0.00/0.05	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.08	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.21/0.47	% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
0.21/0.47	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.21/0.47	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.21/0.47	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.21/0.47	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.21/0.47	% CPULimit : 1440
0.21/0.47	% WCLimit  : 180
0.21/0.47	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:47:40 UTC 2026
0.21/0.47	% CPUTime  : 
0.21/0.47	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.26/0.56	Running first-order theorem proving
0.26/0.56	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
1.01/1.07	% Version: 3.5.1
1.01/1.07	% Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
1.01/1.07	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
1.01/1.07	% Starting new_bool_3 with 540s (3) cores
1.01/1.07	% Starting new_bool_1 with 540s (3) cores
1.01/1.07	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
1.01/1.07	% Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 180s (1) cores
1.01/1.07	% G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 4065074 completed with status 0
1.01/1.07	% Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
1.01/1.07	% Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
1.01/1.07	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
1.01/1.07	% Starting new_bool_3 with 540s (3) cores
1.01/1.07	% Starting new_bool_1 with 540s (3) cores
1.01/1.07	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
1.01/1.07	% Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 180s (1) cores
1.01/1.07	% (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
1.01/1.07	% SinE strategy is gf120_h_gu_RUU_F100_L00500
1.01/1.07	% Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
1.01/1.07	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
1.01/1.07	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores
1.01/1.07	% SubtermCWHack with pid 4065078 completed with status 0
1.01/1.07	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
1.01/1.07	% Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
1.01/1.07	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
1.01/1.07	% Starting new_bool_3 with 540s (3) cores
1.01/1.07	% Starting new_bool_1 with 540s (3) cores
1.01/1.07	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
1.01/1.07	% Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 180s (1) cores
1.01/1.07	% (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
1.01/1.07	% SinE strategy is gf120_h_gu_RUU_F100_L00500
1.01/1.07	% Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
1.01/1.07	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
1.01/1.07	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores
1.01/1.07	% Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
1.01/1.07	
1.01/1.07	% Proof found!
1.01/1.07	% SZS status Theorem
1.01/1.07	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
1.01/1.07	fof('_HAMMER_GOAL', conjecture, (p(cUseAuto_2emyFact)<=![X64]:((cUseAuto_2eP___24a1(X64)<=cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2enat___24t(X64)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', '_HAMMER_GOAL')).
1.01/1.07	fof('$_def_UseAuto.myFact', axiom, (![X64]:((cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2enat___24t(X64)=>(cCoq_2eInit_2ePeano_2ele___24a2(X64,cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eS___24a1(cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eS___24a1(cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eS___24a1(cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eO))))=>cUseAuto_2eP___24a1(X64))))<=>p(cUseAuto_2emyFact)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', '$_def_UseAuto.myFact')).
1.01/1.07	fof(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~((p(cUseAuto_2emyFact)<=![X64]:((cUseAuto_2eP___24a1(X64)<=cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2enat___24t(X64))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['_HAMMER_GOAL'])).
1.01/1.07	fof(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~((![X64]:((cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2enat___24t(X64)=>cUseAuto_2eP___24a1(X64)))=>p(cUseAuto_2emyFact))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
1.01/1.07	fof(c_0_4, plain, ![X2872]:((((cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2enat___24t(esk1_0)|p(cUseAuto_2emyFact))&((cCoq_2eInit_2ePeano_2ele___24a2(esk1_0,cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eS___24a1(cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eS___24a1(cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eS___24a1(cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eO))))|p(cUseAuto_2emyFact))&(~cUseAuto_2eP___24a1(esk1_0)|p(cUseAuto_2emyFact))))&(~p(cUseAuto_2emyFact)|(~cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2enat___24t(X2872)|(~cCoq_2eInit_2ePeano_2ele___24a2(X2872,cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eS___24a1(cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eS___24a1(cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eS___24a1(cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2eO))))|cUseAuto_2eP___24a1(X2872)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['$_def_UseAuto.myFact'])])])])])])).
