0.09/0.11 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.09/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s 0.11/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu 0.11/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.11/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.11/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.11/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.11/0.35 % CPULimit : 1200 0.11/0.35 % WCLimit : 120 0.11/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 14:20:59 EDT 2021 0.11/0.35 % CPUTime : 0.11/0.38 # No SInE strategy applied 0.11/0.38 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_____X1276__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S 0.11/0.38 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP. 0.11/0.38 # 0.11/0.38 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.11/0.38 # Number of axioms: 6 Number of unprocessed: 6 0.11/0.38 # Tableaux proof search. 0.11/0.38 # APR header successfully linked. 0.11/0.38 # Hello from C++ 0.11/0.38 # The folding up rule is enabled... 0.11/0.38 # Local unification is enabled... 0.11/0.38 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... 0.11/0.38 # 6 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification 0.11/0.38 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. 0.11/0.38 # There are 1 start rule candidates: 0.11/0.38 # Found 6 unit axioms. 0.11/0.38 # 1 start rule tableaux created. 0.11/0.38 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses 0.11/0.38 # 6 unit axiom clauses 0.11/0.38 0.11/0.38 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. 0.11/0.38 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 0.11/0.38 # Creating equality axioms 0.11/0.38 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses 0.11/0.38 # Returning from population with 14 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. 0.11/0.38 # We now have 14 tableaux to operate on 14.79/2.24 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. 14.79/2.24 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. 14.79/2.24 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. 14.79/2.24 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. 14.79/2.24 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. 14.79/2.24 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. 14.79/2.24 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. 14.79/2.24 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. 14.79/2.24 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 14.79/2.24 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 14.79/2.24 # Begin clausification derivation 14.79/2.24 14.79/2.24 # End clausification derivation 14.79/2.24 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion 14.79/2.24 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)). 14.79/2.24 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (ifeq(is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2)),true,ifeq(is_a_theorem(X1),true,is_a_theorem(X2),true),true)=true)). 14.79/2.24 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,X3)),equivalent(X2,X3)),X4),X4))=true)). 14.79/2.24 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),X3),X4),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X5),X3),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X5),X4))))=true)). 14.79/2.24 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,X3)),X4),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X3),X4)),X5),X5))=true)). 14.79/2.24 cnf(i_0_9, negated_conjecture, (is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,equivalent(equivalent(b,b),a)),c),c))!=true)). 14.79/2.24 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (X6=X6)). 14.79/2.24 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! 14.79/2.24 # Begin printing tableau 14.79/2.24 # Found 8 steps 14.79/2.24 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (ifeq(X14,X14,X5,X12)=X5), inference(start_rule)). 14.79/2.24 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (ifeq(X14,X14,X5,X12)=X5), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])). 14.79/2.24 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (ifeq(X5,X5,X5,X11)!=X5), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). 14.79/2.24 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (ifeq(X5,X5,X10,X11)!=X10), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). 14.79/2.24 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (ifeq(X5,X5,X11,X11)!=X11), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). 14.79/2.24 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (ifeq(ifeq(X14,X14,X5,X12),ifeq(X5,X5,X5,X11),ifeq(X5,X5,X10,X11),ifeq(X5,X5,X11,X11))=ifeq(X5,X5,X10,X11)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_17])). 14.79/2.24 cnf(i_0_51, plain, (ifeq(X5,X5,X10,X11)!=X10), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). 14.79/2.24 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (ifeq(ifeq(X14,X14,X5,X12),ifeq(X5,X5,X5,X11),ifeq(X5,X5,X10,X11),ifeq(X5,X5,X11,X11))=X10), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_49, ...])). 14.79/2.24 # End printing tableau 14.79/2.24 # SZS output end 14.79/2.24 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" 14.79/2.26 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. 14.79/2.26 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. 14.79/2.26 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. 14.79/2.26 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. 14.79/2.26 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. 14.79/2.26 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. 14.79/2.26 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. 14.79/2.26 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. 14.79/2.26 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 14.79/2.26 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 14.79/2.26 # Begin clausification derivation 14.79/2.26 14.79/2.26 # End clausification derivation 14.79/2.26 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion 14.79/2.26 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)). 14.79/2.26 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (ifeq(is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X2)),true,ifeq(is_a_theorem(X1),true,is_a_theorem(X2),true),true)=true)). 14.79/2.26 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,X3)),equivalent(X2,X3)),X4),X4))=true)). 14.79/2.26 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),X3),X4),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X5),X3),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X5),X4))))=true)). 14.79/2.26 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,X3)),X4),equivalent(equivalent(X2,X3),X4)),X5),X5))=true)). 14.79/2.26 cnf(i_0_9, negated_conjecture, (is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,equivalent(equivalent(b,b),a)),c),c))!=true)). 14.79/2.26 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (X6=X6)). 14.79/2.26 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! 14.79/2.26 # Begin printing tableau 14.79/2.26 # Found 5 steps 14.79/2.26 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (ifeq(X8,X8,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,true)),equivalent(X2,true)),X4),X4),X6)=equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,true)),equivalent(X2,true)),X4),X4)), inference(start_rule)). 14.79/2.26 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (ifeq(X8,X8,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,true)),equivalent(X2,true)),X4),X4),X6)=equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,true)),equivalent(X2,true)),X4),X4)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_19])). 14.79/2.26 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (is_a_theorem(ifeq(X8,X8,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,true)),equivalent(X2,true)),X4),X4),X6))=is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,true)),equivalent(X2,true)),X4),X4))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_17])). 14.79/2.26 cnf(i_0_51, plain, (is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,true)),equivalent(X2,true)),X4),X4))!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_7])). 14.79/2.26 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (is_a_theorem(ifeq(X8,X8,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X2),equivalent(X1,true)),equivalent(X2,true)),X4),X4),X6))=true), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_49, ...])). 14.79/2.26 # End printing tableau 14.79/2.26 # SZS output end 14.79/2.26 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" 14.79/2.26 # Child (13677) has found a proof. 14.79/2.26 14.79/2.26 # Proof search is over... 14.79/2.26 # Freeing feature tree 14.79/2.28 EOF