0.07/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.07/0.12	% Command    : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
0.12/0.33	% Computer   : n004.cluster.edu
0.12/0.33	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.33	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.33	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPULimit   : 960
0.12/0.33	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  2 07:13:58 EDT 2020
0.12/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.72/1.03	============================== Prover9 ===============================
0.72/1.03	Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
0.72/1.03	Process 16015 was started by sandbox2 on n004.cluster.edu,
0.72/1.03	Thu Jul  2 07:13:59 2020
0.72/1.03	The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 960 -f /tmp/Prover9_15862_n004.cluster.edu".
0.72/1.03	============================== end of head ===========================
0.72/1.03	
0.72/1.03	============================== INPUT =================================
0.72/1.03	
0.72/1.03	% Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_15862_n004.cluster.edu
0.72/1.03	
0.72/1.03	set(prolog_style_variables).
0.72/1.03	set(auto2).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
0.72/1.03	    % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
0.72/1.03	    % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
0.72/1.03	    % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
0.72/1.03	assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
0.72/1.03	assign(sos_limit,10000).
0.72/1.03	assign(order,kbo).
0.72/1.03	set(lex_order_vars).
0.72/1.03	clear(print_given).
0.72/1.03	
0.72/1.03	% formulas(sos).  % not echoed (33 formulas)
0.72/1.03	
0.72/1.03	============================== end of input ==========================
0.72/1.03	
0.72/1.03	% From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 960).
0.72/1.03	
0.72/1.03	============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
0.72/1.03	
0.72/1.03	% Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
0.72/1.03	1 (all Ax all C ((exists I3 (-model(I3,Ax) & model(I3,C))) & (exists I1 model(I1,Ax)) & (all I2 (model(I2,Ax) -> model(I2,C))) <-> status(Ax,C,wec))) # label(wec) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	2 (all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,wtc) <-> (exists I1 model(I1,Ax)) & (exists I2 -model(I2,Ax)) & (all I3 model(I3,C)))) # label(wtc) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	3 (all Ax all C ((all I2 model(I2,C)) & (exists I1 model(I1,Ax)) <-> status(Ax,C,tac))) # label(tac) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	4 (all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,sca) <-> (exists I2 model(I2,C)) & -(exists I1 model(I1,Ax)))) # label(sca) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	5 (all Ax all C ((exists I1 model(I1,Ax)) & (all I2 (model(I2,Ax) <-> model(I2,C))) <-> status(Ax,C,eqv))) # label(eqv) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	6 (all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,thm) <-> (all I1 (model(I1,Ax) -> model(I1,C))))) # label(thm) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	7 (all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,wth) <-> (exists I1 model(I1,Ax)) & (exists I4 -model(I4,C)) & (exists I3 (model(I3,C) & -model(I3,Ax))) & (all I2 (model(I2,Ax) -> model(I2,C))))) # label(wth) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	8 (all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,cax) <-> -(exists I1 model(I1,Ax)))) # label(cax) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	9 (all Ax all C ((all I1 model(I1,Ax)) & (all I2 model(I2,not(C))) <-> status(Ax,C,uns))) # label(uns) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	10 (all Ax all C ((exists I2 model(I2,C)) & (exists I3 -model(I3,C)) & -(exists I1 model(I1,Ax)) <-> status(Ax,C,wca))) # label(wca) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	11 (all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,eth) <-> (all I3 (model(I3,Ax) <-> model(I3,C))) & (exists I1 model(I1,Ax)) & (exists I2 -model(I2,Ax)))) # label(eth) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	12 (all Ax all C ((exists