0.05/0.10	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.05/0.11	% Command    : run_portfolio.sh /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.jnHO2OdPw8
0.11/0.31	% Computer   : n031.cluster.edu
0.11/0.31	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.31	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.31	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.11/0.31	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.11/0.31	% CPULimit   : 960
0.11/0.31	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  2 08:06:33 EDT 2020
0.11/0.32	% CPUTime    : 
0.11/0.32	% Running portfolio for 120 s
0.11/0.32	% File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.11/0.32	% Number of cores: 8
0.11/0.32	% Python version: Python 3.6.8
0.11/0.32	% Running in FO mode
0.16/0.52	% Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh for 25
0.16/0.52	% Solved by: fo/fo7.sh
0.16/0.52	To remain in the chosen logic fragment, unification with booleans has been disabled.
0.16/0.52	% done 330 iterations in 0.110s
0.16/0.52	% SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
0.16/0.52	% SZS output start Refutation
0.16/0.52	tff(ax79, axiom,
0.16/0.52	  (![VAR_MSG1_142]:
0.16/0.52	     (pred_attacker(tuple_A_in_2(VAR_MSG1_142)) =>
0.16/0.52	      pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_4(constr_enc(name_objective,name_m_9)))))).
0.16/0.52	tff('0', plain,
0.16/0.52	    ![X9]:
0.16/0.52	      ( pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_4(constr_enc(name_objective, name_m_9)))
0.16/0.52	       | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_A_in_2(X9))),
0.16/0.52	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax79])).
0.16/0.52	tff('1', plain,
0.16/0.52	    ( pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_4(constr_enc(name_objective, name_m_9))))
0.16/0.52	      <= (( pred_attacker(
0.16/0.52	              tuple_A_out_4(constr_enc(name_objective, name_m_9))))),
0.16/0.52	    inference('split', [status(esa)], ['0'])).
0.16/0.52	tff(ax65, axiom,
0.16/0.52	  (![VAR_V_65]:
0.16/0.52	     (pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_4(VAR_V_65)) => pred_attacker(VAR_V_65)))).
0.16/0.52	tff('2', plain,
0.16/0.52	    ![X2]: ( pred_attacker(X2) | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_4(X2))),
0.16/0.52	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax65])).
0.16/0.52	tff('3', plain,
0.16/0.52	    ( pred_attacker(constr_enc(name_objective, name_m_9)))
0.16/0.52	      <= (( pred_attacker(
0.16/0.52	              tuple_A_out_4(constr_enc(name_objective, name_m_9))))),
0.16/0.52	    inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['1', '2'])).
0.16/0.52	tff(ax57, axiom, (pred_attacker(constr_CONST_0x30))).
0.16/0.52	tff('4', plain,  pred_attacker(constr_CONST_0x30),
0.16/0.52	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax57])).
0.16/0.52	tff(ax70, axiom,
0.16/0.52	  (![VAR_V_80X30]:
0.16/0.52	     (pred_attacker(VAR_V_80X30) => pred_attacker(tuple_A_in_2(VAR_V_80X30))))).
0.16/0.52	tff('5', plain,
0.16/0.52	    ![X28]: ( pred_attacker(tuple_A_in_2(X28)) | ~ pred_attacker(X28)),
0.16/0.52	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax70])).
0.16/0.52	tff('6', plain,
0.16/0.52	    (![X9]: ~ pred_attacker(tuple_A_in_2(X9)))
0.16/0.52	      <= ((![X9]: ~ pred_attacker(tuple_A_in_2(X9)))),
0.16/0.52	    inference('split', [status(esa)], ['0'])).
0.16/0.52	tff('7', plain,
0.16/0.52	    (![X0]: ~ pred_attacker(X0))
0.16/0.52	      <= ((![X9]: ~ pred_attacker(tuple_A_in_2(X9)))),
0.16/0.52	    inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['5', '6'])).
0.16/0.52	tff('8', plain, ~ (![X9]: ~ pred_attacker(tuple_A_in_2(X9))),
0.16/0.52	    inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['4', '7'])).
0.16/0.52	tff('9', plain,
0.16/0.52	    ( pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_4(constr_enc(name_objective, name_m_9)))) | 
0.16/0.52	    (![X9]: ~ pred_attacker(tuple_A_in_2(X9))),
0.16/0.52	    inference('split', [status(esa)], ['0'])).
0.16/0.52	tff('10', plain,
0.16/0.52	    ( pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_4(constr_enc(name_objective, name_m_9)))),
0.16/0.52	    inference('sat_resolution*', [status(thm)], ['8', '9'])).
0.16/0.52	tff('11', plain,  pred_attacker(constr_enc(name_objective, name_m_9)),
0.16/0.52	    inference('simpl_trail', [status(thm)], ['3', '10'])).
0.16/0.52	tff(ax45, axiom,
0.16/0.52	  (![VAR_K_8,VAR_M_7]:
0.16/0.52	     (VAR_M_7 = constr_dec(constr_enc(VAR_M_7,VAR_K_8),VAR_K_8)))).
0.16/0.52	tff('12', plain, ![X10, X11]: X10 = constr_dec(constr_enc(X10, X11), X11),
0.16/0.52	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax45])).
