0.00/0.03	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.04	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.12/0.37	% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
0.12/0.37	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.37	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.37	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.12/0.37	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.12/0.37	% CPULimit : 1440
0.12/0.37	% WCLimit  : 180
0.12/0.37	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 10:10:47 UTC 2026
0.12/0.37	% CPUTime  : 
0.12/0.37	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.12/0.42	Running first-order theorem proving
0.12/0.42	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.18/0.54	% Version: 3.5.1
0.18/0.54	% Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.18/0.54	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.18/0.54	% Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 900s (5) cores
0.18/0.54	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	% C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2677516 completed with status 0
0.18/0.54	% Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
0.18/0.54	% Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.18/0.54	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.18/0.54	% Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 900s (5) cores
0.18/0.54	% (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
0.18/0.54	% No SInE strategy applied
0.18/0.54	% Search class: FGHSF-FSLM33-SFFFFFNN
0.18/0.54	% Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.18/0.54	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	% Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 91s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	% Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	% Starting H----_102_C18_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	% Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 82s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	% G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 2677525 completed with status 0
0.18/0.54	% Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
0.18/0.54	% Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
0.18/0.54	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.18/0.54	% Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 900s (5) cores
0.18/0.54	% (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
0.18/0.54	% No SInE strategy applied
0.18/0.54	% Search class: FGHSF-FSLM33-SFFFFFNN
0.18/0.54	% Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.18/0.54	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	% Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 91s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	% Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
0.18/0.54	% Preprocessing time       : 0.011 s
0.18/0.54	
0.18/0.54	% Proof found!
0.18/0.54	% SZS status Theorem
0.18/0.54	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.18/0.54	fof('qu(cond(axiom(73), 0), imp(cond(axiom(73), 0)))', axiom, ![X25, X26, X27, X28]:((((((((((ron(X26,X27)&ron(X25,X28))&?[X29]:((X29=X28&rline(X29))))&?[X30]:((X26=X30&rpoint(X30))))&?[X31]:((X25=X31&rpoint(X31))))&X25!=X26)&?[X32]:((rline(X32)&X32=X27)))&ron(X25,X27))&ron(X26,X28))=>X28=X27)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'qu(cond(axiom(73), 0), imp(cond(axiom(73), 0)))')).
0.18/0.54	fof('qu(theu(the(408), 1), imp(the(408)))', conjecture, ![X599]:((vd1416=X599<=((ron(vd1399,X599)&rline(X599))&ron(vd1401,X599)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'qu(theu(the(408), 1), imp(the(408)))')).
0.18/0.54	fof('and(pred(conjunct2(405), 5), and(pred(s2(plural(conjunct2(405))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(conjunct2(405))), 0), and(pred(conjunct2(405), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(405), 9), and(pred(conjunct1(405), 8), and(pred(conjunct1(405), 7), and(qe(s3(plural(405))), and(qe(s2(plural(405))), qe(s1(plural(405))))))))))))', axiom, (((((((((vd1407=vd1406&vd1400!=vd1399)&?[X422]:((vd1401=X422&rpoint(X422))))&?[X423]:((vd1399=X423&rpoint(X423))))&?[X424]:((rpoint(X424)&X424=vd1400)))&vd1399!=vd1401)&vd1400!=vd1401)&rline(vd1407))&ron(vd1399,vd1406))&ron(vd1400,vd1406)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'and(pred(conjunct2(405), 5), and(pred(s2(plural(conjunct2(405))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(conjunct2(405))), 0), and(pred(conjunct2(405), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(405), 9), and(pred(conjunct1(405), 8), and(pred(conjunct1(405), 7), and(qe(s3(plural(405))), and(qe(s2(plural(405))), qe(s1(plural(405))))))))))))')).
0.18/0.54	fof('and(pred(s2(plural(the(408))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(the(408))), 0), pred(the(408), 0)))', axiom, ((ron(vd1399,vd1416)&rline(vd1416))&ron(vd1401,vd1416)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', 'and(pred(s2(plural(the(408))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(the(408))), 0), pred(the(408), 0)))')).
