0.00/0.02 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.08/0.34 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu 0.08/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.08/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.08/0.34 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.08/0.34 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.08/0.34 % CPULimit : 1440 0.08/0.34 % WCLimit : 180 0.08/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:40:48 UTC 2026 0.08/0.35 % CPUTime : 0.08/0.35 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.12/0.39 Running first-order theorem proving 0.12/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.12/0.42 % Version: 3.5.1 0.12/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.12/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.12/0.42 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 900s (5) cores 0.12/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.12/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores 0.12/0.42 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.12/0.42 % new_bool_3 with pid 1837745 completed with status 0 0.12/0.42 % Result found by new_bool_3 0.12/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.12/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.12/0.42 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 900s (5) cores 0.12/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.12/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)) 0.12/0.42 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0) 0.12/0.42 % Search class: FGUSM-FFMF22-SFFFFFNN 0.12/0.42 % partial match(1): FGUSM-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN 0.12/0.42 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.12/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores 0.12/0.42 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1837748 completed with status 0 0.12/0.42 % Result found by SubtermCWHack 0.12/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.12/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.12/0.42 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 900s (5) cores 0.12/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.12/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)) 0.12/0.42 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0) 0.12/0.42 % Search class: FGUSM-FFMF22-SFFFFFNN 0.12/0.42 % partial match(1): FGUSM-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN 0.12/0.42 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.12/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores 0.12/0.42 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.12/0.42 0.12/0.42 % Proof found! 0.12/0.42 % SZS status Theorem 0.12/0.42 % SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.12/0.42 fof(aSatz7_8, conjecture, ![X5, X6, X24, X9]:((X24!=s(X5,X9)|X9=X6|s(X5,X6)!=X24)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', aSatz7_8)). 0.12/0.42 fof(aSatz7_7, axiom, ![X5, X6]:(X6=s(X5,s(X5,X6))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', aSatz7_7)). 0.12/0.42 fof(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~(![X5, X6, X24, X9]:((X24!=s(X5,X9)|X9=X6|s(X5,X6)!=X24))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[aSatz7_8])). 0.12/0.42 fof(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~(![X5, X6, X24, X9]:((X24!=s(X5,X9)|X9=X6|s(X5,X6)!=X24))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.12/0.42 fof(c_0_4, plain, ![X47, X48]:(X48=s(X47,s(X47,X48))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[aSatz7_7])). 0.12/0.42 fof(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ((esk3_0=s(esk1_0,esk4_0)&esk4_0!=esk2_0)&s(esk1_0,esk2_0)=esk3_0), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])). 0.12/0.42 cnf(c_0_6, plain, (X1=s(X2,s(X2,X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 0.12/0.42 cnf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (esk3_0=s(esk1_0,esk4_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.12/0.42 cnf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (s(esk1_0,esk2_0)=esk3_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.12/0.42 cnf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (s(esk1_0,esk3_0)=esk4_0), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7])). 0.12/0.42 cnf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (esk4_0!=esk2_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.12/0.42 cnf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_8]), c_0_9]), c_0_10]), ['proof']). 0.12/0.42 % SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.12/0.42 % Parsed axioms : 110 0.12/0.42 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 67 0.12/0.42 % Initial clauses : 47 0.12/0.42 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.12/0.42 % Initial clauses in saturation : 47 0.12/0.42 % Processed clauses : 15 0.12/0.42 % ...of these trivial : 0 0.12/0.42 % ...subsumed : 0 0.12/0.42 % ...remaining for further processing : 14 0.12/0.42 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.12/0.42 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.12/0.42 % Backward-subsumed : 0 0.12/0.42 % Backward-rewritten : 0 0.12/0.42 % Generated clauses : 7 0.12/0.42 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6 0.12/0.42 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.12/0.42 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.12/0.42 % Paramodulations : 7 0.12/0.42 % Factorizations : 0 0.12/0.42 % NegExts : 0 0.12/0.42 % Equation resolutions : 0 0.12/0.42 % Disequality decompositions : 0 0.12/0.42 % Total rewrite steps : 2 0.12/0.42 % ...of those cached : 0 0.12/0.42 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.12/0.42 % Propositional check models : 0 0.12/0.42 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.12/0.42 % Propositional clauses : 0 0.12/0.42 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.12/0.42 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.12/0.42 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.12/0.42 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.12/0.42 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.12/0.42 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.12/0.42 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.12/0.42 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.12/0.42 % Current number of processed clauses : 14 0.12/0.42 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 13 0.12/0.42 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.12/0.42 % Negative unit clauses : 1 0.12/0.42 % Non-unit-clauses : 0 0.12/0.42 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 38 0.12/0.42 % ...number of literals in the above : 123 0.12/0.42 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.12/0.42 % Current number of archived clauses : 0 0.12/0.42 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0 0.12/0.42 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.12/0.42 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.12/0.42 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.12/0.42 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.12/0.42 % BW rewrite match attempts : 4 0.12/0.42 % BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.12/0.42 % Condensation attempts : 0 0.12/0.42 % Condensation successes : 0 0.12/0.42 % Termbank termtop insertions : 5424 0.12/0.42 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1280 0.12/0.42 0.12/0.42 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.12/0.42 % User time : 0.003 s 0.12/0.42 % System time : 0.004 s 0.12/0.42 % Total time : 0.007 s 0.12/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 4040 pages 0.12/0.42 0.12/0.42 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.12/0.42 % User time : 0.007 s 0.12/0.42 % System time : 0.007 s 0.12/0.42 % Total time : 0.014 s 0.12/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages 0.12/0.42 % E exiting 0.12/0.43 EOF