0.00/0.02	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.04	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.10/0.35	% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
0.10/0.35	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.35	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.35	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.10/0.35	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.10/0.35	% CPULimit : 1440
0.10/0.35	% WCLimit  : 180
0.10/0.35	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 08:57:53 UTC 2026
0.10/0.35	% CPUTime  : 
0.10/0.35	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.13/0.39	Running first-order theorem proving
0.13/0.39	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.13/0.42	% Version: 3.5.1
0.13/0.42	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.13/0.42	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.13/0.42	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.13/0.42	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.13/0.42	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.13/0.42	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.13/0.42	% new_bool_3 with pid 1112901 completed with status 0
0.13/0.42	% Result found by new_bool_3
0.13/0.42	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.13/0.42	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.13/0.42	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.13/0.42	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.13/0.42	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.13/0.42	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.13/0.42	% Search class: FGHSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
0.13/0.42	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.13/0.42	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.13/0.42	% SubtermCWHack with pid 1112904 completed with status 0
0.13/0.42	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.13/0.42	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.13/0.42	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.13/0.42	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.13/0.42	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.13/0.42	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.13/0.42	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.13/0.42	% Search class: FGHSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
0.13/0.42	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.13/0.42	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.13/0.42	% Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
0.13/0.42	
0.13/0.42	% Proof found!
0.13/0.42	% SZS status Theorem
0.13/0.42	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.13/0.42	fof(odrl613, conjecture, wf(lt,v600,v0,v1200), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', odrl613)).
0.13/0.42	fof(distinct, axiom, $distinct(v0,v600,v1200), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', distinct)).
0.13/0.42	fof(wf_lt, axiom, ![X12, X13, X14]:((((leq(X13,X12)&leq(X12,X14))&X13!=X12)<=>wf(lt,X12,X13,X14))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+8.ax', wf_lt)).
0.13/0.42	fof(leq_def, axiom, ![X1, X2]:((leq(X1,X2)<=>(less(X1,X2)|X1=X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax', leq_def)).
0.13/0.42	fof(ord_v600_v1200, axiom, less(v600,v1200), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ord_v600_v1200)).
0.13/0.42	fof(ord_v0_v600, axiom, less(v0,v600), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ord_v0_v600)).
0.13/0.42	fof(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~(wf(lt,v600,v0,v1200)), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[odrl613])).
0.13/0.42	fof(c_0_7, plain, (v0!=v600&(v0!=v1200&v600!=v1200)), inference(epxand_distinct,[status(thm)],[distinct, theory(distinct)])).
0.13/0.42	fof(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ~wf(lt,v600,v0,v1200), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.13/0.42	fof(c_0_9, plain, ![X12, X13, X14]:((((leq(X13,X12)&leq(X12,X14))&X13!=X12)<=>wf(lt,X12,X13,X14))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[wf_lt])).
0.13/0.42	fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X35, X36]:(((~leq(X35,X36)|(less(X35,X36)|X35=X36))&((~less(X35,X36)|leq(X35,X36))&(X35!=X36|leq(X35,X36))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_def])])])])).
0.13/0.42	fof(c_0_11, plain, (v0!=v600&(v0!=v1200&v600!=v1200)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.13/0.42	fof(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ~wf(lt,v600,v0,v1200), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.13/0.42	fof(c_0_13, plain, ![X28, X29, X30]:(((~leq(X29,X28)|~leq(X28,X30)|X29=X28|wf(lt,X28,X29,X30))&(((leq(X29,X28)|~wf(lt,X28,X29,X30))&(leq(X28,X30)|~wf(lt,X28,X29,X30)))&(X29!=X28|~wf(lt,X28,X29,X30))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])])).
0.13/0.42	cnf(c_0_14, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~less(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.13/0.42	cnf(c_0_15, plain, (less(v600,v1200)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v600_v1200])).
0.13/0.42	cnf(c_0_16, plain, (less(v0,v600)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v0_v600])).
0.13/0.42	fof(c_0_17, plain, (v0!=v600&(v0!=v1200&v600!=v1200)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.13/0.42	cnf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, (~wf(lt,v600,v0,v1200)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])).
0.13/0.42	cnf(c_0_19, plain, (X1=X2|wf(lt,X2,X1,X3)|~leq(X1,X2)|~leq(X2,X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.13/0.42	cnf(c_0_20, plain, (leq(v600,v1200)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])).
0.13/0.42	cnf(c_0_21, plain, (leq(v0,v600)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_16])).
0.13/0.42	cnf(c_0_22, plain, (v0!=v600), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])).
0.13/0.42	cnf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19]), c_0_20]), c_0_21])]), c_0_22]), ['proof']).
0.13/0.42	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.13/0.42	% Parsed axioms                        : 60
0.13/0.42	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 23
0.13/0.42	% Initial clauses                      : 53
0.13/0.42	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.13/0.42	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 53
0.13/0.42	% Processed clauses                    : 121
0.13/0.42	% ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.13/0.42	% ...subsumed                          : 26
0.13/0.42	% ...remaining for further processing  : 95
0.13/0.42	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
0.13/0.42	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.13/0.42	% Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.13/0.42	% Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.13/0.42	% Generated clauses                    : 228
0.13/0.42	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 164
0.13/0.42	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.13/0.42	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.13/0.42	% Paramodulations                      : 223
0.13/0.42	% Factorizations                       : 2
0.13/0.42	% NegExts                              : 0
0.13/0.42	% Equation resolutions                 : 3
0.13/0.42	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.13/0.42	% Total rewrite steps                  : 56
0.13/0.42	% ...of those cached                   : 49
0.13/0.42	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.13/0.42	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.13/0.42	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.13/0.42	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.13/0.42	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.13/0.42	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.13/0.42	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.13/0.42	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.13/0.42	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.13/0.42	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.13/0.42	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.13/0.42	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.13/0.42	% Current number of processed clauses  : 92
0.13/0.42	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 15
0.13/0.42	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.13/0.42	%    Negative unit clauses             : 23
0.13/0.42	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 54
0.13/0.42	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 96
0.13/0.42	% ...number of literals in the above   : 341
0.13/0.42	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.13/0.42	% Current number of archived clauses   : 0
0.13/0.42	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 489
0.13/0.42	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 415
0.13/0.42	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 14
0.13/0.42	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 151
0.13/0.42	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.13/0.42	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.13/0.42	% BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.13/0.42	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.13/0.42	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.13/0.42	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 4668
0.13/0.42	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 560
0.13/0.42	
0.13/0.42	% -------------------------------------------------
0.13/0.42	% User time                : 0.011 s
0.13/0.42	% System time              : 0.000 s
0.13/0.42	% Total time               : 0.011 s
0.13/0.42	% Maximum resident set size: 3680 pages
0.13/0.42	
0.13/0.42	% -------------------------------------------------
0.13/0.42	% User time                : 0.013 s
0.13/0.42	% System time              : 0.004 s
0.13/0.42	% Total time               : 0.018 s
0.13/0.42	% Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
0.13/0.42	% E exiting
0.13/0.42	EOF