0.00/0.03	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.04	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.10/0.36	% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
0.10/0.36	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.36	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.36	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.10/0.36	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.10/0.36	% CPULimit : 1440
0.10/0.36	% WCLimit  : 180
0.10/0.36	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:19:09 UTC 2026
0.10/0.36	% CPUTime  : 
0.10/0.36	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.13/0.41	Running first-order theorem proving
0.13/0.41	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.67/0.52	% Version: 3.5.1
0.67/0.52	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.67/0.52	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.67/0.52	% Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores
0.67/0.52	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.67/0.52	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.67/0.52	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.67/0.52	% sh5l with pid 3462916 completed with status 0
0.67/0.52	% Result found by sh5l
0.67/0.52	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.67/0.52	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.67/0.52	% Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores
0.67/0.52	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.67/0.52	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.67/0.52	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.67/0.52	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
0.67/0.52	% SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
0.67/0.52	% Search class: FGHSM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
0.67/0.52	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.67/0.52	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores
0.67/0.52	% SubtermCWHack with pid 3462920 completed with status 0
0.67/0.52	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.67/0.52	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.67/0.52	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.67/0.52	% Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores
0.67/0.52	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.67/0.52	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.67/0.52	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.67/0.52	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
0.67/0.52	% SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
0.67/0.52	% Search class: FGHSM-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
0.67/0.52	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.67/0.52	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores
0.67/0.52	% Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.67/0.52	
0.67/0.52	% Proof found!
0.67/0.52	% SZS status Theorem
0.67/0.52	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.67/0.52	fof('ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 2)', axiom, ![X31, X32]:((~(greater(X31,X32))|~(less(X31,X32)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 2)')).
0.67/0.52	fof('ass(cond(147, 0), 0)', axiom, ![X35, X36]:((less(X35,X36)=>greater(X36,X35))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'ass(cond(147, 0), 0)')).
0.67/0.52	fof('ass(cond(61, 0), 0)', axiom, ![X11, X12]:(vplus(X11,X12)=vplus(X12,X11)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'ass(cond(61, 0), 0)')).
0.67/0.52	fof('ass(cond(goal(193), 0), 0)', axiom, ![X1, X2, X3]:((less(vplus(X1,X3),vplus(X2,X3))<=less(X1,X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'ass(cond(goal(193), 0), 0)')).
0.67/0.52	fof('holds(antec(conjunct2(conjunct2(204))), 335, 0)', axiom, less(vplus(vd328,vd330),vplus(vd329,vd330)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'holds(antec(conjunct2(conjunct2(204))), 335, 0)')).
0.67/0.52	fof('holds(conseq(conjunct2(conjunct2(204))), 336, 0)', conjecture, less(vd328,vd329), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'holds(conseq(conjunct2(conjunct2(204))), 336, 0)')).
0.67/0.52	fof('ass(cond(140, 0), 0)', axiom, ![X7, X8]:((greater(X7,X8)=>less(X8,X7))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'ass(cond(140, 0), 0)')).
0.67/0.52	fof('ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 0)', axiom, ![X31, X32]:((X32=X31|less(X31,X32)|greater(X31,X32))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 0)')).
0.67/0.52	fof('ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 1)', axiom, ![X31, X32]:((X31!=X32|~(less(X31,X32)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 1)')).
0.67/0.52	fof(c_0_9, plain, ![X31, X32]:((~greater(X31,X32)|~less(X31,X32))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 2)'])).
0.67/0.52	fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X84, X85]:((~greater(X84,X85)|~less(X84,X85))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])).
0.67/0.52	fof(c_0_11, plain, ![X78, X79]:((~less(X78,X79)|greater(X79,X78))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(147, 0), 0)'])])])).
0.67/0.52	fof(c_0_12, plain, ![X91, X92]:(vplus(X91,X92)=vplus(X92,X91)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(61, 0), 0)'])).
0.67/0.52	fof(c_0_13, plain, ![X1, X2, X3]:((less(X1,X2)=>less(vplus(X1,X3),vplus(X2,X3)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(goal(193), 0), 0)'])).
0.67/0.52	cnf(c_0_14, plain, (~greater(X1,X2)|~less(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.67/0.52	cnf(c_0_15, plain, (greater(X2,X1)|~less(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.67/0.52	cnf(c_0_16, plain, (less(vplus(vd328,vd330),vplus(vd329,vd330))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['holds(antec(conjunct2(conjunct2(204))), 335, 0)'])).
0.67/0.52	cnf(c_0_17, plain, (vplus(X1,X2)=vplus(X2,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])).
0.67/0.52	fof(c_0_18, plain, ![X61, X62, X63]:((~less(X61,X62)|less(vplus(X61,X63),vplus(X62,X63)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])])).
0.67/0.52	fof(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ~(less(vd328,vd329)), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['holds(conseq(conjunct2(conjunct2(204))), 336, 0)'])).
0.67/0.52	cnf(c_0_20, plain, (~less(X1,X2)|~less(X2,X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])).
