0.06/0.11 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.06/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 960 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Thu Jul 2 08:26:01 EDT 2020 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime : 0.76/1.10 ============================== Prover9 =============================== 0.76/1.10 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009. 0.76/1.10 Process 643 was started by sandbox2 on n024.cluster.edu, 0.76/1.10 Thu Jul 2 08:26:02 2020 0.76/1.10 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 960 -f /tmp/Prover9_457_n024.cluster.edu". 0.76/1.10 ============================== end of head =========================== 0.76/1.10 0.76/1.10 ============================== INPUT ================================= 0.76/1.10 0.76/1.10 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_457_n024.cluster.edu 0.76/1.10 0.76/1.10 set(prolog_style_variables). 0.76/1.10 set(auto2). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto2) -> set(auto). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000"). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000"). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1). 0.76/1.10 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5). 0.76/1.10 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses). 0.76/1.10 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given). 0.76/1.10 assign(lrs_ticks,-1). 0.76/1.10 assign(sos_limit,10000). 0.76/1.10 assign(order,kbo). 0.76/1.10 set(lex_order_vars). 0.76/1.10 clear(print_given). 0.76/1.10 0.76/1.10 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (88 formulas) 0.76/1.10 0.76/1.10 ============================== end of input ========================== 0.76/1.10 0.76/1.10 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 960). 0.76/1.10 0.76/1.10 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ========== 0.76/1.10 0.76/1.10 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses: 0.76/1.10 1 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X,Y),implies(X,Y)))) <-> equivalence_1 # label(equivalence_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 2 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(Y,or(X,Y)))) <-> or_2 # label(or_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 3 r3 <-> (all P all Q is_a_theorem(implies(or(P,Q),or(Q,P)))) # label(r3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 4 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,and(X,Y))))) <-> and_3 # label(and_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 5 or_3 <-> (all X all Y all Z is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Z),implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(or(X,Y),Z))))) # label(or_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 6 r1 <-> (all P is_a_theorem(implies(or(P,P),P))) # label(r1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 7 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(Y),not(X)),implies(X,Y)))) <-> modus_tollens # label(modus_tollens) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 8 kn1 <-> (all P is_a_theorem(implies(P,and(P,P)))) # label(kn1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 9 cn2 <-> (all P all Q is_a_theorem(implies(P,implies(not(P),Q)))) # label(cn2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 10 kn2 <-> (all P all Q is_a_theorem(implies(and(P,Q),P))) # label(kn2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 11 implies_1 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X)))) # label(implies_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 12 (all X all Y (is_a_theorem(equiv(X,Y)) -> X = Y)) <-> substitution_of_equivalents # label(substitution_of_equivalents) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 13 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(implies(Y,X),equiv(X,Y))))) <-> equivalence_3 # label(equivalence_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 14 kn3 <-> (all P all Q all R is_a_theorem(implies(implies(P,Q),implies(not(and(Q,R)),not(and(R,P)))))) # label(kn3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 15 (all P all Q is_a_theorem(implies(Q,or(P,Q)))) <-> r2 # label(r2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 16 implies_3 <-> (all X all Y all Z