0.07/0.13 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_portfolio.sh /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9dwyDyjdQL 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 960 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jul 2 07:02:37 EDT 2020 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime : 0.14/0.35 % Running portfolio for 120 s 0.14/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.14/0.35 % Number of cores: 8 0.14/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.14/0.36 % Running in FO mode 0.52/0.75 % Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh for 25 0.52/0.75 % Solved by: fo/fo7.sh 0.52/0.75 To remain in the chosen logic fragment, unification with booleans has been disabled. 0.52/0.75 % done 743 iterations in 0.289s 0.52/0.75 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p' 0.52/0.75 % SZS output start Refutation 0.52/0.75 tff(modus_ponens_strict_implies, axiom, 0.52/0.75 (modus_ponens_strict_implies <=> 0.52/0.75 (![X,Y]: 0.52/0.75 ((is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X,Y)) & is_a_theorem(X)) => 0.52/0.75 is_a_theorem(Y))))). 0.52/0.75 tff('0', plain, ( modus_ponens_strict_implies | ~ is_a_theorem(sk_Y_24)), 0.52/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [modus_ponens_strict_implies])). 0.52/0.75 tff('1', plain, (~ is_a_theorem(sk_Y_24)) <= (~ ( is_a_theorem(sk_Y_24))), 0.52/0.75 inference('split', [status(esa)], ['0'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('2', plain, ( modus_ponens_strict_implies | is_a_theorem(sk_X_34)), 0.52/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [modus_ponens_strict_implies])). 0.52/0.75 tff('3', plain, 0.52/0.75 ( modus_ponens_strict_implies) <= (( modus_ponens_strict_implies)), 0.52/0.75 inference('split', [status(esa)], ['2'])). 0.52/0.75 tff(s1_0_modus_ponens_strict_implies, conjecture, 0.52/0.75 (modus_ponens_strict_implies)). 0.52/0.75 tff(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~modus_ponens_strict_implies)). 0.52/0.75 tff('4', plain, ~ modus_ponens_strict_implies, 0.52/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 0.52/0.75 tff('5', plain, ~ ( modus_ponens_strict_implies), 0.52/0.75 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['3', '4'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('6', plain, ~ ( is_a_theorem(sk_Y_24)) | ( modus_ponens_strict_implies), 0.52/0.75 inference('split', [status(esa)], ['0'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('7', plain, ~ ( is_a_theorem(sk_Y_24)), 0.52/0.75 inference('sat_resolution*', [status(thm)], ['5', '6'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('8', plain, ~ is_a_theorem(sk_Y_24), 0.52/0.75 inference('simpl_trail', [status(thm)], ['1', '7'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('9', plain, 0.52/0.75 ( modus_ponens_strict_implies 0.52/0.75 | is_a_theorem(strict_implies(sk_X_34, sk_Y_24))), 0.52/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [modus_ponens_strict_implies])). 0.52/0.75 tff('10', plain, 0.52/0.75 ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(sk_X_34, sk_Y_24))) 0.52/0.75 <= (( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(sk_X_34, sk_Y_24)))), 0.52/0.75 inference('split', [status(esa)], ['9'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('11', plain, 0.52/0.75 ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(sk_X_34, sk_Y_24))) | 0.52/0.75 ( modus_ponens_strict_implies), inference('split', [status(esa)], ['9'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('12', plain, ( is_a_theorem(strict_implies(sk_X_34, sk_Y_24))), 0.52/0.75 inference('sat_resolution*', [status(thm)], ['5', '11'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('13', plain, is_a_theorem(strict_implies(sk_X_34, sk_Y_24)), 0.52/0.75 inference('simpl_trail', [status(thm)], ['10', '12'])). 0.52/0.75 tff(op_strict_implies, axiom, 0.52/0.75 (op_strict_implies => 0.52/0.75 (![X,Y]: (necessarily(implies(X,Y)) = strict_implies(X,Y))))). 