0.13/0.13 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.13/0.13 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 1440 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 180 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 3 03:55:45 EDT 2023 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime : 0.73/1.02 ============================== Prover9 =============================== 0.73/1.02 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009. 0.73/1.02 Process 11821 was started by sandbox on n004.cluster.edu, 0.73/1.02 Mon Jul 3 03:55:46 2023 0.73/1.02 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 1440 -f /tmp/Prover9_11666_n004.cluster.edu". 0.73/1.02 ============================== end of head =========================== 0.73/1.02 0.73/1.02 ============================== INPUT ================================= 0.73/1.02 0.73/1.02 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_11666_n004.cluster.edu 0.73/1.02 0.73/1.02 set(prolog_style_variables). 0.73/1.02 set(auto2). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> set(auto). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000"). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000"). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1). 0.73/1.02 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5). 0.73/1.02 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses). 0.73/1.02 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given). 0.73/1.02 assign(lrs_ticks,-1). 0.73/1.02 assign(sos_limit,10000). 0.73/1.02 assign(order,kbo). 0.73/1.02 set(lex_order_vars). 0.73/1.02 clear(print_given). 0.73/1.02 0.73/1.02 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (19 formulas) 0.73/1.02 0.73/1.02 ============================== end of input ========================== 0.73/1.02 0.73/1.02 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 1440). 0.73/1.02 0.73/1.02 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ========== 0.73/1.02 0.73/1.02 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses: 0.73/1.02 1 (all X6 ((exists Y1 exists Y11 (r2(Y1,Y11) & id(X6,Y11))) | (exists Y19 (id(X6,Y19) & r1(Y19))))) # label(axiom_6a) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 2 (all X7 all Y10 (-r2(X7,Y10) | (all Y20 (-r1(Y20) | -id(Y20,Y10))))) # label(axiom_7a) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 3 (all X26 all X27 (r1(X27) & r1(X26) | -r1(X26) & -r1(X27) | -id(X26,X27))) # label(axiom_8) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 4 (all X1 all X8 exists Y4 ((exists Y7 (r3(X1,X8,Y7) & r2(Y7,Y4))) & (exists Y5 (id(Y5,Y4) & (exists Y15 (r2(X8,Y15) & r3(X1,Y15,Y5))))))) # label(axiom_1a) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 5 (all X2 all X9 exists Y2 ((exists Y6 (r3(Y6,X2,Y2) & r4(X2,X9,Y6))) & (exists Y3 ((exists Y14 (r4(X2,Y14,Y3) & r2(X9,Y14))) & id(Y3,Y2))))) # label(axiom_2a) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 6 (all X13 all X14 exists Y22 all X15 (id(X15,Y22) & r3(X13,X14,X15) | -r3(X13,X14,X15) & -id(X15,Y22))) # label(axiom_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 7 (all X5 exists Y8 ((exists Y18 (r1(Y18) & id(Y8,Y18))) & (exists Y17 (r1(Y17) & r4(X5,Y17,Y8))))) # label(axiom_5a) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 8 (all X32 all X33 all X34 all X35 all X36 all X37 (r3(X32,X33,X34) & r3(X35,X36,X37) | -r3(X32,X33,X34) & -r3(X35,X36,X37) | -id(X34,X37) | -id(X33,X36) | -id(X32,X35))) # label(axiom_10) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 9 (all X3 all X10 ((all Y12 ((all Y13 (-id(Y13,Y12) | -r2(X3,Y13))) | -r2(X10,Y12))) | id(X3,X10))) # label(axiom_3a) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 10 (all