0.06/0.11 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_vampire %s %d 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 960 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 120 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jul 2 06:47:21 EDT 2020 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.18/0.41 % (22064)lrs+1011_1024_add=large:afp=4000:afq=1.1:anc=none:br=off:fsr=off:gsp=input_only:lma=on:nwc=1:stl=30:sos=on:urr=on_187 on theBenchmark 0.18/0.41 % (22061)dis+11_3_afr=on:afp=4000:afq=1.4:anc=none:cond=on:fsr=off:gs=on:lcm=reverse:nm=64:nwc=1:sos=on:sp=reverse_arity_3 on theBenchmark 0.18/0.41 % (22065)dis+11_24_afp=40000:afq=1.1:amm=sco:anc=none:bs=on:gs=on:gsem=off:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1:sos=on:sac=on:updr=off_52 on theBenchmark 0.18/0.41 % (22062)dis+1011_10_add=large:afr=on:afp=4000:afq=1.0:amm=off:anc=none:lma=on:nm=64:nwc=4:sac=on:sp=occurrence_75 on theBenchmark 0.18/0.41 % (22066)dis+11_3_awrs=decay:awrsf=256:av=off:gs=on:gsem=on:lcm=reverse:nm=0:nwc=1:sos=all:sp=frequency:updr=off_481 on theBenchmark 0.18/0.41 % (22063)ins+11_32_av=off:igbrr=0.4:igrr=1/64:igrpq=1.05:igwr=on:lcm=reverse:lma=on:nm=64:newcnf=on:nwc=1:sp=reverse_arity:updr=off_55 on theBenchmark 0.18/0.41 % (22067)lrs+1011_40_add=off:afr=on:afp=4000:afq=1.2:amm=sco:cond=on:fsr=off:gsp=input_only:gs=on:gsaa=from_current:gsem=off:nm=64:nwc=1:stl=60:sos=all:sp=occurrence:urr=ec_only:updr=off:uhcvi=on_388 on theBenchmark 0.18/0.41 % (22068)ott+11_3:2_afp=40000:afq=1.0:amm=sco:bs=unit_only:cond=on:fsr=off:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:lcm=reverse:nm=32:newcnf=on:nwc=5:nicw=on:sd=3:ss=axioms:sac=on:urr=on:updr=off_1019 on theBenchmark 0.18/0.42 % (22066)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya! 0.18/0.42 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark 0.18/0.42 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark 0.18/0.42 fof(f3872,plain,( 0.18/0.42 $false), 0.18/0.42 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f3871,f3000])). 0.18/0.42 fof(f3000,plain,( 0.18/0.42 relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))), 0.18/0.42 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f698])). 0.18/0.42 fof(f698,axiom,( 0.18/0.42 relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))), 0.18/0.42 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1_245)). 0.18/0.42 fof(f3871,plain,( 0.18/0.42 ~relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))), 0.18/0.42 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f3868,f2991])). 0.18/0.42 fof(f2991,plain,( 0.18/0.42 isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))), 0.18/0.42 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1078])). 0.18/0.42 fof(f1078,axiom,( 0.18/0.42 isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))), 0.18/0.42 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1_134)). 0.18/0.42 fof(f3868,plain,( 0.18/0.42 ~isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)) | ~relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))), 0.18/0.42 inference(resolution,[],[f3863,f3855])). 0.18/0.42 fof(f3855,plain,( 0.18/0.42 ( ! [X2,X0,X3,X1] : (isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,X2,X3,X1),X3) | ~isa(X0,X1) | ~relationexistsall(X2,X3,X1)) )), 0.18/0.42 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2722])). 0.18/0.42 fof(f2722,plain,( 0.18/0.42 ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] : (isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,X2,X3,X1),X3) | ~isa(X0,X1) | ~relationexistsall(X2,X3,X1))), 0.18/0.42 inference(flattening,[],[f2721])). 0.18/0.42 fof(f2721,plain,( 0.18/0.42 ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] : (isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,X2,X3,X1),X3) | (~isa(X0,X1) | ~relationexistsall(X2,X3,X1)))), 0.18/0.42 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1889])). 0.18/0.42 fof(f1889,plain,( 0.18/0.42 ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] : ((isa(X0,X1) & relationexistsall(X2,X3,X1)) => isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,X2,X3,X1),X3))), 0.18/0.42 inference(rectify,[],[f136])). 0.18/0.42 fof(f136,axiom,( 0.18/0.42 ! [X10,X11,X12,X13] : ((isa(X10,X11) & relationexistsall(X12,X13,X11)) => isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X10,X12,X13,X11),X13))), 0.18/0.42 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1_64)). 