I1 (model(I1,Ax) & model(I1,C))) & (exists I2 (model(I2,Ax) & model(I2,not(C)))) <-> status(Ax,C,noc))) # label(noc) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	13 (all Ax all C ((exists I1 (model(I1,not(C)) & model(I1,Ax))) <-> status(Ax,C,csa))) # label(csa) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	14 (all Ax all C ((-(exists I1 model(I1,Ax)) -> -(exists I2 model(I2,C))) <-> status(Ax,C,unp))) # label(unp) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	15 (all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,tca) <-> (all I2 model(I2,C)) & -(exists I1 model(I1,Ax)))) # label(tca) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	16 (all Ax all C (((exists I1 model(I1,Ax)) -> (exists I2 model(I2,C))) <-> status(Ax,C,sap))) # label(sap) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	17 (all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,esa) <-> ((exists I1 model(I1,Ax)) <-> (exists I2 model(I2,C))))) # label(esa) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	18 (all Ax all C ((all I1 (model(I1,C) & model(I1,Ax))) <-> status(Ax,C,tau))) # label(tau) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	19 (all Ax all C ((exists I1 (model(I1,C) & model(I1,Ax))) <-> status(Ax,C,sat))) # label(sat) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	20 (exists F all I -model(I,F)) # label(contradiction) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	21 (exists I1 exists Ax exists C (model(I1,Ax) & (exists I2 model(I2,C)) & -model(I1,C))) # label(non_thm_spt) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	22 (all S1 all S2 ((all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,S1) -> status(Ax,C,S2))) <-> isa(S1,S2))) # label(isa) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	23 (all S1 all S2 (nevera(S1,S2) <-> (all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,S1) -> -status(Ax,C,S2))))) # label(nevera) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	24 (exists F ((exists I1 model(I1,F)) & (exists I2 -model(I2,F)))) # label(satisfiable) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	25 (all S1 all S2 ((exists Ax exists C (status(Ax,C,S1) & status(Ax,C,S2))) <-> mighta(S1,S2))) # label(mighta) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	26 (all S1 all S2 ((all Ax all C -(status(Ax,C,S2) <-> status(Ax,C,S1))) <-> xora(S1,S2))) # label(xora) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	27 (exists F all I model(I,F)) # label(tautology) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	28 (all S1 all S2 ((exists Ax exists C (status(Ax,C,S1) & -status(Ax,C,S2))) <-> nota(S1,S2))) # label(nota) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	29 (exists Ax exists C ((exists I4 -model(I4,C)) & (exists I3 (model(I3,C) & -model(I3,Ax))) & (all I2 (model(I2,Ax) -> model(I2,C))) & (exists I1 model(I1,Ax)))) # label(mixed_pair) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	30 (all I all F -(model(I,F) <-> model(I,not(F)))) # label(completeness) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	31 (all I all F (-model(I,not(F)) <-> model(I,F))) # label(not) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	32 (exists Ax exists C ((exists I2 (-model(I2,C) | -model(I2,Ax))) & (exists I1 (model(I1,C) & model(I1,Ax))))) # label(sat_non_taut_pair) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
0.72/1.03	
0.72/1.03	============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
0.72/1.03	
0.72/1.03	============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
0.72/1.03	
0.72/1.03	============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
0.72/1.03	33 -status(A,B,C) | status(A,B,D) | -isa(C,D) # label(isa) # label(axiom).  [clausify(22)].
0.72/1.03	34 status(f42(A,B),f43(A,B),A) | isa(A,B) # label(isa) # label(axiom).  [clausify(22)].
0.72/1.03	35 -status(f42(A,B),f43(A,B),B) | isa(A,B) # label(isa) # label(axiom).  [clausify(22)].
0.72/1.03	Derived: -status(A,B,C) | status(A,B,D) | status(f42(C,D),f43(C,D),C).  [resolve(33,c,34,b)].
0.72/1.03	Derived: -status(A,B,C) | status(A,B,D) | -status(f42(C,D),f43(C,D),D).  [resolve(33,c,35,b)].
0.72/1.03	36 nevera(A,B) | status(f44(A,B),f45(A,B),A) # label(nevera) # label(axiom).  [clausify(23)].