is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(X,Z))))) # label(implies_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 17 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(X,or(X,Y)))) <-> or_1 # label(or_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 18 (all P is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(P),P),P))) <-> cn3 # label(cn3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 19 and_2 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),Y))) # label(and_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 20 (all P all Q all R is_a_theorem(implies(implies(P,Q),implies(implies(Q,R),implies(P,R))))) <-> cn1 # label(cn1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 21 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),X))) <-> and_1 # label(and_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 22 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(equiv(X,Y),implies(Y,X)))) <-> equivalence_2 # label(equivalence_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 23 (all P all Q all R is_a_theorem(implies(or(P,or(Q,R)),or(Q,or(P,R))))) <-> r4 # label(r4) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 24 (all X all Y (is_a_theorem(X) & is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y)) -> is_a_theorem(Y))) <-> modus_ponens # label(modus_ponens) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 25 implies_2 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,implies(X,Y)),implies(X,Y)))) # label(implies_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 26 (all P all Q all R is_a_theorem(implies(implies(Q,R),implies(or(P,Q),or(P,R))))) <-> r5 # label(r5) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 27 op_and -> (all X all Y and(X,Y) = not(or(not(X),not(Y)))) # label(op_and) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 28 op_equiv -> (all X all Y and(implies(X,Y),implies(Y,X)) = equiv(X,Y)) # label(op_equiv) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 29 op_or -> (all X all Y or(X,Y) = not(and(not(X),not(Y)))) # label(op_or) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 30 op_implies_and -> (all X all Y not(and(X,not(Y))) = implies(X,Y)) # label(op_implies_and) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 31 op_implies_or -> (all X all Y or(not(X),Y) = implies(X,Y)) # label(op_implies_or) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 32 axiom_K <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(implies(X,Y)),implies(necessarily(X),necessarily(Y))))) # label(axiom_K) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 33 (all X is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(X),necessarily(necessarily(X))))) <-> axiom_4 # label(axiom_4) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 34 (all P all Q is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(and(P,Q)),and(possibly(P),possibly(Q))))) <-> axiom_s2 # label(axiom_s2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 35 (all X is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(X),X))) <-> axiom_M # label(axiom_M) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 36 substitution_strict_equiv <-> (all X all Y (is_a_theorem(strict_equiv(X,Y)) -> X = Y)) # label(substitution_strict_equiv) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 37 adjunction <-> (all X all Y (is_a_theorem(Y) & is_a_theorem(X) -> is_a_theorem(and(X,Y)))) # label(adjunction) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 38 (all X is_a_theorem(strict_implies(necessarily(X),necessarily(necessarily(X))))) <-> axiom_s4 # label(axiom_s4) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 39 axiom_m1 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X,Y),and(Y,X)))) # label(axiom_m1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 40 axiom_m8 <-> (all P all Q is_a_theorem(strict_implies(strict_implies(P,Q),strict_implies(possibly(P),possibly(Q))))) # label(axiom_m8) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.10 41 (all X is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X,and(X,X)))) <-> axiom_m4 # label(axiom_m4) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.12 42 axiom_m2 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(X,Y),X))) # label(axiom_m2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.12 43 necessitation <-> (all X (is_a_theorem(X) -> is_a_theorem(necessarily(X)))) # label(necessitation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.12 44 axiom_m7 <-> (all P all Q is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(and(P,Q)),P))) # label(axiom_m7) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.12 45 (all X is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(possibly(X)),possibly(X)))) <-> axiom_m9 # label(axiom_m9) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.12 46 axiom_s3 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(strict_implies(strict_implies(X,Y),strict_implies(not(possibly(Y)),not(possibly(X)))))) # label(axiom_s3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.12 47 axiom_s1 <-> (all X all Y all Z is_a_theorem(implies(and(necessarily(implies(X,Y)),necessarily(implies(Y,Z))),necessarily(implies(X,Z))))) # label(axiom_s1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.12 48 (all X is_a_theorem(implies(X,necessarily(possibly(X))))) <-> axiom_B # label(axiom_B) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.12 49 axiom_m6 <-> (all X is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X,possibly(X)))) # label(axiom_m6) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.12 50 axiom_m10 <-> (all X is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(X),necessarily(possibly(X))))) # label(axiom_m10) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.12 51 (all X all Y all Z is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(and(X,Y),Z),and(X,and(Y,Z))))) <-> axiom_m3 # label(axiom_m3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.12 52 axiom_m5 <-> (all X all Y all Z is_a_theorem(strict_implies(and(strict_implies(X,Y),strict_implies(Y,Z)),strict_implies(X,Z)))) # label(axiom_m5) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.12 53 (all X is_a_theorem(implies(possibly(X),necessarily(possibly(X))))) <-> axiom_5 # label(axiom_5) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.12 54 modus_ponens_strict_implies <-> (all X all Y (is_a_theorem(strict_implies(X,Y)) & is_a_theorem(X) -> is_a_theorem(Y))) # label(modus_ponens_strict_implies) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.12 55 op_necessarily -> (all X necessarily(X) = not(possibly(not(X)))) # label(op_necessarily) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.12 56 op_strict_implies -> (all X all Y necessarily(implies(X,Y)) = strict_implies(X,Y)) # label(op_strict_implies) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.12 57 op_possibly -> (all X possibly(X) = not(necessarily(not(X)))) # label(op_possibly) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.12 58 op_strict_equiv -> (all X all Y and(strict_implies(X,Y),strict_implies(Y,X)) = strict_equiv(X,Y)) # label(op_strict_equiv) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.76/1.12 0.76/1.12 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas === 0.76/1.12 0.76/1.12 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES =============== 0.76/1.12 0.76/1.12 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION ================= 0.76/1.12 0.76/1.12 ============================== end predicate elimination ============= 0.76/1.12 0.76/1.12 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes). 0.76/1.12 0.76/1.12 Term ordering decisions: 0.76/1.12 Function symbol KB weights: c1=1. c2=1. c3=1. c4=1. c5=1. c6=1. c7=1. c8=1. c9=1. c10=1. c11=1. c12=1. c13=1. c14=1. c15=1. c16=1. c17=1. c18=1. c19=1. c20=1. c21=1. c22=1. c23=1. c24=1. c25=1. c26=1. c27=1. c28=1. c29=1. c30=1. c31=1. c32=1. c33=1. c34=1. c35=1. c36=1. c37=1. c38=1. c39=1. c40=1. c41=1. c42=1. c43=1. c44=1. c45=1. c46=1. c47=1. c48=1. c49=1. c50=1. c51=1. c52=1. c53=1. c54=1. c55=1. c56=1. c57=1. c58=1. c59=1. c60=1. c61=1. c62=1. c63=1. c64=1. c65=1. c66=1. c67=1. c68=1. c69=1. c70=1. c71=1. c72=1. c73=1. c74=1. c75=1. c76=1. c77=1. c78=1. c79=1. c80=1. c81=1. c82=1. c83=1. c84=1. c85=1. c86=1. c87=1. c88=1. c89=1. c90=1. c91=1. c92=1. c93=1. c94=1. implies=1. and=1. strict_implies=1. or=1. equiv=1. strict_equiv=1. necessarily=1. possibly=1. not=1. 0.76/1.12 0.76/1.12 ============================== end of process initial clauses ======== 0.76/1.12 0.76/1.12 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ==================== 0.76/1.12 0.76/1.12 ============================== end of clauses for search ============= 6.27/6.58 6.27/6.58 ============================== SEARCH ================================ 6.27/6.58 6.27/6.58 % Starting search at 0.04 seconds. 