0.67/0.52	cnf(c_0_21, plain, (less(vplus(vd328,vd330),vplus(vd330,vd329))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])).
0.67/0.52	cnf(c_0_22, plain, (less(vplus(X1,X3),vplus(X2,X3))|~less(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])).
0.67/0.52	fof(c_0_23, plain, ![X64, X65]:((~greater(X64,X65)|less(X65,X64))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(140, 0), 0)'])])])).
0.67/0.52	fof(c_0_24, plain, ![X80, X81]:((X81=X80|less(X80,X81)|greater(X80,X81))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 0)'])).
0.67/0.52	fof(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ~less(vd328,vd329), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])).
0.67/0.52	fof(c_0_26, plain, ![X31, X32]:((X31!=X32|~less(X31,X32))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['ass(cond(goal(130), 0), 1)'])).
0.67/0.52	cnf(c_0_27, plain, (~less(vplus(vd330,vd329),vplus(vd328,vd330))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21])).
0.67/0.52	cnf(c_0_28, plain, (less(vplus(X1,X2),vplus(X3,X1))|~less(X2,X3)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_17])).
0.67/0.52	cnf(c_0_29, plain, (less(X2,X1)|~greater(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])).
0.67/0.52	cnf(c_0_30, plain, (X1=X2|less(X2,X1)|greater(X2,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])).
0.67/0.52	fof(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, ~less(vd328,vd329), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])).
0.67/0.52	fof(c_0_32, plain, ![X82, X83]:((X82!=X83|~less(X82,X83))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_26])])).
0.67/0.52	cnf(c_0_33, plain, (~less(vd329,vd328)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_28])).
0.67/0.52	cnf(c_0_34, plain, (X1=X2|less(X2,X1)|less(X1,X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_30])).
0.67/0.52	cnf(c_0_35, negated_conjecture, (~less(vd328,vd329)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31])).
0.67/0.52	cnf(c_0_36, plain, (X1!=X2|~less(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32])).
0.67/0.52	cnf(c_0_37, plain, (vd329=vd328), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33, c_0_34]), c_0_35])).
0.67/0.52	cnf(c_0_38, plain, (~less(X1,X1)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_36])).
0.67/0.52	cnf(c_0_39, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_37]), c_0_17]), c_0_38]), ['proof']).
0.67/0.52	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.67/0.52	% Parsed axioms                        : 39
0.67/0.52	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.67/0.52	% Initial clauses                      : 47
0.67/0.52	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
0.67/0.52	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 46
0.67/0.52	% Processed clauses                    : 1620
0.67/0.52	% ...of these trivial                  : 81
0.67/0.52	% ...subsumed                          : 1133
0.67/0.52	% ...remaining for further processing  : 406
0.67/0.52	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 289
0.67/0.52	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.67/0.52	% Backward-subsumed                    : 12
0.67/0.52	% Backward-rewritten                   : 31
0.67/0.52	% Generated clauses                    : 13743
0.67/0.52	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12684
0.67/0.52	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.67/0.52	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
0.67/0.52	% Paramodulations                      : 13447
0.67/0.52	% Factorizations                       : 2
0.67/0.52	% NegExts                              : 0
0.67/0.52	% Equation resolutions                 : 294
0.67/0.52	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.67/0.52	% Total rewrite steps                  : 2329
0.67/0.52	% ...of those cached                   : 1804
0.67/0.52	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.67/0.52	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.67/0.52	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.67/0.52	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.67/0.52	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.67/0.52	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.67/0.52	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.67/0.52	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.67/0.52	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.67/0.52	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.67/0.52	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.67/0.52	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.67/0.52	% Current number of processed clauses  : 354
0.67/0.52	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 55
0.67/0.52	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
0.67/0.52	%    Negative unit clauses             : 46
0.67/0.52	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 250
0.67/0.52	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11042
0.67/0.52	% ...number of literals in the above   : 32696
0.67/0.52	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.67/0.52	% Current number of archived clauses   : 43
0.67/0.52	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 15082
0.67/0.52	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13205
0.67/0.52	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 428
0.67/0.52	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 644
0.67/0.52	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.67/0.52	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 164
0.67/0.52	% BW rewrite match successes           : 95
0.67/0.52	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.67/0.52	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.67/0.52	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 110303
0.67/0.52	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 522
0.67/0.52	
0.67/0.52	% -------------------------------------------------
0.67/0.52	% User time                : 0.086 s
0.67/0.52	% System time              : 0.008 s
0.67/0.52	% Total time               : 0.094 s
0.67/0.52	% Maximum resident set size: 3692 pages
0.67/0.52	
0.67/0.52	% -------------------------------------------------
0.67/0.52	% User time                : 0.088 s
0.67/0.52	% System time              : 0.010 s
0.67/0.52	% Total time               : 0.098 s
0.67/0.52	% Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
0.67/0.52	% E exiting
0.67/0.52	EOF