0.16/0.52	tff(ax50, axiom,
0.16/0.52	  (![VAR_V_33,VAR_V_34]:
0.16/0.52	     ((pred_attacker(VAR_V_33) & pred_attacker(VAR_V_34)) =>
0.16/0.52	      pred_attacker(constr_dec(VAR_V_33,VAR_V_34))))).
0.16/0.52	tff('13', plain,
0.16/0.52	    ![X24, X25]:
0.16/0.52	      (~ pred_attacker(X24)
0.16/0.52	       | ~ pred_attacker(X25)
0.16/0.52	       |  pred_attacker(constr_dec(X24, X25))),
0.16/0.52	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax50])).
0.16/0.52	tff('14', plain,
0.16/0.52	    ![X0, X1]:
0.16/0.52	      ( pred_attacker(X0)
0.16/0.52	       | ~ pred_attacker(X1)
0.16/0.52	       | ~ pred_attacker(constr_enc(X0, X1))),
0.16/0.52	    inference('sup+', [status(thm)], ['12', '13'])).
0.16/0.52	tff('15', plain,
0.16/0.52	    (~ pred_attacker(name_m_9) |  pred_attacker(name_objective)),
0.16/0.52	    inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['11', '14'])).
0.16/0.52	tff(co0, conjecture, (pred_attacker(name_objective))).
0.16/0.52	tff(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~pred_attacker(name_objective))).
0.16/0.52	tff('16', plain, ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
0.16/0.52	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
0.16/0.52	tff('17', plain, ~ pred_attacker(name_m_9),
0.16/0.52	    inference('clc', [status(thm)], ['15', '16'])).
0.16/0.52	tff(ax77, axiom,
0.16/0.52	  (pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_1(constr_comm_enc(name_m_9,name_Ka))))).
0.16/0.52	tff('18', plain,
0.16/0.52	     pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_1(constr_comm_enc(name_m_9, name_Ka))),
0.16/0.52	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax77])).
0.16/0.52	tff(ax69, axiom,
0.16/0.52	  (![VAR_V_77]:
0.16/0.52	     (pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_1(VAR_V_77)) => pred_attacker(VAR_V_77)))).
0.16/0.52	tff('19', plain,
0.16/0.52	    ![X14]: ( pred_attacker(X14) | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_1(X14))),
0.16/0.52	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax69])).
0.16/0.52	tff('20', plain,  pred_attacker(constr_comm_enc(name_m_9, name_Ka)),
0.16/0.52	    inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['18', '19'])).
0.16/0.52	tff(ax46, axiom,
0.16/0.52	  (![VAR_K_0X30,VAR_M_0X30]:
0.16/0.52	     (VAR_M_0X30 =
0.16/0.52	      constr_comm_dec(constr_comm_enc(VAR_M_0X30,VAR_K_0X30),VAR_K_0X30)))).
0.16/0.52	tff('21', plain,
0.16/0.52	    ![X0, X1]: X0 = constr_comm_dec(constr_comm_enc(X0, X1), X1),
0.16/0.52	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax46])).
0.16/0.52	tff('22', plain,
0.16/0.52	    ![X28]: ( pred_attacker(tuple_A_in_2(X28)) | ~ pred_attacker(X28)),
0.16/0.52	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax70])).
0.16/0.52	tff(ax78, axiom,
0.16/0.52	  (![VAR_MSG1_128]:
0.16/0.52	     (pred_attacker(tuple_A_in_2(VAR_MSG1_128)) =>
0.16/0.52	      pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_3(constr_comm_dec(VAR_MSG1_128,name_Ka)))))).
0.16/0.52	tff('23', plain,
0.16/0.52	    ![X17]:
0.16/0.52	      ( pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_3(constr_comm_dec(X17, name_Ka)))
0.16/0.52	       | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_A_in_2(X17))),
0.16/0.52	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax78])).
0.16/0.52	tff('24', plain,
0.16/0.52	    ![X0]:
0.16/0.52	      (~ pred_attacker(X0)
0.16/0.52	       |  pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_3(constr_comm_dec(X0, name_Ka)))),
0.16/0.52	    inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['22', '23'])).
0.16/0.52	tff('25', plain,
0.16/0.52	    ![X0]:
0.16/0.52	      ( pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_3(X0))
0.16/0.52	       | ~ pred_attacker(constr_comm_enc(X0, name_Ka))),
0.16/0.52	    inference('sup+', [status(thm)], ['21', '24'])).
0.16/0.52	tff('26', plain,  pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_3(name_m_9)),
0.16/0.52	    inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['20', '25'])).
0.16/0.52	tff(ax67, axiom,
0.16/0.52	  (![VAR_V_71]:
0.16/0.52	     (pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_3(VAR_V_71)) => pred_attacker(VAR_V_71)))).
0.16/0.52	tff('27', plain,
0.16/0.52	    ![X8]: ( pred_attacker(X8) | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_3(X8))),
0.16/0.52	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [ax67])).
0.16/0.52	tff('28', plain,  pred_attacker(name_m_9),
0.16/0.52	    inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['26', '27'])).
0.16/0.52	tff('29', plain, $false, inference('demod', [status(thm)], ['17', '28'])).
0.16/0.52	
0.16/0.52	% SZS output end Refutation
0.16/0.52	
0.32/0.53	% Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
0.32/0.53	EOF