0.00/0.03 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 1440 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 180 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:16:08 UTC 2026 0.09/0.37 % CPUTime : 0.09/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.14/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving 0.14/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.14/0.52 % Version: 3.5.1 0.14/0.52 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN. 0.14/0.52 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.14/0.52 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 900s (5) cores 0.14/0.52 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.14/0.52 % Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores 0.14/0.52 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.14/0.52 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with pid 2808879 completed with status 0 0.14/0.52 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI 0.14/0.52 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN. 0.14/0.52 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.14/0.52 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 900s (5) cores 0.14/0.52 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) 0.14/0.52 % No SInE strategy applied 0.14/0.52 % Search class: FGUSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN 0.14/0.52 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.14/0.52 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 91s (1) cores 0.14/0.52 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 450s (1) cores 0.14/0.52 % Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YI with 91s (1) cores 0.14/0.52 % Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S with 91s (1) cores 0.14/0.52 % Starting U----_207d_00_B07_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 91s (1) cores 0.14/0.52 % U----_207d_00_B07_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2808887 completed with status 0 0.14/0.52 % Result found by U----_207d_00_B07_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN 0.14/0.52 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN. 0.14/0.52 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.14/0.52 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 900s (5) cores 0.14/0.52 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) 0.14/0.52 % No SInE strategy applied 0.14/0.52 % Search class: FGUSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN 0.14/0.52 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.14/0.52 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 91s (1) cores 0.14/0.52 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 450s (1) cores 0.14/0.52 % Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YI with 91s (1) cores 0.14/0.52 % Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S with 91s (1) cores 0.14/0.52 % Starting U----_207d_00_B07_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 91s (1) cores 0.14/0.52 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s 0.14/0.52 % Presaturation interreduction done 0.14/0.52 0.14/0.52 % Proof found! 0.14/0.52 % SZS status Theorem 0.14/0.52 % SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.14/0.52 fof(hilbert_implies_1, conjecture, implies_1, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', hilbert_implies_1)). 0.14/0.52 fof(r2, axiom, (r2<=>![X3, X4]:(is_a_theorem(implies(X4,or(X3,X4))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax', r2)). 0.14/0.52 fof(op_implies_or, axiom, (op_implies_or=>![X1, X2]:(or(not(X1),X2)=implies(X1,X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+1.ax', op_implies_or)). 0.14/0.52 fof(implies_1, axiom, (![X1, X2]:(is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1))))<=>implies_1), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+0.ax', implies_1)). 0.14/0.52 fof(principia_r2, axiom, r2, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax', principia_r2)). 0.14/0.52 fof(principia_op_implies_or, axiom, op_implies_or, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL006+4.ax', principia_op_implies_or)). 0.14/0.52 fof(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~(implies_1), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[hilbert_implies_1])). 0.14/0.52 fof(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ~implies_1, inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.14/0.52 fof(c_0_8, plain, ![X59, X60]:(((~r2|is_a_theorem(implies(X60,or(X59,X60))))&(~is_a_theorem(implies(esk28_0,or(esk27_0,esk28_0)))|r2))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[r2])])])])])). 0.14/0.52 fof(c_0_9, plain, ![X117, X118]:((~op_implies_or|or(not(X117),X118)=implies(X117,X118))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[op_implies_or])])])])). 0.14/0.52 fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X43, X44]:(((~is_a_theorem(implies(esk18_0,implies(esk19_0,esk18_0)))|implies_1)&(~implies_1|is_a_theorem(implies(X43,implies(X44,X43)))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[implies_1])])])])])). 0.14/0.52 fof(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ~implies_1, inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.14/0.52 cnf(c_0_12, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X1)))|~r2), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.14/0.52 cnf(c_0_13, plain, (r2), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_r2])). 0.14/0.52 cnf(c_0_14, plain, (or(not(X1),X2)=implies(X1,X2)|~op_implies_or), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 0.14/0.52 cnf(c_0_15, plain, (op_implies_or), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[principia_op_implies_or])). 0.14/0.52 cnf(c_0_16, plain, (implies_1|~is_a_theorem(implies(esk18_0,implies(esk19_0,esk18_0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])). 0.14/0.52 cnf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (~implies_1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 0.14/0.52 cnf(c_0_18, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(X1,or(X2,X1)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])])). 0.14/0.52 cnf(c_0_19, plain, (or(not(X1),X2)=implies(X1,X2)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])])). 0.14/0.52 cnf(c_0_20, plain, (~is_a_theorem(implies(esk18_0,implies(esk19_0,esk18_0)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])). 0.14/0.52 cnf(c_0_21, plain, (is_a_theorem(implies(X1,implies(X2,X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])). 0.14/0.52 cnf(c_0_22, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21])]), ['proof']). 0.14/0.52 % SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.14/0.52 % Parsed axioms : 45 0.14/0.52 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.14/0.52 % Initial clauses : 74 0.14/0.52 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.14/0.52 % Initial clauses in saturation : 74 0.14/0.52 % Processed clauses : 103 0.14/0.52 % ...of these trivial : 11 0.14/0.52 % ...subsumed : 1 0.14/0.52 % ...remaining for further processing : 91 0.14/0.52 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.14/0.52 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.14/0.52 % Backward-subsumed : 1 0.14/0.52 % Backward-rewritten : 5 0.14/0.52 % Generated clauses : 7 0.14/0.52 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10 0.14/0.52 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.14/0.52 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.14/0.52 % Paramodulations : 7 0.14/0.52 % Factorizations : 0 0.14/0.52 % NegExts : 0 0.14/0.52 % Equation resolutions : 0 0.14/0.52 % Disequality decompositions : 0 0.14/0.52 % Total rewrite steps : 54 0.14/0.52 % ...of those cached : 17 0.14/0.52 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.14/0.52 % Propositional check models : 0 0.14/0.52 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.14/0.52 % Propositional clauses : 0 0.14/0.52 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.14/0.52 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.14/0.52 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.14/0.52 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.14/0.52 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.14/0.52 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.14/0.52 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.14/0.52 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.14/0.52 % Current number of processed clauses : 24 0.14/0.52 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 19 0.14/0.52 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1 0.14/0.52 % Negative unit clauses : 1 0.14/0.52 % Non-unit-clauses : 3 0.14/0.52 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 42 0.14/0.52 % ...number of literals in the above : 78 0.14/0.52 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.14/0.52 % Current number of archived clauses : 67 0.14/0.52 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 73 0.14/0.52 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 73 0.14/0.52 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.14/0.52 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7 0.14/0.52 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.14/0.52 % BW rewrite match attempts : 18 0.14/0.52 % BW rewrite match successes : 7 0.14/0.52 % Condensation attempts : 0 0.14/0.52 % Condensation successes : 0 0.14/0.52 % Termbank termtop insertions : 4966 0.14/0.52 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1092 0.14/0.52 0.14/0.52 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.14/0.52 % User time : 0.012 s 0.14/0.52 % System time : 0.008 s 0.14/0.52 % Total time : 0.021 s 0.14/0.52 % Maximum resident set size: 3688 pages 0.14/0.52 0.14/0.52 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.14/0.52 % User time : 0.033 s 0.14/0.52 % System time : 0.019 s 0.14/0.52 % Total time : 0.053 s 0.14/0.52 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages 0.14/0.52 % E exiting 0.14/0.53 EOF