0.00/0.02 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.09/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu 0.09/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.09/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.09/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.09/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.09/0.35 % CPULimit : 1440 0.09/0.35 % WCLimit : 180 0.09/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:26:38 UTC 2026 0.09/0.35 % CPUTime : 0.09/0.35 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.13/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving 0.13/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.13/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1 0.13/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN. 0.13/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.13/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores 0.13/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.13/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores 0.13/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.13/0.44 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 2270126 completed with status 0 0.13/0.44 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI 0.13/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN. 0.13/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.13/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores 0.13/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) 0.13/0.44 % No SInE strategy applied 0.13/0.44 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN 0.13/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.13/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores 0.13/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 91s (1) cores 0.13/0.44 % Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 82s (1) cores 0.13/0.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 82s (1) cores 0.13/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 82s (1) cores 0.13/0.44 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 2270136 completed with status 0 0.13/0.44 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y 0.13/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN. 0.13/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.13/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 900s (5) cores 0.13/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) 0.13/0.44 % No SInE strategy applied 0.13/0.44 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN 0.13/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.13/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores 0.13/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 91s (1) cores 0.13/0.44 % Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 82s (1) cores 0.13/0.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 82s (1) cores 0.13/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s 0.13/0.44 0.13/0.44 % Proof found! 0.13/0.44 % SZS status Theorem 0.13/0.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.13/0.44 fof(odrl327, conjecture, ?[X1, X2]:((((less(v200,X1)&less(v100,X2))&in_open(X2,v0,v500))&in_open(X1,v0,v800))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', odrl327)). 0.13/0.44 fof(in_open, axiom, ![X1, X10, X11]:((in_open(X1,X10,X11)<=>(less(X1,X11)&less(X10,X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+2.ax', in_open)). 0.13/0.44 fof(ord_v100_v200, axiom, less(v100,v200), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ord_v100_v200)). 0.13/0.44 fof(ord_v0_v200, axiom, less(v0,v200), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ord_v0_v200)). 0.13/0.44 fof(ord_v200_v500, axiom, less(v200,v500), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ord_v200_v500)). 0.13/0.44 fof(ord_v0_v500, axiom, less(v0,v500), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ord_v0_v500)). 0.13/0.44 fof(ord_v500_v800, axiom, less(v500,v800), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ord_v500_v800)). 0.13/0.44 fof(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1, X2]:((((less(v200,X1)&less(v100,X2))&in_open(X2,v0,v500))&in_open(X1,v0,v800)))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[odrl327])). 0.13/0.44 fof(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X88, X89]:((~less(v200,X88)|~less(v100,X89)|~in_open(X89,v0,v500)|~in_open(X88,v0,v800))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])). 0.13/0.44 fof(c_0_9, plain, ![X53, X54, X55]:((((less(X53,X55)|~in_open(X53,X54,X55))&(less(X54,X53)|~in_open(X53,X54,X55)))&(~less(X53,X55)|~less(X54,X53)|in_open(X53,X54,X55)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[in_open])])])])). 0.13/0.44 cnf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (~less(v200,X1)|~less(v100,X2)|~in_open(X2,v0,v500)|~in_open(X1,v0,v800)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.13/0.44 cnf(c_0_11, plain, (in_open(X1,X3,X2)|~less(X1,X2)|~less(X3,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 0.13/0.44 cnf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (~in_open(X1,v0,v800)|~less(v100,X2)|~less(v200,X1)|~less(v0,X2)|~less(X2,v500)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])). 0.13/0.44 cnf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, (~less(v100,X1)|~less(v200,X2)|~less(v0,X1)|~less(X1,v500)|~less(v0,X2)|~less(X2,v800)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_11])). 0.13/0.44 cnf(c_0_14, plain, (less(v100,v200)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v100_v200])). 0.13/0.44 cnf(c_0_15, plain, (less(v0,v200)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v0_v200])). 0.13/0.44 cnf(c_0_16, plain, (less(v200,v500)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v200_v500])). 0.13/0.44 cnf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (~less(v200,X1)|~less(v0,X1)|~less(X1,v800)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14]), c_0_15]), c_0_16])])). 0.13/0.44 cnf(c_0_18, plain, (less(v0,v500)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v0_v500])). 0.13/0.44 cnf(c_0_19, plain, (less(v500,v800)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v500_v800])). 0.13/0.44 cnf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_16]), c_0_18]), c_0_19])]), ['proof']). 0.13/0.44 % SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.13/0.44 % Parsed axioms : 45 0.13/0.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.13/0.44 % Initial clauses : 73 0.13/0.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.13/0.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 73 0.13/0.44 % Processed clauses : 91 0.13/0.44 % ...of these trivial : 0 0.13/0.44 % ...subsumed : 8 0.13/0.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 83 0.13/0.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1 0.13/0.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.13/0.44 % Backward-subsumed : 2 0.13/0.44 % Backward-rewritten : 0 0.13/0.44 % Generated clauses : 94 0.13/0.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 72 0.13/0.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.13/0.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.13/0.44 % Paramodulations : 89 0.13/0.44 % Factorizations : 4 0.13/0.44 % NegExts : 0 0.13/0.44 % Equation resolutions : 1 0.13/0.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0 0.13/0.44 % Total rewrite steps : 7 0.13/0.44 % ...of those cached : 1 0.13/0.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.13/0.44 % Propositional check models : 0 0.13/0.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.13/0.44 % Propositional clauses : 0 0.13/0.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.13/0.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.13/0.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.13/0.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.13/0.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.13/0.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.13/0.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.13/0.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.13/0.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 80 0.13/0.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 19 0.13/0.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.13/0.44 % Negative unit clauses : 16 0.13/0.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 45 0.13/0.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 50 0.13/0.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 169 0.13/0.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.13/0.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 2 0.13/0.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 291 0.13/0.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 164 0.13/0.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5 0.13/0.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26 0.13/0.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.13/0.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 4 0.13/0.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.13/0.44 % Condensation attempts : 0 0.13/0.44 % Condensation successes : 0 0.13/0.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 4848 0.13/0.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 859 0.13/0.44 0.13/0.44 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.13/0.44 % User time : 0.012 s 0.13/0.44 % System time : 0.003 s 0.13/0.44 % Total time : 0.015 s 0.13/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3672 pages 0.13/0.44 0.13/0.44 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.13/0.44 % User time : 0.057 s 0.13/0.44 % System time : 0.017 s 0.13/0.44 % Total time : 0.074 s 0.13/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages 0.13/0.44 % E exiting 0.13/0.44 EOF