1.01/1.07	fof(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X2847]:(((~cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2enat___24t(X2847)|cUseAuto_2eP___24a1(X2847))&~p(cUseAuto_2emyFact))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])).
1.01/1.07	cnf(c_0_6, plain, (p(cUseAuto_2emyFact)|~cUseAuto_2eP___24a1(esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
1.01/1.07	cnf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (~p(cUseAuto_2emyFact)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
1.01/1.07	cnf(c_0_8, plain, (cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2enat___24t(esk1_0)|p(cUseAuto_2emyFact)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
1.01/1.07	cnf(c_0_9, plain, (~cUseAuto_2eP___24a1(esk1_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7])).
1.01/1.07	cnf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (cUseAuto_2eP___24a1(X1)|~cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2enat___24t(X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
1.01/1.07	cnf(c_0_11, plain, (cCoq_2eInit_2eDatatypes_2enat___24t(esk1_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_7])).
1.01/1.07	cnf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10]), c_0_11])]), ['proof']).
1.01/1.07	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
1.01/1.07	% Parsed axioms                        : 2925
1.01/1.07	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2868
1.01/1.07	% Initial clauses                      : 70
1.01/1.07	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 21
1.01/1.07	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 49
1.01/1.07	% Processed clauses                    : 9
1.01/1.07	% ...of these trivial                  : 0
1.01/1.07	% ...subsumed                          : 0
1.01/1.07	% ...remaining for further processing  : 9
1.01/1.07	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
1.01/1.07	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
1.01/1.07	% Backward-subsumed                    : 0
1.01/1.07	% Backward-rewritten                   : 0
1.01/1.07	% Generated clauses                    : 1
1.01/1.07	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
1.01/1.07	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
1.01/1.07	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
1.01/1.07	% Paramodulations                      : 1
1.01/1.07	% Factorizations                       : 0
1.01/1.07	% NegExts                              : 0
1.01/1.07	% Equation resolutions                 : 0
1.01/1.07	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
1.01/1.07	% Total rewrite steps                  : 1
1.01/1.07	% ...of those cached                   : 0
1.01/1.07	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
1.01/1.07	%    Propositional check models        : 0
1.01/1.07	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
1.01/1.07	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
1.01/1.07	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
1.01/1.07	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
1.01/1.07	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
1.01/1.07	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
1.01/1.07	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
1.01/1.07	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
1.01/1.07	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
1.01/1.07	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
1.01/1.07	% Current number of processed clauses  : 9
1.01/1.07	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
1.01/1.07	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
1.01/1.07	%    Negative unit clauses             : 4
1.01/1.07	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
1.01/1.07	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 40
1.01/1.07	% ...number of literals in the above   : 130
1.01/1.07	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
1.01/1.07	% Current number of archived clauses   : 0
1.01/1.07	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
1.01/1.07	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
1.01/1.07	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
1.01/1.07	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
1.01/1.07	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
1.01/1.07	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
1.01/1.07	% BW rewrite match successes           : 0
1.01/1.07	% Condensation attempts                : 0
1.01/1.07	% Condensation successes               : 0
1.01/1.07	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 78360
1.01/1.07	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 35716
1.01/1.07	
1.01/1.07	% -------------------------------------------------
1.01/1.07	% User time                : 0.046 s
1.01/1.07	% System time              : 0.025 s
1.01/1.07	% Total time               : 0.071 s
1.01/1.07	% Maximum resident set size: 14804 pages
1.01/1.07	
1.01/1.07	% -------------------------------------------------
1.01/1.07	% User time                : 0.432 s
1.01/1.07	% System time              : 0.053 s
1.01/1.07	% Total time               : 0.485 s
1.01/1.07	% Maximum resident set size: 11520 pages
1.01/1.07	% E exiting
1.01/1.07	EOF