0.00/0.03	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.05	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.11/0.44	% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
0.11/0.44	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.44	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.44	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.11/0.44	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.11/0.44	% CPULimit : 1440
0.11/0.44	% WCLimit  : 180
0.11/0.44	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:05:50 UTC 2026
0.11/0.45	% CPUTime  : 
0.11/0.45	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.14/0.49	Running first-order theorem proving
0.14/0.50	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.14/0.52	% Version: 3.5.1
0.14/0.52	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.14/0.52	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.14/0.52	% Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores
0.14/0.52	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.52	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.52	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.52	% new_bool_1 with pid 916437 completed with status 0
0.14/0.52	% Result found by new_bool_1
0.14/0.52	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.14/0.52	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.14/0.52	% Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores
0.14/0.52	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.52	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.52	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.14/0.52	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.14/0.52	% Search class: FGHSF-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
0.14/0.52	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.14/0.52	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.14/0.52	% SubtermCWHack with pid 916439 completed with status 0
0.14/0.52	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.14/0.52	% Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.14/0.52	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.14/0.52	% Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (5) cores
0.14/0.52	% Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.52	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.14/0.52	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.14/0.52	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.14/0.52	% Search class: FGHSF-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
0.14/0.52	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.14/0.52	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.14/0.52	% Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
0.14/0.52	
0.14/0.52	% Proof found!
0.14/0.52	% SZS status Theorem
0.14/0.52	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.14/0.52	fof(theorem_2_7_1, conjecture, ![X1]:((?[X5, X4]:(((end_point(X4,X1)&end_point(X5,X1))&X5!=X4))<=open(X1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', theorem_2_7_1)).
0.14/0.52	fof(open_defn, axiom, ![X1]:((?[X5]:(end_point(X5,X1))<=>open(X1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004+0.ax', open_defn)).
0.14/0.52	fof(c6, axiom, ![X1, X5]:((?[X4]:((end_point(X4,X1)&X5!=X4))<=end_point(X5,X1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004+0.ax', c6)).
0.14/0.52	fof(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1]:((?[X5, X4]:(((end_point(X4,X1)&end_point(X5,X1))&X5!=X4))<=open(X1)))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[theorem_2_7_1])).
0.14/0.52	fof(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1]:((open(X1)=>?[X5, X4]:(((end_point(X4,X1)&end_point(X5,X1))&X5!=X4))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.14/0.52	fof(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X9, X10]:((open(esk1_0)&(~end_point(X10,esk1_0)|~end_point(X9,esk1_0)|X9=X10))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])])).
0.14/0.52	fof(c_0_6, plain, ![X13, X14, X15]:(((~end_point(X14,X13)|open(X13))&(~open(X15)|end_point(esk2_1(X15),X15)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[open_defn])])])])])])).
0.14/0.52	fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X1, X5]:((end_point(X5,X1)=>?[X4]:((end_point(X4,X1)&X5!=X4)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c6])).
0.14/0.52	cnf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (X2=X1|~end_point(X1,esk1_0)|~end_point(X2,esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.14/0.52	cnf(c_0_9, plain, (end_point(esk2_1(X1),X1)|~open(X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.14/0.52	cnf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (open(esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.14/0.52	fof(c_0_11, plain, ![X21, X22]:(((end_point(esk3_2(X21,X22),X21)|~end_point(X22,X21))&(X22!=esk3_2(X21,X22)|~end_point(X22,X21)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])])).
0.14/0.52	cnf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (X1=esk2_1(esk1_0)|~end_point(X1,esk1_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9]), c_0_10])])).
0.14/0.52	cnf(c_0_13, plain, (end_point(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1)|~end_point(X2,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.14/0.52	cnf(c_0_14, plain, (X1!=esk3_2(X2,X1)|~end_point(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.14/0.52	cnf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, (esk3_2(esk1_0,X1)=esk2_1(esk1_0)|~end_point(X1,esk1_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])).
0.14/0.52	cnf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, (~end_point(esk2_1(esk1_0),esk1_0)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])])).
0.14/0.52	cnf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_9]), c_0_10])]), ['proof']).
0.14/0.52	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.14/0.52	% Parsed axioms                        : 17
0.14/0.52	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 6
0.14/0.52	% Initial clauses                      : 35
0.14/0.52	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.14/0.52	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 35
0.14/0.52	% Processed clauses                    : 20
0.14/0.52	% ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.14/0.52	% ...subsumed                          : 1
0.14/0.52	% ...remaining for further processing  : 19
0.14/0.52	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
0.14/0.52	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.14/0.52	% Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.14/0.52	% Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.14/0.52	% Generated clauses                    : 18
0.14/0.52	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 14
0.14/0.52	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.14/0.52	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.14/0.52	% Paramodulations                      : 17
0.14/0.52	% Factorizations                       : 0
0.14/0.52	% NegExts                              : 0
0.14/0.52	% Equation resolutions                 : 1
0.14/0.52	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.14/0.52	% Total rewrite steps                  : 4
0.14/0.52	% ...of those cached                   : 3
0.14/0.52	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.14/0.52	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.14/0.52	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.14/0.52	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.14/0.52	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.14/0.52	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.14/0.52	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.14/0.52	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.14/0.52	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.14/0.52	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.14/0.52	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.14/0.52	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.14/0.52	% Current number of processed clauses  : 19
0.14/0.52	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
0.14/0.52	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.14/0.52	%    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.14/0.52	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 16
0.14/0.52	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 28
0.14/0.52	% ...number of literals in the above   : 104
0.14/0.52	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.14/0.52	% Current number of archived clauses   : 0
0.14/0.52	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 35
0.14/0.52	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 31
0.14/0.52	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
0.14/0.52	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
0.14/0.52	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.14/0.52	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
0.14/0.52	% BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.14/0.52	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.14/0.52	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.14/0.52	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 2997
0.14/0.52	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 887
0.14/0.52	
0.14/0.52	% -------------------------------------------------
0.14/0.52	% User time                : 0.004 s
0.14/0.52	% System time              : 0.003 s
0.14/0.52	% Total time               : 0.007 s
0.14/0.52	% Maximum resident set size: 3656 pages
0.14/0.52	
0.14/0.52	% -------------------------------------------------
0.14/0.52	% User time                : 0.005 s
0.14/0.52	% System time              : 0.009 s
0.14/0.52	% Total time               : 0.014 s
0.14/0.52	% Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
0.14/0.52	% E exiting
0.14/0.52	EOF