0.06/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.06/0.12	% Command    : run_vampire %s %d THM
0.12/0.33	% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
0.12/0.33	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.33	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.33	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.12/0.33	% WCLimit    : 180
0.12/0.33	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 04:09:24 EDT 2024
0.12/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.12/0.35	This is a TFF_ problem
0.12/0.35	Running first-order theorem proving
0.12/0.35	Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.21/0.41	% (26142)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
0.21/0.41	% (26146)ott+21_1:1_erd=off:s2a=on:sac=on:sd=1:sgt=64:sos=on:ss=included:st=3.0:to=lpo:urr=on:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (1800ds/2Mi)
0.21/0.41	% (26142)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
0.21/0.41	% (26147)ott+1011_1:2_br=off:bs=unit_only:bsr=unit_only:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2agt=32:urr=on:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (1800ds/37Mi)
0.21/0.41	% (26142)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
0.21/0.41	% (26148)lrs+10_1:32_s2a=on:s2agt=10:sgt=8:ss=axioms:i=15:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (1800ds/15Mi)
0.21/0.41	% (26142)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
0.21/0.41	% (26149)lrs+10_5:1_br=off:fde=none:nwc=3.0:sd=1:sgt=10:sos=on:ss=axioms:urr=on:i=32:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (1800ds/32Mi)
0.21/0.41	% (26142)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
0.21/0.41	% (26144)lrs+1010_1:1_aac=none:bce=on:nicw=on:nm=0:plsq=on:plsql=on:sac=on:sos=on:sp=frequency:spb=units:to=lpo:i=34:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (1800ds/34Mi)
0.21/0.41	% (26142)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
0.21/0.41	% (26143)dis+1010_1:4_aac=none:abs=on:atotf=0.5:avsq=on:avsqc=2:avsqr=215,247:awrs=converge:awrsf=128:bsd=on:erd=off:fde=none:gve=cautious:newcnf=on:nwc=5.0:rnwc=on:sac=on:sas=z3:sp=const_min:tgt=ground:thsq=on:thsqc=64:thsqr=1,4:i=59848:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (1800ds/59848Mi)
0.21/0.41	% (26142)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
0.21/0.41	% (26145)dis+1011_1:64_drc=off:flr=on:nwc=2.0:sac=on:urr=ec_only:i=8:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (1800ds/8Mi)
0.21/0.41	% (26146)Instruction limit reached!
0.21/0.41	% (26146)------------------------------
0.21/0.41	% (26146)Version: Vampire 4.9 (commit 18c118a85 on 2024-06-08 21:14:20 +0100)
0.21/0.41	% (26146)Linked with Z3 4.12.3.0 79bbbf76d0c123481c8ca05cd3a98939270074d3 z3-4.8.4-7980-g79bbbf76d
0.21/0.41	% (26146)Termination reason: Time limit
0.21/0.41	% (26146)Termination phase: Saturation
0.21/0.41	
0.21/0.41	% (26146)Memory used [KB]: 798
0.21/0.41	% (26146)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
0.21/0.41	% (26146)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
0.21/0.42	% (26149)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (26149)------------------------------
0.21/0.42	% (26149)Version: Vampire 4.9 (commit 18c118a85 on 2024-06-08 21:14:20 +0100)
0.21/0.42	% (26149)Linked with Z3 4.12.3.0 79bbbf76d0c123481c8ca05cd3a98939270074d3 z3-4.8.4-7980-g79bbbf76d
0.21/0.42	% (26149)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
0.21/0.42	
0.21/0.42	% (26149)Memory used [KB]: 861
0.21/0.42	% (26149)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
0.21/0.42	% (26149)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
0.21/0.42	% (26149)------------------------------
0.21/0.42	% (26149)------------------------------
0.21/0.42	% (26145)Instruction limit reached!
