0.00/0.03	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.05	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.12/0.39	% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
0.12/0.39	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.39	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.39	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.12/0.39	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.12/0.39	% CPULimit : 1440
0.12/0.39	% WCLimit  : 180
0.12/0.39	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 10:27:52 UTC 2026
0.12/0.39	% CPUTime  : 
0.12/0.39	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.12/0.46	Running first-order theorem proving
0.12/0.46	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.21/0.52	% Version: 3.5.1
0.21/0.52	% Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
0.21/0.52	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.21/0.52	% Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 540s (3) cores
0.21/0.52	% Starting new_bool_3 with 360s (2) cores
0.21/0.52	% Starting new_bool_1 with 360s (2) cores
0.21/0.52	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.21/0.52	% new_bool_1 with pid 664858 completed with status 0
0.21/0.52	% Result found by new_bool_1
0.21/0.52	% Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
0.21/0.52	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.21/0.52	% Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 540s (3) cores
0.21/0.52	% Starting new_bool_3 with 360s (2) cores
0.21/0.52	% Starting new_bool_1 with 360s (2) cores
0.21/0.52	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.21/0.52	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.21/0.52	% Search class: FGUNF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
0.21/0.52	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 360 seconds (360 total)
0.21/0.52	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 37s (1) cores
0.21/0.52	% Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 217s (1) cores
0.21/0.52	% SubtermCWHack with pid 664860 completed with status 0
0.21/0.52	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.21/0.52	% Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
0.21/0.52	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.21/0.52	% Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 540s (3) cores
0.21/0.52	% Starting new_bool_3 with 360s (2) cores
0.21/0.52	% Starting new_bool_1 with 360s (2) cores
0.21/0.52	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.21/0.52	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.21/0.52	% Search class: FGUNF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
0.21/0.52	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 360 seconds (360 total)
0.21/0.52	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 37s (1) cores
0.21/0.52	% Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
0.21/0.52	
0.21/0.52	% Proof found!
0.21/0.52	% SZS status Theorem
0.21/0.52	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.21/0.52	fof(conclusion_rdfbased_sem_class_nothing_term, conjecture, iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_owl_Nothing,uri_ex_c), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conclusion_rdfbased_sem_class_nothing_term)).
0.21/0.52	fof(owl_class_nothing_ext, axiom, ![X7]:(~(icext(uri_owl_Nothing,X7))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax', owl_class_nothing_ext)).
0.21/0.52	fof(owl_class_classowl_ext, axiom, ![X7]:((ic(X7)<=>icext(uri_owl_Class,X7))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax', owl_class_classowl_ext)).
0.21/0.52	fof(rdfs_cext_def, axiom, ![X7, X20]:((icext(X20,X7)<=>iext(uri_rdf_type,X7,X20))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax', rdfs_cext_def)).
0.21/0.52	fof(owl_rdfsext_subclassof, axiom, ![X17, X18]:((iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X17,X18)<=>((ic(X17)&![X7]:((icext(X17,X7)=>icext(X18,X7))))&ic(X18)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax', owl_rdfsext_subclassof)).
0.21/0.52	fof(owl_class_nothing_type, axiom, ic(uri_owl_Nothing), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWB001+0.ax', owl_class_nothing_type)).
0.21/0.52	fof(premise_rdfbased_sem_class_nothing_term, axiom, iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_c,uri_owl_Class), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', premise_rdfbased_sem_class_nothing_term)).
0.21/0.52	fof(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ~(iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_owl_Nothing,uri_ex_c)), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conclusion_rdfbased_sem_class_nothing_term])).
0.21/0.52	fof(c_0_8, plain, ![X7]:(~icext(uri_owl_Nothing,X7)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[owl_class_nothing_ext])).
0.21/0.52	fof(c_0_9, plain, ![X57]:(((~ic(X57)|icext(uri_owl_Class,X57))&(~icext(uri_owl_Class,X57)|ic(X57)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_class_classowl_ext])])])).
0.21/0.52	fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X59, X60]:(((~icext(X60,X59)|iext(uri_rdf_type,X59,X60))&(~iext(uri_rdf_type,X59,X60)|icext(X60,X59)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdfs_cext_def])])])).
0.21/0.52	fof(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ~iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_owl_Nothing,uri_ex_c), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.21/0.52	fof(c_0_12, plain, ![X42]:(~icext(uri_owl_Nothing,X42)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])).
