0.00/0.01	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.02	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.03/0.31	% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
0.03/0.31	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.03/0.31	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.03/0.31	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.03/0.31	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.03/0.31	% CPULimit : 1440
0.03/0.31	% WCLimit  : 180
0.03/0.31	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 04:28:00 UTC 2026
0.03/0.31	% CPUTime  : 
0.03/0.31	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.07/0.33	Running first-order theorem proving
0.07/0.33	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.07/0.35	% Version: 3.5.1
0.07/0.35	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.07/0.35	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.07/0.35	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.07/0.35	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.07/0.35	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.07/0.35	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.07/0.35	% G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 2845337 completed with status 0
0.07/0.35	% Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
0.07/0.35	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.07/0.35	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.07/0.35	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.07/0.35	% (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
0.07/0.35	% No SInE strategy applied
0.07/0.35	% Search class: FGHSF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
0.07/0.35	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.07/0.35	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
0.07/0.35	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 91s (1) cores
0.07/0.35	% Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 82s (1) cores
0.07/0.35	% Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
0.07/0.35	% Starting new_bool_3 with 82s (1) cores
0.07/0.35	% new_bool_3 with pid 2845348 completed with status 0
0.07/0.35	% Result found by new_bool_3
0.07/0.35	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.07/0.35	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.07/0.35	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.07/0.35	% (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
0.07/0.35	% No SInE strategy applied
0.07/0.35	% Search class: FGHSF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
0.07/0.35	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.07/0.35	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
0.07/0.35	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 91s (1) cores
0.07/0.35	% Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 82s (1) cores
0.07/0.35	% Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
0.07/0.35	% Starting new_bool_3 with 82s (1) cores
0.07/0.35	% Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.07/0.35	% Presaturation interreduction done
0.07/0.35	
0.07/0.35	% Proof found!
0.07/0.35	% SZS status Theorem
0.07/0.35	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.07/0.35	fof(leq_def, axiom, ![X1, X2]:((leq(X1,X2)<=>(less(X1,X2)|X1=X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax', leq_def)).
0.07/0.35	fof(odrl462, conjecture, ?[X1, X2]:(((in_lopen(X2,v0,v200)&((in_lopen(X2,v0,v400)&~(in_lopen(X1,v0,v600)))|(in_lopen(X1,v0,v600)&~(in_lopen(X2,v0,v400)))))&leq(v800,X1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', odrl462)).
0.07/0.35	fof(in_lopen, axiom, ![X1, X10, X11]:((in_lopen(X1,X10,X11)<=>(leq(X1,X11)&less(X10,X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+2.ax', in_lopen)).
0.07/0.35	fof(ord_v200_v400, axiom, less(v200,v400), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ord_v200_v400)).
0.07/0.35	fof(distinct, axiom, $distinct(v0,v200,v400,v600,v800), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', distinct)).
0.07/0.35	fof(ord_v0_v200, axiom, less(v0,v200), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ord_v0_v200)).
0.07/0.35	fof(leq_antisym, axiom, ![X1, X2]:(((leq(X2,X1)&leq(X1,X2))=>X2=X1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax', leq_antisym)).
0.07/0.35	fof(ord_v600_v800, axiom, less(v600,v800), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ord_v600_v800)).
0.07/0.35	fof(c_0_8, plain, ![X21, X22]:(((~leq(X21,X22)|(less(X21,X22)|X21=X22))&((~less(X21,X22)|leq(X21,X22))&(X21!=X22|leq(X21,X22))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_def])])])])).
0.07/0.35	fof(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1, X2]:(((in_lopen(X2,v0,v200)&((in_lopen(X2,v0,v400)&~(in_lopen(X1,v0,v600)))|(in_lopen(X1,v0,v600)&~(in_lopen(X2,v0,v400)))))&leq(v800,X1)))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[odrl462])).
0.07/0.35	fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X46, X47, X48]:((((leq(X46,X48)|~in_lopen(X46,X47,X48))&(less(X47,X46)|~in_lopen(X46,X47,X48)))&(~leq(X46,X48)|~less(X47,X46)|in_lopen(X46,X47,X48)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[in_lopen])])])])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_11, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|X1!=X2), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_12, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~less(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_13, plain, (less(v200,v400)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v200_v400])).
0.07/0.35	fof(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1, X2]:(((in_lopen(X2,v0,v200)&((in_lopen(X2,v0,v400)&~in_lopen(X1,v0,v600))|(in_lopen(X1,v0,v600)&~in_lopen(X2,v0,v400))))&leq(v800,X1)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_15, plain, (in_lopen(X1,X3,X2)|~leq(X1,X2)|~less(X3,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_16, plain, (leq(X1,X1)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_17, plain, (leq(v200,v400)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])).
