0.00/0.01 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.02 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.04/0.30 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu 0.04/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.04/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.04/0.30 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.04/0.30 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.04/0.30 % CPULimit : 1440 0.04/0.30 % WCLimit : 180 0.04/0.30 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 04:51:00 UTC 2026 0.04/0.31 % CPUTime : 0.04/0.31 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.07/0.33 Running first-order theorem proving 0.07/0.33 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.07/0.37 % Version: 3.5.1 0.07/0.37 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN. 0.07/0.37 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.07/0.37 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 540s (3) cores 0.07/0.37 % Starting new_bool_3 with 360s (2) cores 0.07/0.37 % Starting new_bool_1 with 360s (2) cores 0.07/0.37 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.07/0.37 % sh5l with pid 2862387 completed with status 0 0.07/0.37 % Result found by sh5l 0.07/0.37 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN. 0.07/0.37 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.07/0.37 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 540s (3) cores 0.07/0.37 % Starting new_bool_3 with 360s (2) cores 0.07/0.37 % Starting new_bool_1 with 360s (2) cores 0.07/0.37 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.07/0.37 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000) 0.07/0.37 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000 0.07/0.37 % Search class: FGHSF-FFLM21-MFFFFFNN 0.07/0.37 % partial match(1): FGHSF-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN 0.07/0.37 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.07/0.37 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores 0.07/0.37 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2862392 completed with status 0 0.07/0.37 % Result found by SubtermCWHack 0.07/0.37 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN. 0.07/0.37 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.07/0.37 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 540s (3) cores 0.07/0.37 % Starting new_bool_3 with 360s (2) cores 0.07/0.37 % Starting new_bool_1 with 360s (2) cores 0.07/0.37 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.07/0.37 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000) 0.07/0.37 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000 0.07/0.37 % Search class: FGHSF-FFLM21-MFFFFFNN 0.07/0.37 % partial match(1): FGHSF-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN 0.07/0.37 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.07/0.37 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores 0.07/0.37 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s 0.07/0.37 0.07/0.37 % Proof found! 0.07/0.37 % SZS status Theorem 0.07/0.37 % SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.07/0.37 fof(less_entry_point_pos_pos, axiom, ![X5, X6, X7, X8]:((less(X5,X6)<=((rdn_translate(X6,rdn_pos(X8))&rdn_positive_less(X7,X8))&rdn_translate(X5,rdn_pos(X7))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax', less_entry_point_pos_pos)). 0.07/0.37 fof(n2_less_n13, conjecture, less(n2,n13), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', n2_less_n13)). 0.07/0.37 fof(rdn2, axiom, rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax', rdn2)). 0.07/0.37 fof(rdn13, axiom, rdn_translate(n13,rdn_pos(rdn(rdnn(n3),rdnn(n1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax', rdn13)). 0.07/0.37 fof(rdn_extra_digits_positive_less, axiom, ![X10, X3, X4]:((rdn_non_zero(X4)=>rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X10),rdn(rdnn(X3),X4)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax', rdn_extra_digits_positive_less)). 0.07/0.37 fof(rdn_non_zero_by_digit, axiom, ![X5]:((rdn_non_zero_digit(rdnn(X5))=>rdn_non_zero(rdnn(X5)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax', rdn_non_zero_by_digit)). 0.07/0.37 fof(rdn_digit1, axiom, rdn_non_zero_digit(rdnn(n1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax', rdn_digit1)). 0.07/0.37 fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X5, X6, X7, X8]:((((rdn_translate(X6,rdn_pos(X8))&rdn_positive_less(X7,X8))&rdn_translate(X5,rdn_pos(X7)))=>less(X5,X6))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[less_entry_point_pos_pos])). 0.07/0.37 fof(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ~(less(n2,n13)), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[n2_less_n13])). 0.07/0.37 fof(c_0_9, plain, ![X42, X43, X44, X45]:((~rdn_translate(X43,rdn_pos(X45))|~rdn_positive_less(X44,X45)|~rdn_translate(X42,rdn_pos(X44))|less(X42,X43))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])). 0.07/0.37 fof(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ~less(n2,n13), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.07/0.37 cnf(c_0_11, plain, (less(X4,X1)|~rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X2))|~rdn_positive_less(X3,X2)|~rdn_translate(X4,rdn_pos(X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 0.07/0.37 cnf(c_0_12, plain, (rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn2])). 