0.52/0.75 tff('14', plain, 0.52/0.75 ![X105, X106]: 0.52/0.75 (necessarily(implies(X105, X106)) = strict_implies(X105, X106) 0.52/0.75 | ~ op_strict_implies), 0.52/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [op_strict_implies])). 0.52/0.75 tff('15', plain, 0.52/0.75 (![X105, X106]: 0.52/0.75 necessarily(implies(X105, X106)) = strict_implies(X105, X106)) 0.52/0.75 <= ((![X105, X106]: 0.52/0.75 necessarily(implies(X105, X106)) = strict_implies(X105, X106))), 0.52/0.75 inference('split', [status(esa)], ['14'])). 0.52/0.75 tff(s1_0_op_strict_implies, axiom, (op_strict_implies)). 0.52/0.75 tff('16', plain, op_strict_implies, 0.52/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [s1_0_op_strict_implies])). 0.52/0.75 tff('17', plain, (~ op_strict_implies) <= (~ ( op_strict_implies)), 0.52/0.75 inference('split', [status(esa)], ['14'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('18', plain, ( op_strict_implies), 0.52/0.75 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['16', '17'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('19', plain, 0.52/0.75 (![X105, X106]: 0.52/0.75 necessarily(implies(X105, X106)) = strict_implies(X105, X106)) | 0.52/0.75 ~ ( op_strict_implies), inference('split', [status(esa)], ['14'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('20', plain, 0.52/0.75 (![X105, X106]: 0.52/0.75 necessarily(implies(X105, X106)) = strict_implies(X105, X106)), 0.52/0.75 inference('sat_resolution*', [status(thm)], ['18', '19'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('21', plain, 0.52/0.75 ![X105, X106]: 0.52/0.75 necessarily(implies(X105, X106)) = strict_implies(X105, X106), 0.52/0.75 inference('simpl_trail', [status(thm)], ['15', '20'])). 0.52/0.75 tff(axiom_M, axiom, 0.52/0.75 ((![X]: is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(X),X))) <=> axiom_M)). 0.52/0.75 tff('22', plain, 0.52/0.75 ![X70]: ( is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(X70), X70)) | ~ axiom_M), 0.52/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_M])). 0.52/0.75 tff('23', plain, 0.52/0.75 (![X70]: is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(X70), X70))) 0.52/0.75 <= ((![X70]: is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(X70), X70)))), 0.52/0.75 inference('split', [status(esa)], ['22'])). 0.52/0.75 tff(km4b_axiom_M, axiom, (axiom_M)). 0.52/0.75 tff('24', plain, axiom_M, inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [km4b_axiom_M])). 0.52/0.75 tff('25', plain, (~ axiom_M) <= (~ ( axiom_M)), 0.52/0.75 inference('split', [status(esa)], ['22'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('26', plain, ( axiom_M), inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['24', '25'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('27', plain, 0.52/0.75 (![X70]: is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(X70), X70))) | ~ ( axiom_M), 0.52/0.75 inference('split', [status(esa)], ['22'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('28', plain, (![X70]: is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(X70), X70))), 0.52/0.75 inference('sat_resolution*', [status(thm)], ['26', '27'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('29', plain, ![X70]: is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(X70), X70)), 0.52/0.75 inference('simpl_trail', [status(thm)], ['23', '28'])). 0.52/0.75 tff(modus_ponens, axiom, 0.52/0.75 ((![X,Y]: 0.52/0.75 ((is_a_theorem(X) & is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))) => is_a_theorem(Y))) <=> 0.52/0.75 modus_ponens)). 0.52/0.75 tff('30', plain, 0.52/0.75 ![X48, X49]: 0.52/0.75 ( is_a_theorem(X48) 0.52/0.75 | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X49, X48)) 0.52/0.75 | ~ is_a_theorem(X49) 0.52/0.75 | ~ modus_ponens), 0.52/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [modus_ponens])). 