0.07/0.35	fof(c_0_18, plain, (v0!=v200&(v0!=v400&(v0!=v600&(v0!=v800&(v200!=v400&(v200!=v600&(v200!=v800&(v400!=v600&(v400!=v800&v600!=v800))))))))), inference(epxand_distinct,[status(thm)],[distinct, theory(distinct)])).
0.07/0.35	fof(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ![X85, X86]:(((~in_lopen(X86,v0,v400)|in_lopen(X85,v0,v600)|~in_lopen(X86,v0,v200)|~leq(v800,X85))&(~in_lopen(X85,v0,v600)|in_lopen(X86,v0,v400)|~in_lopen(X86,v0,v200)|~leq(v800,X85)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])])])])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_20, plain, (in_lopen(X1,X2,X1)|~less(X2,X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_21, plain, (less(v0,v200)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v0_v200])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_22, plain, (in_lopen(v200,X1,v400)|~less(X1,v200)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_17])).
0.07/0.35	fof(c_0_23, plain, (v0!=v200&(v0!=v400&(v0!=v600&(v0!=v800&(v200!=v400&(v200!=v600&(v200!=v800&(v400!=v600&(v400!=v800&v600!=v800))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, (in_lopen(X2,v0,v600)|~in_lopen(X1,v0,v400)|~in_lopen(X1,v0,v200)|~leq(v800,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_25, plain, (in_lopen(v200,v0,v200)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_26, plain, (in_lopen(v200,v0,v400)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_21])).
0.07/0.35	fof(c_0_27, plain, ![X29, X30]:((~leq(X30,X29)|~leq(X29,X30)|X30=X29)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_antisym])])])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_28, plain, (less(v600,v800)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v600_v800])).
0.07/0.35	fof(c_0_29, plain, (v0!=v200&(v0!=v400&(v0!=v600&(v0!=v800&(v200!=v400&(v200!=v600&(v200!=v800&(v400!=v600&(v400!=v800&v600!=v800))))))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, (in_lopen(X1,v0,v600)|~leq(v800,X1)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_25]), c_0_26])])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_31, plain, (X1=X2|~leq(X1,X2)|~leq(X2,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_32, plain, (leq(v600,v800)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_28])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_33, plain, (v600!=v800), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_34, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~in_lopen(X1,X3,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_35, negated_conjecture, (in_lopen(v800,v0,v600)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30, c_0_16])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_36, plain, (~leq(v800,v600)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31, c_0_32]), c_0_33])).
0.07/0.35	cnf(c_0_37, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34, c_0_35]), c_0_36]), ['proof']).
0.07/0.35	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.07/0.35	% Parsed axioms                        : 44
0.07/0.35	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.07/0.35	% Initial clauses                      : 72
0.07/0.35	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.07/0.35	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 72
0.07/0.35	% Processed clauses                    : 225
0.07/0.35	% ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.07/0.35	% ...subsumed                          : 6
0.07/0.35	% ...remaining for further processing  : 219
0.07/0.35	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 7
0.07/0.35	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.07/0.35	% Backward-subsumed                    : 1
0.07/0.35	% Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.07/0.35	% Generated clauses                    : 275
0.07/0.35	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 191
0.07/0.35	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.07/0.35	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.07/0.35	% Paramodulations                      : 265
0.07/0.35	% Factorizations                       : 4
0.07/0.35	% NegExts                              : 0
0.07/0.35	% Equation resolutions                 : 7
0.07/0.35	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.07/0.35	% Total rewrite steps                  : 86
0.07/0.35	% ...of those cached                   : 58
0.07/0.35	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.07/0.35	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.07/0.35	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.07/0.35	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.07/0.35	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.07/0.35	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.07/0.35	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.07/0.35	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.07/0.35	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.07/0.35	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.07/0.36	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.07/0.36	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.07/0.36	% Current number of processed clauses  : 141
0.07/0.36	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 49
0.07/0.36	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.07/0.36	%    Negative unit clauses             : 24
0.07/0.36	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 68
0.07/0.36	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 109
0.07/0.36	% ...number of literals in the above   : 276
0.07/0.36	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.07/0.36	% Current number of archived clauses   : 72
0.07/0.36	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 555
0.07/0.36	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 421
0.07/0.36	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 7
0.07/0.36	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 276
0.07/0.36	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.07/0.36	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 14
0.07/0.36	% BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.07/0.36	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.07/0.36	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.07/0.36	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 6483
0.07/0.36	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 844
0.07/0.36	
0.07/0.36	% -------------------------------------------------
0.07/0.36	% User time                : 0.008 s
0.07/0.36	% System time              : 0.002 s
0.07/0.36	% Total time               : 0.010 s
0.07/0.36	% Maximum resident set size: 3672 pages
0.07/0.36	
0.07/0.36	% -------------------------------------------------
0.07/0.36	% User time                : 0.031 s
0.07/0.36	% System time              : 0.013 s
0.07/0.36	% Total time               : 0.044 s
0.07/0.36	% Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
0.07/0.36	% E exiting
0.07/0.36	EOF