0.72/1.03	37 -nevera(A,B) | -status(C,D,A) | -status(C,D,B) # label(nevera) # label(axiom).  [clausify(23)].
0.72/1.03	Derived: status(f44(A,B),f45(A,B),A) | -status(C,D,A) | -status(C,D,B).  [resolve(36,a,37,a)].
1.95/2.22	38 nevera(A,B) | status(f44(A,B),f45(A,B),B) # label(nevera) # label(axiom).  [clausify(23)].
1.95/2.22	Derived: status(f44(A,B),f45(A,B),B) | -status(C,D,A) | -status(C,D,B).  [resolve(38,a,37,a)].
1.95/2.22	39 -nevera(csa,thm) # label(nevera_csa_thm) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
1.95/2.22	Derived: status(f44(csa,thm),f45(csa,thm),csa).  [resolve(39,a,36,a)].
1.95/2.22	Derived: status(f44(csa,thm),f45(csa,thm),thm).  [resolve(39,a,38,a)].
1.95/2.22	40 status(f46(A,B),f47(A,B),A) | -mighta(A,B) # label(mighta) # label(axiom).  [clausify(25)].
1.95/2.22	41 -status(A,B,C) | -status(A,B,D) | mighta(C,D) # label(mighta) # label(axiom).  [clausify(25)].
1.95/2.22	Derived: status(f46(A,B),f47(A,B),A) | -status(C,D,A) | -status(C,D,B).  [resolve(40,b,41,c)].
1.95/2.22	42 status(f46(A,B),f47(A,B),B) | -mighta(A,B) # label(mighta) # label(axiom).  [clausify(25)].
1.95/2.22	Derived: status(f46(A,B),f47(A,B),B) | -status(C,D,A) | -status(C,D,B).  [resolve(42,b,41,c)].
1.95/2.22	43 status(A,B,C) | status(A,B,D) | -xora(D,C) # label(xora) # label(axiom).  [clausify(26)].
1.95/2.22	44 -status(f48(A,B),f49(A,B),B) | status(f48(A,B),f49(A,B),A) | xora(A,B) # label(xora) # label(axiom).  [clausify(26)].
1.95/2.22	45 status(f48(A,B),f49(A,B),B) | -status(f48(A,B),f49(A,B),A) | xora(A,B) # label(xora) # label(axiom).  [clausify(26)].
1.95/2.22	Derived: status(A,B,C) | status(A,B,D) | -status(f48(D,C),f49(D,C),C) | status(f48(D,C),f49(D,C),D).  [resolve(43,c,44,c)].
1.95/2.22	Derived: status(A,B,C) | status(A,B,D) | status(f48(D,C),f49(D,C),C) | -status(f48(D,C),f49(D,C),D).  [resolve(43,c,45,c)].
1.95/2.22	46 -status(A,B,C) | -status(A,B,D) | -xora(D,C) # label(xora) # label(axiom).  [clausify(26)].
1.95/2.22	Derived: -status(A,B,C) | -status(A,B,D) | -status(f48(D,C),f49(D,C),C) | status(f48(D,C),f49(D,C),D).  [resolve(46,c,44,c)].
1.95/2.22	Derived: -status(A,B,C) | -status(A,B,D) | status(f48(D,C),f49(D,C),C) | -status(f48(D,C),f49(D,C),D).  [resolve(46,c,45,c)].
1.95/2.22	47 status(f50(A,B),f51(A,B),A) | -nota(A,B) # label(nota) # label(axiom).  [clausify(28)].
1.95/2.22	48 -status(A,B,C) | status(A,B,D) | nota(C,D) # label(nota) # label(axiom).  [clausify(28)].
1.95/2.22	Derived: status(f50(A,B),f51(A,B),A) | -status(C,D,A) | status(C,D,B).  [resolve(47,b,48,c)].
1.95/2.22	49 -status(f50(A,B),f51(A,B),B) | -nota(A,B) # label(nota) # label(axiom).  [clausify(28)].