X20 id(X20,X20)) # label(axiom_5) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 11 (all X11 exists Y21 all X12 (-r2(X11,X12) & -id(X12,Y21) | id(X12,Y21) & r2(X11,X12))) # label(axiom_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.73/1.02 12 (exists Y24 all X19 (r1(X19) & id(X19,Y24) | -r1(X19) & -id(X19,Y24))) # label(axiom_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.98/1.31 13 (all X4 exists Y9 (id(Y9,X4) & (exists Y16 (r1(Y16) & r3(X4,Y16,Y9))))) # label(axiom_4a) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.98/1.31 14 (all X38 all X39 all X40 all X41 all X42 all X43 (-id(X38,X41) | -id(X40,X43) | r4(X38,X39,X40) & r4(X41,X42,X43) | -r4(X41,X42,X43) & -r4(X38,X39,X40) | -id(X39,X42))) # label(axiom_11) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.98/1.31 15 (all X21 all X22 (-id(X21,X22) | id(X22,X21))) # label(axiom_6) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.98/1.31 16 (all X28 all X29 all X30 all X31 (-id(X29,X31) | r2(X30,X31) & r2(X28,X29) | -r2(X28,X29) & -r2(X30,X31) | -id(X28,X30))) # label(axiom_9) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.98/1.31 17 (all X23 all X24 all X25 (-id(X23,X24) | id(X23,X25) | -id(X24,X25))) # label(axiom_7) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.98/1.31 18 (all X16 all X17 exists Y23 all X18 (-id(X18,Y23) & -r4(X16,X17,X18) | r4(X16,X17,X18) & id(X18,Y23))) # label(axiom_4) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.98/1.31 19 -(exists Y1 exists Y2 exists Y3 ((exists Y4 ((exists Y6 (r4(Y6,Y2,Y4) & (exists Y7 (r2(Y7,Y6) & (exists Y8 (r1(Y8) & r2(Y8,Y7))))))) & id(Y4,Y1))) & (exists Y5 (r3(Y2,Y3,Y5) & id(Y5,Y1))))) # label(thereexistsanevennumberid) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas === 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES =============== 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION ================= 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 ============================== end predicate elimination ============= 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes). 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 Term ordering decisions: 0.98/1.31 Function symbol KB weights: c1=1. f4=1. f5=1. f6=1. f7=1. f8=1. f9=1. f10=1. f11=1. f12=1. f19=1. f1=1. f2=1. f3=1. f13=1. f14=1. f15=1. f16=1. f17=1. f18=1. 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 ============================== end of process initial clauses ======== 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ==================== 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 ============================== end of clauses for search ============= 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 ============================== SEARCH ================================ 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds. 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 Low Water (keep): wt=16.000, iters=4015 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 Low Water (keep): wt=14.000, iters=3922 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 Low Water (keep): wt=13.000, iters=3700 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 Low Water (keep): wt=12.000, iters=3614 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 ============================== PROOF ================================= 0.98/1.31 % SZS status Theorem 0.98/1.31 % SZS output start Refutation 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 % Proof 1 at 0.29 (+ 0.01) seconds. 0.98/1.31 % Length of proof is 25. 0.98/1.31 % Level of proof is 5. 0.98/1.31 % Maximum clause weight is 22.000. 0.98/1.31 % Given clauses 109. 