0.00/0.03	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.05	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.11/0.37	% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
0.11/0.37	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.37	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.37	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.11/0.37	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.11/0.37	% CPULimit : 1440
0.11/0.37	% WCLimit  : 180
0.11/0.37	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 08:59:19 UTC 2026
0.11/0.37	% CPUTime  : 
0.11/0.37	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.14/0.41	Running first-order theorem proving
0.14/0.41	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.14/0.43	% Version: 3.5.1
0.14/0.43	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.14/0.43	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.14/0.43	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.14/0.43	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.43	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.43	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.43	% new_bool_3 with pid 2847434 completed with status 0
0.14/0.43	% Result found by new_bool_3
0.14/0.43	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.14/0.43	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.14/0.43	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.14/0.43	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.43	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.14/0.43	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.14/0.43	% Search class: FGUSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
0.14/0.43	% partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
0.14/0.43	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.14/0.43	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.14/0.43	% SubtermCWHack with pid 2847437 completed with status 0
0.14/0.43	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.14/0.43	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.14/0.43	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.14/0.43	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.14/0.43	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.43	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.14/0.43	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.14/0.43	% Search class: FGUSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
0.14/0.43	% partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
0.14/0.43	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.14/0.43	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.14/0.43	% Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
0.14/0.43	
0.14/0.43	% Proof found!
0.14/0.43	% SZS status Theorem
0.14/0.43	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.14/0.43	fof(odrl411, conjecture, ~(?[X1, X2, X3]:((((((less(v300,X2)&in_lopen(X3,v0,v32))&leq(v16,X3))&in_open(X2,v0,v500))&in_closed(X1,v601,v601))&in_closed(X1,v600,v600)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', odrl411)).
0.14/0.43	fof(in_closed, axiom, ![X1, X10, X11]:(((leq(X1,X11)&leq(X10,X1))<=>in_closed(X1,X10,X11))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+2.ax', in_closed)).
0.14/0.43	fof(leq_antisym, axiom, ![X1, X2]:(((leq(X2,X1)&leq(X1,X2))=>X2=X1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax', leq_antisym)).
0.14/0.43	fof(distinct, axiom, $distinct(v0,v16,v32,v300,v500,v600,v601), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', distinct)).
0.14/0.43	fof(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~(~(?[X1, X2, X3]:((((((less(v300,X2)&in_lopen(X3,v0,v32))&leq(v16,X3))&in_open(X2,v0,v500))&in_closed(X1,v601,v601))&in_closed(X1,v600,v600))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[odrl411])).
0.14/0.43	fof(c_0_5, plain, ![X16, X17, X18]:(((~leq(X16,X18)|~leq(X17,X16)|in_closed(X16,X17,X18))&((leq(X16,X18)|~in_closed(X16,X17,X18))&(leq(X17,X16)|~in_closed(X16,X17,X18))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[in_closed])])])])).
0.14/0.43	fof(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (((((less(v300,esk2_0)&in_lopen(esk3_0,v0,v32))&leq(v16,esk3_0))&in_open(esk2_0,v0,v500))&in_closed(esk1_0,v601,v601))&in_closed(esk1_0,v600,v600)), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])).
0.14/0.43	fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X33, X34]:((~leq(X34,X33)|~leq(X33,X34)|X34=X33)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_antisym])])])).
0.14/0.43	cnf(c_0_8, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~in_closed(X1,X3,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.14/0.43	cnf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (in_closed(esk1_0,v601,v601)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.14/0.43	cnf(c_0_10, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~in_closed(X2,X1,X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.14/0.43	fof(c_0_11, plain, (v0!=v16&(v0!=v32&(v0!=v300&(v0!=v500&(v0!=v600&(v0!=v601&(v16!=v32&(v16!=v300&(v16!=v500&(v16!=v600&(v16!=v601&(v32!=v300&(v32!=v500&(v32!=v600&(v32!=v601&(v300!=v500&(v300!=v600&(v300!=v601&(v500!=v600&(v500!=v601&v600!=v601)))))))))))))))))))), inference(epxand_distinct,[status(thm)],[distinct, theory(distinct)])).
0.14/0.43	cnf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (in_closed(esk1_0,v600,v600)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.14/0.43	cnf(c_0_13, plain, (X1=X2|~leq(X1,X2)|~leq(X2,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.14/0.43	cnf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, (leq(esk1_0,v601)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])).
