0.00/0.03	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.05	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.12/0.38	% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
0.12/0.38	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.38	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.38	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.12/0.38	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.12/0.38	% CPULimit : 1440
0.12/0.38	% WCLimit  : 180
0.12/0.38	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:29:50 UTC 2026
0.12/0.38	% CPUTime  : 
0.12/0.38	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.12/0.43	Running first-order theorem proving
0.12/0.43	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.12/0.48	% Version: 3.5.1
0.12/0.48	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.12/0.48	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.12/0.48	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.12/0.48	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.12/0.48	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.12/0.48	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.12/0.48	% G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 1125288 completed with status 0
0.12/0.48	% Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
0.12/0.48	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.12/0.48	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.12/0.48	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.12/0.48	% (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
0.12/0.48	% No SInE strategy applied
0.12/0.48	% Search class: FGHSF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
0.12/0.48	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.12/0.48	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
0.12/0.48	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 91s (1) cores
0.12/0.48	% Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 82s (1) cores
0.12/0.48	% Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
0.12/0.48	% Starting new_bool_3 with 82s (1) cores
0.12/0.48	% new_bool_3 with pid 1125297 completed with status 0
0.12/0.48	% Result found by new_bool_3
0.12/0.48	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.12/0.48	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.12/0.48	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.12/0.48	% (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
0.12/0.48	% No SInE strategy applied
0.12/0.48	% Search class: FGHSF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
0.12/0.48	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.12/0.48	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
0.12/0.48	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 91s (1) cores
0.12/0.48	% Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 82s (1) cores
0.12/0.48	% Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
0.12/0.48	% Starting new_bool_3 with 82s (1) cores
0.12/0.48	% Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
0.12/0.48	% Presaturation interreduction done
0.12/0.48	
0.12/0.48	% Proof found!
0.12/0.48	% SZS status Theorem
0.12/0.48	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.12/0.48	fof(odrl445, conjecture, ~(?[X1, X2, X3]:(((((in_lopen(X1,v0,v200)|in_lopen(X2,v0,v100)|in_lopen(X3,v0,v50))&leq(v400,X1))&leq(v200,X2))&leq(v100,X3)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', odrl445)).
0.12/0.48	fof(in_lopen, axiom, ![X1, X10, X11]:((in_lopen(X1,X10,X11)<=>(leq(X1,X11)&less(X10,X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+2.ax', in_lopen)).
0.12/0.48	fof(leq_trans, axiom, ![X1, X2, X3]:(((leq(X1,X2)&leq(X2,X3))=>leq(X1,X3))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax', leq_trans)).
0.12/0.48	fof(leq_def, axiom, ![X1, X2]:((leq(X1,X2)<=>(less(X1,X2)|X1=X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax', leq_def)).
0.12/0.48	fof(leq_antisym, axiom, ![X1, X2]:(((leq(X2,X1)&leq(X1,X2))=>X2=X1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax', leq_antisym)).
0.12/0.48	fof(ord_v100_v200, axiom, less(v100,v200), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ord_v100_v200)).
0.12/0.48	fof(ord_v200_v400, axiom, less(v200,v400), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ord_v200_v400)).
0.12/0.48	fof(distinct, axiom, $distinct(v0,v50,v100,v200,v400), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', distinct)).
0.12/0.48	fof(ord_v50_v100, axiom, less(v50,v100), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ord_v50_v100)).
0.12/0.48	fof(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ~(~(?[X1, X2, X3]:(((((in_lopen(X1,v0,v200)|in_lopen(X2,v0,v100)|in_lopen(X3,v0,v50))&leq(v400,X1))&leq(v200,X2))&leq(v100,X3))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[odrl445])).
0.12/0.48	fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X46, X47, X48]:((((leq(X46,X48)|~in_lopen(X46,X47,X48))&(less(X47,X46)|~in_lopen(X46,X47,X48)))&(~leq(X46,X48)|~less(X47,X46)|in_lopen(X46,X47,X48)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[in_lopen])])])])).
0.12/0.48	fof(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ((((in_lopen(esk4_0,v0,v200)|in_lopen(esk5_0,v0,v100)|in_lopen(esk6_0,v0,v50))&leq(v400,esk4_0))&leq(v200,esk5_0))&leq(v100,esk6_0)), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_12, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~in_lopen(X1,X3,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, (in_lopen(esk4_0,v0,v200)|in_lopen(esk5_0,v0,v100)|in_lopen(esk6_0,v0,v50)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, (in_lopen(esk6_0,v0,v50)|in_lopen(esk4_0,v0,v200)|leq(esk5_0,v100)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])).
0.12/0.48	fof(c_0_15, plain, ![X23, X24, X25]:((~leq(X23,X24)|~leq(X24,X25)|leq(X23,X25))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_trans])])])).
0.12/0.48	fof(c_0_16, plain, ![X21, X22]:(((~leq(X21,X22)|(less(X21,X22)|X21=X22))&((~less(X21,X22)|leq(X21,X22))&(X21!=X22|leq(X21,X22))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_def])])])])).
0.12/0.48	fof(c_0_17, plain, ![X29, X30]:((~leq(X30,X29)|~leq(X29,X30)|X30=X29)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_antisym])])])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, (in_lopen(esk6_0,v0,v50)|leq(esk5_0,v100)|leq(esk4_0,v200)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_14])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_19, plain, (leq(X1,X3)|~leq(X1,X2)|~leq(X2,X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, (leq(v200,esk5_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_21, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~less(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_22, plain, (less(v100,v200)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v100_v200])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_23, plain, (X1=X2|~leq(X1,X2)|~leq(X2,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, (leq(esk4_0,v200)|leq(esk5_0,v100)|leq(esk6_0,v50)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_18])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, (leq(X1,esk5_0)|~leq(X1,v200)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_26, plain, (leq(v100,v200)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, (esk5_0=v100|leq(esk6_0,v50)|leq(esk4_0,v200)|~leq(v100,esk5_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, (leq(v100,esk5_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, (leq(v400,esk4_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_30, plain, (less(v200,v400)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v200_v400])).
