0.00/0.02 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 1440 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 180 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:42:22 UTC 2026 0.11/0.38 % CPUTime : 0.11/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.32/0.46 % Version: 3.5.1 0.32/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN. 0.32/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.32/0.46 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 900s (5) cores 0.32/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.32/0.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores 0.32/0.46 % Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.32/0.46 % new_bool_1 with pid 1115530 completed with status 0 0.32/0.46 % Result found by new_bool_1 0.32/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN. 0.32/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.32/0.46 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 900s (5) cores 0.32/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.32/0.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores 0.32/0.46 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)) 0.32/0.46 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0) 0.32/0.46 % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM22-SFFFFFNN 0.32/0.46 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.32/0.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores 0.32/0.46 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1115532 completed with status 0 0.32/0.46 % Result found by SubtermCWHack 0.32/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN. 0.32/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.32/0.46 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 900s (5) cores 0.32/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 180s (1) cores 0.32/0.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores 0.32/0.46 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)) 0.32/0.46 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0) 0.32/0.46 % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM22-SFFFFFNN 0.32/0.46 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.32/0.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores 0.32/0.46 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s 0.32/0.46 0.32/0.46 % Proof found! 0.32/0.46 % SZS status Theorem 0.32/0.46 % SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.32/0.46 fof(happens_terminates_not_holds, axiom, ![X3, X2, X1]:((~(holdsAt(X1,plus(X2,n1)))<=(happens(X3,X2)&terminates(X3,X1,X2)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR001+0.ax', happens_terminates_not_holds)). 0.32/0.46 fof(symmetry_of_plus, axiom, ![X9, X10]:(plus(X10,X9)=plus(X9,X10)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', symmetry_of_plus)). 0.32/0.46 fof(terminates_all_defn, axiom, ![X3, X1, X2]:(((((pull=X3&X1=forwards)&~(happens(push,X2)))|((~(happens(push,X2))&X1=spinning)&pull=X3)|((push=X3&spinning=X1)&~(happens(pull,X2)))|((pull=X3&happens(push,X2))&X1=backwards)|((happens(push,X2)&forwards=X1)&X3=pull)|((X3=push&X1=backwards)&~(happens(pull,X2))))<=>terminates(X3,X1,X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR001+2.ax', terminates_all_defn)). 0.32/0.46 fof(plus1_2, axiom, plus(n1,n2)=n3, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', plus1_2)). 0.32/0.46 fof(not_forwards_3, conjecture, ~(holdsAt(forwards,n3)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', not_forwards_3)). 0.32/0.46 fof(happens_all_defn, axiom, ![X3, X2]:((((push=X3&X2=n0)|(push=X3&X2=n2)|(X3=pull&n2=X2)|(n1=X2&X3=pull))<=>happens(X3,X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR001+2.ax', happens_all_defn)). 0.32/0.46 fof(c_0_6, plain, ![X3, X2, X1]:(((happens(X3,X2)&terminates(X3,X1,X2))=>~holdsAt(X1,plus(X2,n1)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[happens_terminates_not_holds])). 0.32/0.46 fof(c_0_7, plain, ![X22, X23, X24]:((~happens(X22,X23)|~terminates(X22,X24,X23)|~holdsAt(X24,plus(X23,n1)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])). 0.32/0.46 fof(c_0_8, plain, ![X40, X41]:(plus(X41,X40)=plus(X40,X41)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[symmetry_of_plus])). 0.32/0.46 fof(c_0_9, plain, ![X1, X3, X2]:((epred2_3(X2,X3,X1)<=>(((pull=X3&X1=forwards)&~happens(push,X2))|((~happens(push,X2)&X1=spinning)&pull=X3)|((push=X3&spinning=X1)&~happens(pull,X2))|((pull=X3&happens(push,X2))&X1=backwards)|((happens(push,X2)&forwards=X1)&X3=pull)|((X3=push&X1=backwards)&~happens(pull,X2))))), introduced(definition)). 0.32/0.46 fof(c_0_10, plain, ![X1, X3, X2]:((epred1_3(X2,X3,X1)<=>(((pull=X3&X1=forwards)&~happens(push,X2))|((~happens(push,X2)&X1=spinning)&pull=X3)|((push=X3&spinning=X1)&~happens(pull,X2))))), introduced(definition)). 0.32/0.46 cnf(c_0_11, plain, (~happens(X1,X2)|~terminates(X1,X3,X2)|~holdsAt(X3,plus(X2,n1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.32/0.46 cnf(c_0_12, plain, (plus(X1,X2)=plus(X2,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.32/0.46 fof(c_0_13, plain, ![X3, X1, X2]:((epred2_3(X2,X3,X1)<=>terminates(X3,X1,X2))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[terminates_all_defn]), c_0_9])). 