0.08/0.13 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.08/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s 0.13/0.35 Computer : n004.cluster.edu 0.13/0.35 Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.13/0.35 CPUModel : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.13/0.35 RAMPerCPU : 8042.1875MB 0.13/0.35 OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 960 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 120 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 03:27:20 EDT 2022 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime : 0.13/0.38 # No SInE strategy applied 0.13/0.38 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN 0.13/0.38 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. 0.13/0.38 # 0.13/0.38 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.13/0.38 # Number of axioms: 11 Number of unprocessed: 11 0.13/0.38 # Tableaux proof search. 0.13/0.38 # APR header successfully linked. 0.13/0.38 # Hello from C++ 0.13/0.38 # The folding up rule is enabled... 0.13/0.38 # Local unification is enabled... 0.13/0.38 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... 0.13/0.38 # 11 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification 0.13/0.38 # Creating start rules for all 3 conjectures. 0.13/0.38 # There are 3 start rule candidates: 0.13/0.38 # Found 8 unit axioms. 0.13/0.38 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. 0.13/0.38 # 3 start rule tableaux created. 0.13/0.38 # 3 extension rule candidate clauses 0.13/0.38 # 8 unit axiom clauses 0.13/0.38 0.13/0.38 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. 0.13/0.38 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 3 0.13/0.38 # Creating equality axioms 0.13/0.38 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses 0.13/0.38 # Returning from population with 17 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. 0.13/0.38 # We now have 17 tableaux to operate on 240.02/30.48 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts. 240.02/30.48 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. 240.02/30.48 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. 240.02/30.48 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. 240.02/30.48 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. 240.02/30.48 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. 240.02/30.48 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. 240.02/30.48 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. 240.02/30.48 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240.02/30.48 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240.02/30.48 # Begin clausification derivation 240.02/30.48 240.02/30.48 # End clausification derivation 240.02/30.48 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion 240.02/30.48 cnf(i_0_1, plain, ('==>'(X1,'0')='0')). 240.02/30.48 cnf(i_0_6, plain, ('==>'('0',X1)=X1)). 240.02/30.48 cnf(i_0_5, plain, ('+'(X1,'0')=X1)). 240.02/30.48 cnf(i_0_8, plain, ('==>'(X1,X1)='0')). 240.02/30.48 cnf(i_0_11, plain, ('==>'('+'(X1,X2),X3)='==>'(X1,'==>'(X2,X3)))). 240.02/30.48 cnf(i_0_10, plain, ('+'('+'(X1,X2),X3)='+'(X1,'+'(X2,X3)))). 240.02/30.48 cnf(i_0_7, plain, ('+'(X1,X2)='+'(X2,X1))). 240.02/30.48 cnf(i_0_9, plain, ('+'(X1,'==>'(X1,X2))='+'(X2,'==>'(X2,X1)))). 240.02/30.48 cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, ('==>'(c,'+'(a,'==>'(a,b)))!='0'|'==>'(c,a)!='0'|'==>'(c,b)!='0')). 240.02/30.48 cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, ('==>'(c,'+'(a,'==>'(a,b)))='0'|'==>'(c,a)='0')). 240.02/30.48 cnf(i_0_3, negated_conjecture, ('==>'(c,'+'(a,'==>'(a,b)))='0'|'==>'(c,b)='0')). 240.02/30.48 cnf(i_0_68, plain, (X18=X18)). 240.02/30.48 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! 240.02/30.48 # Begin printing tableau 240.02/30.48 # Found 8 steps 240.02/30.48 cnf(i_0_1, plain, ('==>'(X6,'0')='0'), inference(start_rule)). 240.02/30.48 cnf(i_0_74, plain, ('==>'(X6,'0')='0'), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_73])). 240.02/30.48 cnf(i_0_109, plain, ('==>'('+'('0','0'),'0')!='0'), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_1])). 240.02/30.48 cnf(i_0_107, plain, ('+'('==>'(X6,'0'),'==>'('+'('0','0'),'0'))='+'('0','0')), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_71])). 240.02/30.48 cnf(i_0_123, plain, ('==>'('0','+'('0','0'))!='+'('0','0')), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])). 240.02/30.48 cnf(i_0_121, plain, ('+'('==>'(X6,'0'),'==>'('+'('0','0'),'0'))='==>'('0','+'('0','0'))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_72])). 240.02/30.48 cnf(i_0_1069351, plain, ('==>'(X1,'0')!='0'), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_1])). 240.02/30.48 cnf(i_0_1069349, plain, ('==>'('+'('==>'(X6,'0'),'==>'('+'('0','0'),'0')),'==>'(X1,'0'))='==>'('==>'('0','+'('0','0')),'0')), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_1069349, ...])). 240.02/30.48 # End printing tableau 240.02/30.48 # SZS output end 240.02/30.48 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" 240.65/30.58 # Child (16695) has found a proof. 240.65/30.58 240.65/30.58 # Proof search is over... 240.65/30.58 # Freeing feature tree 240.65/30.82 EOF