0.07/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_portfolio.sh /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rIUdhSd2R4 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 960 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jul 2 06:56:15 EDT 2020 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : 0.12/0.34 % Running portfolio for 120 s 0.12/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.12/0.34 % Number of cores: 8 0.12/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.12/0.35 % Running in FO mode 0.19/0.50 % Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh for 25 0.19/0.50 % Solved by: fo/fo7.sh 0.19/0.50 To remain in the chosen logic fragment, unification with booleans has been disabled. 0.19/0.50 % done 154 iterations in 0.049s 0.19/0.50 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p' 0.19/0.50 % SZS output start Refutation 0.19/0.50 tff(ax147, axiom, (pred_attacker(constr_CONST_4))). 0.19/0.50 tff('0', plain, pred_attacker(constr_CONST_4), 0.19/0.50 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax147])). 0.19/0.50 tff(ax122, axiom, 0.19/0.50 (![VAR_V_159]: 0.19/0.50 (pred_attacker(VAR_V_159) => 0.19/0.50 pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(VAR_V_159))))). 0.19/0.50 tff('1', plain, 0.19/0.50 ![X79]: ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X79)) | ~ pred_attacker(X79)), 0.19/0.50 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax122])). 0.19/0.50 tff(ax89, axiom, 0.19/0.50 (![VAR_X_41,VAR_Y_42]: pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(VAR_X_41,VAR_Y_42))). 0.19/0.50 tff('2', plain, ![X105, X106]: pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X105, X106), 0.19/0.50 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax89])). 0.19/0.50 tff(ax173, axiom, 0.19/0.50 (![VAR_0X40SID_60X305,VAR_AENC_NA_A_60X307,VAR_AENC_NB_60X306, 0.19/0.50 VAR_SIGN_A_PKA_60X308]: 0.19/0.50 ((pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(VAR_AENC_NB_60X306)) & 0.19/0.50 pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A, 0.19/0.50 constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1(constr_adec( 0.19/0.50 VAR_AENC_NA_A_60X307, 0.19/0.50 name_skB))) & 0.19/0.50 pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A, 0.19/0.50 constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign( 0.19/0.50 VAR_SIGN_A_PKA_60X308, 0.19/0.50 constr_pkey( 0.19/0.50 name_skS)))) & 0.19/0.50 pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(VAR_SIGN_A_PKA_60X308)) & 0.19/0.50 pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(VAR_AENC_NA_A_60X307)) & 0.19/0.50 pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(VAR_0X40SID_60X305), 0.19/0.50 constr_adec(VAR_AENC_NB_60X306,name_skB))) => 0.19/0.50 pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))))). 0.19/0.50 tff('3', plain, 0.19/0.50 ![X47, X48, X49, X50]: 0.19/0.50 ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X47), 0.19/0.50 constr_adec(X48, name_skB)) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X49)) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A, 0.19/0.50 constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1(constr_adec(X49, name_skB))) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X48)) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A, 0.19/0.50 constr_tuple_2_get_0x30( 0.19/0.50 constr_checksign(X50, constr_pkey(name_skS)))) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X50))), 0.19/0.50 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax173])). 0.19/0.50 tff('4', plain, 0.19/0.50 (![X49]: 0.19/0.50 (~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X49)) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A, 0.19/0.50 constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1(constr_adec(X49, name_skB))))) 0.19/0.50 <= ((![X49]: 0.19/0.50 (~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X49)) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A, 0.19/0.50 constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1(constr_adec(X49, name_skB)))))), 0.19/0.50 inference('split', [status(esa)], ['3'])). 0.19/0.50 tff('5', plain, 0.19/0.50 (![X0]: ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X0))) 0.19/0.50 <= ((![X49]: 0.19/0.50 (~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X49)) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A, 0.19/0.50 constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1(constr_adec(X49, name_skB)))))), 0.19/0.50 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['2', '4'])). 0.19/0.50 tff('6', plain, 0.19/0.50 ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))) 0.19/0.50 <= (( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)))), 0.19/0.50 inference('split', [status(esa)], ['3'])). 0.19/0.50 tff(ax114, axiom, 0.19/0.50 (![VAR_V_128]: 0.19/0.50 (pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(VAR_V_128)) => 0.19/0.50 pred_attacker(VAR_V_128)))). 0.19/0.50 tff('7', plain, 0.19/0.50 ![X3]: ( pred_attacker(X3) | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X3))), 0.19/0.50 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax114])). 0.19/0.50 tff('8', plain, 0.19/0.50 ( pred_attacker(name_objective)) 0.19/0.50 <= (( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)))), 0.19/0.50 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['6', '7'])). 0.19/0.50 tff(co0, conjecture, (pred_attacker(name_objective))). 0.19/0.50 tff(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~pred_attacker(name_objective))). 0.19/0.50 tff('9', plain, ~ pred_attacker(name_objective), 0.19/0.50 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 0.19/0.50 tff('10', plain, ~ ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))), 0.19/0.50 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['8', '9'])). 0.19/0.50 tff('11', plain, pred_attacker(constr_CONST_4), 0.19/0.50 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax147])). 0.19/0.50 tff(ax124, axiom, 0.19/0.50 (![VAR_V_165]: 0.19/0.50 (pred_attacker(VAR_V_165) => 0.19/0.50 pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(VAR_V_165))))). 