0.07/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.07/0.13 % Command : eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule --cpu-limit=%d %s 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 960 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 120 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jul 2 06:41:21 EDT 2020 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : 0.13/0.35 # Version: 2.5pre002 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000 0.21/0.50 # Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds 0.47/0.68 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN 0.47/0.68 # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. 0.47/0.68 # 0.47/0.68 # Preprocessing time : 0.086 s 0.47/0.68 0.47/0.68 # Proof found! 0.47/0.68 # SZS status Theorem 0.47/0.68 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.47/0.68 fof(synth_qa07_004_mw3_158, conjecture, ?[X1, X2, X3, X4]:((((attr(X1,X2)&scar(X4,X3))&sub(X2,name_1_1))&sub(X1,stadt__1_1))&val(X2,rom_0)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', synth_qa07_004_mw3_158)). 0.47/0.68 fof(ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mw3_158, hypothesis, (((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((subs(c657,haben_1_1)&pred(c660,bewohner__1_1))&assoc(c672,c814))&scar(c672,c43))&semrel(c672,c657))&sub(c814,provinz_1_1))&attr(c819,c820))&sort(c657,st))&gener(c657,sp))&sort(c660,d))&fact(c660,real))&gener(c660,sp))&varia(c660,varia_c))&sort(c43,abs))&sort(c43,ta))&sort(c43,re))&card(c43,card_c))&gener(c43,sp))&varia(c43,varia_c))&sort(haben_1_1,st))&fact(haben_1_1,real))&gener(haben_1_1,ge))&etype(bewohner__1_1,int0))&gener(bewohner__1_1,ge))&quant(bewohner__1_1,one))&refer(bewohner__1_1,refer_c))&sort(c672,st))&fact(c672,real))&sort(c814,d))&sort(c814,io))&card(c814,int1))&etype(c814,int0))&refer(c814,det))&sort(c819,d))&sort(c819,io))&etype(c819,int0))&quant(c819,one))&refer(c819,det))&fact(geh__366ren_1_1,real))&gener(geh__366ren_1_1,ge))&card(provinz_1_1,int1))&etype(provinz_1_1,int0))&fact(provinz_1_1,real))&gener(provinz_1_1,ge))&quant(provinz_1_1,one))&refer(provinz_1_1,refer_c))&varia(provinz_1_1,varia_c))&card(c820,int1))&refer(c820,indet))&sort(stadt__1_1,d))&card(stadt__1_1,int1))&fact(stadt__1_1,real))&gener(stadt__1_1,ge))&refer(stadt__1_1,refer_c))&card(name_1_1,int1))&etype(name_1_1,int0))&gener(name_1_1,ge))&quant(name_1_1,one))&varia(name_1_1,varia_c))&sort(rom_0,fe))&refer(name_1_1,refer_c))&fact(name_1_1,real))&sort(name_1_1,na))&varia(stadt__1_1,varia_c))&quant(stadt__1_1,one))&etype(stadt__1_1,int0))&sort(stadt__1_1,io))&varia(c820,varia_c))&quant(c820,one))&gener(c820,sp))&fact(c820,real))&etype(c820,int0))&sort(c820,na))&sort(provinz_1_1,io))&sort(provinz_1_1,d))&sort(geh__366ren_1_1,st))&varia(c819,con))&gener(c819,sp))&fact(c819,real))&card(c819,int1))&varia(c814,con))&quant(c814,one))&gener(c814,sp))&fact(c814,real))&gener(c672,sp))&varia(bewohner__1_1,varia_c))&fact(bewohner__1_1,real))&card(bewohner__1_1,int1))&sort(bewohner__1_1,d))&refer(c43,det))&quant(c43,quant_c))&fact(c43,real))&etype(c43,etype_c))&sort(c43,mo))&sort(c43,io))&sort(c43,co))&refer(c660,indet))&quant(c660,nfquant))&etype(c660,int1))&card(c660,int35895))&fact(c657,real))&val(c820,rom_0))&sub(c820,name_1_1))&sub(c819,stadt__1_1))&subs(c672,geh__366ren_1_1))&sspe(c672,c819))&scar(c657,c43))&obj(c657,c660)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mw3_158)). 0.47/0.68 fof(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1, X2, X3, X4]:((((attr(X1,X2)&scar(X4,X3))&sub(X2,name_1_1))&sub(X1,stadt__1_1))&val(X2,rom_0))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[synth_qa07_004_mw3_158])). 0.47/0.68 fof(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X8, X9, X10, X11]:(~attr(X8,X9)|~scar(X11,X10)|~sub(X9,name_1_1)|~sub(X8,stadt__1_1)|~val(X9,rom_0)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])). 0.47/0.68 cnf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, (~attr(X1,X2)|~scar(X3,X4)|~sub(X2,name_1_1)|~sub(X1,stadt__1_1)|~val(X2,rom_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.47/0.68 cnf(c_0_5, hypothesis, (val(c820,rom_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mw3_158])). 0.47/0.68 cnf(c_0_6, hypothesis, (sub(c820,name_1_1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mw3_158])). 