0.00/0.04 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.16/0.42 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu 0.16/0.42 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.16/0.42 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.16/0.42 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.16/0.42 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.16/0.42 % CPULimit : 1440 0.16/0.42 % WCLimit : 180 0.16/0.42 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:32:43 UTC 2026 0.16/0.43 % CPUTime : 0.16/0.43 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.24/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving 0.24/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.54/0.87 % Version: 3.5.1 0.54/0.87 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN. 0.54/0.87 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.54/0.87 % Starting new_bool_3 with 540s (3) cores 0.54/0.87 % Starting new_bool_1 with 540s (3) cores 0.54/0.87 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.54/0.87 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 180s (1) cores 0.54/0.87 % G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 2483780 completed with status 0 0.54/0.87 % Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y 0.54/0.87 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN. 0.54/0.87 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.54/0.87 % Starting new_bool_3 with 540s (3) cores 0.54/0.87 % Starting new_bool_1 with 540s (3) cores 0.54/0.87 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.54/0.87 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 180s (1) cores 0.54/0.87 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) 0.54/0.87 % SinE strategy is gf120_h_gu_RUU_F100_L00500 0.54/0.87 % Search class: FUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN 0.54/0.87 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.54/0.87 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores 0.54/0.87 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2483781 completed with status 0 0.54/0.87 % Result found by SubtermCWHack 0.54/0.87 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN. 0.54/0.87 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.54/0.87 % Starting new_bool_3 with 540s (3) cores 0.54/0.87 % Starting new_bool_1 with 540s (3) cores 0.54/0.87 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.54/0.87 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 180s (1) cores 0.54/0.87 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) 0.54/0.87 % SinE strategy is gf120_h_gu_RUU_F100_L00500 0.54/0.87 % Search class: FUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN 0.54/0.87 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.54/0.87 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores 0.54/0.87 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s 0.54/0.87 0.54/0.87 % Proof found! 0.54/0.87 % SZS status Theorem 0.54/0.87 % SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.54/0.87 fof('_HAMMER_GOAL', conjecture, ![X350]:(((p(X350)<=>p(X350))<=cProp___24t(X350))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', '_HAMMER_GOAL')). 0.54/0.87 fof(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X350]:(((p(X350)<=>p(X350))<=cProp___24t(X350)))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['_HAMMER_GOAL'])). 0.54/0.87 fof(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~(![X350]:($true)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])). 0.54/0.87 fof(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~$true, inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])). 0.54/0.87 cnf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.54/0.87 cnf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]), ['proof']). 0.54/0.87 % SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.54/0.87 % Parsed axioms : 2364 0.54/0.87 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2361 0.54/0.87 % Initial clauses : 4 0.54/0.87 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 3 0.54/0.87 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1 0.54/0.87 % Processed clauses : 1 0.54/0.87 % ...of these trivial : 0 0.54/0.87 % ...subsumed : 0 0.54/0.87 % ...remaining for further processing : 0 0.54/0.87 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.54/0.87 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.54/0.87 % Backward-subsumed : 0 0.54/0.87 % Backward-rewritten : 0 0.54/0.87 % Generated clauses : 0 0.54/0.87 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0 0.54/0.87 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.54/0.87 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.54/0.87 % Paramodulations : 0 0.54/0.87 % Factorizations : 0 0.54/0.87 % NegExts : 0 0.54/0.87 % Equation resolutions : 0 0.54/0.87 % Disequality decompositions : 0 0.54/0.87 % Total rewrite steps : 0 0.54/0.87 % ...of those cached : 0 0.54/0.87 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.54/0.87 % Propositional check models : 0 0.54/0.87 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.54/0.87 % Propositional clauses : 0 0.54/0.87 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.54/0.87 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.54/0.87 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.54/0.87 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.54/0.87 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.54/0.87 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.54/0.87 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.54/0.87 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.54/0.87 % Current number of processed clauses : 0 0.54/0.87 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0 0.54/0.87 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.54/0.87 % Negative unit clauses : 0 0.54/0.87 % Non-unit-clauses : 0 0.54/0.87 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0 0.54/0.87 % ...number of literals in the above : 0 0.54/0.87 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.54/0.87 % Current number of archived clauses : 0 0.54/0.87 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0 0.54/0.87 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.54/0.87 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.54/0.87 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.54/0.87 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.54/0.87 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0 0.54/0.87 % BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.54/0.87 % Condensation attempts : 0 0.54/0.87 % Condensation successes : 0 0.54/0.87 % Termbank termtop insertions : 72377 0.54/0.87 % Search garbage collected termcells : 29182 0.54/0.87 0.54/0.87 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.54/0.87 % User time : 0.022 s 0.54/0.87 % System time : 0.023 s 0.54/0.87 % Total time : 0.045 s 0.54/0.87 % Maximum resident set size: 12456 pages 0.54/0.87 0.54/0.87 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.54/0.87 % User time : 0.310 s 0.54/0.87 % System time : 0.044 s 0.54/0.87 % Total time : 0.353 s 0.54/0.87 % Maximum resident set size: 10240 pages 0.54/0.87 % E exiting 0.54/0.87 EOF