0.00/0.04 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.06 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.16/0.43 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu 0.16/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.16/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.16/0.43 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.16/0.43 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.16/0.43 % CPULimit : 1440 0.16/0.43 % WCLimit : 180 0.16/0.43 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:19:23 UTC 2026 0.16/0.43 % CPUTime : 0.16/0.43 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.23/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving 0.23/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.23/0.55 % Version: 3.5.1 0.23/0.55 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.23/0.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.23/0.55 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores 0.23/0.55 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.23/0.55 % Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores 0.23/0.55 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.23/0.55 % sh5l with pid 2810454 completed with status 0 0.23/0.55 % Result found by sh5l 0.23/0.55 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.23/0.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.23/0.55 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores 0.23/0.55 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.23/0.55 % Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores 0.23/0.55 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.23/0.55 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000) 0.23/0.55 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000 0.23/0.55 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMS31-MFFFFFNN 0.23/0.55 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.23/0.55 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores 0.23/0.55 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2810457 completed with status 0 0.23/0.55 % Result found by SubtermCWHack 0.23/0.55 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.23/0.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.23/0.55 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores 0.23/0.55 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.23/0.55 % Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores 0.23/0.55 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.23/0.55 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000) 0.23/0.55 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000 0.23/0.55 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMS31-MFFFFFNN 0.23/0.55 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.23/0.55 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores 0.23/0.55 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s 0.23/0.55 0.23/0.55 % Proof found! 0.23/0.55 % SZS status Theorem 0.23/0.55 % SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.23/0.55 fof(unordered_pair_defn, axiom, ![X1, X4, X5]:((member(X1,unordered_pair(X4,X5))<=>((X4=X1|X5=X1)&member(X1,universal_class)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax', unordered_pair_defn)). 0.23/0.55 fof(unordered_pair, axiom, ![X4, X5]:(member(unordered_pair(X4,X5),universal_class)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax', unordered_pair)). 0.23/0.55 fof(singleton_set_defn, axiom, ![X4]:(unordered_pair(X4,X4)=singleton(X4)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax', singleton_set_defn)). 0.23/0.55 fof(singleton_member_of_ordered_pair, conjecture, ![X4, X5]:(member(singleton(X4),ordered_pair(X4,X5))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', singleton_member_of_ordered_pair)). 0.23/0.55 fof(ordered_pair_defn, axiom, ![X4, X5]:(ordered_pair(X4,X5)=unordered_pair(singleton(X4),unordered_pair(X4,singleton(X5)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax', ordered_pair_defn)). 0.23/0.55 fof(c_0_5, plain, ![X53, X54, X55]:((((X54=X53|X55=X53|~member(X53,unordered_pair(X54,X55)))&(member(X53,universal_class)|~member(X53,unordered_pair(X54,X55))))&((X54!=X53|~member(X53,universal_class)|member(X53,unordered_pair(X54,X55)))&(X55!=X53|~member(X53,universal_class)|member(X53,unordered_pair(X54,X55)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_defn])])])])). 0.23/0.55 fof(c_0_6, plain, ![X51, X52]:(member(unordered_pair(X51,X52),universal_class)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair])). 0.23/0.55 fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X36]:(unordered_pair(X36,X36)=singleton(X36)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[singleton_set_defn])). 0.23/0.55 fof(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ~(![X4, X5]:(member(singleton(X4),ordered_pair(X4,X5)))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[singleton_member_of_ordered_pair])). 0.23/0.55 cnf(c_0_9, plain, (member(X2,unordered_pair(X1,X3))|X1!=X2|~member(X2,universal_class)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.23/0.55 fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X30, X31]:(ordered_pair(X30,X31)=unordered_pair(singleton(X30),unordered_pair(X30,singleton(X31)))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ordered_pair_defn])). 0.23/0.55 cnf(c_0_11, plain, (member(unordered_pair(X1,X2),universal_class)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.23/0.55 cnf(c_0_12, plain, (unordered_pair(X1,X1)=singleton(X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.23/0.55 fof(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ~member(singleton(esk1_0),ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])])). 0.23/0.55 cnf(c_0_14, plain, (member(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2))|~member(X1,universal_class)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 0.23/0.55 cnf(c_0_15, plain, (ordered_pair(X1,X2)=unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,singleton(X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])). 0.23/0.55 cnf(c_0_16, plain, (member(singleton(X1),universal_class)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])). 0.23/0.55 cnf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (~member(singleton(esk1_0),ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])). 0.23/0.55 cnf(c_0_18, plain, (member(singleton(X1),ordered_pair(X1,X2))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15]), c_0_16])])). 0.23/0.55 cnf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18])]), ['proof']). 0.23/0.55 % SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.23/0.55 % Parsed axioms : 44 0.23/0.55 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 9 0.23/0.55 % Initial clauses : 72 0.23/0.55 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.23/0.55 % Initial clauses in saturation : 72 0.23/0.55 % Processed clauses : 134 0.23/0.55 % ...of these trivial : 0 0.23/0.55 % ...subsumed : 30 0.23/0.55 % ...remaining for further processing : 104 0.23/0.55 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5 0.23/0.55 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.23/0.55 % Backward-subsumed : 5 0.23/0.55 % Backward-rewritten : 6 0.23/0.55 % Generated clauses : 230 0.23/0.55 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 207 0.23/0.55 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.23/0.55 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.23/0.55 % Paramodulations : 225 0.23/0.55 % Factorizations : 0 0.23/0.55 % NegExts : 0 0.23/0.55 % Equation resolutions : 5 0.23/0.55 % Disequality decompositions : 0 0.23/0.55 % Total rewrite steps : 29 0.23/0.55 % ...of those cached : 13 0.23/0.55 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.23/0.55 % Propositional check models : 0 0.23/0.55 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.23/0.55 % Propositional clauses : 0 0.23/0.55 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.23/0.55 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.23/0.55 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.23/0.55 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.23/0.55 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.23/0.55 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.23/0.55 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.23/0.55 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.23/0.55 % Current number of processed clauses : 88 0.23/0.55 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 27 0.23/0.55 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.23/0.55 % Negative unit clauses : 1 0.23/0.55 % Non-unit-clauses : 60 0.23/0.55 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 136 0.23/0.55 % ...number of literals in the above : 332 0.23/0.55 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.23/0.55 % Current number of archived clauses : 11 0.23/0.55 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1049 0.23/0.55 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 959 0.23/0.55 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 29 0.23/0.55 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 210 0.23/0.55 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.23/0.55 % BW rewrite match attempts : 8 0.23/0.55 % BW rewrite match successes : 4 0.23/0.55 % Condensation attempts : 0 0.23/0.55 % Condensation successes : 0 0.23/0.55 % Termbank termtop insertions : 6515 0.23/0.55 % Search garbage collected termcells : 867 0.23/0.55 0.23/0.55 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.23/0.55 % User time : 0.015 s 0.23/0.55 % System time : 0.004 s 0.23/0.55 % Total time : 0.019 s 0.23/0.55 % Maximum resident set size: 3692 pages 0.23/0.55 0.23/0.55 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.23/0.55 % User time : 0.019 s 0.23/0.55 % System time : 0.009 s 0.23/0.55 % Total time : 0.028 s 0.23/0.55 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages 0.23/0.55 % E exiting 0.23/0.55 EOF