0.21/0.52	fof(c_0_13, plain, ![X43, X44, X45, X46, X47]:(((((ic(X43)|~iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X43,X44))&(~icext(X43,X45)|icext(X44,X45)|~iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X43,X44)))&(ic(X44)|~iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X43,X44)))&((icext(X46,esk1_2(X46,X47))|~ic(X46)|~ic(X47)|iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X46,X47))&(~icext(X47,esk1_2(X46,X47))|~ic(X46)|~ic(X47)|iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X46,X47))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[owl_rdfsext_subclassof])])])])])])])).
0.21/0.52	cnf(c_0_14, plain, (ic(X1)|~icext(uri_owl_Class,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.21/0.52	cnf(c_0_15, plain, (icext(X2,X1)|~iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.21/0.52	fof(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ~iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_owl_Nothing,uri_ex_c), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.21/0.52	cnf(c_0_17, plain, (~icext(uri_owl_Nothing,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])).
0.21/0.52	cnf(c_0_18, plain, (icext(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2))|iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,X1,X2)|~ic(X1)|~ic(X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.21/0.52	cnf(c_0_19, plain, (ic(uri_owl_Nothing)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[owl_class_nothing_type])).
0.21/0.52	cnf(c_0_20, plain, (ic(X1)|~iext(uri_rdf_type,X1,uri_owl_Class)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])).
0.21/0.52	cnf(c_0_21, plain, (iext(uri_rdf_type,uri_ex_c,uri_owl_Class)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[premise_rdfbased_sem_class_nothing_term])).
0.21/0.52	cnf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, (~iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_owl_Nothing,uri_ex_c)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])).
0.21/0.52	cnf(c_0_23, plain, (iext(uri_rdfs_subClassOf,uri_owl_Nothing,X1)|~ic(X1)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18]), c_0_19])])).
0.21/0.52	cnf(c_0_24, plain, (ic(uri_ex_c)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21])).
0.21/0.52	cnf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_23]), c_0_24])]), ['proof']).
0.21/0.52	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.21/0.52	% Parsed axioms                        : 560
0.21/0.52	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 506
0.21/0.52	% Initial clauses                      : 80
0.21/0.52	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.21/0.52	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 80
0.21/0.52	% Processed clauses                    : 129
0.21/0.52	% ...of these trivial                  : 20
0.21/0.52	% ...subsumed                          : 20
0.21/0.52	% ...remaining for further processing  : 89
0.21/0.52	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.21/0.52	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.21/0.52	% Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.21/0.52	% Backward-rewritten                   : 1
0.21/0.52	% Generated clauses                    : 118
0.21/0.52	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 65
0.21/0.52	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.21/0.52	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.21/0.52	% Paramodulations                      : 118
0.21/0.52	% Factorizations                       : 0
0.21/0.52	% NegExts                              : 0
0.21/0.52	% Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.21/0.52	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.21/0.52	% Total rewrite steps                  : 72
0.21/0.52	% ...of those cached                   : 49
0.21/0.52	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.21/0.52	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.21/0.52	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.21/0.52	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.21/0.52	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.21/0.52	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.21/0.52	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.21/0.52	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.21/0.52	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.21/0.52	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.21/0.52	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.21/0.52	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.21/0.52	% Current number of processed clauses  : 88
0.21/0.52	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 44
0.21/0.52	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.21/0.52	%    Negative unit clauses             : 3
0.21/0.52	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 41
0.21/0.52	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16
0.21/0.52	% ...number of literals in the above   : 56
0.21/0.52	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.21/0.52	% Current number of archived clauses   : 1
0.21/0.52	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 121
0.21/0.52	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 106
0.21/0.52	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 20
0.21/0.52	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
0.21/0.52	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.21/0.52	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
0.21/0.52	% BW rewrite match successes           : 1
0.21/0.52	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.21/0.52	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.21/0.52	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 11431
0.21/0.52	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 3865
0.21/0.52	
0.21/0.52	% -------------------------------------------------
0.21/0.52	% User time                : 0.012 s
0.21/0.52	% System time              : 0.006 s
0.21/0.52	% Total time               : 0.018 s
0.21/0.52	% Maximum resident set size: 4744 pages
0.21/0.52	
0.21/0.52	% -------------------------------------------------
0.21/0.52	% User time                : 0.043 s
0.21/0.52	% System time              : 0.017 s
0.21/0.52	% Total time               : 0.061 s
0.21/0.52	% Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
0.21/0.52	% E exiting
0.21/0.53	EOF