0.03/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.03/0.13 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 960 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 120 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 04:21:01 EDT 2022 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : 0.75/1.01 ============================== Prover9 =============================== 0.75/1.01 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009. 0.75/1.01 Process 31862 was started by sandbox on n014.cluster.edu, 0.75/1.01 Tue Aug 9 04:21:01 2022 0.75/1.01 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 960 -f /tmp/Prover9_31635_n014.cluster.edu". 0.75/1.01 ============================== end of head =========================== 0.75/1.01 0.75/1.01 ============================== INPUT ================================= 0.75/1.01 0.75/1.01 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_31635_n014.cluster.edu 0.75/1.01 0.75/1.01 set(prolog_style_variables). 0.75/1.01 set(auto2). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto2) -> set(auto). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000"). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000"). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1). 0.75/1.01 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5). 0.75/1.01 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses). 0.75/1.01 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given). 0.75/1.01 assign(lrs_ticks,-1). 0.75/1.01 assign(sos_limit,10000). 0.75/1.01 assign(order,kbo). 0.75/1.01 set(lex_order_vars). 0.75/1.01 clear(print_given). 0.75/1.01 0.75/1.01 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (10 formulas) 0.75/1.01 0.75/1.01 ============================== end of input ========================== 0.75/1.01 0.75/1.01 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 960). 0.75/1.01 0.75/1.01 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ========== 0.75/1.01 0.75/1.01 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses: 0.75/1.01 1 queens_p -> (all I all J (le(I,n) & le(s(I),J) & le(J,n) & le(s(n0),I) -> p(J) != p(I) & minus(p(J),J) != minus(p(I),I) & plus(p(J),J) != plus(p(I),I))) # label(queens_p) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.75/1.01 2 (all J all I minus(perm(J),perm(I)) = minus(I,J)) # label(permutation_another_one) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.75/1.01 3 (all X le(X,s(X))) # label(succ_le) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.75/1.01 4 (all X all Y all Z (le(Y,Z) & le(X,Y) -> le(X,Z))) # label(le_trans) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.75/1.01 5 (all I minus(s(n),I) = perm(I)) # label(permutation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.75/1.01 6 (all I all J all K all L (minus(K,L) = minus(I,J) <-> minus(J,L) = minus(I,K))) # label(minus1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.75/1.01 7 (all I all J all K all L (minus(L,J) = minus(I,K) <-> plus(K,L) = plus(I,J))) # label(plus1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.75/1.01 8 (all I all J (le(J,n) & (le(s(perm(J)),perm(I)) <-> le(s(I),J)) & le(s(I),J) & le(I,n) & le(s(n0),I) -> q(J) != q(I) & plus(q(I),I) != plus(q(J),J) & minus(q(I),I) != minus(q(J),J))) -> queens_q # label(queens_q) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.75/1.01 9 (all I (le(s(n0),I) & le(I,n) -> le(s(n0),perm(I)) & le(perm(I),n))) # label(permutation_range) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.75/1.01 10 -(queens_p & (all I p(perm(I)) = q(I)) -> queens_q) # label(queens_sym) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.75/1.01 0.75/1.01 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas === 0.75/1.01 0.75/1.01 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES =============== 0.75/1.01 0.75/1.01 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION ================= 0.75/1.01 0.75/1.01 ============================== end predicate elimination ============= 0.75/1.01 0.75/1.01 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes). 