0.03/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.03/0.12 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jul 5 04:22:24 EDT 2024 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : 0.12/0.36 This is a TFF_ problem 0.12/0.36 Running vampire --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.21/0.36 % (31349)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP 0.21/0.42 % (31352)dis-10_20_canc=force:fsd=off:gs=on:gsem=off:nm=0:sas=z3:sac=on:tha=off:thi=strong:tgt=ground_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi) 0.21/0.42 % (31353)dis-11_10:1_canc=force:fsd=off:nwc=1.5:sas=z3:tha=off:uwa=all_472 on theBenchmark for (472ds/0Mi) 0.21/0.42 % (31350)lrs+2_32_add=large:amm=off:bd=off:bs=unit_only:drc=off:flr=on:fsd=off:fde=none:nm=0:nwc=1.1:sos=theory:sp=reverse_arity:tgt=ground:stl=180_1034 on theBenchmark for (1034ds/0Mi) 0.21/0.42 % (31351)dis-1010_2:3_canc=force:fsd=off:fde=unused:gs=on:gsem=on:nm=0:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:tha=off:thf=on:uwa=ground_572 on theBenchmark for (572ds/0Mi) 0.21/0.42 % (31355)ott+10_1024_av=off:bd=preordered:br=off:ep=RSTC:fsr=off:fde=none:nm=2:urr=on_318 on theBenchmark for (318ds/0Mi) 0.21/0.42 % (31356)lrs-1010_3_av=off:br=off:drc=off:er=known:fsd=off:fde=unused:nm=4:nwc=3.0:sp=scramble:urr=on:stl=180_280 on theBenchmark for (280ds/0Mi) 0.21/0.42 % (31354)lrs+1010_2:1_amm=off:bs=on:bsr=on:canc=force:fsd=off:fsr=off:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=on:nm=0:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sac=on:tha=off:thi=overlap:tgt=ground:uwa=ground:stl=60_408 on theBenchmark for (408ds/0Mi) 10.37/1.89 % (31353)First to succeed. 10.37/1.89 % (31353)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya! 10.37/1.89 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark 10.37/1.89 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark 10.37/1.89 tff(func_def_0, type, a: $int). 10.37/1.89 tff(func_def_1, type, b: $int). 10.37/1.89 tff(func_def_2, type, c: $int). 10.37/1.89 tff(func_def_3, type, d: $int). 10.37/1.89 tff(f19,plain,( 10.37/1.89 $false), 10.37/1.89 inference(avatar_smt_refutation,[],[f13,f18])). 10.37/1.89 tff(f18,plain,( 10.37/1.89 spl0_2), 10.37/1.89 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f7,f15])). 10.37/1.89 tff(f15,plain,( 10.37/1.89 spl0_2 <=> $sum($sum($sum($product(a,a),$product($product($sum(a,b),$sum($sum(c,d),1)),$sum(a,2))),b),$product(-1,$product($sum($sum($sum(a,b),c),d),$sum(2,c)))) = 0), 10.37/1.89 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])])). 10.37/1.89 tff(f7,plain,( 10.37/1.89 $sum($sum($sum($product(a,a),$product($product($sum(a,b),$sum($sum(c,d),1)),$sum(a,2))),b),$product(-1,$product($sum($sum($sum(a,b),c),d),$sum(2,c)))) = 0), 10.37/1.89 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1])). 10.37/1.89 tff(f1,axiom,( 10.37/1.89 $sum($sum($sum($product(a,a),$product($product($sum(a,b),$sum($sum(c,d),1)),$sum(a,2))),b),$product(-1,$product($sum($sum($sum(a,b),c),d),$sum(2,c)))) = 0), 10.37/1.89 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',eq)). 10.37/1.89 tff(f13,plain,( 10.37/1.89 ~spl0_1), 10.37/1.89 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f8,f10])). 10.37/1.89 tff(f10,plain,( 10.37/1.89 spl0_1 <=> 0 = $sum($product($product(d,b),a),$product(-1,$sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($product(-2,$product(a,a)),$product(-1,$product(c,a))),$uminus(b)),$product(-1,$product(b,a))),$product(2,c)),$product(-1,$product(c,b))),$product(c,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(c,a),a))),$product(-2,$product(d,a))),$product(-2,$product(d,b))),$product(-1,$product($product(c,b),a))),$product(d,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(d,a),a))),$product(2,d))))), 10.37/1.89 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])])). 10.37/1.89 tff(f8,plain,( 10.37/1.89 0 != $sum($product($product(d,b),a),$product(-1,$sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($product(-2,$product(a,a)),$product(-1,$product(c,a))),$uminus(b)),$product(-1,$product(b,a))),$product(2,c)),$product(-1,$product(c,b))),$product(c,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(c,a),a))),$product(-2,$product(d,a))),$product(-2,$product(d,b))),$product(-1,$product($product(c,b),a))),$product(d,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(d,a),a))),$product(2,d))))), 10.37/1.89 inference(evaluation,[],[f6])). 10.37/1.89 tff(f6,plain,( 10.37/1.89 0 != $sum($product($product(d,b),a),$product(-1,$sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($product(-2,$product(a,a)),$product(-1,$product(c,a))),$uminus(b)),$product(-1,$product(b,a))),$product(2,c)),$product(-1,$product(c,b))),$product(c,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(c,a),a))),$product(-1,$product(2,$product(d,a)))),$product(-1,$product(2,$product(d,b)))),$product(-1,$product($product(c,b),a))),$product(d,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(d,a),a))),$product(2,d))))), 10.37/1.89 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5])). 