0.32/0.46 fof(c_0_14, plain, ![X1, X3, X2]:((epred2_3(X2,X3,X1)<=>(epred1_3(X2,X3,X1)|((pull=X3&happens(push,X2))&X1=backwards)|((happens(push,X2)&forwards=X1)&X3=pull)|((X3=push&X1=backwards)&~happens(pull,X2))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])). 0.32/0.46 cnf(c_0_15, plain, (~holdsAt(X1,plus(n1,X2))|~happens(X3,X2)|~terminates(X3,X1,X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])). 0.32/0.46 cnf(c_0_16, plain, (plus(n1,n2)=n3), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[plus1_2])). 0.32/0.46 fof(c_0_17, plain, ![X27, X28, X29]:(((~epred2_3(X29,X27,X28)|terminates(X27,X28,X29))&(~terminates(X27,X28,X29)|epred2_3(X29,X27,X28)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])])). 0.32/0.46 fof(c_0_18, plain, ![X52, X53, X54]:(((((((((X53=push|(happens(push,X54)|(pull=X53|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52))&(X52=backwards|(happens(push,X54)|(pull=X53|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52)))&(~happens(pull,X54)|(happens(push,X54)|(pull=X53|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52)))&(((X53=push|(forwards=X52|(pull=X53|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52))&(X52=backwards|(forwards=X52|(pull=X53|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52)))&(~happens(pull,X54)|(forwards=X52|(pull=X53|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52))))&(((X53=push|(X53=pull|(pull=X53|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52))&(X52=backwards|(X53=pull|(pull=X53|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52)))&(~happens(pull,X54)|(X53=pull|(pull=X53|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52))))&(((((X53=push|(happens(push,X54)|(happens(push,X54)|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52))&(X52=backwards|(happens(push,X54)|(happens(push,X54)|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52)))&(~happens(pull,X54)|(happens(push,X54)|(happens(push,X54)|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52)))&(((X53=push|(forwards=X52|(happens(push,X54)|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52))&(X52=backwards|(forwards=X52|(happens(push,X54)|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52)))&(~happens(pull,X54)|(forwards=X52|(happens(push,X54)|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52))))&(((X53=push|(X53=pull|(happens(push,X54)|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52))&(X52=backwards|(X53=pull|(happens(push,X54)|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52)))&(~happens(pull,X54)|(X53=pull|(happens(push,X54)|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52)))))&(((((X53=push|(happens(push,X54)|(X52=backwards|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52))&(X52=backwards|(happens(push,X54)|(X52=backwards|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52)))&(~happens(pull,X54)|(happens(push,X54)|(X52=backwards|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52)))&(((X53=push|(forwards=X52|(X52=backwards|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52))&(X52=backwards|(forwards=X52|(X52=backwards|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52)))&(~happens(pull,X54)|(forwards=X52|(X52=backwards|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52))))&(((X53=push|(X53=pull|(X52=backwards|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52))&(X52=backwards|(X53=pull|(X52=backwards|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52)))&(~happens(pull,X54)|(X53=pull|(X52=backwards|epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)))|~epred2_3(X54,X53,X52)))))&((((~epred1_3(X54,X53,X52)|epred2_3(X54,X53,X52))&(pull!=X53|~happens(push,X54)|X52!=backwards|epred2_3(X54,X53,X52)))&(~happens(push,X54)|forwards!=X52|X53!=pull|epred2_3(X54,X53,X52)))&(X53!=push|X52!=backwards|happens(pull,X54)|epred2_3(X54,X53,X52))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])])])])). 0.32/0.46 fof(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ~(~(holdsAt(forwards,n3))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[not_forwards_3])). 0.32/0.46 fof(c_0_20, plain, ![X47, X48]:((((((push!=X47|X48!=n0|happens(X47,X48))&(push!=X47|X48!=n2|happens(X47,X48)))&(X47!=pull|n2!=X48|happens(X47,X48)))&(n1!=X48|X47!=pull|happens(X47,X48)))&(((((n1=X48|(X47=pull|(push=X47|push=X47))|~happens(X47,X48))&(X47=pull|(X47=pull|(push=X47|push=X47))|~happens(X47,X48)))&((n1=X48|(n2=X48|(push=X47|push=X47))|~happens(X47,X48))&(X47=pull|(n2=X48|(push=X47|push=X47))|~happens(X47,X48))))&(((n1=X48|(X47=pull|(X48=n2|push=X47))|~happens(X47,X48))&(X47=pull|(X47=pull|(X48=n2|push=X47))|~happens(X47,X48)))&((n1=X48|(n2=X48|(X48=n2|push=X47))|~happens(X47,X48))&(X47=pull|(n2=X48|(X48=n2|push=X47))|~happens(X47,X48)))))&((((n1=X48|(X47=pull|(push=X47|X48=n0))|~happens(X47,X48))&(X47=pull|(X47=pull|(push=X47|X48=n0))|~happens(X47,X48)))&((n1=X48|(n2=X48|(push=X47|X48=n0))|~happens(X47,X48))&(X47=pull|(n2=X48|(push=X47|X48=n0))|~happens(X47,X48))))&(((n1=X48|(X47=pull|(X48=n2|X48=n0))|~happens(X47,X48))&(X47=pull|(X47=pull|(X48=n2|X48=n0))|~happens(X47,X48)))&((n1=X48|(n2=X48|(X48=n2|X48=n0))|~happens(X47,X48))&(X47=pull|(n2=X48|(X48=n2|X48=n0))|~happens(X47,X48)))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[happens_all_defn])])])])). 