0.00/0.03	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.04	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.10/0.44	% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
0.10/0.44	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.44	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.44	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.10/0.44	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.10/0.44	% CPULimit : 1440
0.10/0.44	% WCLimit  : 180
0.10/0.44	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:11:15 UTC 2026
0.10/0.44	% CPUTime  : 
0.10/0.44	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.15/0.49	Running first-order theorem proving
0.15/0.49	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.15/0.51	% Version: 3.5.1
0.15/0.51	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.15/0.51	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.15/0.51	% Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores
0.15/0.51	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.51	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.51	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.51	% new_bool_3 with pid 920001 completed with status 0
0.15/0.51	% Result found by new_bool_3
0.15/0.51	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.15/0.51	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.15/0.51	% Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores
0.15/0.51	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.51	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.15/0.51	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.15/0.51	% Search class: FGHSF-FFMS31-SFFFFFNN
0.15/0.51	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.15/0.51	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.15/0.51	% SubtermCWHack with pid 920004 completed with status 0
0.15/0.51	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.15/0.51	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.15/0.51	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.15/0.51	% Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores
0.15/0.51	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.51	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.15/0.51	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.15/0.51	% Search class: FGHSF-FFMS31-SFFFFFNN
0.15/0.51	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.15/0.51	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.15/0.51	% Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
0.15/0.51	
0.15/0.51	% Proof found!
0.15/0.51	% SZS status Theorem
0.15/0.51	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.15/0.51	fof(no_short_cut_edge, conjecture, ![X1, X2, X3, X4, X5]:((~(?[X6]:(((head_of(X4)=head_of(X6)&tail_of(X6)=tail_of(X3))&edge(X6))))<=(precedes(X3,X4,X5)&shortest_path(X1,X2,X5)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', no_short_cut_edge)).
0.15/0.51	fof(shortest_path_properties, axiom, ![X1, X2, X3, X4, X5]:(((~(?[X6]:((head_of(X6)=head_of(X4)&tail_of(X3)=tail_of(X6))))&~(precedes(X4,X3,X5)))<=(shortest_path(X1,X2,X5)&precedes(X3,X4,X5)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRA001+0.ax', shortest_path_properties)).
0.15/0.51	fof(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1, X2, X3, X4, X5]:((~(?[X6]:(((head_of(X4)=head_of(X6)&tail_of(X6)=tail_of(X3))&edge(X6))))<=(precedes(X3,X4,X5)&shortest_path(X1,X2,X5))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[no_short_cut_edge])).
0.15/0.51	fof(c_0_3, plain, ![X1, X2, X3, X4, X5]:(((shortest_path(X1,X2,X5)&precedes(X3,X4,X5))=>(~(?[X6]:((head_of(X6)=head_of(X4)&tail_of(X3)=tail_of(X6))))&~precedes(X4,X3,X5)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[shortest_path_properties])).
0.15/0.51	fof(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1, X2, X3, X4, X5]:(((precedes(X3,X4,X5)&shortest_path(X1,X2,X5))=>~(?[X6]:(((head_of(X4)=head_of(X6)&tail_of(X6)=tail_of(X3))&edge(X6))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.15/0.51	fof(c_0_5, plain, ![X19, X20, X21, X22, X23, X24]:(((head_of(X24)!=head_of(X22)|tail_of(X21)!=tail_of(X24)|(~shortest_path(X19,X20,X23)|~precedes(X21,X22,X23)))&(~precedes(X22,X21,X23)|(~shortest_path(X19,X20,X23)|~precedes(X21,X22,X23))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])])).
0.15/0.51	fof(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ((precedes(esk3_0,esk4_0,esk5_0)&shortest_path(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk5_0))&((head_of(esk4_0)=head_of(esk6_0)&tail_of(esk6_0)=tail_of(esk3_0))&edge(esk6_0))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])).
0.15/0.51	cnf(c_0_7, plain, (head_of(X1)!=head_of(X2)|tail_of(X3)!=tail_of(X1)|~shortest_path(X4,X5,X6)|~precedes(X3,X2,X6)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.15/0.51	cnf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (shortest_path(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk5_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.15/0.51	cnf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (head_of(X1)!=head_of(X2)|tail_of(X1)!=tail_of(X3)|~precedes(X3,X2,esk5_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])).
0.15/0.51	cnf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (precedes(esk3_0,esk4_0,esk5_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.15/0.51	cnf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (head_of(esk4_0)=head_of(esk6_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.15/0.51	cnf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (tail_of(esk6_0)=tail_of(esk3_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.15/0.51	cnf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, (head_of(X1)!=head_of(esk6_0)|tail_of(X1)!=tail_of(esk6_0)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10]), c_0_11]), c_0_12])).
0.15/0.51	cnf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]), ['proof']).
0.15/0.51	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.15/0.51	% Parsed axioms                        : 18
0.15/0.51	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 11
0.15/0.51	% Initial clauses                      : 25
0.15/0.51	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.15/0.51	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 25
0.15/0.51	% Processed clauses                    : 39
0.15/0.51	% ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.15/0.51	% ...subsumed                          : 2
0.15/0.51	% ...remaining for further processing  : 37
0.15/0.51	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
0.15/0.51	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.15/0.51	% Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.15/0.51	% Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.15/0.51	% Generated clauses                    : 23
0.15/0.51	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 20
0.15/0.51	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.15/0.51	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.15/0.51	% Paramodulations                      : 20
0.15/0.51	% Factorizations                       : 0
0.15/0.51	% NegExts                              : 0
0.15/0.51	% Equation resolutions                 : 3
0.15/0.51	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.15/0.51	% Total rewrite steps                  : 3
0.15/0.51	% ...of those cached                   : 0
0.15/0.51	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.15/0.51	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.15/0.51	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.15/0.51	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.15/0.51	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.15/0.51	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.15/0.51	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.15/0.51	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.15/0.51	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.15/0.51	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.15/0.51	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.15/0.51	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.15/0.51	% Current number of processed clauses  : 35
0.15/0.51	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 8
0.15/0.51	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.15/0.51	%    Negative unit clauses             : 5
0.15/0.51	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 22
0.15/0.51	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
0.15/0.51	% ...number of literals in the above   : 27
0.15/0.51	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.15/0.51	% Current number of archived clauses   : 0
0.15/0.51	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 85
0.15/0.51	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 53
0.15/0.51	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.15/0.51	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
0.15/0.51	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.15/0.51	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.15/0.51	% BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.15/0.51	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.15/0.51	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.15/0.51	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 2430
0.15/0.51	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 702
0.15/0.51	
0.15/0.51	% -------------------------------------------------
0.15/0.51	% User time                : 0.007 s
0.15/0.51	% System time              : 0.002 s
0.15/0.51	% Total time               : 0.009 s
0.15/0.51	% Maximum resident set size: 3668 pages
0.15/0.51	
0.15/0.51	% -------------------------------------------------
0.15/0.51	% User time                : 0.009 s
0.15/0.51	% System time              : 0.004 s
0.15/0.51	% Total time               : 0.013 s
0.15/0.51	% Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
0.15/0.51	% E exiting
0.15/0.51	EOF