10.37/1.89 tff(f5,plain,( 10.37/1.89 0 != $sum($product($product(d,b),a),$product(-1,$sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($product(-2,$product(a,a)),$product(-1,$product(c,a))),$uminus(b)),$product(-1,$product(b,a))),$product(2,c)),$product(-1,$product(c,b))),$product(c,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(c,a),a))),$product(-1,$product(2,$product(d,a)))),$product(-1,$product(2,$product(d,b)))),$product(-1,$product($product(c,b),a))),$product(d,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(d,a),a))),$product(2,d))))), 10.37/1.89 inference(flattening,[],[f4])). 10.37/1.89 tff(f4,plain,( 10.37/1.89 ~0 = $sum($product($product(d,b),a),$product(-1,$sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($product(-2,$product(a,a)),$product(-1,$product(c,a))),$uminus(b)),$product(-1,$product(b,a))),$product(2,c)),$product(-1,$product(c,b))),$product(c,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(c,a),a))),$product(-1,$product(2,$product(d,a)))),$product(-1,$product(2,$product(d,b)))),$product(-1,$product($product(c,b),a))),$product(d,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(d,a),a))),$product(2,d))))), 10.37/1.89 inference(theory_normalization,[],[f3])). 10.37/1.89 tff(f3,negated_conjecture,( 10.37/1.89 ~0 = $sum($product($product(d,b),a),$product(-1,$sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($difference($sum($product(-2,$product(a,a)),$product(-1,$product(c,a))),b),$product(-1,$product(b,a))),$product(2,c)),$product(-1,$product(c,b))),$product(c,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(c,a),a))),$product(-1,$product(2,$product(d,a)))),$product(-1,$product(2,$product(d,b)))),$product(-1,$product($product(c,b),a))),$product(d,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(d,a),a))),$product(2,d))))), 10.37/1.89 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f2])). 10.37/1.89 tff(f2,conjecture,( 10.37/1.89 0 = $sum($product($product(d,b),a),$product(-1,$sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($sum($difference($sum($product(-2,$product(a,a)),$product(-1,$product(c,a))),b),$product(-1,$product(b,a))),$product(2,c)),$product(-1,$product(c,b))),$product(c,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(c,a),a))),$product(-1,$product(2,$product(d,a)))),$product(-1,$product(2,$product(d,b)))),$product(-1,$product($product(c,b),a))),$product(d,c)),$product(-1,$product($product(d,a),a))),$product(2,d))))), 10.37/1.89 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj)). 10.37/1.89 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark 10.37/1.89 % (31353)------------------------------ 10.37/1.89 % (31353)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 05ef610bd on 2023-06-21 19:03:17 +0100) 10.37/1.89 % (31353)Linked with Z3 4.9.1.0 6ed071b44407cf6623b8d3c0dceb2a8fb7040cee z3-4.8.4-6427-g6ed071b44 10.37/1.89 % (31353)Termination reason: Refutation 10.37/1.89 10.37/1.89 % (31353)Memory used [KB]: 1023 10.37/1.89 % (31353)Time elapsed: 1.470 s 10.37/1.89 % (31353)------------------------------ 10.37/1.89 % (31353)------------------------------ 10.37/1.89 % (31349)Success in time 1.495 s 10.37/1.89 31351 Aborted by signal SIGHUP on /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 10.37/1.89 % (31351)------------------------------ 10.37/1.89 % (31351)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 05ef610bd on 2023-06-21 19:03:17 +0100) 10.37/1.89 31354 Aborted by signal SIGHUP on /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 10.37/1.89 % (31354)------------------------------ 10.37/1.89 % (31354)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 05ef610bd on 2023-06-21 19:03:17 +0100) 10.37/1.89 31352 Aborted by signal SIGHUP on /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 10.37/1.89 % (31352)------------------------------ 10.37/1.89 % (31352)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 05ef610bd on 2023-06-21 19:03:17 +0100) 10.37/1.89 % (31351)Linked with Z3 4.9.1.0 6ed071b44407cf6623b8d3c0dceb2a8fb7040cee z3-4.8.4-6427-g6ed071b44 10.37/1.89 % (31354)Linked with Z3 4.9.1.0 6ed071b44407cf6623b8d3c0dceb2a8fb7040cee z3-4.8.4-6427-g6ed071b44 10.37/1.89 % (31352)Linked with Z3 4.9.1.0 6ed071b44407cf6623b8d3c0dceb2a8fb7040cee z3-4.8.4-6427-g6ed071b44 10.37/1.89 % (31351)Termination reason: Refutation not found, SMT solver inside AVATAR returned Unknown 10.37/1.89 % (31354)Termination reason: Refutation not found, SMT solver inside AVATAR returned Unknown 10.37/1.89 % (31352)Termination reason: Refutation not found, SMT solver inside AVATAR returned Unknown 10.37/1.89 10.37/1.89 10.37/1.89 10.37/1.89 % (31354)Memory used [KB]: 8443 10.37/1.89 % (31352)Memory used [KB]: 5628 10.37/1.89 % (31351)Memory used [KB]: 6268 10.37/1.89 % (31354)Time elapsed: 1.473 s 10.37/1.89 % (31352)Time elapsed: 1.473 s 10.37/1.89 % (31351)Time elapsed: 1.474 s 10.37/1.89 % (31354)------------------------------ 10.37/1.89 % (31354)------------------------------ 10.37/1.89 % (31352)------------------------------ 10.37/1.89 % (31352)------------------------------ 10.37/1.89 % (31351)------------------------------ 10.37/1.89 % (31351)------------------------------ 10.37/1.89 % Vampire---4.8 exiting 10.37/1.91 EOF