0.75/1.01 0.75/1.01 Term ordering decisions: 0.75/1.01 Function symbol KB weights: n=1. n0=1. c1=1. c2=1. minus=1. plus=1. s=1. perm=1. q=1. p=1. 1.20/1.47 1.20/1.47 ============================== end of process initial clauses ======== 1.20/1.47 1.20/1.47 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ==================== 1.20/1.47 1.20/1.47 ============================== end of clauses for search ============= 1.20/1.47 1.20/1.47 ============================== SEARCH ================================ 1.20/1.47 1.20/1.47 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds. 1.20/1.47 1.20/1.47 NOTE: Back_subsumption disabled, ratio of kept to back_subsumed is 249 (0.00 of 0.17 sec). 1.20/1.47 1.20/1.47 ============================== PROOF ================================= 1.20/1.47 % SZS status Theorem 1.20/1.47 % SZS output start Refutation 1.20/1.47 1.20/1.47 % Proof 1 at 0.46 (+ 0.01) seconds. 1.20/1.47 % Length of proof is 75. 1.20/1.47 % Level of proof is 10. 1.20/1.47 % Maximum clause weight is 42.000. 1.20/1.47 % Given clauses 1132. 1.20/1.47 1.20/1.47 1 queens_p -> (all I all J (le(I,n) & le(s(I),J) & le(J,n) & le(s(n0),I) -> p(J) != p(I) & minus(p(J),J) != minus(p(I),I) & plus(p(J),J) != plus(p(I),I))) # label(queens_p) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.20/1.47 2 (all J all I minus(perm(J),perm(I)) = minus(I,J)) # label(permutation_another_one) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.20/1.47 3 (all X le(X,s(X))) # label(succ_le) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.20/1.47 4 (all X all Y all Z (le(Y,Z) & le(X,Y) -> le(X,Z))) # label(le_trans) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.20/1.47 5 (all I minus(s(n),I) = perm(I)) # label(permutation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.20/1.47 6 (all I all J all K all L (minus(K,L) = minus(I,J) <-> minus(J,L) = minus(I,K))) # label(minus1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.20/1.47 7 (all I all J all K all L (minus(L,J) = minus(I,K) <-> plus(K,L) = plus(I,J))) # label(plus1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.20/1.47 8 (all I all J (le(J,n) & (le(s(perm(J)),perm(I)) <-> le(s(I),J)) & le(s(I),J) & le(I,n) & le(s(n0),I) -> q(J) != q(I) & plus(q(I),I) != plus(q(J),J) & minus(q(I),I) != minus(q(J),J))) -> queens_q # label(queens_q) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.20/1.47 9 (all I (le(s(n0),I) & le(I,n) -> le(s(n0),perm(I)) & le(perm(I),n))) # label(permutation_range) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.20/1.47 10 -(queens_p & (all I p(perm(I)) = q(I)) -> queens_q) # label(queens_sym) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 1.20/1.47 11 queens_p # label(queens_sym) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(10)]. 1.20/1.47 12 le(A,s(A)) # label(succ_le) # label(axiom). [clausify(3)]. 1.20/1.47 13 le(c2,n) | queens_q # label(queens_q) # label(axiom). [clausify(8)]. 1.20/1.47 14 le(c1,n) | queens_q # label(queens_q) # label(axiom). [clausify(8)]. 1.20/1.47 15 le(s(c1),c2) | queens_q # label(queens_q) # label(axiom). [clausify(8)]. 1.20/1.47 16 le(s(n0),c1) | queens_q # label(queens_q) # label(axiom). [clausify(8)]. 