0.14/0.43	cnf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, (leq(v601,esk1_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_9])).
0.14/0.43	fof(c_0_16, plain, (v0!=v16&(v0!=v32&(v0!=v300&(v0!=v500&(v0!=v600&(v0!=v601&(v16!=v32&(v16!=v300&(v16!=v500&(v16!=v600&(v16!=v601&(v32!=v300&(v32!=v500&(v32!=v600&(v32!=v601&(v300!=v500&(v300!=v600&(v300!=v601&(v500!=v600&(v500!=v601&v600!=v601)))))))))))))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.14/0.43	cnf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (leq(v600,esk1_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_12])).
0.14/0.43	cnf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, (esk1_0=v601), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14]), c_0_15])])).
0.14/0.43	cnf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, (leq(esk1_0,v600)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_12])).
0.14/0.43	fof(c_0_20, plain, (v0!=v16&(v0!=v32&(v0!=v300&(v0!=v500&(v0!=v600&(v0!=v601&(v16!=v32&(v16!=v300&(v16!=v500&(v16!=v600&(v16!=v601&(v32!=v300&(v32!=v500&(v32!=v600&(v32!=v601&(v300!=v500&(v300!=v600&(v300!=v601&(v500!=v600&(v500!=v601&v600!=v601)))))))))))))))))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])).
0.14/0.43	cnf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, (leq(v600,v601)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18])).
0.14/0.43	cnf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, (leq(v601,v600)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_18])).
0.14/0.43	cnf(c_0_23, plain, (v600!=v601), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])).
0.14/0.43	cnf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_21]), c_0_22])]), c_0_23]), ['proof']).
0.14/0.43	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.14/0.43	% Parsed axioms                        : 57
0.14/0.43	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 15
0.14/0.43	% Initial clauses                      : 75
0.14/0.43	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.14/0.43	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 75
0.14/0.43	% Processed clauses                    : 80
0.14/0.43	% ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.14/0.43	% ...subsumed                          : 1
0.14/0.43	% ...remaining for further processing  : 79
0.14/0.43	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
0.14/0.43	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.14/0.43	% Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.14/0.43	% Backward-rewritten                   : 6
0.14/0.43	% Generated clauses                    : 29
0.14/0.43	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 28
0.14/0.43	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.14/0.43	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.14/0.43	% Paramodulations                      : 26
0.14/0.43	% Factorizations                       : 2
0.14/0.43	% NegExts                              : 0
0.14/0.43	% Equation resolutions                 : 1
0.14/0.43	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.14/0.43	% Total rewrite steps                  : 14
0.14/0.43	% ...of those cached                   : 6
0.14/0.43	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.14/0.43	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.14/0.43	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.14/0.43	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.14/0.43	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.14/0.43	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.14/0.43	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.14/0.43	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.14/0.43	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.14/0.43	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.14/0.43	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.14/0.43	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.14/0.43	% Current number of processed clauses  : 72
0.14/0.43	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 40
0.14/0.43	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.14/0.43	%    Negative unit clauses             : 22
0.14/0.43	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 10
0.14/0.43	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 20
0.14/0.43	% ...number of literals in the above   : 44
0.14/0.43	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.14/0.43	% Current number of archived clauses   : 6
0.14/0.43	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 34
0.14/0.43	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 31
0.14/0.43	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
0.14/0.43	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 70
0.14/0.43	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.14/0.43	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
0.14/0.43	% BW rewrite match successes           : 1
0.14/0.43	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.14/0.43	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.14/0.43	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 2756
0.14/0.43	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 498
0.14/0.43	
0.14/0.43	% -------------------------------------------------
0.14/0.43	% User time                : 0.006 s
0.14/0.43	% System time              : 0.004 s
0.14/0.43	% Total time               : 0.010 s
0.14/0.43	% Maximum resident set size: 3684 pages
0.14/0.43	
0.14/0.43	% -------------------------------------------------
0.14/0.43	% User time                : 0.008 s
0.14/0.43	% System time              : 0.006 s
0.14/0.43	% Total time               : 0.014 s
0.14/0.43	% Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
0.14/0.43	% E exiting
0.14/0.44	EOF