0.00/0.04 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.19/0.43 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu 0.19/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.19/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.19/0.43 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.19/0.43 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.19/0.43 % CPULimit : 1440 0.19/0.43 % WCLimit : 180 0.19/0.43 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:51:04 UTC 2026 0.19/0.44 % CPUTime : 0.19/0.44 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.29/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving 0.29/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.57/0.87 % Version: 3.5.1 0.57/0.87 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN. 0.57/0.87 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.57/0.87 % Starting new_bool_3 with 540s (3) cores 0.57/0.87 % Starting new_bool_1 with 540s (3) cores 0.57/0.87 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.57/0.87 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 180s (1) cores 0.57/0.87 % new_bool_1 with pid 2545090 completed with status 0 0.57/0.87 % Result found by new_bool_1 0.57/0.87 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN. 0.57/0.87 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.57/0.87 % Starting new_bool_3 with 540s (3) cores 0.57/0.87 % Starting new_bool_1 with 540s (3) cores 0.57/0.87 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)) 0.57/0.87 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0) 0.57/0.87 % Search class: FGUSF-FFSM31-SFFFFFNN 0.57/0.87 % partial match(1): FGUSF-FFSM11-SFFFFFNN 0.57/0.87 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 3 cores with 540 seconds (540 total) 0.57/0.87 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 55s (1) cores 0.57/0.87 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 325s (1) cores 0.57/0.87 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 55s (1) cores 0.57/0.87 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2545093 completed with status 0 0.57/0.87 % Result found by SubtermCWHack 0.57/0.87 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN. 0.57/0.87 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.57/0.87 % Starting new_bool_3 with 540s (3) cores 0.57/0.87 % Starting new_bool_1 with 540s (3) cores 0.57/0.87 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)) 0.57/0.87 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0) 0.57/0.87 % Search class: FGUSF-FFSM31-SFFFFFNN 0.57/0.87 % partial match(1): FGUSF-FFSM11-SFFFFFNN 0.57/0.87 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 3 cores with 540 seconds (540 total) 0.57/0.87 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 55s (1) cores 0.57/0.87 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s 0.57/0.87 0.57/0.87 % Proof found! 0.57/0.87 % SZS status Theorem 0.57/0.87 % SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.57/0.87 fof('_HAMMER_GOAL', conjecture, ![X97]:((![X98]:((![X99]:((![X100]:((![X101]:((cRedblack_2eTREES_2eE!=cRedblack_2eTREES_2eT___24a5(X97,X98,X99,X100,X101)<=cRedblack_2eTREES_2etree___24t(X101)))<=cV___24t(X100)))<=cRedblack_2ekey___24t(X99)))<=cRedblack_2eTREES_2etree___24t(X98)))<=cRedblack_2ecolor___24t(X97))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', '_HAMMER_GOAL')). 0.57/0.87 fof('$_discrim_Redblack.TREES.E$Redblack.TREES.T', axiom, ![X149, X150, X151, X152, X153]:(cRedblack_2eTREES_2eE!=cRedblack_2eTREES_2eT___24a5(X149,X150,X151,X152,X153)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', '$_discrim_Redblack.TREES.E$Redblack.TREES.T')). 0.57/0.87 fof(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~(![X97]:((![X98]:((![X99]:((![X100]:((![X101]:((cRedblack_2eTREES_2eE!=cRedblack_2eTREES_2eT___24a5(X97,X98,X99,X100,X101)<=cRedblack_2eTREES_2etree___24t(X101)))<=cV___24t(X100)))<=cRedblack_2ekey___24t(X99)))<=cRedblack_2eTREES_2etree___24t(X98)))<=cRedblack_2ecolor___24t(X97)))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['_HAMMER_GOAL'])). 0.57/0.87 fof(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~(![X97]:((cRedblack_2ecolor___24t(X97)=>![X98]:((cRedblack_2eTREES_2etree___24t(X98)=>![X99]:((cRedblack_2ekey___24t(X99)=>![X100]:((cV___24t(X100)=>![X101]:((cRedblack_2eTREES_2etree___24t(X101)=>cRedblack_2eTREES_2eE!=cRedblack_2eTREES_2eT___24a5(X97,X98,X99,X100,X101)))))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.57/0.87 fof(c_0_4, plain, ![X149, X150, X151, X152, X153]:(cRedblack_2eTREES_2eE!