1.20/1.47 17 q(A) = p(perm(A)) # label(queens_sym) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(10)]. 1.20/1.47 18 perm(A) = minus(s(n),A) # label(permutation) # label(axiom). [clausify(5)]. 1.20/1.47 19 minus(perm(A),perm(B)) = minus(B,A) # label(permutation_another_one) # label(axiom). [clausify(2)]. 1.20/1.47 20 minus(minus(s(n),A),minus(s(n),B)) = minus(B,A). [copy(19),rewrite([18(1),18(4)])]. 1.20/1.47 21 q(c2) = q(c1) | plus(q(c2),c2) = plus(q(c1),c1) | minus(q(c2),c2) = minus(q(c1),c1) | queens_q # label(queens_q) # label(axiom). [clausify(8)]. 1.20/1.47 22 p(minus(s(n),c2)) = p(minus(s(n),c1)) | plus(p(minus(s(n),c2)),c2) = plus(p(minus(s(n),c1)),c1) | minus(p(minus(s(n),c2)),c2) = minus(p(minus(s(n),c1)),c1) | queens_q. [copy(21),rewrite([17(2),18(2),17(7),18(7),17(13),18(13),17(20),18(20),17(28),18(28),17(35),18(35)])]. 1.20/1.47 23 -queens_q # label(queens_sym) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(10)]. 1.20/1.47 24 -queens_p | -le(A,n) | -le(s(A),B) | -le(B,n) | -le(s(n0),A) | p(B) != p(A) # label(queens_p) # label(axiom). [clausify(1)]. 1.20/1.47 25 -le(A,n) | -le(s(A),B) | -le(B,n) | -le(s(n0),A) | p(B) != p(A). [copy(24),unit_del(a,11)]. 1.20/1.47 26 -queens_p | -le(A,n) | -le(s(A),B) | -le(B,n) | -le(s(n0),A) | minus(p(B),B) != minus(p(A),A) # label(queens_p) # label(axiom). [clausify(1)]. 1.20/1.47 27 -le(A,n) | -le(s(A),B) | -le(B,n) | -le(s(n0),A) | minus(p(B),B) != minus(p(A),A). [copy(26),unit_del(a,11)]. 1.20/1.47 28 -queens_p | -le(A,n) | -le(s(A),B) | -le(B,n) | -le(s(n0),A) | plus(p(B),B) != plus(p(A),A) # label(queens_p) # label(axiom). [clausify(1)]. 1.20/1.47 29 -le(A,n) | -le(s(A),B) | -le(B,n) | -le(s(n0),A) | plus(p(B),B) != plus(p(A),A). [copy(28),unit_del(a,11)]. 1.20/1.47 30 -le(A,B) | -le(C,A) | le(C,B) # label(le_trans) # label(axiom). [clausify(4)]. 1.20/1.47 31 le(s(perm(c2)),perm(c1)) | -le(s(c1),c2) | queens_q # label(queens_q) # label(axiom). [clausify(8)]. 1.20/1.47 32 le(s(minus(s(n),c2)),minus(s(n),c1)) | -le(s(c1),c2). [copy(31),rewrite([18(2),18(7)]),unit_del(c,23)]. 1.20/1.47 33 -le(s(n0),A) | -le(A,n) | le(perm(A),n) # label(permutation_range) # label(axiom). [clausify(9)]. 1.20/1.47 34 -le(s(n0),A) | -le(A,n) | le(minus(s(n),A),n). [copy(33),rewrite([18(6)])]. 1.20/1.47 35 -le(s(n0),A) | -le(A,n) | le(s(n0),perm(A)) # label(permutation_range) # label(axiom). [clausify(9)]. 1.20/1.47 36 -le(s(n0),A) | -le(A,n) | le(s(n0),minus(s(n),A)). [copy(35),rewrite([18(8)])]. 1.20/1.47 37 minus(A,B) != minus(C,D) | minus(D,B) = minus(C,A) # label(minus1) # label(axiom). [clausify(6)]. 1.20/1.47 38 minus(A,B) != minus(C,D) | plus(D,A) = plus(C,B) # label(plus1) # label(axiom). [clausify(7)]. 1.20/1.47 39 minus(A,B) = minus(C,D) | plus(D,A) != plus(C,B) # label(plus1) # label(axiom). [clausify(7)]. 1.20/1.47 41 p(minus(s(n),c2)) = p(minus(s(n),c1)) | plus(p(minus(s(n),c2)),c2) = plus(p(minus(s(n),c1)),c1) | minus(p(minus(s(n),c2)),c2) = minus(p(minus(s(n),c1)),c1). [back_unit_del(22),unit_del(d,23)]. 1.20/1.47 42 le(s(n0),c1). [back_unit_del(16),unit_del(b,23)]. 1.20/1.47 43 le(s(c1),c2). [back_unit_del(15),unit_del(b,23)]. 1.20/1.47 44 le(c1,n). [back_unit_del(14),unit_del(b,23)]. 1.20/1.47 45 le(c2,n). [back_unit_del(13),unit_del(b,23)]. 1.20/1.47 51 le(s(minus(s(n),c2)),minus(s(n),c1)). [back_unit_del(32),unit_del(b,43)]. 1.20/1.47 60 -le(s(A),B) | le(A,B). [resolve(30,b,12,a)]. 1.20/1.47 63 minus(A,minus(s(n),B)) = minus(B,minus(s(n),A)). [resolve(37,a,20,a)]. 1.20/1.47 65 minus(A,A) = minus(B,B). [xx_res(37,a)]. 1.20/1.47 66 minus(A,B) != minus(C,D) | minus(D,minus(s(n),A)) = minus(C,minus(s(n),B)). [para(20(a,1),37(a,1))]. 1.20/1.47 68 minus(A,A) = c_0. [new_symbol(65)]. 