0.47/0.68 cnf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (~scar(X1,X2)|~attr(X3,c820)|~sub(X3,stadt__1_1)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4, c_0_5]), c_0_6])])). 0.47/0.68 cnf(c_0_8, hypothesis, (attr(c819,c820)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mw3_158])). 0.47/0.68 cnf(c_0_9, hypothesis, (sub(c819,stadt__1_1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mw3_158])). 0.47/0.68 cnf(c_0_10, hypothesis, (scar(c657,c43)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ave07_era5_synth_qa07_004_mw3_158])). 0.47/0.68 cnf(c_0_11, hypothesis, (~scar(X1,X2)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8]), c_0_9])])). 0.47/0.68 cnf(c_0_12, hypothesis, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11]), ['proof']). 0.47/0.68 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.47/0.68 # Proof object total steps : 13 0.47/0.68 # Proof object clause steps : 9 0.47/0.68 # Proof object formula steps : 4 0.47/0.68 # Proof object conjectures : 5 0.47/0.68 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2 0.47/0.68 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3 0.47/0.68 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6 0.47/0.68 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2 0.47/0.68 # Proof object generating inferences : 2 0.47/0.68 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 5 0.47/0.68 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative 0.47/0.68 # Parsed axioms : 10189 0.47/0.68 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 9950 0.47/0.68 # Initial clauses : 500 0.47/0.68 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.47/0.68 # Initial clauses in saturation : 500 0.47/0.68 # Processed clauses : 502 0.47/0.68 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.47/0.68 # ...subsumed : 0 0.47/0.68 # ...remaining for further processing : 502 0.47/0.68 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.47/0.68 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.47/0.68 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.47/0.68 # Backward-rewritten : 0 0.47/0.68 # Generated clauses : 419 0.47/0.68 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 405 0.47/0.68 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.47/0.68 # Paramodulations : 417 0.47/0.68 # Factorizations : 0 0.47/0.68 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.47/0.68 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.47/0.68 # Propositional check models : 0 0.47/0.68 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.47/0.68 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.47/0.68 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.47/0.68 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.47/0.68 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.47/0.68 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.47/0.68 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.47/0.68 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.47/0.68 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.47/0.68 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.47/0.68 # Current number of processed clauses : 500 0.47/0.68 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 241 0.47/0.68 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.47/0.68 # Negative unit clauses : 1 0.47/0.68 # Non-unit-clauses : 258 0.47/0.68 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 403 0.47/0.68 # ...number of literals in the above : 1765 0.47/0.68 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.47/0.68 # Current number of archived clauses : 2 0.47/0.68 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 11178 0.47/0.68 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3303 0.47/0.68 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.47/0.68 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 432 0.47/0.68 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.47/0.68 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0 0.47/0.68 # BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.47/0.68 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.47/0.68 # Condensation successes : 0 0.47/0.68 # Termbank termtop insertions : 72915 0.47/0.69 0.47/0.69 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.47/0.69 # User time : 0.246 s 0.47/0.69 # System time : 0.083 s 0.47/0.69 # Total time : 0.329 s 0.47/0.69 # Maximum resident set size: 48012 pages 0.47/0.69 EOF