0.05/0.09	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.05/0.09	% Command    : run_vampire %s %d
0.09/0.30	% Computer   : n015.cluster.edu
0.09/0.30	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.09/0.30	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.09/0.30	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.09/0.30	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.09/0.30	% CPULimit   : 960
0.09/0.30	% WCLimit    : 120
0.09/0.30	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  2 06:37:45 EDT 2020
0.09/0.30	% CPUTime    : 
0.15/0.45	% (9560)lrs+1_5:4_aac=none:add=off:afr=on:afp=4000:afq=1.2:amm=sco:anc=none:gsp=input_only:gs=on:irw=on:nm=64:newcnf=on:nwc=1.3:nicw=on:sas=z3:stl=30:sp=occurrence:tha=off_3 on theBenchmark
0.15/0.46	% (9575)dis+1_3:1_acc=on:afp=100000:afq=1.1:amm=off:anc=none:bd=off:cond=on:fsr=off:gs=on:inw=on:lma=on:nm=32:nwc=1:urr=on_2 on theBenchmark
0.15/0.46	% (9578)dis+11_3_add=large:afr=on:afp=4000:afq=1.2:amm=off:anc=none:gs=on:gsem=on:lwlo=on:nm=64:nwc=1:sas=z3:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity:tha=off:thf=on:updr=off_92 on theBenchmark
0.15/0.47	% (9568)lrs+1_2:3_afr=on:afp=1000:afq=1.1:amm=sco:anc=none:fsr=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=on:lma=on:nm=64:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:stl=30:sac=on:tha=off:uwa=one_side_interpreted:updr=off_9 on theBenchmark
0.15/0.47	% (9570)lrs+1011_1_add=off:afp=100000:afq=1.0:anc=none:cond=on:gs=on:gsaa=from_current:gsem=on:inw=on:lma=on:nm=64:newcnf=on:nwc=1:sas=z3:stl=30:sos=on:sp=occurrence:tha=off:uwa=ground_3 on theBenchmark
0.15/0.47	% (9561)dis+1002_8:1_awrs=converge:awrsf=256:anc=all_dependent:br=off:fsr=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=from_current:gsem=on:irw=on:nm=64:nwc=1:sas=z3:s2a=on:sp=frequency:thf=on:uwa=interpreted_only:urr=on_7 on theBenchmark
0.15/0.47	% (9576)dis+1011_2:3_add=off:afr=on:afp=4000:afq=1.4:anc=none:bs=unit_only:fsr=off:gs=on:gsem=on:lwlo=on:nm=16:nwc=1.3:nicw=on:sas=z3:sac=on:tha=off_260 on theBenchmark
0.15/0.47	% (9558)lrs-11_1_av=off:cond=on:gs=on:lcm=reverse:lma=on:lwlo=on:nm=16:nwc=5:stl=30:sp=reverse_arity:tha=off:thi=strong:uwa=interpreted_only_58 on theBenchmark
0.15/0.48	% (9574)dis-2_2:3_add=large:afp=40000:afq=1.4:amm=off:anc=none:gsp=input_only:gs=on:gsem=on:inw=on:lcm=reverse:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1:nicw=on:sas=z3:sos=all:sp=reverse_arity:tha=off:urr=on_5 on theBenchmark
0.15/0.49	% (9583)dis+1002_4_add=off:afp=10000:afq=2.0:amm=off:anc=none:fsr=off:gsp=input_only:gs=on:gsem=on:irw=on:lwlo=on:nm=2:newcnf=on:nwc=1:sos=on:sac=on:sp=occurrence:tha=off:updr=off_2 on theBenchmark
0.15/0.49	% (9557)lrs+1_3_awrs=decay:awrsf=4:afp=10000:afq=1.0:amm=off:anc=none:bd=off:cond=on:fsr=off:fde=unused:gs=on:lwlo=on:nm=16:nwc=1:sas=z3:stl=30:ss=axioms:s2a=on:st=1.2:sos=theory:sp=frequency_29 on theBenchmark
0.15/0.49	% (9575)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
0.15/0.49	% SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
0.15/0.49	% SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
0.15/0.49	tff(pred_def_1, type, p: $int > $o).
0.15/0.49	tff(pred_def_2, type, q: $int > $o).