0.19/0.50 tff('12', plain, 0.19/0.50 ![X1]: ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X1)) | ~ pred_attacker(X1)), 0.19/0.50 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax124])). 0.19/0.50 tff('13', plain, ![X105, X106]: pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X105, X106), 0.19/0.50 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax89])). 0.19/0.50 tff('14', plain, 0.19/0.50 (![X50]: 0.19/0.50 (~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A, 0.19/0.50 constr_tuple_2_get_0x30( 0.19/0.50 constr_checksign(X50, constr_pkey(name_skS)))) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X50)))) 0.19/0.50 <= ((![X50]: 0.19/0.50 (~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A, 0.19/0.50 constr_tuple_2_get_0x30( 0.19/0.50 constr_checksign(X50, constr_pkey(name_skS)))) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X50))))), 0.19/0.50 inference('split', [status(esa)], ['3'])). 0.19/0.50 tff('15', plain, 0.19/0.50 (![X0]: ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X0))) 0.19/0.50 <= ((![X50]: 0.19/0.50 (~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A, 0.19/0.50 constr_tuple_2_get_0x30( 0.19/0.50 constr_checksign(X50, constr_pkey(name_skS)))) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X50))))), 0.19/0.50 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['13', '14'])). 0.19/0.50 tff('16', plain, 0.19/0.50 (![X0]: ~ pred_attacker(X0)) 0.19/0.50 <= ((![X50]: 0.19/0.50 (~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A, 0.19/0.50 constr_tuple_2_get_0x30( 0.19/0.50 constr_checksign(X50, constr_pkey(name_skS)))) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X50))))), 0.19/0.50 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['12', '15'])). 0.19/0.50 tff('17', plain, 0.19/0.50 ~ 0.19/0.50 (![X50]: 0.19/0.50 (~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A, 0.19/0.50 constr_tuple_2_get_0x30( 0.19/0.50 constr_checksign(X50, constr_pkey(name_skS)))) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X50)))), 0.19/0.50 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['11', '16'])). 0.19/0.50 tff('18', plain, pred_attacker(constr_CONST_4), 0.19/0.50 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax147])). 0.19/0.50 tff(ax120, axiom, 0.19/0.50 (![VAR_V_153]: 0.19/0.50 (pred_attacker(VAR_V_153) => 0.19/0.50 pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(VAR_V_153))))). 0.19/0.50 tff('19', plain, 0.19/0.50 ![X32]: ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X32)) | ~ pred_attacker(X32)), 0.19/0.50 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax120])). 0.19/0.50 tff('20', plain, ![X105, X106]: pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X105, X106), 0.19/0.50 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax89])). 0.19/0.50 tff('21', plain, 0.19/0.50 (![X47, X48]: 0.19/0.50 (~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X47), 0.19/0.50 constr_adec(X48, name_skB)) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X48)))) 0.19/0.50 <= ((![X47, X48]: 0.19/0.50 (~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X47), 0.19/0.50 constr_adec(X48, name_skB)) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X48))))), 0.19/0.50 inference('split', [status(esa)], ['3'])). 0.19/0.50 tff('22', plain, 0.19/0.50 (![X0]: ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X0))) 0.19/0.50 <= ((![X47, X48]: 0.19/0.50 (~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X47), 0.19/0.50 constr_adec(X48, name_skB)) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X48))))), 0.19/0.50 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['20', '21'])). 0.19/0.50 tff('23', plain, 0.19/0.50 (![X0]: ~ pred_attacker(X0)) 0.19/0.50 <= ((![X47, X48]: 0.19/0.50 (~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X47), 0.19/0.50 constr_adec(X48, name_skB)) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X48))))), 0.19/0.50 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['19', '22'])). 0.19/0.50 tff('24', plain, 0.19/0.50 ~ 0.19/0.50 (![X47, X48]: 0.19/0.50 (~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X47), 0.19/0.50 constr_adec(X48, name_skB)) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X48)))), 0.19/0.50 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['18', '23'])). 0.19/0.50 tff('25', plain, 0.19/0.50 (![X49]: 0.19/0.50 (~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X49)) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A, 0.19/0.50 constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1(constr_adec(X49, name_skB))))) | 0.19/0.50 (![X47, X48]: 0.19/0.50 (~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X47), 0.19/0.50 constr_adec(X48, name_skB)) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X48)))) | 0.19/0.50 (![X50]: 0.19/0.50 (~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A, 0.19/0.50 constr_tuple_2_get_0x30( 0.19/0.50 constr_checksign(X50, constr_pkey(name_skS)))) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X50)))) | 0.19/0.50 ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))), 0.19/0.50 inference('split', [status(esa)], ['3'])). 0.19/0.50 tff('26', plain, 0.19/0.50 (![X49]: 0.19/0.50 (~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X49)) 0.19/0.50 | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A, 0.19/0.50 constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1(constr_adec(X49, name_skB))))), 0.19/0.50 inference('sat_resolution*', [status(thm)], ['10', '17', '24', '25'])). 0.19/0.50 tff('27', plain, ![X0]: ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X0)), 0.19/0.50 inference('simpl_trail', [status(thm)], ['5', '26'])). 0.19/0.50 tff('28', plain, ![X79]: ~ pred_attacker(X79), 0.19/0.50 inference('clc', [status(thm)], ['1', '27'])). 0.19/0.50 tff('29', plain, $false, inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['0', '28'])). 0.19/0.50 0.19/0.50 % SZS output end Refutation 0.19/0.50 0.19/0.51 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting 0.19/0.51 EOF