0.18/0.42 fof(f3863,plain,( 0.18/0.42 ~isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),c_tptpcol_16_7738)), 0.18/0.42 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f3862,f2991])). 0.18/0.42 fof(f3862,plain,( 0.18/0.42 ~isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),c_tptpcol_16_7738) | ~isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))), 0.18/0.42 inference(resolution,[],[f3857,f3620])). 0.18/0.42 fof(f3620,plain,( 0.18/0.42 ( ! [X0] : (tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X0) | ~isa(X0,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))) )), 0.18/0.42 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2480])). 0.18/0.42 fof(f2480,plain,( 0.18/0.42 ! [X0] : (tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X0) | ~isa(X0,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)))), 0.18/0.42 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1683])). 0.18/0.42 fof(f1683,plain,( 0.18/0.42 ! [X0] : (isa(X0,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)) => tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X0))), 0.18/0.42 inference(rectify,[],[f804])). 0.18/0.42 fof(f804,axiom,( 0.18/0.42 ! [X10] : (isa(X10,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)) => tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X10,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X10))), 0.18/0.42 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1_244)). 0.18/0.42 fof(f3857,plain,( 0.18/0.42 ( ! [X0] : (~tptp_8_968(X0,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804) | ~isa(X0,c_tptpcol_16_7738)) )), 0.18/0.42 inference(resolution,[],[f2724,f3481])). 0.18/0.42 fof(f3481,plain,( 0.18/0.42 ( ! [X0] : (tptpcol_16_7738(X0) | ~isa(X0,c_tptpcol_16_7738)) )), 0.18/0.42 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2341])). 0.18/0.42 fof(f2341,plain,( 0.18/0.42 ! [X0] : (tptpcol_16_7738(X0) | ~isa(X0,c_tptpcol_16_7738))), 0.18/0.42 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1544])). 0.18/0.42 fof(f1544,plain,( 0.18/0.42 ! [X0] : (isa(X0,c_tptpcol_16_7738) => tptpcol_16_7738(X0))), 0.18/0.42 inference(rectify,[],[f1127])). 0.18/0.42 fof(f1127,axiom,( 0.18/0.42 ! [X2] : (isa(X2,c_tptpcol_16_7738) => tptpcol_16_7738(X2))), 0.18/0.42 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1_673)). 0.18/0.42 fof(f2724,plain,( 0.18/0.42 ( ! [X0] : (~tptpcol_16_7738(X0) | ~tptp_8_968(X0,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)) )), 0.18/0.42 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1890])). 0.18/0.42 fof(f1890,plain,( 0.18/0.42 ! [X0] : ((~tptpcol_16_7738(X0) | ~tptp_8_968(X0,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)) & mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt))), 0.18/0.42 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1134])). 0.18/0.42 fof(f1134,plain,( 0.18/0.42 ~? [X0] : (mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt) => (tptpcol_16_7738(X0) & tptp_8_968(X0,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)))), 0.18/0.42 inference(rectify,[],[f1133])). 0.18/0.42 fof(f1133,negated_conjecture,( 0.18/0.42 ~? [X2] : (mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt) => (tptpcol_16_7738(X2) & tptp_8_968(X2,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)))), 0.18/0.42 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1132])). 0.18/0.42 fof(f1132,conjecture,( 0.18/0.42 ? [X2] : (mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt) => (tptpcol_16_7738(X2) & tptp_8_968(X2,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)))), 0.18/0.42 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query88)). 0.18/0.42 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark 0.18/0.42 % (22066)------------------------------ 0.18/0.42 % (22066)Version: Vampire 4.5.0 (commit 2ee491ce on 2020-06-19 13:55:12 +0100) 0.18/0.42 % (22066)Termination reason: Refutation 0.18/0.42 0.18/0.42 % (22066)Memory used [KB]: 6908 0.18/0.42 % (22066)Time elapsed: 0.010 s 0.18/0.42 % (22066)------------------------------ 0.18/0.42 % (22066)------------------------------ 0.18/0.42 % (22065)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (22065)------------------------------ 0.18/0.42 % (22065)Version: Vampire 4.5.0 (commit 2ee491ce on 2020-06-19 13:55:12 +0100) 0.18/0.42 % (22065)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy 0.18/0.42 0.18/0.42 % (22065)Memory used [KB]: 11513 0.18/0.42 % (22065)Time elapsed: 0.012 s 0.18/0.42 % (22065)------------------------------ 0.18/0.42 % (22065)------------------------------ 0.18/0.42 % (22060)Success in time 0.083 s 0.18/0.43 EOF