0.08/0.14 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.08/0.15 % Command : eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule --cpu-limit=%d %s 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 960 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 120 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Thu Jul 2 07:02:54 EDT 2020 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime : 0.15/0.37 # Version: 2.5pre002 0.34/0.53 # SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000 0.34/0.53 # Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds 0.36/0.69 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN 0.36/0.69 # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. 0.36/0.69 # 0.36/0.69 # Preprocessing time : 0.081 s 0.36/0.69 0.36/0.69 # Proof found! 0.36/0.69 # SZS status Theorem 0.36/0.69 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.36/0.69 fof(synth_qa07_007_mira_wp_495, conjecture, ?[X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6]:((((attr(X4,X3)&sub(X3,name_1_1))&sub(X2,name_1_1))&attr(X5,X6))&attr(X1,X2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', synth_qa07_007_mira_wp_495)). 0.36/0.69 fof(name_rel__attr_val_name_1_1, axiom, ![X1, X2]:(name(X2,X1)=>?[X3]:((val(X3,X1)&sub(X3,name_1_1))&attr(X2,X3))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR004+0.ax', name_rel__attr_val_name_1_1)). 0.36/0.69 fof(ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_wp_495, hypothesis, ((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((sub(c341,mensch_1_1)&sub(c342,familiename_1_1))&exp(c368,c341))&subs(c368,einl__344uten_1_1))&in(c373,c362))&sort(c341,d))&fact(c341,real))&gener(c341,sp))&quant(c341,one))&refer(c341,det))&sort(c342,na))&card(c342,int1))&gener(c342,sp))&quant(c342,one))&varia(c342,varia_c))&sort(mensch_1_1,d))&etype(mensch_1_1,int0))&gener(mensch_1_1,ge))&quant(mensch_1_1,one))&refer(mensch_1_1,refer_c))&sort(familiename_1_1,na))&etype(familiename_1_1,int0))&quant(familiename_1_1,one))&refer(familiename_1_1,refer_c))&varia(familiename_1_1,varia_c))&card(c358,int1))&fact(c358,hypo))&gener(c358,sp))&quant(c358,one))&refer(c358,refer_c))&varia(c358,varia_c))&sort(c362,d))&etype(c362,int0))&fact(c362,real))&gener(c362,sp))&refer(c362,det))&varia(c362,con))&sort(mountain_bike_1_1,d))&etype(mountain_bike_1_1,int0))&gener(mountain_bike_1_1,ge))&quant(mountain_bike_1_1,one))&refer(mountain_bike_1_1,refer_c))&varia(mountain_bike_1_1,varia_c))&gener(c364,sp))&refer(c364,refer_c))&card(bereich_1_1,int1))&etype(bereich_1_1,int0))&gener(bereich_1_1,ge))&quant(bereich_1_1,one))&varia(bereich_1_1,varia_c))&sort(c373,l))&card(c373,int1))&fact(c373,real))&varia(c373,con))&sort(einl__344uten_1_1,dn))&gener(einl__344uten_1_1,ge))&fact(einl__344uten_1_1,real))&refer(c373,det))&quant(c373,one))&gener(c373,sp))&etype(c373,int0))&gener(c368,sp))&fact(c368,real))&sort(c368,dn))&refer(bereich_1_1,refer_c))&fact(bereich_1_1,real))&sort(bereich_1_1,d))&varia(c364,varia_c))&quant(c364,one))&fact(c364,real))&etype(c364,int0))&card(c364,int1))&sort(c364,d))&fact(mountain_bike_1_1,real))&card(mountain_bike_1_1,int1))&quant(c362,one))&card(c362,int1))&sort(freeride_____344ra_0,fe))&etype(c358,int0))&sort(c358,o))&sort(marzocchi_0,fe))&gener(familiename_1_1,ge))&fact(familiename_1_1,real))&card(familiename_1_1,int1))&varia(mensch_1_1,varia_c))&fact(mensch_1_1,real))&card(mensch_1_1,int1))&refer(c342,indet))&fact(c342,real))&etype(c342,int0))&varia(c341,con))&etype(c341,int0))&card(c341,int1))&mcont(c368,c358))&loc(c368,c373))&benf(c368,c364))&sub(c364,bereich_1_1))&sub(c362,mountain_bike_1_1))&name(c358,freeride_____344ra_0))&val(c342,marzocchi_0))&attr(c341,c342)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_wp_495)). 0.36/0.69 fof(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6]:((((attr(X4,X3)&sub(X3,name_1_1))&sub(X2,name_1_1))&attr(X5,X6))&attr(X1,X2))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[synth_qa07_007_mira_wp_495])). 0.36/0.69 fof(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X8, X9, X10, X11, X12, X13]:(~attr(X11,X10)|~sub(X10,name_1_1)|~sub(X9,name_1_1)|~attr(X12,X13)|~attr(X8,X9)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])). 0.36/0.69 fof(c_0_5, plain, ![X35, X36]:(((val(esk7_2(X35,X36),X35)|~name(X36,X35))&(sub(esk7_2(X35,X36),name_1_1)|~name(X36,X35)))&(attr(X36,esk7_2(X35,X36))|~name(X36,X35))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[name_rel__attr_val_name_1_1])])])])). 0.36/0.69 cnf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (~attr(X1,X2)|~sub(X2,name_1_1)|~sub(X3,name_1_1)|~attr(X4,X5)|~attr(X6,X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 0.36/0.69 cnf(c_0_7, plain, (sub(esk7_2(X1,X2),name_1_1)|~name(X2,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.36/0.69 cnf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (~name(X1,X2)|~attr(X3,esk7_2(X2,X1))|~attr(X4,X5)|~attr(X6,X7)|~sub(X7,name_1_1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7])). 