0.15/0.49	tff(f159,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  $false),
0.15/0.49	  inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f120,f128,f158])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f158,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  spl0_2),
0.15/0.49	  inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f157])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f157,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  $false | spl0_2),
0.15/0.49	  inference(evaluation,[],[f156])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f156,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  ~$less(-4,1) | spl0_2),
0.15/0.49	  inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f127,f19])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f19,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  ( ! [X3:$int] : (~$less(X3,1) | q(X3)) )),
0.15/0.49	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f18,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  ! [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : (~p(X0) | $sum(X0,X1) != 0 | ~q(X1)) & ! [X2 : $int] : (p(X2) | ~$less(3,X2)) & ! [X3 : $int] : (q(X3) | ~$less(X3,1))),
0.15/0.49	  inference(rectify,[],[f17])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f17,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  ! [X2 : $int,X3 : $int] : (~p(X2) | 0 != $sum(X2,X3) | ~q(X3)) & ! [X0 : $int] : (p(X0) | ~$less(3,X0)) & ! [X1 : $int] : (q(X1) | ~$less(X1,1))),
0.15/0.49	  inference(flattening,[],[f16])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f16,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  ! [X2 : $int,X3 : $int] : (~p(X2) | 0 != $sum(X2,X3) | ~q(X3)) & (! [X0 : $int] : (p(X0) | ~$less(3,X0)) & ! [X1 : $int] : (q(X1) | ~$less(X1,1)))),
0.15/0.49	  inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f15,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  ~((! [X0 : $int] : ($less(3,X0) => p(X0)) & ! [X1 : $int] : ($less(X1,1) => q(X1))) => ? [X2 : $int,X3 : $int] : (p(X2) & 0 = $sum(X2,X3) & q(X3)))),
0.15/0.49	  inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f2,negated_conjecture,(
0.15/0.49	  ~((! [X0 : $int] : ($less(3,X0) => p(X0)) & ! [X0 : $int] : ($less(X0,1) => q(X0))) => ? [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : (p(X0) & $sum(X0,X1) = 0 & q(X1)))),
0.15/0.49	  inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f1,conjecture,(
0.15/0.49	  (! [X0 : $int] : ($less(3,X0) => p(X0)) & ! [X0 : $int] : ($less(X0,1) => q(X0))) => ? [X0 : $int,X1 : $int] : (p(X0) & $sum(X0,X1) = 0 & q(X1))),
0.15/0.49	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',interv_3_infty_and_neginfty_1_contain_compl)).
0.15/0.49	tff(f127,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  ~q(-4) | spl0_2),
0.15/0.49	  inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f125])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f125,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  spl0_2 <=> q(-4)),
0.15/0.49	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f128,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  ~spl0_2 | ~spl0_1),
0.15/0.49	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f123,f114,f125])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f114,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  spl0_1 <=> p(4)),
0.15/0.49	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f123,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  ~q(-4) | ~spl0_1),
0.15/0.49	  inference(evaluation,[],[f121])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f121,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  ~q($uminus(4)) | ~spl0_1),
0.15/0.49	  inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f7,f116,f21])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f21,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  ( ! [X0:$int,X1:$int] : (~p(X0) | $sum(X0,X1) != 0 | ~q(X1)) )),
0.15/0.49	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f116,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  p(4) | ~spl0_1),
0.15/0.49	  inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f114])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f7,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  ( ! [X0:$int] : (0 = $sum(X0,$uminus(X0))) )),
0.15/0.49	  introduced(theory_axiom,[])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f120,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  spl0_1),
0.15/0.49	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f109,f114])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f109,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  p(4)),
0.15/0.49	  inference(evaluation,[],[f104])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f104,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  p($sum(3,1))),
0.15/0.49	  inference(resolution,[],[f27,f20])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f20,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  ( ! [X2:$int] : (~$less(3,X2) | p(X2)) )),
0.15/0.49	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f27,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  ( ! [X0:$int] : ($less(X0,$sum(X0,1))) )),
0.15/0.49	  inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f8,f12])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f12,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  ( ! [X0:$int,X1:$int] : ($less(X1,$sum(X0,1)) | $less(X0,X1)) )),
0.15/0.49	  introduced(theory_axiom,[])).
0.15/0.49	tff(f8,plain,(
0.15/0.49	  ( ! [X0:$int] : (~$less(X0,X0)) )),
0.15/0.49	  introduced(theory_axiom,[])).
0.15/0.49	% SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
0.15/0.49	% (9575)------------------------------
0.15/0.49	% (9575)Version: Vampire 4.5.0 (commit 2ee491ce on 2020-06-19 13:55:12 +0100)
0.15/0.49	% (9575)Termination reason: Refutation
0.15/0.49	
0.15/0.49	% (9575)Memory used [KB]: 10618
0.15/0.49	% (9575)Time elapsed: 0.120 s
0.15/0.49	% (9575)------------------------------
0.15/0.49	% (9575)------------------------------
0.15/0.49	% (9583)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (9583)------------------------------
0.15/0.49	% (9583)Version: Vampire 4.5.0 (commit 2ee491ce on 2020-06-19 13:55:12 +0100)
0.15/0.49	% (9583)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
0.15/0.49	
0.15/0.49	% (9583)Memory used [KB]: 10362
0.15/0.49	% (9583)Time elapsed: 0.075 s
0.15/0.49	% (9583)------------------------------
0.15/0.49	% (9583)------------------------------
0.15/0.49	% (9553)Success in time 0.179 s
0.15/0.49	EOF