0.52/0.75 tff('31', plain, 0.52/0.75 (![X48, X49]: 0.52/0.75 ( is_a_theorem(X48) 0.52/0.75 | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X49, X48)) 0.52/0.75 | ~ is_a_theorem(X49))) 0.52/0.75 <= ((![X48, X49]: 0.52/0.75 ( is_a_theorem(X48) 0.52/0.75 | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X49, X48)) 0.52/0.75 | ~ is_a_theorem(X49)))), 0.52/0.75 inference('split', [status(esa)], ['30'])). 0.52/0.75 tff(hilbert_modus_ponens, axiom, (modus_ponens)). 0.52/0.75 tff('32', plain, modus_ponens, 0.52/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [hilbert_modus_ponens])). 0.52/0.75 tff('33', plain, (~ modus_ponens) <= (~ ( modus_ponens)), 0.52/0.75 inference('split', [status(esa)], ['30'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('34', plain, ( modus_ponens), 0.52/0.75 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['32', '33'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('35', plain, 0.52/0.75 (![X48, X49]: 0.52/0.75 ( is_a_theorem(X48) 0.52/0.75 | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X49, X48)) 0.52/0.75 | ~ is_a_theorem(X49))) | 0.52/0.75 ~ ( modus_ponens), inference('split', [status(esa)], ['30'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('36', plain, 0.52/0.75 (![X48, X49]: 0.52/0.75 ( is_a_theorem(X48) 0.52/0.75 | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X49, X48)) 0.52/0.75 | ~ is_a_theorem(X49))), 0.52/0.75 inference('sat_resolution*', [status(thm)], ['34', '35'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('37', plain, 0.52/0.75 ![X48, X49]: 0.52/0.75 ( is_a_theorem(X48) 0.52/0.75 | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X49, X48)) 0.52/0.75 | ~ is_a_theorem(X49)), 0.52/0.75 inference('simpl_trail', [status(thm)], ['31', '36'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('38', plain, 0.52/0.75 ![X0]: (~ is_a_theorem(necessarily(X0)) | is_a_theorem(X0)), 0.52/0.75 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['29', '37'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('39', plain, 0.52/0.75 ![X0, X1]: 0.52/0.75 (~ is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X1, X0)) 0.52/0.75 | is_a_theorem(implies(X1, X0))), 0.52/0.75 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['21', '38'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('40', plain, is_a_theorem(implies(sk_X_34, sk_Y_24)), 0.52/0.75 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['13', '39'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('41', plain, 0.52/0.75 ![X48, X49]: 0.52/0.75 ( is_a_theorem(X48) 0.52/0.75 | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X49, X48)) 0.52/0.75 | ~ is_a_theorem(X49)), 0.52/0.75 inference('simpl_trail', [status(thm)], ['31', '36'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('42', plain, (~ is_a_theorem(sk_X_34) | is_a_theorem(sk_Y_24)), 0.52/0.75 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['40', '41'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('43', plain, ( is_a_theorem(sk_X_34)) <= (( is_a_theorem(sk_X_34))), 0.52/0.75 inference('split', [status(esa)], ['2'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('44', plain, ( is_a_theorem(sk_X_34)) | ( modus_ponens_strict_implies), 0.52/0.75 inference('split', [status(esa)], ['2'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('45', plain, ( is_a_theorem(sk_X_34)), 0.52/0.75 inference('sat_resolution*', [status(thm)], ['5', '44'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('46', plain, is_a_theorem(sk_X_34), 0.52/0.75 inference('simpl_trail', [status(thm)], ['43', '45'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('47', plain, is_a_theorem(sk_Y_24), 0.52/0.75 inference('demod', [status(thm)], ['42', '46'])). 0.52/0.75 tff('48', plain, $false, inference('demod', [status(thm)], ['8', '47'])). 0.52/0.75 0.52/0.75 % SZS output end Refutation 0.52/0.75 0.52/0.76 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting 0.52/0.76 EOF