0.00/0.09	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.10	% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
0.09/0.30	% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
0.09/0.30	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.09/0.30	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.09/0.30	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.09/0.30	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.09/0.30	% CPULimit : 960
0.09/0.30	% WCLimit  : 120
0.09/0.30	% DateTime : Tue Aug  9 02:15:57 EDT 2022
0.09/0.30	% CPUTime  : 
0.70/1.02	============================== Prover9 ===============================
0.70/1.02	Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
0.70/1.02	Process 28479 was started by sandbox on n023.cluster.edu,
0.70/1.02	Tue Aug  9 02:15:58 2022
0.70/1.02	The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 960 -f /tmp/Prover9_28325_n023.cluster.edu".
0.70/1.02	============================== end of head ===========================
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	============================== INPUT =================================
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	% Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_28325_n023.cluster.edu
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	set(prolog_style_variables).
0.70/1.02	set(auto2).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
0.70/1.02	    % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
0.70/1.02	    % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
0.70/1.02	    % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
0.70/1.02	assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
0.70/1.02	assign(sos_limit,10000).
0.70/1.02	assign(order,kbo).
0.70/1.02	set(lex_order_vars).
0.70/1.02	clear(print_given).
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	% formulas(sos).  % not echoed (19 formulas)
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	============================== end of input ==========================
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	% From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 960).
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	% Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
0.70/1.02	1 (all X21 all X22 (-id(X21,X22) | id(X22,X21))) # label(axiom_6) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	2 (all X11 exists Y21 all X12 (r2(X11,X12) & id(X12,Y21) | -r2(X11,X12) & -id(X12,Y21))) # label(axiom_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	3 (exists Y24 all X19 (-id(X19,Y24) & -r1(X19) | r1(X19) & id(X19,Y24))) # label(axiom_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	4 (all X16 all X17 exists Y23 all X18 (id(X18,Y23) & r4(X16,X17,X18) | -id(X18,Y23) & -r4(X16,X17,X18))) # label(axiom_4) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	5 (all X3 all X10 ((all Y12 ((all Y13 (-r2(X3,Y13) | -id(Y13,Y12))) | -r2(X10,Y12))) | id(X3,X10))) # label(axiom_3a) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	6 (all X6 ((exists Y19 (id(X6,Y19) & r1(Y19))) | (exists Y1 exists Y11 (id(X6,Y11) & r2(Y1,Y11))))) # label(axiom_6a) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	7 (all X13 all X14 exists Y22 all X15 (-r3(X13,X14,X15) & -id(X15,Y22) | id(X15,Y22) & r3(X13,X14,X15))) # label(axiom_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	8 (all X4 exists Y9 ((exists Y16 (r3(X4,Y16,Y9) & r1(Y16))) & id(Y9,X4))) # label(axiom_4a) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	9 (all X20 id(X20,X20)) # label(axiom_5) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	10 (all X7 all Y10 (-r2(X7,Y10) | (all Y20 (-id(Y20,Y10) | -r1(Y20))))) # label(axiom_7a) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	11 (all X1 all X8 exists Y4 ((exists Y5 (id(Y5,Y4) & (exists Y15 (r2(X8,Y15) & r3(X1,Y15,Y5))))) & (exists Y7 (r2(Y7,Y4) & r3(X1,X8,Y7))))) # label(axiom_1a) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	12 (all X32 all X33 all X34 all X35 all X36 all X37 (-r3(X35,X36,X37) & -r3(X32,X33,X34) | r3(X35,X36,X37) & r3(X32,X33,X34) | -id(X34,X37) | -id(X33,X36) | -id(X32,X35))) # label(axiom_10) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	13 (all X2 all X9 exists Y2 ((exists Y6 (r3(Y6,X2,Y2) & r4(X2,X9,Y6))) & (exists Y3 ((exists Y14 (r2(X9,Y14) & r4(X2,Y14,Y3))) & id(Y3,Y2))))) # label(axiom_2a) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	14 (all X5 exists Y8 ((exists Y17 (r1(Y17) & r4(X5,Y17,Y8))) & (exists Y18 (id(Y8,Y18) & r1(Y18))))) # label(axiom_5a) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	15 (all X23 all X24 all X25 (-id(X23,X24) | -id(X24,X25) | id(X23,X25))) # label(axiom_7) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	16 (all X26 all X27 (-id(X26,X27) | -r1(X26) & -r1(X27) | r1(X27) & r1(X26))) # label(axiom_8) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	17 (all X38 all X39 all X40 all X41 all X42 all X43 (-id(X38,X41) | -id(X40,X43) | r4(X38,X39,X40) & r4(X41,X42,X43) | -r4(X41,X42,X43) & -r4(X38,X39,X40) | -id(X39,X42))) # label(axiom_11) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	18 (all X28 all X29 all X30 all X31 (-id(X28,X30) | -id(X29,X31) | -r2(X28,X29) & -r2(X30,X31) | r2(X28,X29) & r2(X30,X31))) # label(axiom_9) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	19 -(exists Y1 exists Y2 exists Y3 (r3(Y1,Y2,Y3) & (exists Y4 ((exists Y5 (r2(Y5,Y4) & (exists Y6 (r2(Y6,Y5) & (exists Y7 (r1(Y7) & r2(Y7,Y6))))))) & id(Y3,Y4))))) # label(xplusyidthree) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	============================== end predicate elimination =============
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	Term ordering decisions:
0.70/1.02	Function symbol KB weights:  c1=1. f2=1. f6=1. f9=1. f10=1. f11=1. f12=1. f13=1. f14=1. f15=1. f16=1. f1=1. f3=1. f4=1. f5=1. f7=1. f8=1. f17=1. f18=1. f19=1.