0.32/0.46 cnf(c_0_21, plain, (~holdsAt(X1,n3)|~happens(X2,n2)|~terminates(X2,X1,n2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])). 0.32/0.46 cnf(c_0_22, plain, (terminates(X2,X3,X1)|~epred2_3(X1,X2,X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])). 0.32/0.46 cnf(c_0_23, plain, (epred2_3(X1,X3,X2)|~happens(push,X1)|forwards!=X2|X3!=pull), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])). 0.32/0.46 fof(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, holdsAt(forwards,n3), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])). 0.32/0.46 cnf(c_0_25, plain, (happens(X1,X2)|X1!=pull|n2!=X2), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])). 0.32/0.46 cnf(c_0_26, plain, (happens(X1,X2)|push!=X1|X2!=n2), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])). 0.32/0.46 cnf(c_0_27, plain, (~epred2_3(n2,X1,X2)|~holdsAt(X2,n3)|~happens(X1,n2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22])). 0.32/0.46 cnf(c_0_28, plain, (epred2_3(X1,pull,forwards)|~happens(push,X1)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])])). 0.32/0.46 cnf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, (holdsAt(forwards,n3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])). 0.32/0.46 cnf(c_0_30, plain, (happens(pull,n2)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])])). 0.32/0.46 cnf(c_0_31, plain, (happens(push,n2)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_26])])). 0.32/0.46 cnf(c_0_32, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_28]), c_0_29]), c_0_30]), c_0_31])]), ['proof']). 0.32/0.46 % SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.32/0.46 % Parsed axioms : 48 0.32/0.46 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 17 0.32/0.46 % Initial clauses : 154 0.32/0.46 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 3 0.32/0.46 % Initial clauses in saturation : 151 0.32/0.46 % Processed clauses : 202 0.32/0.46 % ...of these trivial : 0 0.32/0.46 % ...subsumed : 73 0.32/0.46 % ...remaining for further processing : 129 0.32/0.46 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 26 0.32/0.46 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.32/0.46 % Backward-subsumed : 1 0.32/0.46 % Backward-rewritten : 2 0.32/0.46 % Generated clauses : 187 0.32/0.46 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 131 0.32/0.46 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.32/0.46 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1 0.32/0.46 % Paramodulations : 171 0.32/0.46 % Factorizations : 2 0.32/0.46 % NegExts : 0 0.32/0.46 % Equation resolutions : 26 0.32/0.46 % Disequality decompositions : 0 0.32/0.46 % Total rewrite steps : 59 0.32/0.46 % ...of those cached : 45 0.32/0.46 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.32/0.46 % Propositional check models : 0 0.32/0.46 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.32/0.46 % Propositional clauses : 0 0.32/0.46 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.32/0.46 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.32/0.46 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.32/0.46 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.32/0.46 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.32/0.46 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.32/0.46 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.32/0.46 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.32/0.46 % Current number of processed clauses : 112 0.32/0.46 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 15 0.32/0.46 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1 0.32/0.46 % Negative unit clauses : 15 0.32/0.46 % Non-unit-clauses : 81 0.32/0.46 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 80 0.32/0.46 % ...number of literals in the above : 340 0.32/0.46 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.32/0.46 % Current number of archived clauses : 3 0.32/0.46 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 739 0.32/0.46 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 531 0.32/0.46 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 53 0.32/0.46 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 70 0.32/0.46 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.32/0.46 % BW rewrite match attempts : 12 0.32/0.46 % BW rewrite match successes : 12 0.32/0.46 % Condensation attempts : 0 0.32/0.46 % Condensation successes : 0 0.32/0.46 % Termbank termtop insertions : 8624 0.32/0.46 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1385 0.32/0.46 0.32/0.46 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.32/0.46 % User time : 0.014 s 0.32/0.46 % System time : 0.003 s 0.32/0.46 % Total time : 0.016 s 0.32/0.46 % Maximum resident set size: 3900 pages 0.32/0.46 0.32/0.46 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.32/0.46 % User time : 0.017 s 0.32/0.46 % System time : 0.007 s 0.32/0.46 % Total time : 0.024 s 0.32/0.46 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages 0.32/0.46 % E exiting 0.32/0.47 EOF