1.20/1.47 71 plus(A,B) = plus(B,A). [xx_res(38,a)]. 1.20/1.47 77 p(minus(s(n),c2)) = p(minus(s(n),c1)) | plus(c2,p(minus(s(n),c2))) = plus(c1,p(minus(s(n),c1))) | minus(p(minus(s(n),c2)),c2) = minus(p(minus(s(n),c1)),c1). [back_rewrite(41),rewrite([71(18),71(25)])]. 1.20/1.47 78 minus(A,B) = minus(C,D) | plus(A,D) != plus(B,C). [back_rewrite(39),rewrite([71(4),71(5)])]. 1.20/1.47 79 minus(A,B) != minus(C,D) | plus(A,D) = plus(B,C). [back_rewrite(38),rewrite([71(4),71(5)])]. 1.20/1.47 80 -le(A,n) | -le(s(A),B) | -le(B,n) | -le(s(n0),A) | plus(B,p(B)) != plus(A,p(A)). [back_rewrite(29),rewrite([71(11),71(13)])]. 1.20/1.47 82 le(minus(s(n),c1),n). [resolve(42,a,34,a),unit_del(a,44)]. 1.20/1.47 98 -le(minus(s(n),c2),n) | -le(s(n0),minus(s(n),c2)) | minus(p(minus(s(n),c2)),minus(s(n),c2)) != minus(p(minus(s(n),c1)),minus(s(n),c1)). [resolve(51,a,27,b),flip(d),unit_del(b,82)]. 1.20/1.47 99 -le(minus(s(n),c2),n) | -le(s(n0),minus(s(n),c2)) | p(minus(s(n),c2)) != p(minus(s(n),c1)). [resolve(51,a,25,b),flip(d),unit_del(b,82)]. 1.20/1.47 229 le(c1,c2). [resolve(60,a,43,a)]. 1.20/1.47 240 -le(A,c1) | le(A,c2). [resolve(229,a,30,a)]. 1.20/1.47 285 minus(s(n),minus(s(n),A)) = minus(A,c_0). [para(63(a,1),18(a,2)),rewrite([18(4),68(11)])]. 1.20/1.47 288 minus(A,minus(B,c_0)) = minus(A,B). [para(63(a,1),20(a,1)),rewrite([285(6)])]. 1.20/1.47 289 minus(A,minus(s(n),B)) != minus(C,D) | minus(D,minus(s(n),A)) = minus(C,B). [para(63(a,1),37(a,1))]. 1.20/1.47 335 le(s(n0),c2). [resolve(240,a,42,a)]. 1.20/1.47 341 le(s(n0),minus(s(n),c2)). [resolve(335,a,36,a),unit_del(a,45)]. 1.20/1.47 342 le(minus(s(n),c2),n). [resolve(335,a,34,a),unit_del(a,45)]. 1.20/1.47 347 p(minus(s(n),c2)) != p(minus(s(n),c1)). [back_unit_del(99),unit_del(a,342),unit_del(b,341)]. 1.20/1.47 348 minus(p(minus(s(n),c2)),minus(s(n),c2)) != minus(p(minus(s(n),c1)),minus(s(n),c1)). [back_unit_del(98),unit_del(a,342),unit_del(b,341)]. 1.20/1.47 349 plus(c2,p(minus(s(n),c2))) = plus(c1,p(minus(s(n),c1))) | minus(p(minus(s(n),c2)),c2) = minus(p(minus(s(n),c1)),c1). [back_unit_del(77),unit_del(a,347)]. 1.20/1.47 350 minus(A,B) != minus(C,D) | minus(A,C) = minus(B,D). [para(20(a,1),66(a,2)),rewrite([20(10),20(11)])]. 1.20/1.47 532 plus(minus(s(n),c2),p(minus(s(n),c2))) != plus(minus(s(n),c1),p(minus(s(n),c1))). [resolve(80,b,51,a),flip(d),unit_del(a,342),unit_del(b,82),unit_del(c,341)]. 1.20/1.47 1720 minus(p(minus(s(n),c1)),p(minus(s(n),c2))) != minus(c2,c1). [ur(289,b,348,a),rewrite([285(8),288(5)]),flip(a)]. 1.20/1.47 1745 minus(p(minus(s(n),c2)),c2) = minus(p(minus(s(n),c1)),c1). [resolve(349,a,78,b),flip(b),unit_del(b,1720)]. 1.20/1.47 2710 minus(p(minus(s(n),c1)),p(minus(s(n),c2))) != minus(c1,c2). [ur(79,b,532,a),rewrite([20(9)]),flip(a)]. 1.20/1.47 2712 $F. [ur(350,b,2710,a),rewrite([1745(14)]),xx(a)]. 1.20/1.47 1.20/1.47 % SZS output end Refutation 1.20/1.47 ============================== end of proof ========================== 1.20/1.47 1.20/1.47 ============================== STATISTICS ============================ 1.20/1.47 1.20/1.47 Given=1132. Generated=12951. Kept=2693. proofs=1. 1.20/1.47 Usable=1124. Sos=1514. Demods=15. Limbo=0, Disabled=77. Hints=0. 1.20/1.47 Megabytes=2.74. 1.20/1.47 User_CPU=0.46, System_CPU=0.01, Wall_clock=1. 1.20/1.47 1.20/1.47 ============================== end of statistics ===================== 1.20/1.47 1.20/1.47 ============================== end of search ========================= 1.20/1.47 1.20/1.47 THEOREM PROVED 1.20/1.47 % SZS status Theorem 1.20/1.47 1.20/1.47 Exiting with 1 proof. 1.20/1.47 1.20/1.47 Process 31862 exit (max_proofs) Tue Aug 9 04:21:02 2022 1.20/1.47 Prover9 interrupted 1.20/1.48 EOF