0.04/0.10 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.04/0.11 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s 0.09/0.31 Computer : n016.cluster.edu 0.09/0.31 Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.09/0.31 CPUModel : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.09/0.31 RAMPerCPU : 8042.1875MB 0.09/0.31 OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.09/0.31 % CPULimit : 960 0.09/0.31 % WCLimit : 120 0.09/0.31 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 03:22:42 EDT 2022 0.09/0.31 % CPUTime : 0.14/0.34 # No SInE strategy applied 0.14/0.34 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y 0.14/0.34 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred. 0.14/0.34 # 0.14/0.34 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.14/0.34 # Number of axioms: 25 Number of unprocessed: 25 0.14/0.34 # Tableaux proof search. 0.14/0.34 # APR header successfully linked. 0.14/0.34 # Hello from C++ 0.14/0.34 # The folding up rule is enabled... 0.14/0.34 # Local unification is enabled... 0.14/0.34 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... 0.14/0.34 # 25 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification 0.14/0.34 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. 0.14/0.34 # There are 1 start rule candidates: 0.14/0.34 # Found 12 unit axioms. 0.14/0.34 # 1 start rule tableaux created. 0.14/0.34 # 13 extension rule candidate clauses 0.14/0.34 # 12 unit axiom clauses 0.14/0.34 0.14/0.34 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. 0.14/0.34 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 0.14/0.34 # Creating equality axioms 0.14/0.34 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses 0.14/0.34 # Returning from population with 63 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. 0.14/0.34 # We now have 63 tableaux to operate on 0.14/0.38 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. 0.14/0.38 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. 0.14/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. 0.14/0.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. 0.14/0.38 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.14/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.14/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation 0.14/0.38 0.14/0.38 # End clausification derivation 0.14/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (p(a))). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (p(kk))). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (p(enc(tmk,pp)))). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (p(i(kk)))). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (i(i(X1))=X1)). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (p(enc(tc,k)))). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (p(enc(w,t1)))). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (p(enc(wk,w)))). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (p(enc(lp,t2)))). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (enc(i(X1),enc(X1,X2))=X2)). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (enc(X1,enc(i(X1),X2))=X2)). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, (~p(enc(pp,a)))). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (p(i(X1))|~p(X1))). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (p(enc(X1,X2))|~p(X1)|~p(X3)|~p(X2))). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (p(enc(tc,X1))|~p(X1)|~p(X2)|~p(X3))). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (p(enc(enc(i(tc),X1),X2))|~p(X2)|~p(X3)|~p(X1))). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (p(enc(wk,enc(i(tmk),X1)))|~p(X1)|~p(X2)|~p(X3))). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (p(enc(i(enc(i(tc),X1)),X2))|~p(X3)|~p(X2)|~p(X1))). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (p(enc(enc(i(tmk),X1),enc(i(tmk),X2)))|~p(X1)|~p(X3)|~p(X2))). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (p(enc(enc(i(tmk),X1),enc(i(tc),X2)))|~p(X2)|~p(X3)|~p(X1))). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (p(enc(enc(i(wk),X1),enc(i(lp),X2)))|~p(X2)|~p(X1)|~p(X3))). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (p(enc(tmk,enc(i(enc(i(zcmk),X1)),X2)))|~p(X2)|~p(X1)|~p(X3))). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (p(enc(i(enc(i(zcmk),X1)),enc(i(tmk),X2)))|~p(X2)|~p(X1)|~p(X3))). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (p(enc(enc(i(wk),X1),enc(i(enc(i(wk),X2)),X3)))|~p(X1)|~p(X2)|~p(X3))). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (p(enc(enc(i(wk),X1),enc(i(enc(i(tmk),X2)),X3)))|~p(X3)|~p(X1)|~p(X2))). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_127, plain, (X46=X46)). 0.14/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! 0.14/0.38 # Begin printing tableau 0.14/0.38 # Found 6 steps 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (p(a)), inference(start_rule)). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_134, plain, (p(a)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_133])). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_259, plain, (p(enc(pp,a))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_2])). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_260, plain, (a!=enc(pp,a)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_130])). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_317, plain, (a!=i(i(a))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_7])). 0.14/0.38 cnf(i_0_318, plain, (i(i(a))!=enc(pp,a)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_318, ...])). 0.14/0.38 # End printing tableau 0.14/0.38 # SZS output end 0.14/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" 0.14/0.38 # Child (28946) has found a proof. 0.14/0.38 0.14/0.38 # Proof search is over... 0.14/0.38 # Freeing feature tree 0.14/0.38 EOF