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	============================== end of process initial clauses ========
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	============================== end of clauses for search =============
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	============================== SEARCH ================================
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	% Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	============================== PROOF =================================
0.70/1.02	% SZS status Theorem
0.70/1.02	% SZS output start Refutation
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	% Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
0.70/1.02	% Length of proof is 11.
0.70/1.02	% Level of proof is 3.
0.70/1.02	% Maximum clause weight is 18.000.
0.70/1.02	% Given clauses 24.
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	8 (all X4 exists Y9 ((exists Y16 (r3(X4,Y16,Y9) & r1(Y16))) & id(Y9,X4))) # label(axiom_4a) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	13 (all X2 all X9 exists Y2 ((exists Y6 (r3(Y6,X2,Y2) & r4(X2,X9,Y6))) & (exists Y3 ((exists Y14 (r2(X9,Y14) & r4(X2,Y14,Y3))) & id(Y3,Y2))))) # label(axiom_2a) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	14 (all X5 exists Y8 ((exists Y17 (r1(Y17) & r4(X5,Y17,Y8))) & (exists Y18 (id(Y8,Y18) & r1(Y18))))) # label(axiom_5a) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	19 -(exists Y1 exists Y2 exists Y3 (r3(Y1,Y2,Y3) & (exists Y4 ((exists Y5 (r2(Y5,Y4) & (exists Y6 (r2(Y6,Y5) & (exists Y7 (r1(Y7) & r2(Y7,Y6))))))) & id(Y3,Y4))))) # label(xplusyidthree) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.70/1.02	23 r1(f19(A)) # label(axiom_5a) # label(axiom).  [clausify(14)].
0.70/1.02	24 id(f7(A),A) # label(axiom_4a) # label(axiom).  [clausify(8)].
0.70/1.02	26 r2(A,f16(B,A)) # label(axiom_2a) # label(axiom).  [clausify(13)].
0.70/1.02	28 r3(A,f8(A),f7(A)) # label(axiom_4a) # label(axiom).  [clausify(8)].
0.70/1.02	43 -r3(A,B,C) | -r2(D,E) | -r2(F,D) | -r1(V6) | -r2(V6,F) | -id(C,E) # label(xplusyidthree) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(19)].
0.70/1.02	113 -r3(A,B,f7(f16(C,f16(D,f16(E,f19(F)))))).  [ur(43,b,26,a,c,26,a,d,23,a,e,26,a,f,24,a)].
0.70/1.02	114 $F.  [resolve(113,a,28,a)].
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	% SZS output end Refutation
0.70/1.02	============================== end of proof ==========================
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	============================== STATISTICS ============================
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	Given=24. Generated=106. Kept=94. proofs=1.
0.70/1.02	Usable=24. Sos=65. Demods=0. Limbo=4, Disabled=43. Hints=0.
0.70/1.02	Megabytes=0.16.
0.70/1.02	User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	============================== end of statistics =====================
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	============================== end of search =========================
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	THEOREM PROVED
0.70/1.02	% SZS status Theorem
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	Exiting with 1 proof.
0.70/1.02	
0.70/1.02	Process 28479 exit (max_proofs) Tue Aug  9 02:15:58 2022
0.70/1.02	Prover9 interrupted
0.70/1.03	EOF