0.00/0.02	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.04	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.09/0.36	% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
0.09/0.36	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.09/0.36	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.09/0.36	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.09/0.36	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.09/0.36	% CPULimit : 1440
0.09/0.36	% WCLimit  : 180
0.09/0.36	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:26:21 UTC 2026
0.09/0.36	% CPUTime  : 
0.09/0.36	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.09/0.41	Running first-order theorem proving
0.09/0.41	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.09/0.44	% Version: 3.5.1
0.09/0.44	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.09/0.44	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.09/0.44	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.09/0.44	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.09/0.44	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.09/0.44	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.09/0.44	% new_bool_3 with pid 1121892 completed with status 0
0.09/0.44	% Result found by new_bool_3
0.09/0.44	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.09/0.44	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.09/0.44	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.09/0.44	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.09/0.44	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.09/0.44	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.09/0.44	% Search class: FGUSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
0.09/0.44	% partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
0.09/0.44	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.09/0.44	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.09/0.44	% SubtermCWHack with pid 1121895 completed with status 0
0.09/0.45	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.09/0.45	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.09/0.45	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.09/0.45	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.09/0.45	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.09/0.45	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.09/0.45	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.09/0.45	% Search class: FGUSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
0.09/0.45	% partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
0.09/0.45	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.09/0.45	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.09/0.45	% Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.09/0.45	
0.09/0.45	% Proof found!
0.09/0.45	% SZS status Theorem
0.09/0.45	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.09/0.45	fof(leq_def, axiom, ![X1, X2]:((leq(X1,X2)<=>(less(X1,X2)|X1=X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax', leq_def)).
0.09/0.45	fof(leq_trans, axiom, ![X1, X2, X3]:(((leq(X1,X2)&leq(X2,X3))=>leq(X1,X3))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax', leq_trans)).
0.09/0.45	fof(odrl350, conjecture, ?[X1, X2, X3]:((((~(((in_lopen(X3,v0,v16)&in_lopen(X2,v0,v800))&in_lopen(X1,v0,v1200)))&in_lopen(X3,v0,v32))&in_lopen(X2,v0,v400))&in_lopen(X1,v0,v600))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', odrl350)).
0.09/0.45	fof(in_lopen, axiom, ![X1, X10, X11]:((in_lopen(X1,X10,X11)<=>(leq(X1,X11)&less(X10,X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+2.ax', in_lopen)).
0.09/0.45	fof(distinct, axiom, $distinct(v0,v16,v32,v400,v600,v800,v1200), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', distinct)).
0.09/0.45	fof(ord_v16_v32, axiom, less(v16,v32), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ord_v16_v32)).
0.09/0.45	fof(ord_v0_v600, axiom, less(v0,v600), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ord_v0_v600)).
0.09/0.45	fof(leq_antisym, axiom, ![X1, X2]:(((leq(X2,X1)&leq(X1,X2))=>X2=X1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax', leq_antisym)).
0.09/0.45	fof(ord_v0_v400, axiom, less(v0,v400), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ord_v0_v400)).
0.09/0.45	fof(ord_v0_v32, axiom, less(v0,v32), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ord_v0_v32)).
0.09/0.45	fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X28, X29]:(((~leq(X28,X29)|(less(X28,X29)|X28=X29))&((~less(X28,X29)|leq(X28,X29))&(X28!=X29|leq(X28,X29))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_def])])])])).
0.09/0.45	fof(c_0_11, plain, ![X30, X31, X32]:((~leq(X30,X31)|~leq(X31,X32)|leq(X30,X32))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_trans])])])).
0.09/0.45	fof(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1, X2, X3]:((((~(((in_lopen(X3,v0,v16)&in_lopen(X2,v0,v800))&in_lopen(X1,v0,v1200)))&in_lopen(X3,v0,v32))&in_lopen(X2,v0,v400))&in_lopen(X1,v0,v600)))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[odrl350])).
0.09/0.45	fof(c_0_13, plain, ![X16, X17, X18]:((((leq(X16,X18)|~in_lopen(X16,X17,X18))&(less(X17,X16)|~in_lopen(X16,X17,X18)))&(~leq(X16,X18)|~less(X17,X16)|in_lopen(X16,X17,X18)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[in_lopen])])])])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_14, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|X1!=X2), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_15, plain, (leq(X1,X3)|~leq(X1,X2)|~leq(X2,X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_16, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~less(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.09/0.45	fof(c_0_17, plain, (v0!=v16&(v0!=v32&(v0!=v400&(v0!=v600&(v0!=v800&(v0!=v1200&(v16!=v32&(v16!=v400&(v16!=v600&(v16!=v800&(v16!=v1200&(v32!=v400&(v32!=v600&(v32!=v800&(v32!=v1200&(v400!=v600&(v400!=v800&(v400!=v1200&(v600!=v800&(v600!=v1200&v800!=v1200)))))))))))))))))))), inference(epxand_distinct,[status(thm)],[distinct, theory(distinct)])).
0.09/0.45	fof(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X13, X14, X15]:((((in_lopen(X15,v0,v16)|~in_lopen(X15,v0,v32)|~in_lopen(X14,v0,v400)|~in_lopen(X13,v0,v600))&(in_lopen(X14,v0,v800)|~in_lopen(X15,v0,v32)|~in_lopen(X14,v0,v400)|~in_lopen(X13,v0,v600)))&(in_lopen(X13,v0,v1200)|~in_lopen(X15,v0,v32)|~in_lopen(X14,v0,v400)|~in_lopen(X13,v0,v600)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])])])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_19, plain, (in_lopen(X1,X3,X2)|~leq(X1,X2)|~less(X3,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_20, plain, (leq(X1,X1)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_21, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~leq(X1,X3)|~less(X3,X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_22, plain, (less(v16,v32)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v16_v32])).
