0.00/0.01	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.02	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.03/0.36	% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
0.03/0.36	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.03/0.36	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.03/0.36	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.03/0.36	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.03/0.36	% CPULimit : 1440
0.03/0.36	% WCLimit  : 180
0.03/0.36	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 03:56:01 UTC 2026
0.03/0.37	% CPUTime  : 
0.03/0.37	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.03/0.39	Running first-order theorem proving
0.03/0.39	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.03/0.41	% Version: 3.5.1
0.03/0.41	% Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.03/0.41	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.03/0.41	% Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 900s (5) cores
0.03/0.41	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.03/0.41	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.03/0.41	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.03/0.41	% new_bool_3 with pid 2812424 completed with status 0
0.03/0.41	% Result found by new_bool_3
0.03/0.41	% Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.03/0.41	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.03/0.41	% Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 900s (5) cores
0.03/0.41	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.03/0.41	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.03/0.41	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.03/0.41	% Search class: FGUSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
0.03/0.41	% partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
0.03/0.41	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.03/0.41	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.03/0.41	% SubtermCWHack with pid 2812427 completed with status 0
0.03/0.41	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.03/0.41	% Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.03/0.41	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.03/0.41	% Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 900s (5) cores
0.03/0.41	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.03/0.41	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.03/0.41	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.03/0.41	% Search class: FGUSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
0.03/0.41	% partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
0.03/0.41	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.03/0.41	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.03/0.41	% Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.03/0.41	
0.03/0.41	% Proof found!
0.03/0.41	% SZS status Theorem
0.03/0.41	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.03/0.41	fof(odrl365, conjecture, ~(?[X1, X2, X3, X13]:((((((((in_closed(X1,v800,v800)&less(v100,X2))&in_open(X2,v0,v500))&in_lopen(X3,v0,v32))&in_lopen(X13,v0,v300))&leq(v150,X13))&leq(v8,X3))&in_closed(X1,v600,v600)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', odrl365)).
0.03/0.41	fof(in_closed, axiom, ![X1, X10, X11]:(((leq(X1,X11)&leq(X10,X1))<=>in_closed(X1,X10,X11))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+2.ax', in_closed)).
0.03/0.41	fof(leq_antisym, axiom, ![X1, X2]:(((leq(X2,X1)&leq(X1,X2))=>X2=X1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax', leq_antisym)).
0.03/0.41	fof(distinct, axiom, $distinct(v0,v8,v32,v100,v150,v300,v500,v600,v800), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', distinct)).
0.03/0.41	fof(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~(~(?[X1, X2, X3, X13]:((((((((in_closed(X1,v800,v800)&less(v100,X2))&in_open(X2,v0,v500))&in_lopen(X3,v0,v32))&in_lopen(X13,v0,v300))&leq(v150,X13))&leq(v8,X3))&in_closed(X1,v600,v600))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[odrl365])).
0.03/0.41	fof(c_0_5, plain, ![X18, X19, X20]:(((~leq(X18,X20)|~leq(X19,X18)|in_closed(X18,X19,X20))&((leq(X18,X20)|~in_closed(X18,X19,X20))&(leq(X19,X18)|~in_closed(X18,X19,X20))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[in_closed])])])])).
0.03/0.41	fof(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (((((((in_closed(esk1_0,v800,v800)&less(v100,esk2_0))&in_open(esk2_0,v0,v500))&in_lopen(esk3_0,v0,v32))&in_lopen(esk4_0,v0,v300))&leq(v150,esk4_0))&leq(v8,esk3_0))&in_closed(esk1_0,v600,v600)), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])).
0.03/0.41	fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X32, X33]:((~leq(X33,X32)|~leq(X32,X33)|X33=X32)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_antisym])])])).
0.03/0.41	cnf(c_0_8, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~in_closed(X1,X3,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.03/0.41	cnf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (in_closed(esk1_0,v600,v600)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.03/0.41	cnf(c_0_10, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~in_closed(X2,X1,X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.03/0.41	fof(c_0_11, plain, (v0!=v8&(v0!=v32&(v0!=v100&(v0!=v150&(v0!=v300&(v0!=v500&(v0!=v600&(v0!=v800&(v8!=v32&(v8!=v100&(v8!=v150&(v8!=v300&(v8!=v500&(v8!=v600&(v8!=v800&(v32!=v100&(v32!=v150&(v32!=v300&(v32!=v500&(v32!=v600&(v32!=v800&(v100!=v150&(v100!=v300&(v100!=v500&(v100!=v600&(v100!=v800&(v150!=v300&(v150!=v500&(v150!=v600&(v150!=v800&(v300!=v500&(v300!=v600&(v300!=v800&(v500!=v600&(v500!=v800&v600!=v800))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))), inference(epxand_distinct,[status(thm)],[distinct, theory(distinct)])).