0.21/0.42	% (26145)------------------------------
0.21/0.42	% (26145)Version: Vampire 4.9 (commit 18c118a85 on 2024-06-08 21:14:20 +0100)
0.21/0.42	% (26145)Linked with Z3 4.12.3.0 79bbbf76d0c123481c8ca05cd3a98939270074d3 z3-4.8.4-7980-g79bbbf76d
0.21/0.42	% (26145)Termination reason: Time limit
0.21/0.42	% (26145)Termination phase: Saturation
0.21/0.42	
0.21/0.42	% (26145)Memory used [KB]: 898
0.21/0.42	% (26145)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
0.21/0.42	% (26145)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
0.21/0.42	% (26148)First to succeed.
0.21/0.42	% (26148)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-26142"
0.21/0.42	% (26142)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
0.21/0.42	% (26148)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
0.21/0.42	% SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
0.21/0.42	% SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
0.21/0.42	tff(type_def_5, type, array: $tType).
0.21/0.42	tff(func_def_0, type, read: (array * $int) > $int).
0.21/0.42	tff(func_def_1, type, write: (array * $int * $int) > array).
0.21/0.42	tff(func_def_12, type, sK0: array).
0.21/0.42	tff(f351,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  $false),
0.21/0.42	  inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f350,f32])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f32,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ( ! [X2 : $int] : (53 != read(sK0,X2)) )),
0.21/0.42	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f30,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ! [X1 : $int] : ($less(30,X1) | $less(X1,20) | $sum($product(2,X1),3) = read(sK0,X1)) & ! [X2 : $int] : 53 != read(sK0,X2)),
0.21/0.42	  inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f28,f29])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f29,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ? [X0 : array] : (! [X1 : $int] : ($less(30,X1) | $less(X1,20) | read(X0,X1) = $sum($product(2,X1),3)) & ! [X2 : $int] : read(X0,X2) != 53) => (! [X1 : $int] : ($less(30,X1) | $less(X1,20) | $sum($product(2,X1),3) = read(sK0,X1)) & ! [X2 : $int] : 53 != read(sK0,X2))),
0.21/0.42	  introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f28,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ? [X0 : array] : (! [X1 : $int] : ($less(30,X1) | $less(X1,20) | read(X0,X1) = $sum($product(2,X1),3)) & ! [X2 : $int] : read(X0,X2) != 53)),
0.21/0.42	  inference(flattening,[],[f27])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f27,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ? [X0 : array] : (! [X2 : $int] : read(X0,X2) != 53 & ! [X1 : $int] : (read(X0,X1) = $sum($product(2,X1),3) | ($less(X1,20) | $less(30,X1))))),
0.21/0.42	  inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f24])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f24,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ~! [X0 : array] : (! [X1 : $int] : ((~$less(X1,20) & ~$less(30,X1)) => read(X0,X1) = $sum($product(2,X1),3)) => ? [X2 : $int] : read(X0,X2) = 53)),
0.21/0.42	  inference(rectify,[],[f5])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f5,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ~! [X4 : array] : (! [X5 : $int] : ((~$less(30,X5) & ~$less(X5,20)) => read(X4,X5) = $sum($product(2,X5),3)) => ? [X6 : $int] : read(X4,X6) = 53)),
0.21/0.42	  inference(theory_normalization,[],[f4])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f4,negated_conjecture,(
0.21/0.42	  ~! [X4 : array] : (! [X5 : $int] : (($lesseq(X5,30) & $lesseq(20,X5)) => read(X4,X5) = $sum($product(2,X5),3)) => ? [X6 : $int] : read(X4,X6) = 53)),
0.21/0.42	  inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f3])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f3,conjecture,(
0.21/0.42	  ! [X4 : array] : (! [X5 : $int] : (($lesseq(X5,30) & $lesseq(20,X5)) => read(X4,X5) = $sum($product(2,X5),3)) => ? [X6 : $int] : read(X4,X6) = 53)),
0.21/0.42	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unknown)).