0.36/0.69 cnf(c_0_9, plain, (attr(X1,esk7_2(X2,X1))|~name(X1,X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.36/0.69 cnf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (~name(X1,X2)|~attr(X3,X4)|~attr(X5,X6)|~sub(X6,name_1_1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])). 0.36/0.69 cnf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (~name(X1,X2)|~name(X3,X4)|~attr(X5,esk7_2(X4,X3))|~attr(X6,X7)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_7])). 0.36/0.69 cnf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (~name(X1,X2)|~name(X3,X4)|~attr(X5,X6)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_9])). 0.36/0.69 cnf(c_0_13, hypothesis, (name(c358,freeride_____344ra_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_wp_495])). 0.36/0.69 cnf(c_0_14, hypothesis, (~name(X1,X2)|~attr(X3,X4)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])). 0.36/0.69 cnf(c_0_15, hypothesis, (attr(c341,c342)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_007_mira_wp_495])). 0.36/0.69 cnf(c_0_16, hypothesis, (~attr(X1,X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_13])). 0.36/0.69 cnf(c_0_17, hypothesis, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16]), ['proof']). 0.36/0.69 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.36/0.69 # Proof object total steps : 18 0.36/0.69 # Proof object clause steps : 12 0.36/0.69 # Proof object formula steps : 6 0.36/0.69 # Proof object conjectures : 8 0.36/0.69 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5 0.36/0.69 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3 0.36/0.69 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5 0.36/0.69 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3 0.36/0.69 # Proof object generating inferences : 6 0.36/0.69 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1 0.36/0.69 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative 0.36/0.69 # Parsed axioms : 10189 0.36/0.69 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 9942 0.36/0.69 # Initial clauses : 503 0.36/0.69 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.36/0.69 # Initial clauses in saturation : 503 0.36/0.69 # Processed clauses : 526 0.36/0.69 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.36/0.69 # ...subsumed : 0 0.36/0.69 # ...remaining for further processing : 526 0.36/0.69 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.36/0.69 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.36/0.69 # Backward-subsumed : 6 0.36/0.69 # Backward-rewritten : 0 0.36/0.69 # Generated clauses : 442 0.36/0.69 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 437 0.36/0.69 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.36/0.69 # Paramodulations : 441 0.36/0.69 # Factorizations : 0 0.36/0.69 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.36/0.69 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.36/0.69 # Propositional check models : 0 0.36/0.69 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.36/0.69 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.36/0.69 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.36/0.69 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.36/0.69 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.36/0.69 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.36/0.69 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.36/0.69 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.36/0.69 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.36/0.69 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.36/0.69 # Current number of processed clauses : 519 0.36/0.69 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 245 0.36/0.69 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.36/0.69 # Negative unit clauses : 1 0.36/0.69 # Non-unit-clauses : 273 0.36/0.69 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 414 0.36/0.69 # ...number of literals in the above : 1875 0.36/0.69 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.36/0.69 # Current number of archived clauses : 7 0.36/0.69 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 15720 0.36/0.69 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5886 0.36/0.69 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6 0.36/0.69 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2114 0.36/0.69 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.36/0.69 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0 0.36/0.69 # BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.36/0.69 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.36/0.69 # Condensation successes : 0 0.36/0.69 # Termbank termtop insertions : 73809 0.36/0.70 0.36/0.70 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.36/0.70 # User time : 0.240 s 0.36/0.70 # System time : 0.086 s 0.36/0.70 # Total time : 0.326 s 0.36/0.70 # Maximum resident set size: 48008 pages 0.52/0.70 EOF