0.18/0.54	fof(c_0_4, plain, ![X25, X26, X27, X28]:((((((((((ron(X26,X27)&ron(X25,X28))&?[X29]:((X29=X28&rline(X29))))&?[X30]:((X26=X30&rpoint(X30))))&?[X31]:((X25=X31&rpoint(X31))))&X25!=X26)&?[X32]:((rline(X32)&X32=X27)))&ron(X25,X27))&ron(X26,X28))=>X28=X27)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['qu(cond(axiom(73), 0), imp(cond(axiom(73), 0)))'])).
0.18/0.54	fof(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~(![X599]:((vd1416=X599<=((ron(vd1399,X599)&rline(X599))&ron(vd1401,X599))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['qu(theu(the(408), 1), imp(the(408)))'])).
0.18/0.54	fof(c_0_6, plain, (((((((((vd1407=vd1406&vd1400!=vd1399)&?[X422]:((vd1401=X422&rpoint(X422))))&?[X423]:((vd1399=X423&rpoint(X423))))&?[X424]:((rpoint(X424)&X424=vd1400)))&vd1399!=vd1401)&vd1400!=vd1401)&rline(vd1407))&ron(vd1399,vd1406))&ron(vd1400,vd1406)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],['and(pred(conjunct2(405), 5), and(pred(s2(plural(conjunct2(405))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(conjunct2(405))), 0), and(pred(conjunct2(405), 1), and(pred(conjunct1(405), 9), and(pred(conjunct1(405), 8), and(pred(conjunct1(405), 7), and(qe(s3(plural(405))), and(qe(s2(plural(405))), qe(s1(plural(405))))))))))))'])).
0.18/0.54	fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X802, X803, X804, X805, X806, X807, X808, X809]:((~ron(X803,X804)|~ron(X802,X805)|(X806!=X805|~rline(X806))|(X803!=X807|~rpoint(X807))|(X802!=X808|~rpoint(X808))|X802=X803|(~rline(X809)|X809!=X804)|~ron(X802,X804)|~ron(X803,X805)|X805=X804)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])).
0.18/0.54	fof(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ~(![X599]:((((ron(vd1399,X599)&rline(X599))&ron(vd1401,X599))=>vd1416=X599))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.18/0.54	fof(c_0_9, plain, (((((((((vd1407=vd1406&vd1400!=vd1399)&(vd1401=esk25_0&rpoint(esk25_0)))&(vd1399=esk26_0&rpoint(esk26_0)))&(rpoint(esk27_0)&esk27_0=vd1400))&vd1399!=vd1401)&vd1400!=vd1401)&rline(vd1407))&ron(vd1399,vd1406))&ron(vd1400,vd1406)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])).
0.18/0.54	cnf(c_0_10, plain, (X3=X1|X4=X2|~ron(X1,X2)|~ron(X3,X4)|X5!=X4|~rline(X5)|X1!=X6|~rpoint(X6)|X3!=X7|~rpoint(X7)|~rline(X8)|X8!=X2|~ron(X3,X2)|~ron(X1,X4)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.18/0.54	fof(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (((ron(vd1399,esk43_0)&rline(esk43_0))&ron(vd1401,esk43_0))&vd1416!=esk43_0), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])])).
0.18/0.54	cnf(c_0_12, plain, (rpoint(esk25_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.18/0.54	cnf(c_0_13, plain, (vd1401=esk25_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.18/0.54	cnf(c_0_14, plain, (X1=X2|X3=X4|~ron(X4,X2)|~ron(X4,X1)|~ron(X3,X2)|~ron(X3,X1)|~rpoint(X4)|~rpoint(X3)|~rline(X1)|~rline(X2)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])])).
0.18/0.54	cnf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, (ron(vd1401,esk43_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.18/0.54	cnf(c_0_16, plain, (rpoint(vd1401)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])).