0.07/0.37 fof(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ~less(n2,n13), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])). 0.07/0.37 cnf(c_0_14, plain, (less(n2,X1)|~rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),X2)|~rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X2))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])). 0.07/0.37 cnf(c_0_15, plain, (rdn_translate(n13,rdn_pos(rdn(rdnn(n3),rdnn(n1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn13])). 0.07/0.37 cnf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, (~less(n2,n13)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])). 0.07/0.37 fof(c_0_17, plain, ![X59, X60, X61]:((~rdn_non_zero(X61)|rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X59),rdn(rdnn(X60),X61)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdn_extra_digits_positive_less])])])). 0.07/0.37 cnf(c_0_18, plain, (~rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdn(rdnn(n3),rdnn(n1)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15]), c_0_16])). 0.07/0.37 cnf(c_0_19, plain, (rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X2),rdn(rdnn(X3),X1))|~rdn_non_zero(X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])). 0.07/0.37 fof(c_0_20, plain, ![X109]:((~rdn_non_zero_digit(rdnn(X109))|rdn_non_zero(rdnn(X109)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdn_non_zero_by_digit])])])). 0.07/0.37 cnf(c_0_21, plain, (~rdn_non_zero(rdnn(n1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])). 0.07/0.37 cnf(c_0_22, plain, (rdn_non_zero(rdnn(X1))|~rdn_non_zero_digit(rdnn(X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])). 0.07/0.37 cnf(c_0_23, plain, (rdn_non_zero_digit(rdnn(n1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_digit1])). 0.07/0.37 cnf(c_0_24, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22]), c_0_23])]), ['proof']). 0.07/0.37 % SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.07/0.37 % Parsed axioms : 402 0.07/0.37 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 246 0.07/0.37 % Initial clauses : 160 0.07/0.37 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.07/0.37 % Initial clauses in saturation : 160 0.07/0.37 % Processed clauses : 432 0.07/0.37 % ...of these trivial : 2 0.07/0.37 % ...subsumed : 26 0.07/0.37 % ...remaining for further processing : 404 0.07/0.37 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2 0.07/0.37 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.07/0.37 % Backward-subsumed : 6 0.07/0.37 % Backward-rewritten : 5 0.07/0.37 % Generated clauses : 608 0.07/0.37 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 493 0.07/0.37 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.07/0.37 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.07/0.37 % Paramodulations : 604 0.07/0.37 % Factorizations : 2 0.07/0.37 % NegExts : 0 0.07/0.37 % Equation resolutions : 2 0.07/0.37 % Disequality decompositions : 0 0.07/0.37 % Total rewrite steps : 160 0.07/0.37 % ...of those cached : 86 0.07/0.37 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.07/0.37 % Propositional check models : 0 0.07/0.37 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.07/0.37 % Propositional clauses : 0 0.07/0.37 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.07/0.37 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.07/0.37 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.07/0.37 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.07/0.37 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.07/0.37 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.07/0.37 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.07/0.37 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.07/0.37 % Current number of processed clauses : 391 0.07/0.37 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 197 0.07/0.37 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.07/0.37 % Negative unit clauses : 87 0.07/0.37 % Non-unit-clauses : 107 0.07/0.37 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 215 0.07/0.37 % ...number of literals in the above : 962 0.07/0.37 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.07/0.37 % Current number of archived clauses : 11 0.07/0.37 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1764 0.07/0.37 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1383 0.07/0.37 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 14 0.07/0.37 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6904 0.07/0.37 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.07/0.37 % BW rewrite match attempts : 5 0.07/0.37 % BW rewrite match successes : 5 0.07/0.37 % Condensation attempts : 0 0.07/0.37 % Condensation successes : 0 0.07/0.37 % Termbank termtop insertions : 21544 0.07/0.37 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1852 0.07/0.37 0.07/0.37 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.07/0.37 % User time : 0.016 s 0.07/0.37 % System time : 0.005 s 0.07/0.37 % Total time : 0.022 s 0.07/0.37 % Maximum resident set size: 4764 pages 0.07/0.37 0.07/0.37 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.07/0.37 % User time : 0.020 s 0.07/0.37 % System time : 0.009 s 0.07/0.37 % Total time : 0.028 s 0.07/0.37 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages 0.07/0.37 % E exiting 0.07/0.37 EOF