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 3 (all X26 all X27 (r1(X27) & r1(X26) | -r1(X26) & -r1(X27) | -id(X26,X27))) # label(axiom_8) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.98/1.31 4 (all X1 all X8 exists Y4 ((exists Y7 (r3(X1,X8,Y7) & r2(Y7,Y4))) & (exists Y5 (id(Y5,Y4) & (exists Y15 (r2(X8,Y15) & r3(X1,Y15,Y5))))))) # label(axiom_1a) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.98/1.31 7 (all X5 exists Y8 ((exists Y18 (r1(Y18) & id(Y8,Y18))) & (exists Y17 (r1(Y17) & r4(X5,Y17,Y8))))) # label(axiom_5a) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.98/1.31 12 (exists Y24 all X19 (r1(X19) & id(X19,Y24) | -r1(X19) & -id(X19,Y24))) # label(axiom_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.98/1.31 13 (all X4 exists Y9 (id(Y9,X4) & (exists Y16 (r1(Y16) & r3(X4,Y16,Y9))))) # label(axiom_4a) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.98/1.31 19 -(exists Y1 exists Y2 exists Y3 ((exists Y4 ((exists Y6 (r4(Y6,Y2,Y4) & (exists Y7 (r2(Y7,Y6) & (exists Y8 (r1(Y8) & r2(Y8,Y7))))))) & id(Y4,Y1))) & (exists Y5 (r3(Y2,Y3,Y5) & id(Y5,Y1))))) # label(thereexistsanevennumberid) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption]. 0.98/1.31 20 r1(f14(A)) # label(axiom_5a) # label(axiom). [clausify(7)]. 0.98/1.31 21 r1(f15(A)) # label(axiom_5a) # label(axiom). [clausify(7)]. 0.98/1.31 23 r1(f18(A)) # label(axiom_4a) # label(axiom). [clausify(13)]. 0.98/1.31 24 id(f17(A),A) # label(axiom_4a) # label(axiom). [clausify(13)]. 0.98/1.31 25 r2(A,f7(B,A)) # label(axiom_1a) # label(axiom). [clausify(4)]. 0.98/1.31 27 id(f13(A),f14(A)) # label(axiom_5a) # label(axiom). [clausify(7)]. 0.98/1.31 30 r4(A,f15(A),f13(A)) # label(axiom_5a) # label(axiom). [clausify(7)]. 0.98/1.31 31 r3(A,f18(A),f17(A)) # label(axiom_4a) # label(axiom). [clausify(13)]. 0.98/1.31 43 -r4(A,B,C) | -r2(D,A) | -r1(E) | -r2(E,D) | -id(C,F) | -r3(B,V6,V7) | -id(V7,F) # label(thereexistsanevennumberid) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(19)]. 0.98/1.31 45 id(A,c1) | -r1(A) # label(axiom_1) # label(axiom). [clausify(12)]. 0.98/1.31 48 r1(A) | -r1(B) | -id(A,B) # label(axiom_8) # label(axiom). [clausify(3)]. 0.98/1.31 821 r1(f13(A)). [resolve(48,c,27,a),unit_del(b,20)]. 0.98/1.31 822 r1(f17(A)) | -r1(A). [resolve(48,c,24,a)]. 0.98/1.31 1422 id(f13(A),c1). [resolve(821,a,45,b)]. 0.98/1.31 5799 r1(f17(f18(A))). [resolve(822,b,23,a)]. 0.98/1.31 5800 r1(f17(f15(A))). [resolve(822,b,21,a)]. 0.98/1.31 6735 -id(f17(f15(f7(A,f7(B,f17(f18(C)))))),c1). [ur(43,a,30,a,b,25,a,c,5799,a,d,25,a,e,1422,a,f,31,a)]. 0.98/1.31 6745 id(f17(f15(A)),c1). [resolve(5800,a,45,b)]. 0.98/1.31 6746 $F. [resolve(6745,a,6735,a)]. 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 % SZS output end Refutation 0.98/1.31 ============================== end of proof ========================== 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 ============================== STATISTICS ============================ 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 Given=109. Generated=15076. Kept=6726. proofs=1. 0.98/1.31 Usable=109. Sos=6242. Demods=0. Limbo=1, Disabled=416. Hints=0. 0.98/1.31 Megabytes=5.02. 0.98/1.31 User_CPU=0.29, System_CPU=0.01, Wall_clock=0. 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 ============================== end of statistics ===================== 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 ============================== end of search ========================= 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 THEOREM PROVED 0.98/1.31 % SZS status Theorem 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 Exiting with 1 proof. 0.98/1.31 0.98/1.31 Process 11821 exit (max_proofs) Mon Jul 3 03:55:46 2023 0.98/1.31 Prover9 interrupted 0.98/1.31 EOF