1.95/2.22	Derived: -status(f50(A,B),f51(A,B),B) | -status(C,D,A) | status(C,D,B).  [resolve(49,b,48,c)].
1.95/2.22	
1.95/2.22	============================== end predicate elimination =============
1.95/2.22	
1.95/2.22	Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
1.95/2.22	
1.95/2.22	Term ordering decisions:
1.95/2.22	
1.95/2.22	% Assigning unary symbol not kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (91).
1.95/2.22	Function symbol KB weights:  csa=1. thm=1. eqv=1. eth=1. noc=1. wec=1. wth=1. esa=1. sap=1. sat=1. tac=1. tau=1. unp=1. uns=1. wtc=1. sca=1. tca=1. wca=1. cax=1. c1=1. c2=1. c3=1. c4=1. c5=1. c6=1. c7=1. c8=1. c9=1. c10=1. c11=1. c12=1. c13=1. c14=1. c15=1. c16=1. c17=1. c18=1. f1=1. f2=1. f3=1. f4=1. f5=1. f6=1. f7=1. f8=1. f9=1. f10=1. f11=1. f12=1. f13=1. f14=1. f15=1. f16=1. f17=1. f18=1. f19=1. f20=1. f21=1. f22=1. f23=1. f24=1. f25=1. f26=1. f27=1. f28=1. f29=1. f30=1. f31=1. f32=1. f33=1. f34=1. f35=1. f36=1. f37=1. f38=1. f39=1. f40=1. f41=1. f42=1. f43=1. f44=1. f45=1. f46=1. f47=1. f48=1. f49=1. f50=1. f51=1. not=0.
1.95/2.22	
1.95/2.22	============================== end of process initial clauses ========
1.95/2.22	
1.95/2.22	============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
1.95/2.22	
1.95/2.22	============================== end of clauses for search =============
1.95/2.22	
1.95/2.22	============================== SEARCH ================================
1.95/2.22	
1.95/2.22	% Starting search at 0.04 seconds.
1.95/2.22	
1.95/2.22	Low Water (keep): wt=30.000, iters=3423
1.95/2.22	
1.95/2.22	Low Water (keep): wt=25.000, iters=3466
1.95/2.22	
1.95/2.22	Low Water (keep): wt=21.000, iters=3348
1.95/2.22	
1.95/2.22	Low Water (keep): wt=20.000, iters=3370
1.95/2.22	
1.95/2.22	Low Water (keep): wt=18.000, iters=3335
1.95/2.22	
1.95/2.22	Low Water (keep): wt=17.000, iters=3343
1.95/2.22	
1.95/2.22	NOTE: Back_subsumption disabled, ratio of kept to back_subsumed is 74 (0.00 of 0.85 sec).
1.95/2.22	
1.95/2.22	Low Water (keep): wt=16.000, iters=3341
1.95/2.22	
1.95/2.22	Low Water (keep): wt=15.000, iters=3341
1.95/2.22	
1.95/2.22	Low Water (keep): wt=14.000, iters=3336
1.95/2.22	
1.95/2.22	Low Water (keep): wt=13.000, iters=3425
1.95/2.22	
1.95/2.22	Low Water (displace): id=10941, wt=11.000
1.95/2.22	
1.95/2.22	Low Water (displace): id=10988, wt=10.000
2.57/2.86	
2.57/2.86	Low Water (displace): id=11037, wt=9.000
2.57/2.86	
2.57/2.86	Low Water (displace): id=12485, wt=6.000
2.57/2.86	
2.57/2.86	Low Water (keep): wt=12.000, iters=3336
2.57/2.86	
2.57/2.86	============================== PROOF =================================
2.57/2.86	% SZS status Theorem
2.57/2.86	% SZS output start Refutation
2.57/2.86	
2.57/2.86	% Proof 1 at 1.77 (+ 0.08) seconds.