0.21/0.42	tff(f350,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  53 = read(sK0,25)),
0.21/0.42	  inference(evaluation,[],[f340])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f340,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  read(sK0,$sum(5,20)) = $sum(3,$product(2,$sum(5,20))) | $less(30,$sum(5,20))),
0.21/0.42	  inference(resolution,[],[f309,f37])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f37,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ( ! [X1 : $int] : ($less(30,X1) | $less(X1,20) | read(sK0,X1) = $sum(3,$product(2,X1))) )),
0.21/0.42	  inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f33,f6])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f6,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($sum(X0,X1) = $sum(X1,X0)) )),
0.21/0.42	  introduced(theory_axiom_143,[])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f33,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ( ! [X1 : $int] : ($less(X1,20) | $sum($product(2,X1),3) = read(sK0,X1) | $less(30,X1)) )),
0.21/0.42	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f309,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ( ! [X0 : $int] : (~$less($sum(5,X0),X0)) )),
0.21/0.42	  inference(evaluation,[],[f299])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f299,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ( ! [X0 : $int] : (~$less($sum(4,$sum(X0,1)),X0)) )),
0.21/0.42	  inference(resolution,[],[f241,f100])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f100,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($less(X0,$sum(X1,1)) | ~$less(X0,X1)) )),
0.21/0.42	  inference(resolution,[],[f12,f68])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f68,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ( ! [X0 : $int] : ($less(X0,$sum(X0,1))) )),
0.21/0.42	  inference(resolution,[],[f15,f11])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f11,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ( ! [X0 : $int] : (~$less(X0,X0)) )),
0.21/0.42	  introduced(theory_axiom_150,[])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f15,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ( ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : ($less(X1,$sum(X0,1)) | $less(X0,X1)) )),
0.21/0.42	  introduced(theory_axiom_155,[])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f12,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ( ! [X2 : $int,X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : (~$less(X1,X2) | ~$less(X0,X1) | $less(X0,X2)) )),
0.21/0.42	  introduced(theory_axiom_151,[])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f241,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ( ! [X0 : $int] : (~$less($sum(4,X0),X0)) )),
0.21/0.42	  inference(evaluation,[],[f229])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f229,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ( ! [X0 : $int] : (~$less($sum(3,$sum(X0,1)),X0)) )),
0.21/0.42	  inference(resolution,[],[f198,f100])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f198,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ( ! [X0 : $int] : (~$less($sum(3,X0),X0)) )),
0.21/0.42	  inference(evaluation,[],[f185])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f185,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ( ! [X0 : $int] : (~$less($sum(2,$sum(X0,1)),X0)) )),
0.21/0.42	  inference(resolution,[],[f161,f100])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f161,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ( ! [X0 : $int] : (~$less($sum(2,X0),X0)) )),
0.21/0.42	  inference(evaluation,[],[f149])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f149,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ( ! [X0 : $int] : (~$less($sum($sum(X0,1),1),X0)) )),
0.21/0.42	  inference(resolution,[],[f141,f100])).
0.21/0.42	tff(f141,plain,(
0.21/0.42	  ( ! [X0 : $int] : (~$less($sum(X0,1),X0)) )),
0.21/0.42	  inference(resolution,[],[f100,f11])).
0.21/0.42	% SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
0.21/0.42	% (26148)------------------------------
0.21/0.42	% (26148)Version: Vampire 4.9 (commit 18c118a85 on 2024-06-08 21:14:20 +0100)
0.21/0.42	% (26148)Linked with Z3 4.12.3.0 79bbbf76d0c123481c8ca05cd3a98939270074d3 z3-4.8.4-7980-g79bbbf76d
0.21/0.42	% (26148)Termination reason: Refutation
0.21/0.42	
0.21/0.42	% (26148)Memory used [KB]: 896
0.21/0.42	% (26148)Time elapsed: 0.012 s
0.21/0.42	% (26148)Instructions burned: 15 (million)
0.21/0.42	% (26148)------------------------------
0.21/0.42	% (26148)------------------------------
0.21/0.42	% (26142)Success in time 0.058 s
0.21/0.43	EOF