0.12/0.48	fof(c_0_31, plain, (v0!=v50&(v0!=v100&(v0!=v200&(v0!=v400&(v50!=v100&(v50!=v200&(v50!=v400&(v100!=v200&(v100!=v400&v200!=v400))))))))), inference(epxand_distinct,[status(thm)],[distinct, theory(distinct)])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, (esk5_0=v100|leq(esk4_0,v200)|leq(esk6_0,v50)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_28])])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, (leq(X1,esk4_0)|~leq(X1,v400)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_29])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_34, plain, (leq(v200,v400)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_30])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_35, negated_conjecture, (leq(v100,esk6_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_36, plain, (less(v50,v100)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v50_v100])).
0.12/0.48	fof(c_0_37, plain, (v0!=v50&(v0!=v100&(v0!=v200&(v0!=v400&(v50!=v100&(v50!=v200&(v50!=v400&(v100!=v200&(v100!=v400&v200!=v400))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_31])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_38, negated_conjecture, (esk5_0=v100|esk4_0=v200|leq(esk6_0,v50)|~leq(v200,esk4_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_32])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_39, negated_conjecture, (leq(v200,esk4_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33, c_0_34])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_40, negated_conjecture, (leq(X1,esk6_0)|~leq(X1,v100)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_35])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_41, plain, (leq(v50,v100)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_36])).
0.12/0.48	fof(c_0_42, plain, (v0!=v50&(v0!=v100&(v0!=v200&(v0!=v400&(v50!=v100&(v50!=v200&(v50!=v400&(v100!=v200&(v100!=v400&v200!=v400))))))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_37])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_43, negated_conjecture, (esk4_0=v200|esk5_0=v100|leq(esk6_0,v50)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38, c_0_39])])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_44, negated_conjecture, (leq(v50,esk6_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40, c_0_41])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_45, plain, (v100!=v200), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_46, negated_conjecture, (esk5_0=v100|esk4_0=v200|esk6_0=v50), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_43]), c_0_44])])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_47, plain, (~leq(v200,v100)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_26]), c_0_45])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_48, plain, (v200!=v400), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_49, negated_conjecture, (esk6_0=v50|esk4_0=v200), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_46]), c_0_47])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_50, plain, (~leq(v400,v200)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_34]), c_0_48])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_51, negated_conjecture, (esk6_0=v100|~leq(esk6_0,v100)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_35])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_52, negated_conjecture, (esk6_0=v50), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_49]), c_0_50])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_53, plain, (v50!=v100), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42])).
0.12/0.48	cnf(c_0_54, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_51, c_0_52]), c_0_52]), c_0_41])]), c_0_53]), ['proof']).
0.12/0.48	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.12/0.48	% Parsed axioms                        : 44
0.12/0.48	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.12/0.48	% Initial clauses                      : 74
0.12/0.48	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.12/0.48	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 74
0.12/0.48	% Processed clauses                    : 236
0.12/0.48	% ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.12/0.48	% ...subsumed                          : 5
0.12/0.48	% ...remaining for further processing  : 231
0.12/0.48	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 7
0.12/0.48	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.12/0.48	% Backward-subsumed                    : 3
0.12/0.48	% Backward-rewritten                   : 26
0.12/0.48	% Generated clauses                    : 461
0.12/0.48	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 408
0.12/0.48	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.12/0.48	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.12/0.48	% Paramodulations                      : 451
0.12/0.48	% Factorizations                       : 4
0.12/0.48	% NegExts                              : 0
0.12/0.48	% Equation resolutions                 : 7
0.12/0.48	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.12/0.48	% Total rewrite steps                  : 107
0.12/0.48	% ...of those cached                   : 72
0.12/0.48	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.12/0.48	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.12/0.48	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.12/0.48	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.12/0.48	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.12/0.48	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.12/0.48	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.12/0.48	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.12/0.48	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.12/0.48	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.12/0.48	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.12/0.48	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.12/0.48	% Current number of processed clauses  : 123
0.12/0.48	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 40
0.12/0.48	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.12/0.48	%    Negative unit clauses             : 24
0.12/0.48	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 59
0.12/0.48	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 314
0.12/0.48	% ...number of literals in the above   : 861
0.12/0.48	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.12/0.48	% Current number of archived clauses   : 102
0.12/0.48	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1195
0.12/0.48	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 840
0.12/0.48	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 8
0.12/0.48	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 233
0.12/0.48	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.12/0.48	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 9
0.12/0.48	% BW rewrite match successes           : 3
0.12/0.48	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.12/0.48	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.12/0.48	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 7703
0.12/0.48	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 818
0.12/0.48	
0.12/0.48	% -------------------------------------------------
0.12/0.48	% User time                : 0.019 s
0.12/0.48	% System time              : 0.005 s
0.12/0.48	% Total time               : 0.024 s
0.12/0.48	% Maximum resident set size: 3416 pages
0.12/0.48	
0.12/0.48	% -------------------------------------------------
0.12/0.48	% User time                : 0.073 s
0.12/0.48	% System time              : 0.019 s
0.12/0.48	% Total time               : 0.092 s
0.12/0.48	% Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
0.12/0.48	% E exiting
0.34/0.49	EOF