0.00/0.10 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.11 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s 0.11/0.31 Computer : n020.cluster.edu 0.11/0.31 Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.11/0.31 CPUModel : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.11/0.31 RAMPerCPU : 8042.1875MB 0.11/0.31 OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.11/0.31 % CPULimit : 960 0.11/0.31 % WCLimit : 120 0.11/0.31 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 05:38:50 EDT 2022 0.11/0.31 % CPUTime : 0.16/0.34 # No SInE strategy applied 0.16/0.34 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y 0.16/0.34 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred. 0.16/0.34 # 0.16/0.34 # Number of axioms: 43 Number of unprocessed: 43 0.16/0.34 # Tableaux proof search. 0.16/0.34 # APR header successfully linked. 0.16/0.34 # Hello from C++ 0.16/0.34 # The folding up rule is enabled... 0.16/0.34 # Local unification is enabled... 0.16/0.34 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... 0.16/0.34 # 43 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification 0.16/0.34 # Creating start rules for all 4 conjectures. 0.16/0.34 # There are 4 start rule candidates: 0.16/0.34 # Found 16 unit axioms. 0.16/0.34 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. 0.16/0.34 # 4 start rule tableaux created. 0.16/0.34 # 27 extension rule candidate clauses 0.16/0.34 # 16 unit axiom clauses 0.16/0.34 0.16/0.34 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. 0.16/0.34 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 4 0.16/0.34 # Returning from population with 13 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. 0.16/0.34 # We now have 13 tableaux to operate on 18.96/2.73 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts. 18.96/2.73 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. 18.96/2.73 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. 18.96/2.73 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. 18.96/2.73 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations. 18.96/2.73 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. 18.96/2.73 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. 18.96/2.73 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch. 18.96/2.73 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 18.96/2.73 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 18.96/2.73 # Begin clausification derivation 18.96/2.73 18.96/2.73 # End clausification derivation 18.96/2.73 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (relation(empty_set))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (relation(esk1_0))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (relation(esk3_0))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (relation(esk7_0))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (empty(empty_set))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (empty(empty_set))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (empty(esk2_0))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (empty(esk3_0))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (~empty(esk1_0))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (~empty(esk14_0))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (X1=empty_set|~empty(X1))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (relation(identity_relation(X1)))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (relation(X1)|~empty(X1))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (X1=X2|~empty(X2)|~empty(X1))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (~empty(singleton(X1)))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (element(esk15_1(X1),X1))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (unordered_pair(X1,X2)=unordered_pair(X2,X1))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (~empty(X1)|~in(X2,X1))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (element(X1,X2)|~in(X1,X2))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (empty(X2)|in(X1,X2)|~element(X1,X2))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~relation(X2)|~empty(X1))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~relation(X1)|~empty(X2))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (empty(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~relation(X2)|~empty(X1))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (empty(relation_composition(X1,X2))|~relation(X1)|~empty(X2))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (~in(X2,X1)|~in(X1,X2))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (~empty(unordered_pair(X1,X2)))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (in(esk4_0,esk6_0)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),singleton(esk4_0)),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk6_0),esk7_0)))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),X4)|X1!=X2|identity_relation(X3)!=X4|~relation(X4)|~in(X1,X3))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (~empty(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1))))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (X1=X2|identity_relation(X4)!=X3|~relation(X3)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),X3))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (in(X1,X2)|identity_relation(X2)!=X4|~relation(X4)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X3),singleton(X1)),X4))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),singleton(esk4_0)),esk7_0)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),singleton(esk4_0)),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk6_0),esk7_0)))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_21, negated_conjecture, (~in(esk4_0,esk6_0)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),singleton(esk4_0)),esk7_0)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),singleton(esk4_0)),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk6_0),esk7_0)))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (identity_relation(X1)=X2|esk9_2(X1,X2)=esk8_2(X1,X2)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk8_2(X1,X2),esk9_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk8_2(X1,X2))),X2)|~relation(X2))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (identity_relation(X1)=X2|in(esk8_2(X1,X2),X1)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk8_2(X1,X2),esk9_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk8_2(X1,X2))),X2)|~relation(X2))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X4),singleton(X1)),X6)|relation_composition(X3,X5)!=X6|~relation(X6)|~relation(X5)|~relation(X3)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X2,X4),singleton(X2)),X5)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),X3))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (identity_relation(X1)=X2|esk9_2(X1,X2)!=esk8_2(X1,X2)|~relation(X2)|~in(esk8_2(X1,X2),X1)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk8_2(X1,X2),esk9_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk8_2(X1,X2))),X2))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (relation_composition(X1,X2)=X3|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk11_3(X1,X2,X3),esk12_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(esk11_3(X1,X2,X3))),X3)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk11_3(X1,X2,X3),esk13_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(esk11_3(X1,X2,X3))),X1)|~relation(X3)|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (relation_composition(X1,X2)=X3|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk11_3(X1,X2,X3),esk12_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(esk11_3(X1,X2,X3))),X3)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk13_3(X1,X2,X3),esk12_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(esk13_3(X1,X2,X3))),X2)|~relation(X3)|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (relation_composition(X1,X2)=X3|~relation(X3)|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X4,esk12_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(X4)),X2)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk11_3(X1,X2,X3),X4),singleton(esk11_3(X1,X2,X3))),X1)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk11_3(X1,X2,X3),esk12_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(esk11_3(X1,X2,X3))),X3))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,esk10_5(X2,X3,X4,X1,X5)),singleton(X1)),X2)|relation_composition(X2,X3)!=X4|~relation(X4)|~relation(X3)|~relation(X2)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X5),singleton(X1)),X4))). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk10_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X5),singleton(esk10_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5))),X2)|relation_composition(X1,X2)!=X3|~relation(X3)|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X4,X5),singleton(X4)),X3))). 18.96/2.73 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! 18.96/2.73 # Begin printing tableau 18.96/2.73 # Found 6 steps 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),singleton(esk4_0)),esk7_0)|in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),singleton(esk4_0)),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk6_0),esk7_0))), inference(start_rule)). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_53, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),singleton(esk4_0)),esk7_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_47])). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_371, plain, (~empty(esk7_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_32])). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_384, plain, (~element(esk15_1(esk7_0),esk7_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_49])). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_54, plain, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),singleton(esk4_0)),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk6_0),esk7_0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_54, ...])). 18.96/2.73 cnf(i_0_383, plain, (in(esk15_1(esk7_0),esk7_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_383, ...])). 18.96/2.73 # End printing tableau 18.96/2.73 # SZS output end 18.96/2.73 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" 18.96/2.74 # Child (2502) has found a proof. 18.96/2.74 18.96/2.74 # Proof search is over... 18.96/2.74 # Freeing feature tree 18.96/2.75 EOF