0.02/0.09 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.02/0.09 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.10/0.29 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu 0.10/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.10/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.10/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.10/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.10/0.29 % CPULimit : 960 0.10/0.29 % WCLimit : 120 0.10/0.29 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 02:25:45 EDT 2022 0.10/0.29 % CPUTime : 0.14/0.41 Running first-order on 8 cores theorem proving 0.14/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.14/0.41 # Version: 3.0pre003 0.14/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN. 0.14/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.14/0.44 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 600s (5) cores 0.14/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.44 # Starting new_bool_1 with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.44 # Starting sh5l with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.44 # new_bool_3 with pid 14968 completed with status 0 0.14/0.44 # Result found by new_bool_3 0.14/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN. 0.14/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.14/0.44 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 600s (5) cores 0.14/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0) 0.14/0.44 # ...ProofStateSinE()=67/92 0.14/0.44 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN 0.14/0.44 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN 0.14/0.44 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total) 0.14/0.44 # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with 51s (1) cores 0.14/0.44 # G-E--_200_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with pid 14971 completed with status 0 0.14/0.44 # Result found by G-E--_200_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y 0.14/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN. 0.14/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.14/0.44 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 600s (5) cores 0.14/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 120s (1) cores 0.14/0.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0) 0.14/0.44 # ...ProofStateSinE()=67/92 0.14/0.44 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN 0.14/0.44 # partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN 0.14/0.44 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total) 0.14/0.44 # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with 51s (1) cores 0.14/0.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s 0.14/0.44 0.14/0.44 # Proof found! 0.14/0.44 # SZS status Theorem 0.14/0.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_22, type, a_select3: ($i * $i * $i) > $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_23, type, n0: $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_24, type, leq: ($i * $i) > $o). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_25, type, trans: $i > $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_26, type, tptp_mmul: ($i * $i) > $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_27, type, tptp_madd: ($i * $i) > $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_28, type, true: $o). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_29, type, tptp_update3: ($i * $i * $i * $i) > $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_30, type, gt: ($i * $i) > $o). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_31, type, dim: ($i * $i) > $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_32, type, tptp_const_array1: ($i * $i) > $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_33, type, a_select2: ($i * $i) > $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_34, type, tptp_update2: ($i * $i * $i) > $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_35, type, n1: $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_36, type, minus: ($i * $i) > $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_37, type, pred: $i > $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_38, type, succ: $i > $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_39, type, n2: $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_40, type, plus: ($i * $i) > $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_41, type, inv: $i > $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_42, type, tptp_minus_1: $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_43, type, sum: ($i * $i * $i) > $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_44, type, uniform_int_rnd: ($i * $i) > $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_45, type, tptp_const_array2: ($i * $i * $i) > $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_46, type, use: $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_47, type, def: $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_48, type, n5: $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_49, type, n3: $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_50, type, tptp_msub: ($i * $i) > $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_51, type, lt: ($i * $i) > $o). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_52, type, n4: $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_53, type, geq: ($i * $i) > $o). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_54, type, tptp_float_0_0: $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_55, type, n135299: $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_56, type, q: $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_57, type, tptp_sum_index: $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_58, type, pv10: $i). 0.14/0.44 tff(decl_59, type, esk1_0: $i). 0.14/0.44 fof(cl5_nebula_norm_0012, conjecture, ((((![X1]:((sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X1,tptp_sum_index))=n1<=(leq(n0,X1)&leq(X1,pred(pv10)))))&leq(pv10,n135299))&leq(n0,pv10))&sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,pv10,tptp_sum_index))=n1)=>![X2]:(((leq(n0,X2)&leq(X2,pv10))=>n1=sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X2,tptp_sum_index))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cl5_nebula_norm_0012)). 0.14/0.44 fof(leq_gt_pred, axiom, ![X13, X14]:((leq(X13,pred(X14))<=>gt(X14,X13))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax', leq_gt_pred)). 