0.18/0.54	cnf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (rline(esk43_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.18/0.54	cnf(c_0_18, plain, (rpoint(esk26_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.18/0.54	cnf(c_0_19, plain, (vd1399=esk26_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.18/0.54	cnf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, (X1=vd1401|X2=esk43_0|~ron(vd1401,X2)|~ron(X1,esk43_0)|~ron(X1,X2)|~rpoint(X1)|~rline(X2)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15]), c_0_16]), c_0_17])])).
0.18/0.54	cnf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, (ron(vd1399,esk43_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.18/0.54	cnf(c_0_22, plain, (rpoint(vd1399)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])).
0.18/0.54	cnf(c_0_23, plain, (vd1399!=vd1401), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.18/0.54	cnf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, (X1=esk43_0|~ron(vd1401,X1)|~ron(vd1399,X1)|~rline(X1)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21]), c_0_22])]), c_0_23])).
0.18/0.54	cnf(c_0_25, plain, (rline(vd1416)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(s2(plural(the(408))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(the(408))), 0), pred(the(408), 0)))'])).
0.18/0.54	cnf(c_0_26, plain, (ron(vd1401,vd1416)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(s2(plural(the(408))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(the(408))), 0), pred(the(408), 0)))'])).
0.18/0.54	cnf(c_0_27, plain, (ron(vd1399,vd1416)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['and(pred(s2(plural(the(408))), 0), and(pred(s1(plural(the(408))), 0), pred(the(408), 0)))'])).
0.18/0.54	cnf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, (vd1416!=esk43_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.18/0.54	cnf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_25]), c_0_26]), c_0_27])]), c_0_28]), ['proof']).
0.18/0.54	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.18/0.54	% Parsed axioms                        : 125
0.18/0.54	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.18/0.54	% Initial clauses                      : 297
0.18/0.54	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
0.18/0.54	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 295
0.18/0.54	% Processed clauses                    : 378
0.18/0.54	% ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.18/0.54	% ...subsumed                          : 1
0.18/0.54	% ...remaining for further processing  : 377
0.18/0.54	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1197
0.18/0.54	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.18/0.54	% Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.18/0.54	% Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.18/0.54	% Generated clauses                    : 338
0.18/0.54	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 335
0.18/0.54	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.18/0.54	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
0.18/0.54	% Paramodulations                      : 74
0.18/0.54	% Factorizations                       : 0
0.18/0.54	% NegExts                              : 0
0.18/0.54	% Equation resolutions                 : 1206
0.18/0.54	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.18/0.54	% Total rewrite steps                  : 71
0.18/0.54	% ...of those cached                   : 55
0.18/0.54	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.18/0.54	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.18/0.54	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.18/0.54	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.18/0.54	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.18/0.54	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.18/0.54	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.18/0.54	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.18/0.54	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.18/0.54	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.18/0.54	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.18/0.54	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.18/0.54	% Current number of processed clauses  : 122
0.18/0.54	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 25
0.18/0.54	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.18/0.54	%    Negative unit clauses             : 10
0.18/0.54	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 87
0.18/0.54	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 251
0.18/0.54	% ...number of literals in the above   : 2359
0.18/0.54	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.18/0.54	% Current number of archived clauses   : 0
0.18/0.54	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 21251
0.18/0.54	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 738
0.18/0.54	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
0.18/0.54	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 93
0.18/0.54	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.18/0.54	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.18/0.54	% BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.18/0.54	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.18/0.54	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.18/0.54	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 68150
0.18/0.54	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 14998
0.18/0.54	
0.18/0.54	% -------------------------------------------------
0.18/0.54	% User time                : 0.082 s
0.18/0.54	% System time              : 0.010 s
0.18/0.54	% Total time               : 0.092 s
0.18/0.54	% Maximum resident set size: 6068 pages
0.18/0.54	
0.18/0.54	% -------------------------------------------------
0.18/0.54	% User time                : 0.258 s
0.18/0.54	% System time              : 0.031 s
0.18/0.54	% Total time               : 0.289 s
0.18/0.54	% Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
0.18/0.54	% E exiting
0.18/0.55	EOF