2.57/2.86	% Length of proof is 18.
2.57/2.86	% Level of proof is 5.
2.57/2.86	% Maximum clause weight is 12.000.
2.57/2.86	% Given clauses 1456.
2.57/2.86	
2.57/2.86	6 (all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,thm) <-> (all I1 (model(I1,Ax) -> model(I1,C))))) # label(thm) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
2.57/2.86	13 (all Ax all C ((exists I1 (model(I1,not(C)) & model(I1,Ax))) <-> status(Ax,C,csa))) # label(csa) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
2.57/2.86	23 (all S1 all S2 (nevera(S1,S2) <-> (all Ax all C (status(Ax,C,S1) -> -status(Ax,C,S2))))) # label(nevera) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
2.57/2.86	30 (all I all F -(model(I,F) <-> model(I,not(F)))) # label(completeness) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
2.57/2.86	36 nevera(A,B) | status(f44(A,B),f45(A,B),A) # label(nevera) # label(axiom).  [clausify(23)].
2.57/2.86	38 nevera(A,B) | status(f44(A,B),f45(A,B),B) # label(nevera) # label(axiom).  [clausify(23)].
2.57/2.86	39 -nevera(csa,thm) # label(nevera_csa_thm) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
2.57/2.86	71 -status(A,B,thm) | -model(C,A) | model(C,B) # label(thm) # label(axiom).  [clausify(6)].
2.57/2.86	102 model(f29(A,B),not(B)) | -status(A,B,csa) # label(csa) # label(axiom).  [clausify(13)].
2.57/2.86	103 model(f29(A,B),A) | -status(A,B,csa) # label(csa) # label(axiom).  [clausify(13)].
2.57/2.86	136 -model(A,B) | -model(A,not(B)) # label(completeness) # label(axiom).  [clausify(30)].
2.57/2.86	144 status(f44(csa,thm),f45(csa,thm),csa).  [resolve(39,a,36,a)].
2.57/2.86	145 status(f44(csa,thm),f45(csa,thm),thm).  [resolve(39,a,38,a)].
2.57/2.86	516 model(f29(f44(csa,thm),f45(csa,thm)),f44(csa,thm)).  [resolve(144,a,103,b)].
2.57/2.86	517 model(f29(f44(csa,thm),f45(csa,thm)),not(f45(csa,thm))).  [resolve(144,a,102,b)].
2.57/2.86	524 -model(A,f44(csa,thm)) | model(A,f45(csa,thm)).  [resolve(145,a,71,a)].
2.57/2.86	14649 -model(f29(f44(csa,thm),f45(csa,thm)),f45(csa,thm)).  [resolve(517,a,136,b)].
2.57/2.86	14698 $F.  [resolve(524,a,516,a),unit_del(a,14649)].
2.57/2.86	
2.57/2.86	% SZS output end Refutation
2.57/2.86	============================== end of proof ==========================
2.57/2.86	
2.57/2.86	============================== STATISTICS ============================
2.57/2.86	
2.57/2.86	Given=1456. Generated=124930. Kept=14648. proofs=1.
2.57/2.86	Usable=1456. Sos=9999. Demods=0. Limbo=0, Disabled=3316. Hints=0.
2.57/2.86	Megabytes=15.98.
2.57/2.86	User_CPU=1.77, System_CPU=0.08, Wall_clock=2.
2.57/2.86	
2.57/2.86	============================== end of statistics =====================
2.57/2.86	
2.57/2.86	============================== end of search =========================
2.57/2.86	
2.57/2.86	THEOREM PROVED
2.57/2.86	% SZS status Theorem
2.57/2.86	
2.57/2.86	Exiting with 1 proof.
2.57/2.86	
2.57/2.86	Process 16015 exit (max_proofs) Thu Jul  2 07:14:01 2020
2.57/2.86	Prover9 interrupted
2.57/2.86	EOF