0.00/0.03	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.05	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.09/0.39	% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
0.09/0.39	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.09/0.39	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.09/0.39	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.09/0.39	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.09/0.39	% CPULimit : 1440
0.09/0.39	% WCLimit  : 180
0.09/0.39	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:04:05 UTC 2026
0.09/0.40	% CPUTime  : 
0.09/0.40	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.09/0.45	Running first-order theorem proving
0.09/0.45	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.17/0.47	% Version: 3.5.1
0.17/0.47	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.17/0.47	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.17/0.47	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.17/0.47	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	% new_bool_1 with pid 793369 completed with status 0
0.17/0.47	% Result found by new_bool_1
0.17/0.47	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.17/0.47	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.17/0.47	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.17/0.47	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.17/0.47	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.17/0.47	% Search class: FGUSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
0.17/0.47	% partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
0.17/0.47	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.17/0.47	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	% SubtermCWHack with pid 793371 completed with status 0
0.17/0.47	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.17/0.47	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.17/0.47	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.17/0.47	% Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores
0.17/0.47	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.17/0.47	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.17/0.47	% Search class: FGUSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
0.17/0.47	% partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
0.17/0.47	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.17/0.47	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	% Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
0.17/0.47	
0.17/0.47	% Proof found!
0.17/0.47	% SZS status Theorem
0.17/0.47	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.17/0.47	fof(odrl341, conjecture, ~(?[X1, X2, X3]:((((((in_lopen(X1,v0,v600)&in_lopen(X3,v0,v32))&leq(v8,X3))&leq(v200,X2))&in_lopen(X2,v0,v800))&leq(v1200,X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', odrl341)).
0.17/0.47	fof(in_lopen, axiom, ![X1, X10, X11]:((in_lopen(X1,X10,X11)<=>(leq(X1,X11)&less(X10,X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+2.ax', in_lopen)).
0.17/0.47	fof(leq_antisym, axiom, ![X1, X2]:(((leq(X2,X1)&leq(X1,X2))=>X2=X1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax', leq_antisym)).
0.17/0.47	fof(irreflexive, axiom, ![X1]:(~(less(X1,X1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax', irreflexive)).
0.17/0.47	fof(leq_less_trans, axiom, ![X1, X2, X3]:(((less(X2,X3)&leq(X1,X2))=>less(X1,X3))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax', leq_less_trans)).
0.17/0.47	fof(leq_def, axiom, ![X1, X2]:((leq(X1,X2)<=>(less(X1,X2)|X1=X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax', leq_def)).
0.17/0.47	fof(ord_v600_v1200, axiom, less(v600,v1200), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ord_v600_v1200)).
0.17/0.47	fof(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ~(~(?[X1, X2, X3]:((((((in_lopen(X1,v0,v600)&in_lopen(X3,v0,v32))&leq(v8,X3))&leq(v200,X2))&in_lopen(X2,v0,v800))&leq(v1200,X1))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[odrl341])).
0.17/0.47	fof(c_0_8, plain, ![X31, X32, X33]:((((leq(X31,X33)|~in_lopen(X31,X32,X33))&(less(X32,X31)|~in_lopen(X31,X32,X33)))&(~leq(X31,X33)|~less(X32,X31)|in_lopen(X31,X32,X33)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[in_lopen])])])])).
0.17/0.47	fof(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (((((in_lopen(esk1_0,v0,v600)&in_lopen(esk3_0,v0,v32))&leq(v8,esk3_0))&leq(v200,esk2_0))&in_lopen(esk2_0,v0,v800))&leq(v1200,esk1_0)), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])).
0.17/0.47	fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X27, X28]:((~leq(X28,X27)|~leq(X27,X28)|X28=X27)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_antisym])])])).
0.17/0.47	fof(c_0_11, plain, ![X1]:(~less(X1,X1)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[irreflexive])).
0.17/0.47	fof(c_0_12, plain, ![X24, X25, X26]:((~less(X25,X26)|~leq(X24,X25)|less(X24,X26))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_less_trans])])])).