6.27/6.58 6.27/6.58 Low Water (keep): wt=26.000, iters=3368 6.27/6.58 6.27/6.58 Low Water (keep): wt=25.000, iters=3365 6.27/6.58 6.27/6.58 Low Water (keep): wt=24.000, iters=3352 6.27/6.58 6.27/6.58 Low Water (keep): wt=22.000, iters=3343 6.27/6.58 6.27/6.58 Low Water (keep): wt=20.000, iters=3348 6.27/6.58 6.27/6.58 Low Water (keep): wt=19.000, iters=3390 6.27/6.58 6.27/6.58 Low Water (keep): wt=18.000, iters=3342 6.27/6.58 6.27/6.58 Low Water (keep): wt=17.000, iters=3351 6.27/6.58 6.27/6.58 Low Water (keep): wt=16.000, iters=3336 6.27/6.58 6.27/6.58 Low Water (keep): wt=15.000, iters=3354 6.27/6.58 6.27/6.58 Low Water (keep): wt=14.000, iters=3391 6.27/6.58 6.27/6.58 Low Water (keep): wt=13.000, iters=3391 6.27/6.58 6.27/6.58 Low Water (keep): wt=12.000, iters=3335 6.27/6.58 6.27/6.58 Low Water (displace): id=15105, wt=32.000 6.27/6.58 6.27/6.58 Low Water (displace): id=20486, wt=11.000 6.27/6.58 6.27/6.58 Low Water (displace): id=20487, wt=10.000 6.27/6.58 6.27/6.58 Low Water (displace): id=20636, wt=9.000 6.27/6.58 6.27/6.58 ============================== PROOF ================================= 6.27/6.58 % SZS status Theorem 6.27/6.58 % SZS output start Refutation 6.27/6.58 6.27/6.58 % Proof 1 at 5.44 (+ 0.05) seconds. 6.27/6.58 % Length of proof is 88. 6.27/6.58 % Level of proof is 13. 6.27/6.58 % Maximum clause weight is 14.000. 6.27/6.58 % Given clauses 1320. 6.27/6.58 6.27/6.58 4 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,and(X,Y))))) <-> and_3 # label(and_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 7 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(Y),not(X)),implies(X,Y)))) <-> modus_tollens # label(modus_tollens) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 12 (all X all Y (is_a_theorem(equiv(X,Y)) -> X = Y)) <-> substitution_of_equivalents # label(substitution_of_equivalents) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 13 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(implies(Y,X),equiv(X,Y))))) <-> equivalence_3 # label(equivalence_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 17 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(X,or(X,Y)))) <-> or_1 # label(or_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 21 (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(and(X,Y),X))) <-> and_1 # label(and_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 24 (all X all Y (is_a_theorem(X) & is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y)) -> is_a_theorem(Y))) <-> modus_ponens # label(modus_ponens) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 25 implies_2 <-> (all X all Y is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,implies(X,Y)),implies(X,Y)))) # label(implies_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 29 op_or -> (all X all Y or(X,Y) = not(and(not(X),not(Y)))) # label(op_or) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 30 op_implies_and -> (all X all Y not(and(X,not(Y))) = implies(X,Y)) # label(op_implies_and) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 35 (all X is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(X),X))) <-> axiom_M # label(axiom_M) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 43 necessitation <-> (all X (is_a_theorem(X) -> is_a_theorem(necessarily(X)))) # label(necessitation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 45 (all X is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(possibly(X)),possibly(X)))) <-> axiom_m9 # label(axiom_m9) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 53 (all X is_a_theorem(implies(possibly(X),necessarily(possibly(X))))) <-> axiom_5 # label(axiom_5) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 56 op_strict_implies -> (all X all Y necessarily(implies(X,Y)) = strict_implies(X,Y)) # label(op_strict_implies) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 57 op_possibly -> (all X possibly(X) = not(necessarily(not(X)))) # label(op_possibly) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 66 is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,and(A,B)))) | -and_3 # label(and_3) # label(axiom). [clausify(4)]. 