
0.07/0.35	fof(owl_parts_iodp_def, axiom, ![X7]:((iodp(X7)<=>iext(uri_rdf_type,X7,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax', owl_parts_iodp_def)).
0.07/0.35	fof(owl_prop_bottomdataproperty_type, axiom, iodp(uri_owl_bottomDataProperty), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax', owl_prop_bottomdataproperty_type)).
0.07/0.35	fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_prop_bottomdataproperty_term, axiom, iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', premise_rdfbased_sem_prop_bottomdataproperty_term)).
0.07/0.35	fof(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ~(iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_owl_bottomDataProperty,uri_ex_p)), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_prop_bottomdataproperty_term])).
0.07/0.35	fof(c_0_8, plain, ![X7, X8]:(~iext(uri_owl_bottomDataProperty,X7,X8)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[owl_prop_bottomdataproperty_ext])).
0.07/0.35	fof(c_0_9, plain, ![X12, X14]:((iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X12,X14)<=>((ip(X12)&![X7, X8]:((iext(X12,X7,X8)=>iext(X14,X7,X8))))&ip(X14)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[owl_rdfsext_subpropertyof])).
0.07/0.35	fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X67]:((~iodp(X67)|ip(X67))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_parts_iodp_cond_set])])])).
0.07/0.35	fof(c_0_11, plain, ![X60]:(((~iodp(X60)|iext(uri_rdf_type,X60,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty))&(~iext(uri_rdf_type,X60,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty)|iodp(X60)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_parts_iodp_def])])])).
0.07/0.35	fof(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ~iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_owl_bottomDataProperty,uri_ex_p), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.07/0.35	fof(c_0_13, plain, ![X42, X43]:(~iext(uri_owl_bottomDataProperty,X42,X43)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])).
0.07/0.35	fof(c_0_14, plain, ![X44, X45, X46, X47, X48, X49]:(((((ip(X44)|~iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X44,X45))&(~iext(X44,X46,X47)|iext(X45,X46,X47)|~iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X44,X45)))&(ip(X45)|~iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X44,X45)))&((iext(X48,esk1_2(X48,X49),esk2_2(X48,X49))|~ip(X48)|~ip(X49)|iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X48,X49))&(~iext(X49,esk1_2(X48,X49),esk2_2(X48,X49))|~ip(X48)|~ip(X49)|iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X48,X49))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])])])])])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_15, plain, (ip(X1)|~iodp(X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_16, plain, (iodp(uri_owl_bottomDataProperty)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[owl_prop_bottomdataproperty_type])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_17, plain, (iodp(X1)|~iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.07/0.35	fof(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ~iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_owl_bottomDataProperty,uri_ex_p), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_19, plain, (~iext(uri_owl_bottomDataProperty,X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_20, plain, (iext(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2))|iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,X1,X2)|~ip(X1)|~ip(X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_21, plain, (ip(uri_owl_bottomDataProperty)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_22, plain, (ip(X1)|~iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_17])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_23, plain, (iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_p,uri_owl_DatatypeProperty)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_prop_bottomdataproperty_term])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, (~iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_owl_bottomDataProperty,uri_ex_p)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_25, plain, (iext(uri_rdfs_subPropertyOf,uri_owl_bottomDataProperty,X1)|~ip(X1)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20]), c_0_21])])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_26, plain, (ip(uri_ex_p)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_23])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_25]), c_0_26])]), ['proof']).
0.07/0.35	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.07/0.35	% Parsed axioms                        : 560
0.07/0.35	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 513
0.07/0.35	% Initial clauses                      : 72
0.07/0.35	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.07/0.35	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 72
0.07/0.35	% Processed clauses                    : 146
0.07/0.35	% ...of these trivial                  : 13
0.07/0.35	% ...subsumed                          : 31
0.07/0.35	% ...remaining for further processing  : 102
0.07/0.35	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.07/0.35	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.07/0.35	% Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.07/0.35	% Backward-rewritten                   : 2
0.07/0.35	% Generated clauses                    : 206
0.07/0.35	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 135
0.07/0.35	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.07/0.35	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.07/0.35	% Paramodulations                      : 206
0.07/0.35	% Factorizations                       : 0
0.07/0.35	% NegExts                              : 0
0.07/0.35	% Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.07/0.35	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.07/0.35	% Total rewrite steps                  : 121
0.07/0.35	% ...of those cached                   : 100
0.07/0.35	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.07/0.35	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.07/0.35	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.07/0.35	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.07/0.35	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.07/0.35	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.07/0.35	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.07/0.35	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.07/0.35	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.07/0.35	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.07/0.35	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.07/0.35	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.07/0.35	% Current number of processed clauses  : 100
0.07/0.35	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 37
0.07/0.35	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.07/0.35	%    Negative unit clauses             : 2
0.07/0.35	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 61
0.07/0.35	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 50
0.07/0.35	% ...number of literals in the above   : 165
0.07/0.35	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.07/0.35	% Current number of archived clauses   : 2
0.07/0.35	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 283
0.07/0.35	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 253
0.07/0.35	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 31
0.07/0.35	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 25
0.07/0.35	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.07/0.35	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 13
0.07/0.35	% BW rewrite match successes           : 2
0.07/0.35	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.07/0.35	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.07/0.35	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 12244
0.07/0.35	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 3891
0.07/0.35	
0.07/0.35	% -------------------------------------------------
0.07/0.35	% User time                : 0.004 s
0.07/0.35	% System time              : 0.005 s
0.07/0.35	% Total time               : 0.009 s
0.07/0.35	% Maximum resident set size: 4436 pages
0.07/0.35	
0.07/0.35	% -------------------------------------------------
0.07/0.35	% User time                : 0.017 s
0.07/0.35	% System time              : 0.008 s
0.07/0.35	% Total time               : 0.025 s
0.07/0.35	% Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
0.07/0.35	% E exiting
0.07/0.35	EOF