0.03/0.41	cnf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (in_closed(esk1_0,v800,v800)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.03/0.41	cnf(c_0_13, plain, (X1=X2|~leq(X1,X2)|~leq(X2,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.03/0.41	cnf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, (leq(esk1_0,v600)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])).
0.03/0.41	cnf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, (leq(v600,esk1_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_9])).
0.03/0.41	fof(c_0_16, plain, (v0!=v8&(v0!=v32&(v0!=v100&(v0!=v150&(v0!=v300&(v0!=v500&(v0!=v600&(v0!=v800&(v8!=v32&(v8!=v100&(v8!=v150&(v8!=v300&(v8!=v500&(v8!=v600&(v8!=v800&(v32!=v100&(v32!=v150&(v32!=v300&(v32!=v500&(v32!=v600&(v32!=v800&(v100!=v150&(v100!=v300&(v100!=v500&(v100!=v600&(v100!=v800&(v150!=v300&(v150!=v500&(v150!=v600&(v150!=v800&(v300!=v500&(v300!=v600&(v300!=v800&(v500!=v600&(v500!=v800&v600!=v800))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.03/0.41	cnf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (leq(v800,esk1_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_12])).
0.03/0.41	cnf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, (esk1_0=v600), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14]), c_0_15])])).
0.03/0.41	cnf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, (leq(esk1_0,v800)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_12])).
0.03/0.41	fof(c_0_20, plain, (v0!=v8&(v0!=v32&(v0!=v100&(v0!=v150&(v0!=v300&(v0!=v500&(v0!=v600&(v0!=v800&(v8!=v32&(v8!=v100&(v8!=v150&(v8!=v300&(v8!=v500&(v8!=v600&(v8!=v800&(v32!=v100&(v32!=v150&(v32!=v300&(v32!=v500&(v32!=v600&(v32!=v800&(v100!=v150&(v100!=v300&(v100!=v500&(v100!=v600&(v100!=v800&(v150!=v300&(v150!=v500&(v150!=v600&(v150!=v800&(v300!=v500&(v300!=v600&(v300!=v800&(v500!=v600&(v500!=v800&v600!=v800))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])).
0.03/0.41	cnf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, (leq(v800,v600)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18])).
0.03/0.41	cnf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, (leq(v600,v800)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_18])).
0.03/0.41	cnf(c_0_23, plain, (v600!=v800), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])).
0.03/0.41	cnf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_21]), c_0_22])]), c_0_23]), ['proof']).
0.03/0.41	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.03/0.41	% Parsed axioms                        : 74
0.03/0.41	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 15
0.03/0.41	% Initial clauses                      : 109
0.03/0.41	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.03/0.41	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 109
0.03/0.41	% Processed clauses                    : 125
0.03/0.41	% ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.03/0.41	% ...subsumed                          : 1
0.03/0.41	% ...remaining for further processing  : 124
0.03/0.41	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
0.03/0.41	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.03/0.41	% Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.03/0.41	% Backward-rewritten                   : 10
0.03/0.41	% Generated clauses                    : 35
0.03/0.41	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 34
0.03/0.41	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.03/0.41	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.03/0.41	% Paramodulations                      : 32
0.03/0.41	% Factorizations                       : 2
0.03/0.41	% NegExts                              : 0
0.03/0.41	% Equation resolutions                 : 1
0.03/0.41	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.03/0.41	% Total rewrite steps                  : 24
0.03/0.41	% ...of those cached                   : 15
0.03/0.41	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.03/0.41	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.03/0.41	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.03/0.41	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.03/0.41	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.03/0.41	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.03/0.41	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.03/0.41	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.03/0.41	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.03/0.41	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.03/0.41	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.03/0.41	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.03/0.41	% Current number of processed clauses  : 113
0.03/0.41	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 62
0.03/0.41	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.03/0.41	%    Negative unit clauses             : 37
0.03/0.41	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 14
0.03/0.41	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15
0.03/0.41	% ...number of literals in the above   : 35
0.03/0.41	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.03/0.41	% Current number of archived clauses   : 10
0.03/0.41	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 36
0.03/0.41	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 33
0.03/0.41	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
0.03/0.41	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 462
0.03/0.41	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.03/0.41	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
0.03/0.41	% BW rewrite match successes           : 1
0.03/0.41	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.03/0.41	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.03/0.41	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 3511
0.03/0.41	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 593
0.03/0.41	
0.03/0.41	% -------------------------------------------------
0.03/0.41	% User time                : 0.005 s
0.03/0.41	% System time              : 0.001 s
0.03/0.41	% Total time               : 0.006 s
0.03/0.41	% Maximum resident set size: 3696 pages
0.03/0.41	
0.03/0.41	% -------------------------------------------------
0.03/0.41	% User time                : 0.007 s
0.03/0.41	% System time              : 0.003 s
0.03/0.41	% Total time               : 0.010 s
0.03/0.41	% Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
0.03/0.41	% E exiting
0.03/0.41	EOF