0.09/0.45	fof(c_0_23, plain, (v0!=v16&(v0!=v32&(v0!=v400&(v0!=v600&(v0!=v800&(v0!=v1200&(v16!=v32&(v16!=v400&(v16!=v600&(v16!=v800&(v16!=v1200&(v32!=v400&(v32!=v600&(v32!=v800&(v32!=v1200&(v400!=v600&(v400!=v800&(v400!=v1200&(v600!=v800&(v600!=v1200&v800!=v1200)))))))))))))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, (in_lopen(X1,v0,v16)|~in_lopen(X1,v0,v32)|~in_lopen(X2,v0,v400)|~in_lopen(X3,v0,v600)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_25, plain, (in_lopen(X1,X2,X1)|~less(X2,X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_26, plain, (less(v0,v600)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v0_v600])).
0.09/0.45	fof(c_0_27, plain, ![X36, X37]:((~leq(X37,X36)|~leq(X36,X37)|X37=X36)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_antisym])])])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_28, plain, (leq(X1,v32)|~leq(X1,v16)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22])).
0.09/0.45	fof(c_0_29, plain, (v0!=v16&(v0!=v32&(v0!=v400&(v0!=v600&(v0!=v800&(v0!=v1200&(v16!=v32&(v16!=v400&(v16!=v600&(v16!=v800&(v16!=v1200&(v32!=v400&(v32!=v600&(v32!=v800&(v32!=v1200&(v400!=v600&(v400!=v800&(v400!=v1200&(v600!=v800&(v600!=v1200&v800!=v1200)))))))))))))))))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, (in_lopen(X1,v0,v16)|~in_lopen(X2,v0,v400)|~in_lopen(X1,v0,v32)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_25]), c_0_26])])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_31, plain, (less(v0,v400)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v0_v400])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_32, plain, (X1=X2|~leq(X1,X2)|~leq(X2,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_33, plain, (leq(v16,v32)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_20])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_34, plain, (v16!=v32), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_35, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~in_lopen(X1,X3,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_36, negated_conjecture, (in_lopen(X1,v0,v16)|~in_lopen(X1,v0,v32)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30, c_0_25]), c_0_31])])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_37, plain, (~leq(v32,v16)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32, c_0_33]), c_0_34])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_38, negated_conjecture, (leq(X1,v16)|~in_lopen(X1,v0,v32)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35, c_0_36])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_39, negated_conjecture, (~in_lopen(v32,v0,v32)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37, c_0_38])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_40, plain, (less(v0,v32)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v0_v32])).
0.09/0.45	cnf(c_0_41, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39, c_0_25]), c_0_40])]), ['proof']).
0.09/0.45	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.09/0.45	% Parsed axioms                        : 57
0.09/0.45	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 17
0.09/0.45	% Initial clauses                      : 66
0.09/0.45	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.09/0.45	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 66
0.09/0.45	% Processed clauses                    : 356
0.09/0.45	% ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.09/0.45	% ...subsumed                          : 151
0.09/0.45	% ...remaining for further processing  : 205
0.09/0.45	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
0.09/0.45	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.09/0.45	% Backward-subsumed                    : 2
0.09/0.45	% Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.09/0.45	% Generated clauses                    : 1295
0.09/0.45	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 711
0.09/0.45	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.09/0.45	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.09/0.45	% Paramodulations                      : 1292
0.09/0.45	% Factorizations                       : 2
0.09/0.45	% NegExts                              : 0
0.09/0.45	% Equation resolutions                 : 1
0.09/0.45	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.09/0.45	% Total rewrite steps                  : 751
0.09/0.45	% ...of those cached                   : 723
0.09/0.45	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.09/0.45	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.09/0.45	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.09/0.45	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.09/0.45	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.09/0.45	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.09/0.45	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.09/0.45	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.09/0.45	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.09/0.45	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.09/0.45	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.09/0.45	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.09/0.45	% Current number of processed clauses  : 202
0.09/0.45	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 35
0.09/0.45	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.09/0.45	%    Negative unit clauses             : 58
0.09/0.45	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 109
0.09/0.45	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 420
0.09/0.45	% ...number of literals in the above   : 1460
0.09/0.45	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.09/0.45	% Current number of archived clauses   : 2
0.09/0.45	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1515
0.09/0.45	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1337
0.09/0.45	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 91
0.09/0.45	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 261
0.09/0.45	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.09/0.45	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.09/0.45	% BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.09/0.45	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.09/0.45	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.09/0.45	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 14279
0.09/0.45	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 476
0.09/0.45	
0.09/0.45	% -------------------------------------------------
0.09/0.45	% User time                : 0.015 s
0.09/0.45	% System time              : 0.001 s
0.09/0.45	% Total time               : 0.016 s
0.09/0.45	% Maximum resident set size: 3684 pages
0.09/0.45	
0.09/0.45	% -------------------------------------------------
0.09/0.45	% User time                : 0.018 s
0.09/0.45	% System time              : 0.005 s
0.09/0.45	% Total time               : 0.023 s
0.09/0.45	% Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
0.09/0.45	% E exiting
0.09/0.45	EOF