0.14/0.44 fof(leq_gt2, axiom, ![X13, X14]:(((leq(X13,X14)&X14!=X13)=>gt(X14,X13))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax', leq_gt2)). 0.14/0.44 fof(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~(((((![X1]:(((leq(n0,X1)&leq(X1,pred(pv10)))=>sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X1,tptp_sum_index))=n1))&leq(pv10,n135299))&leq(n0,pv10))&sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,pv10,tptp_sum_index))=n1)=>![X2]:(((leq(n0,X2)&leq(X2,pv10))=>n1=sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X2,tptp_sum_index)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_norm_0012])])). 0.14/0.44 fof(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X28]:((((((~leq(n0,X28)|~leq(X28,pred(pv10))|sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X28,tptp_sum_index))=n1)&leq(pv10,n135299))&leq(n0,pv10))&sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,pv10,tptp_sum_index))=n1)&((leq(n0,esk1_0)&leq(esk1_0,pv10))&n1!=sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,esk1_0,tptp_sum_index))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])). 0.14/0.44 fof(c_0_5, plain, ![X56, X57]:(((~leq(X56,pred(X57))|gt(X57,X56))&(~gt(X57,X56)|leq(X56,pred(X57))))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_gt_pred])])). 0.14/0.44 fof(c_0_6, plain, ![X53, X54]:((~leq(X53,X54)|X54=X53|gt(X54,X53))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_gt2])])). 0.14/0.44 cnf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (n1!=sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,esk1_0,tptp_sum_index))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 0.14/0.44 cnf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,X1,tptp_sum_index))=n1|~leq(n0,X1)|~leq(X1,pred(pv10))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 0.14/0.44 cnf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (leq(n0,esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 0.14/0.44 cnf(c_0_10, plain, (leq(X2,pred(X1))|~gt(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.14/0.44 cnf(c_0_11, plain, (X2=X1|gt(X2,X1)|~leq(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.14/0.44 cnf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (~leq(esk1_0,pred(pv10))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8]), c_0_9])])). 0.14/0.44 cnf(c_0_13, plain, (X1=X2|leq(X1,pred(X2))|~leq(X1,X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])). 0.14/0.44 cnf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, (leq(esk1_0,pv10)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 0.14/0.44 cnf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, (esk1_0=pv10), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13]), c_0_14])])). 0.14/0.44 cnf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, (sum(n0,n4,a_select3(q,pv10,tptp_sum_index))=n1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 0.14/0.44 cnf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_15]), c_0_16])]), ['proof']). 0.14/0.44 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.14/0.44 # Parsed axioms : 92 0.14/0.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 25 0.14/0.44 # Initial clauses : 76 0.14/0.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.14/0.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 76 0.14/0.44 # Processed clauses : 640 0.14/0.44 # ...of these trivial : 25 0.14/0.44 # ...subsumed : 331 0.14/0.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 284 0.14/0.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.14/0.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.14/0.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.14/0.44 # Backward-rewritten : 20 0.14/0.44 # Generated clauses : 1246 0.14/0.44 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 994 0.14/0.44 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.14/0.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.14/0.44 # Paramodulations : 1244 0.14/0.44 # Factorizations : 2 0.14/0.44 # NegExts : 0 0.14/0.44 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.14/0.44 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.14/0.44 # Propositional check models : 0 0.14/0.44 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.14/0.44 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.14/0.44 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.14/0.44 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.14/0.44 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.14/0.44 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.14/0.44 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.14/0.44 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.14/0.44 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.14/0.44 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.14/0.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 264 0.14/0.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 107 0.14/0.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.14/0.44 # Negative unit clauses : 84 0.14/0.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 73 0.14/0.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 413 0.14/0.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 1088 0.14/0.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.14/0.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 20 0.14/0.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 474 0.14/0.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 400 0.14/0.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 25 0.14/0.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1426 0.14/0.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.14/0.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 8 0.14/0.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 1 0.14/0.44 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.14/0.44 # Condensation successes : 0 0.14/0.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 14975 0.14/0.44 0.14/0.44 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.14/0.44 # User time : 0.025 s 0.14/0.44 # System time : 0.003 s 0.14/0.44 # Total time : 0.028 s 0.14/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1912 pages 0.14/0.44 0.14/0.44 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.14/0.44 # User time : 0.027 s 0.14/0.44 # System time : 0.006 s 0.14/0.44 # Total time : 0.033 s 0.14/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1748 pages 0.14/0.44 EOF