0.00/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 960 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 120 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jul 2 06:36:03 EDT 2020 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode: 0.18/0.48 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.18/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p 0.18/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p 0.18/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p 9.11/2.73 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb: 9.11/2.73 # No SInE strategy applied 9.11/2.73 # Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds 9.11/2.73 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN 9.11/2.73 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. 9.11/2.73 # 9.11/2.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.021 s 9.11/2.73 # Presaturation interreduction done 9.11/2.73 9.11/2.73 # Proof found! 9.11/2.73 # SZS status Theorem 9.11/2.73 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 9.11/2.73 cnf(i_0_1065, negated_conjecture, (~tptpcol_16_7738(X1)|~tptp_8_968(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6wlae4tj/lgb.p', i_0_1065)). 9.11/2.73 cnf(i_0_280, plain, (tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X1)|~isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6wlae4tj/lgb.p', i_0_280)). 9.11/2.73 cnf(i_0_162, plain, (isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6wlae4tj/lgb.p', i_0_162)). 9.11/2.73 cnf(i_0_713, plain, (tptpcol_16_7738(X1)|~isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_7738)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6wlae4tj/lgb.p', i_0_713)). 9.11/2.73 cnf(i_0_691, plain, (isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3)|~isa(X1,X4)|~relationexistsall(X2,X3,X4)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6wlae4tj/lgb.p', i_0_691)). 9.11/2.73 cnf(i_0_281, plain, (relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6wlae4tj/lgb.p', i_0_281)). 9.11/2.73 cnf(c_0_1072, negated_conjecture, (~tptpcol_16_7738(X1)|~tptp_8_968(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)), i_0_1065). 9.11/2.73 cnf(c_0_1073, plain, (tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X1)|~isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))), i_0_280). 9.11/2.73 cnf(c_0_1074, plain, (isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))), i_0_162). 9.11/2.73 cnf(c_0_1075, negated_conjecture, (~tptpcol_16_7738(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1072, c_0_1073]), c_0_1074])])). 9.11/2.73 cnf(c_0_1076, plain, (tptpcol_16_7738(X1)|~isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_7738)), i_0_713). 9.11/2.73 cnf(c_0_1077, plain, (~isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),c_tptpcol_16_7738)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1075, c_0_1076])). 9.11/2.73 cnf(c_0_1078, plain, (isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3)|~isa(X1,X4)|~relationexistsall(X2,X3,X4)), i_0_691). 9.11/2.73 cnf(c_0_1079, plain, (relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))), i_0_281). 9.11/2.73 cnf(c_0_1080, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1077, c_0_1078]), c_0_1079]), c_0_1074])]), ['proof']). 9.11/2.73 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 9.11/2.73 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative 9.11/2.73 9.11/2.73 # ------------------------------------------------- 9.11/2.73 # User time : 0.032 s 9.11/2.73 # System time : 0.007 s 9.11/2.73 # Total time : 0.040 s 9.11/2.73 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages 9.11/2.73 9.11/2.75 EOF