=cRedblack_2eTREES_2eT___24a5(X149,X150,X151,X152,X153)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['$_discrim_Redblack.TREES.E$Redblack.TREES.T'])). 0.57/0.87 fof(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, (cRedblack_2ecolor___24t(esk1_0)&(cRedblack_2eTREES_2etree___24t(esk2_0)&(cRedblack_2ekey___24t(esk3_0)&(cV___24t(esk4_0)&(cRedblack_2eTREES_2etree___24t(esk5_0)&cRedblack_2eTREES_2eE=cRedblack_2eTREES_2eT___24a5(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0,esk5_0)))))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])). 0.57/0.87 fof(c_0_6, plain, ![X2295, X2296, X2297, X2298, X2299]:(cRedblack_2eTREES_2eE!=cRedblack_2eTREES_2eT___24a5(X2295,X2296,X2297,X2298,X2299)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])). 0.57/0.87 cnf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (cRedblack_2eTREES_2eE=cRedblack_2eTREES_2eT___24a5(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0,esk4_0,esk5_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.57/0.87 cnf(c_0_8, plain, (cRedblack_2eTREES_2eE!=cRedblack_2eTREES_2eT___24a5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.57/0.87 cnf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8]), ['proof']). 0.57/0.87 % SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.57/0.87 % Parsed axioms : 2821 0.57/0.87 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2816 0.57/0.87 % Initial clauses : 19 0.57/0.87 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.57/0.87 % Initial clauses in saturation : 19 0.57/0.87 % Processed clauses : 13 0.57/0.87 % ...of these trivial : 0 0.57/0.87 % ...subsumed : 0 0.57/0.87 % ...remaining for further processing : 13 0.57/0.87 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.57/0.87 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.57/0.87 % Backward-subsumed : 0 0.57/0.87 % Backward-rewritten : 0 0.57/0.87 % Generated clauses : 1 0.57/0.87 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0 0.57/0.87 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.57/0.87 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.57/0.87 % Paramodulations : 0 0.57/0.87 % Factorizations : 0 0.57/0.87 % NegExts : 0 0.57/0.87 % Equation resolutions : 0 0.57/0.87 % Disequality decompositions : 0 0.57/0.87 % Total rewrite steps : 0 0.57/0.87 % ...of those cached : 0 0.57/0.87 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.57/0.87 % Propositional check models : 0 0.57/0.87 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.57/0.87 % Propositional clauses : 0 0.57/0.87 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.57/0.87 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.57/0.87 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.57/0.87 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.57/0.87 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.57/0.87 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.57/0.87 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.57/0.87 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.57/0.87 % Current number of processed clauses : 12 0.57/0.87 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 6 0.57/0.87 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.57/0.87 % Negative unit clauses : 1 0.57/0.87 % Non-unit-clauses : 5 0.57/0.87 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6 0.57/0.87 % ...number of literals in the above : 13 0.57/0.87 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.57/0.87 % Current number of archived clauses : 1 0.57/0.87 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2 0.57/0.87 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2 0.57/0.87 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.57/0.87 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.57/0.87 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.57/0.87 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0 0.57/0.87 % BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.57/0.87 % Condensation attempts : 0 0.57/0.87 % Condensation successes : 0 0.57/0.87 % Termbank termtop insertions : 44466 0.57/0.87 % Search garbage collected termcells : 34557 0.57/0.87 0.57/0.87 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.57/0.87 % User time : 0.033 s 0.57/0.87 % System time : 0.022 s 0.57/0.87 % Total time : 0.055 s 0.57/0.87 % Maximum resident set size: 14584 pages 0.57/0.87 0.57/0.87 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.57/0.87 % User time : 0.291 s 0.57/0.87 % System time : 0.057 s 0.57/0.87 % Total time : 0.348 s 0.57/0.87 % Maximum resident set size: 11264 pages 0.57/0.87 % E exiting 0.57/0.87 EOF