0.17/0.47	cnf(c_0_13, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~in_lopen(X1,X3,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.17/0.47	cnf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, (in_lopen(esk1_0,v0,v600)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.17/0.47	cnf(c_0_15, plain, (X1=X2|~leq(X1,X2)|~leq(X2,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.17/0.47	cnf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, (leq(v1200,esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.17/0.47	fof(c_0_17, plain, ![X19, X20]:(((~leq(X19,X20)|(less(X19,X20)|X19=X20))&((~less(X19,X20)|leq(X19,X20))&(X19!=X20|leq(X19,X20))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_def])])])])).
0.17/0.47	fof(c_0_18, plain, ![X39]:(~less(X39,X39)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])).
0.17/0.47	cnf(c_0_19, plain, (less(X3,X2)|~less(X1,X2)|~leq(X3,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])).
0.17/0.47	cnf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, (leq(esk1_0,v600)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14])).
0.17/0.47	cnf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, (esk1_0=v1200|~leq(esk1_0,v1200)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])).
0.17/0.47	cnf(c_0_22, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~less(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])).
0.17/0.47	cnf(c_0_23, plain, (~less(X1,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])).
0.17/0.47	cnf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, (less(esk1_0,X1)|~less(v600,X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20])).
0.17/0.47	cnf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, (esk1_0=v1200|~less(esk1_0,v1200)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22])).
0.17/0.47	cnf(c_0_26, plain, (less(v600,v1200)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v600_v1200])).
0.17/0.47	cnf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, (~less(v600,esk1_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24])).
0.17/0.47	cnf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, (esk1_0=v1200), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_24]), c_0_26])])).
0.17/0.47	cnf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_28]), c_0_26])]), ['proof']).
0.17/0.47	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.17/0.47	% Parsed axioms                        : 57
0.17/0.47	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 17
0.17/0.47	% Initial clauses                      : 69
0.17/0.47	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.17/0.47	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 69
0.17/0.47	% Processed clauses                    : 153
0.17/0.47	% ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.17/0.47	% ...subsumed                          : 15
0.17/0.47	% ...remaining for further processing  : 138
0.17/0.47	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
0.17/0.47	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.17/0.47	% Backward-subsumed                    : 3
0.17/0.47	% Backward-rewritten                   : 12
0.17/0.47	% Generated clauses                    : 228
0.17/0.47	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 190
0.17/0.47	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.17/0.47	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.17/0.47	% Paramodulations                      : 225
0.17/0.47	% Factorizations                       : 2
0.17/0.47	% NegExts                              : 0
0.17/0.47	% Equation resolutions                 : 1
0.17/0.47	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.17/0.47	% Total rewrite steps                  : 33
0.17/0.47	% ...of those cached                   : 17
0.17/0.47	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.17/0.47	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.17/0.47	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.17/0.47	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.17/0.47	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.17/0.47	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.17/0.47	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.17/0.47	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.17/0.47	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.17/0.47	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.17/0.47	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.17/0.47	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.17/0.47	% Current number of processed clauses  : 122
0.17/0.47	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 38
0.17/0.47	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.17/0.47	%    Negative unit clauses             : 37
0.17/0.47	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 47
0.17/0.47	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 106
0.17/0.47	% ...number of literals in the above   : 264
0.17/0.47	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.17/0.47	% Current number of archived clauses   : 15
0.17/0.47	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 203
0.17/0.47	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 200
0.17/0.47	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 7
0.17/0.47	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 235
0.17/0.47	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.17/0.47	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
0.17/0.47	% BW rewrite match successes           : 1
0.17/0.47	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.17/0.47	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.17/0.47	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 3940
0.17/0.47	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 438
0.17/0.47	
0.17/0.47	% -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.47	% User time                : 0.009 s
0.17/0.47	% System time              : 0.002 s
0.17/0.47	% Total time               : 0.011 s
0.17/0.47	% Maximum resident set size: 3684 pages
0.17/0.47	
0.17/0.47	% -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.47	% User time                : 0.010 s
0.17/0.47	% System time              : 0.008 s
0.17/0.47	% Total time               : 0.017 s
0.17/0.47	% Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
0.17/0.47	% E exiting
0.17/0.48	EOF