6.27/6.58 72 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),implies(B,A))) | -modus_tollens # label(modus_tollens) # label(axiom). [clausify(7)]. 6.27/6.58 83 -is_a_theorem(equiv(A,B)) | B = A | -substitution_of_equivalents # label(substitution_of_equivalents) # label(axiom). [clausify(12)]. 6.27/6.58 85 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,A),equiv(A,B)))) | -equivalence_3 # label(equivalence_3) # label(axiom). [clausify(13)]. 6.27/6.58 93 is_a_theorem(implies(A,or(A,B))) | -or_1 # label(or_1) # label(axiom). [clausify(17)]. 6.27/6.58 101 is_a_theorem(implies(and(A,B),A)) | -and_1 # label(and_1) # label(axiom). [clausify(21)]. 6.27/6.58 109 -is_a_theorem(A) | -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) | is_a_theorem(B) | -modus_ponens # label(modus_ponens) # label(axiom). [clausify(24)]. 6.27/6.58 110 -implies_2 | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(A,B)),implies(A,B))) # label(implies_2) # label(axiom). [clausify(25)]. 6.27/6.58 116 -op_or | not(and(not(A),not(B))) = or(A,B) # label(op_or) # label(axiom). [clausify(29)]. 6.27/6.58 117 -op_implies_and | not(and(A,not(B))) = implies(A,B) # label(op_implies_and) # label(axiom). [clausify(30)]. 6.27/6.58 119 op_implies_and # label(hilbert_op_implies_and) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 120 equivalence_3 # label(hilbert_equivalence_3) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 121 modus_tollens # label(hilbert_modus_tollens) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 122 implies_2 # label(hilbert_implies_2) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 124 and_1 # label(hilbert_and_1) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 127 or_1 # label(hilbert_or_1) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 129 and_3 # label(hilbert_and_3) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 132 substitution_of_equivalents # label(substitution_of_equivalents) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 133 modus_ponens # label(hilbert_modus_ponens) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 134 op_or # label(hilbert_op_or) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 144 is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(A),A)) | -axiom_M # label(axiom_M) # label(axiom). [clausify(35)]. 6.27/6.58 162 -necessitation | -is_a_theorem(A) | is_a_theorem(necessarily(A)) # label(necessitation) # label(axiom). [clausify(43)]. 6.27/6.58 167 -is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(possibly(c77)),possibly(c77))) | axiom_m9 # label(axiom_m9) # label(axiom). [clausify(45)]. 6.27/6.58 184 is_a_theorem(implies(possibly(A),necessarily(possibly(A)))) | -axiom_5 # label(axiom_5) # label(axiom). [clausify(53)]. 6.27/6.58 191 -op_strict_implies | strict_implies(A,B) = necessarily(implies(A,B)) # label(op_strict_implies) # label(axiom). [clausify(56)]. 6.27/6.58 192 -op_strict_implies | necessarily(implies(A,B)) = strict_implies(A,B). [copy(191),flip(b)]. 6.27/6.58 193 -op_possibly | possibly(A) = not(necessarily(not(A))) # label(op_possibly) # label(axiom). [clausify(57)]. 6.27/6.58 194 -op_possibly | not(necessarily(not(A))) = possibly(A). [copy(193),flip(b)]. 6.27/6.58 197 axiom_M # label(km5_axiom_M) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 198 necessitation # label(km5_necessitation) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 200 op_possibly # label(km5_op_possibly) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 201 axiom_5 # label(km5_axiom_5) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 204 op_strict_implies # label(s1_0_op_strict_implies) # label(axiom). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 205 -axiom_m9 # label(s1_0_m6s3m9b_axiom_m9) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption]. 6.27/6.58 206 not(and(A,not(B))) = implies(A,B). [back_unit_del(117),unit_del(a,119)]. 6.27/6.58 207 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,A),equiv(A,B)))). [back_unit_del(85),unit_del(b,120)]. 6.27/6.58 208 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),implies(B,A))). [back_unit_del(72),unit_del(b,121)]. 6.27/6.58 209 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(A,B)),implies(A,B))). [back_unit_del(110),unit_del(a,122)]. 6.27/6.58 211 is_a_theorem(implies(and(A,B),A)). [back_unit_del(101),unit_del(b,124)]. 6.27/6.58 214 is_a_theorem(implies(A,or(A,B))). [back_unit_del(93),unit_del(b,127)]. 6.27/6.58 216 is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,and(A,B)))). [back_unit_del(66),unit_del(b,129)]. 6.27/6.58 219 -is_a_theorem(equiv(A,B)) | B = A. [back_unit_del(83),unit_del(c,132)]. 6.27/6.58 220 -is_a_theorem(A) | -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) | is_a_theorem(B). [back_unit_del(109),unit_del(d,133)]. 6.27/6.58 221 implies(not(A),B) = or(A,B). [back_unit_del(116),rewrite([206(5)]),unit_del(a,134)]. 6.27/6.58 225 is_a_theorem(implies(necessarily(A),A)). [back_unit_del(144),unit_del(b,197)]. 6.27/6.58 226 -is_a_theorem(A) | is_a_theorem(necessarily(A)). [back_unit_del(162),unit_del(a,198)]. 6.27/6.58 228 not(necessarily(not(A))) = possibly(A). [back_unit_del(194),unit_del(a,200)]. 6.27/6.58 229 is_a_theorem(implies(possibly(A),necessarily(possibly(A)))). [back_unit_del(184),unit_del(b,201)]. 6.27/6.58 231 necessarily(implies(A,B)) = strict_implies(A,B). [back_unit_del(192),unit_del(a,204)]. 6.27/6.59 232 -is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(possibly(c77)),possibly(c77))). [back_unit_del(167),unit_del(b,205)]. 6.27/6.59 235 is_a_theorem(implies(or(A,not(B)),implies(B,A))). [back_rewrite(208),rewrite([221(3)])]. 6.27/6.59 283 -is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(A,B))) | is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)). [resolve(220,b,209,a)]. 6.27/6.59 284 -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(B,A),equiv(A,B))). [resolve(220,b,207,a)]. 6.27/6.59 291 is_a_theorem(or(A,or(not(A),B))). [para(221(a,1),214(a,1))]. 6.27/6.59 347 not(necessarily(possibly(A))) = possibly(necessarily(not(A))). [para(228(a,1),228(a,1,1,1))]. 6.27/6.59 356 necessarily(or(A,B)) = strict_implies(not(A),B). [para(221(a,1),231(a,1,1))]. 6.27/6.59 360 -is_a_theorem(or(A,not(B))) | is_a_theorem(implies(B,A)). [resolve(235,a,220,b)]. 6.27/6.59 3355 is_a_theorem(implies(A,and(A,A))). [resolve(283,a,216,a)]. 6.27/6.59 3462 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(necessarily(possibly(A)),possibly(A)),equiv(possibly(A),necessarily(possibly(A))))). [resolve(284,a,229,a)]. 6.27/6.59 3549 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(and(A,A),A),equiv(A,and(A,A)))). [resolve(3355,a,284,a)]. 6.27/6.59 20935 is_a_theorem(equiv(possibly(A),necessarily(possibly(A)))). [resolve(3462,a,220,b),unit_del(a,225)]. 6.27/6.59 20951 necessarily(possibly(A)) = possibly(A). [resolve(20935,a,219,a)]. 6.27/6.59 20967 possibly(necessarily(not(A))) = not(possibly(A)). [back_rewrite(347),rewrite([20951(2)]),flip(a)]. 6.27/6.59 21003 not(not(possibly(A))) = possibly(possibly(A)). [para(228(a,1),20967(a,1,1,1)),rewrite([20951(2),20967(5)]),flip(a)]. 6.27/6.59 21229 is_a_theorem(equiv(A,and(A,A))). [resolve(3549,a,220,b),unit_del(a,211)]. 6.27/6.59 21260 and(A,A) = A. [resolve(21229,a,219,a)]. 6.27/6.59 21263 not(not(A)) = or(A,A). [para(21260(a,1),206(a,1,1)),rewrite([221(4)])]. 6.27/6.59 21310 is_a_theorem(or(A,not(not(not(A))))). [para(21263(a,2),291(a,1,2))]. 6.27/6.59 22275 is_a_theorem(or(not(A),A)). [resolve(21310,a,360,a),rewrite([221(3)])]. 6.27/6.59 22304 is_a_theorem(strict_implies(not(not(A)),A)). [resolve(22275,a,226,a),rewrite([356(3)])]. 6.27/6.59 22346 is_a_theorem(strict_implies(possibly(possibly(A)),possibly(A))). [para(21003(a,1),22304(a,1,1))]. 6.27/6.59 22347 $F. [resolve(22346,a,232,a)]. 6.27/6.59 6.27/6.59 % SZS output end Refutation 6.27/6.59 ============================== end of proof ========================== 6.27/6.59 6.27/6.59 ============================== STATISTICS ============================ 6.27/6.59 6.27/6.59 Given=1320. Generated=58428. Kept=22284. proofs=1. 6.27/6.59 Usable=851. Sos=7217. Demods=95. Limbo=28, Disabled=14333. Hints=0. 6.27/6.59 Megabytes=19.36. 6.27/6.59 User_CPU=5.44, System_CPU=0.05, Wall_clock=6. 6.27/6.59 6.27/6.59 ============================== end of statistics ===================== 6.27/6.59 6.27/6.59 ============================== end of search ========================= 6.27/6.59 6.27/6.59 THEOREM PROVED 6.27/6.59 % SZS status Theorem 6.27/6.59 6.27/6.59 Exiting with 1 proof. 6.27/6.59 6.27/6.59 Process 643 exit (max_proofs) Thu Jul 2 08:26:08 2020 6.27/6.59 Prover9 interrupted 6.27/6.59 EOF